Resolution-PC 95-62~
R~..~.TL~L.~.~~--~.~'~
A RE50LU710N OF THF ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIdN
THAT PE71710N FA~i CONDi1'IONAL U5E PERINIT N0, 3766 [3~ GRAN'fED
WHEREAB, tho An~h~irn City F~lanning Ccmmission did recoiva a verifle~d Petitlon for
~onditfonal Use k'ormit for cort~.in real prope~~ty aituated in the City of Anaheim, County uf Oranga, Stato
~f Californla, described as;
PARC~LS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 IN TH~ CITY 0~ ANAHEIM, AS Sh90WN ON A PARCEL
MAp FILED IN B~OK 12Q, PAGGS 22 AiVD 23 OF PARCEL MAPS~ !N THE
pi=FICE OF zHE COU~ITY R~CORDEFl OF SAID COUNTY.
WH~[~EAS, the Cfty Plan~ing Cornmisslon did holci a publla hearing at the Civic Csnter
in the City of Anahoim on May ~1, 1995 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having beon duly given
ws requ(r~ by law and in accordann~ a~ahns sald prc~posed canditional use permit and to nvestigato a d
to hear and c~nsider evidence for a d c~
r~iake findings and recommendation~ fn conn~cti~n therewith; ~nd
Whi~:REA~, said Commaio nof all ovldence andQ epo~tsSOffered~~t sa•id ear ng, does find
ancJ in its bc~r~alf, and r~fter due ronside
and dotormine the following fiacts:
1, That tha prapased use is 50 60 tQ ne mit ahprivato community ceneerlwitht ha following
Anaheim Municipai Code SecYiun 18.44 0 P
waivoc:
~eCt~ong 18 q~Q~g~1.Q21~, . Minim r~n .n~, er of qarkina s~~~•
ig,Q~.~~ ~3~ r~qufreci; ,~ spaces existing and
1a 6.Q,~9?.~:.R~?. rec~mmended by the City TrAifia and
1 Q 05.05A.U?.~ Tran~Qortatian Manac~er)
?$~
an, 18 44 066.050
2. The requeated wafver fur minfmum number of parking spaces h~s b~en sub~tantiated by
~ parking demand study which was r~vi a~s a e ad~quate~to neet thetypa king ne~ds ofthe exlsting
Manager, and that the existing parking sp
commercla{ sho~ping center {ncl~ding the proposed c~mmuniry centor;
3. That tt~o parking waiver, under the condftions fmposecl, wili not cause fe•~ver off•street
parking spac~s ta be pr~vided for to said~usesyunder the nr~rmal and reasonably fureseeable condir 1 ns
accommacJate all vehicles attributable
of operation nf said uses;
4. That tha parking waiver, undb'~Ch~ ~ets fin~tMe` m~m~cliate ilvic ifty of the propasad us~ nd
compatition for parking spaces upun the pu
~. That tha parking waivor, under the condiiions imposad, wlll not incr~ase the demand and
competitlon for parking ~paces upon ad)acerri private property !n the immediato vicinity of the ~rapos~d
use (whlch praperty (s noi oxpressl~+~evf~ed as parkfng for such use under an agreament in complfance
with Secti~n '18.06.010.02Q of th(s C )~
-1- PC95-62
CR23~36MS.WP
g. That tho parking Wi ~ lon confllctse withintit~lie ff st aet~ pnrking iareas~or lot~gCp av ded tor
nolsp, air pollution, ar 4rafflc circu a
SUCf1 U4A;
7. '~V~at tha parking waiver, undor the candition~ imposod, will not inrreaae traffic congestion,
nofae, air poil~~tlon, or irnpedca ~~fitl~e rroQosecltusar egress from adjacent propertles, upon the public
straots in tha Immediate vicinity o p p
a. That uniess conditiong to trie contrary are expressly imposed upon the granting af thls
p~rking waivar pursuant to this SeCtlon ~en oh ef ~Itfoni of such u~se~~n co-tform nce~iwith theaasisumpt on
wr~iv~,r shall bo doomed contingent up p
r~lating tr~ the operatlon and intonsity of 4,he use as cantaine~ in tho parldng demand ~tudy that farm~
the Liasis for ~pprav~l af said(ne~~n the ~arkin~ideena dt3tudy ahall`tbe deomad ~ lala~t~lan af heroxp ess
of safd ~ssumptlons as conta p
r,anclitions impc~s~ upon sald Wa~~'1~.a3092 o thisuCc~l~tormination or mod(ficati~n pur~uant to the
~ravisio~s of Section 'I4.A3.091 and
g. '~h~t ihe prQp~sed use will not advorsaly afFe~ct the ~