Resolution-PC 95-61,,ti ~,,. ^~~
R~~ ~ ~ N...~.Q..~~~t
A R~SOI.UTION OF TMC ANAH~IM CITY PLANNING CO{1+iMiSSION
THAT PETITION FOR ~ONDITIONAL lJ~~ i'E~IM~r Np. 3787 8E a~iANTED
W~ rmRt~fos~cottain raal iproperty sFtuatod n~ ~mCity of Anahelmi Craui tyrA Oranga~Sta~A
Conditionol Us~ Pa
of Caiifr~rnia, descrit~ed ~-s:
PARCF~.S t, 2, 3 ANd 4 IN 'TME CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS SHOWN ON A PARCEL
MAF' F~IL~D fN a00K 120, PAG~S 22 AND 23 AF PARC~L MAPS, IN 7HC
OF~ICE OF TW~ COUNT`( Cif~CARDFR OF ~AID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Clty Plannin~ Commissian did hold a public he~ring at the ~ivic Conter
in the City of Anahoim un May 31, 1995 at 1:30 p.~~n., notice of ::~id publ(a hearing having been duly given
as r~quired by law and In accordancA with the provisions of the ,~nahelcn Municipal Code~ Chapter 18.03,
to hear and Gonsider ev(dence for and aga(nst said propc~sed coridltional usa perm(t and ~o investlgate and
make findings ar~d recommendations In connectlon therewith; and
WHERft~AS~~eic~ s der~tionnaf all ev dence and~ eportaSOffer~ed atns id ear ng, ~aes ind
and in fts behalf, and a
and determino tho Yollawing facts:
1, That th e Se~oQnd 8~4I0 Or~35rto permit fu~t'her subdiviispon iof flooe pace i~n anrex(~sting
Anaheim Munfcip~l Cod
sh~ppfng center ta ~Ilow Individual office suftes.
2. 7hat tho proposed use (17 individu~l office suites) is properiy or~e fior which a cc~nditianal
use permit is ~uthor6zed by tha Zon(ng CodH;
3. 7hat the praposed use will not ac~versely affect tho adjoining land uses and the growth and
dovelopment ohti QaeX~~'n W comnt~erciaa sho ping~cointeatan~ with the immrediata ~nefg bfo hood ice~ are
corrpatiblo wit ~
4. That tho sizo and shape af the site for the qroposed use is adequate to allow the full
development of trie proposed use In a mannor not tletrimental td tha particular area nor 4o the pQace,
health, safety, and ~enerai welfara because tha propASed individual offica suites are located (n an existing
building in an ~xisting shopping center that generally compifos with the devel~pment standards of the
CL(SC) Zone and, alth f 9hetsuh~s,th e opospci ioffices do ~not requireianytw~ivors from Zor~ing Code
original configuration o P
requiroments;
5. That th~ traffic genorated by the proposed use wlll not Impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designeci and improvad to carry the traffic in the area;
6 T~t aco 9health~ afety ~nd goner~l~ welfaee of the citixons aftha City af Anahefmnand~
dotrimenta.i to the pe ,
7. That no one indlcated theiP pre~enco a.t said public hearin~ in opposftion; ~nd th~t no
aorrespondence was roceived in appo~itlon ta tho subject petltlon.
_~ _ PC95-81
Cp23~DM.WP
, ~:
,;a
.~r.d
SALIFOR[~IA,~,~y,ti, ONM ~I7AI. Q~„IIy,~.~,E~.~1N~.~ That the An~heim City Planning
Cc~mmission has reviowed th~ proposal to pormit furthar subdivi3lon of s~ace in an existing ahopp(ng
centor to allow for individual office sulte~ an an irregularly-shapad parcel of land conslstin~ of
mpproximatoly 5.03 acrea located ~t the northwest corner af Santa Ana Canyan Road and Imperlal
Highway, I~aving ~pproximate frontages af 700 feet on th~ north sidd of 5ant~ Ana Canyon Road en~t 500
feet on tha west side nf Imper(al Highw~y, an~ furthar describeci as 55a5 - 5665 East Santa Ana Canyan
Road (Imperial C~nyon Shopping Cc~nter); and c~oes heroby apprave the Nopattva Doclaratinn upan finding
th~t ths declaration reflects tho ir~danAndent Jud~ement oi the le~~! agency and that ft has consir,lored the
Negativ~, Declaration tognth~r with any comments ~ecoived durinp the pubNc rsviaw proc~ss and further
finding an thA basis nf the initial study and any comments receiv~d that tf ~ero Is no stibs4antial evidence
that the ~roJ~ct wlil havo a signiflcant effect an the envirnnment.
NOW, THFREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim ~ity Planning Commission d~es
hereby ~rant subJect PetPtion for Gnnditic~nal Use Permit, u~an the follawing cond(tian~ which aro heroby
found to bv a necess~ry prerequisito ta the proposed use of the subJ~ct property in order to presenra the
safety and gQneral weif~ro ~f the Citizens of the Ciry af Anal~~im:
1. Tliat there shall be no more th~n thrRO (3) wali sir~ns permitted fo~ the 17 affice sult~s.
2. That subject prope~ty shai! be doveloped substan~ially (n accordance with plans and ~pe~iflcations
submitted to tha City of Anaheim by the potftioner and wrifch plans are on file witfi 4he Pianning
Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2,
3. That subjart individual suftes shall be Iimited ta office ~ises only.
4. That priur to final buflding and zoning inspectfans, ar wfthin a pvrind of one (1) yemr fr~m the date
of ihis rosolut(on, whichev~r accurs first, Cendition No. 2, abov~-mentioned, shali be complied wiih.
~. That appraval of thfs application canstitutes ap~rovat oF the propased re~uest aniy to tho ~xtent that
it complie~ with the Anahoim Municfpal Zoning Coda and ~ny other applicable (:fty, State and Fe~eral
rec~ulations. A~provai doos not Incfu~e any actfon or findings as to complianc~ ar approv~l af the
re~uest regarding any other applicalalo ordinance, reguiatlon or roquirement.
BC IT FURTHER R~SGLVED that tho Anaheirn City Planning C~mmisslo~~ daes hereb,y find
and deterr;~ine that adoption of thls Fies~lution fs expressly predicated upori ap~licant's comp!(ance with
each and ail of the conditians hereinabove set forth. Should any such cc~ndition, or any part thereof, be
d~aclarecl invalid or unenforceablo by the flnal Judgment of ~ny court of campetent Jurisdict(on, thon 4his
Resolut(on, and ar~y approvais herPin aontain~d, shall be caeemad null and vold.
THE FOt~EG01NG RESOLUTION wag adoptod at the Planning Commisslon meeting of
May 31, 1995.
_.~'7G . ~~~-+~.,.~
HAIRW AN ANA EIM CI'CY P NNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~1~CC~~b
SEC ETARY, A ANEINA CI'~lt PLANNING COMh11SSI0N
-2- PC95~61
I J~4~ "~
Sl'AT~ OF CRI.IFOFiNIA )
COUN7Y 0~ ORANGE ) ss,
CI'i'Y OF ARIAHE{NV )
I, Mar~~~irh~~i 5oforio, Soc;ret~ry of the Anahe(m ~fty Pi~nning f;~mmission, d~ hqr+aby certify
that thA foregaing res~oluti~i~ was passed and adoptad at a meeting ofi tha Anahalm Git~ ~'lanning
Commission held on Mtt,y 31, 1995, by the fallowing vote of the members thareaf:
AYES: COMMISSIQN :RS: BOS'1'WlCK, BUYD"7UN, CALDW~CLL, H~NNINGER, MAYE6~,
M~SSE~ PEFiAZA
NOE; : COMMISSIQNEf~S: NON~
AsS~NT: C(7MMISSIUNERS: ~:ON~
IN WIl'NESS WMEREOF, i hav~ her~unta set my hand this ~CJv~„ ~aY Qf . ~'t'~?""'~ ---'
1995. w~ . -
,~ ~ v c~5~,~n~ ~,
SE~RETARY, A H~li~" ~I'1~"Y i~LAPJNWG COMMISSIOt~i
-3- PC95-$1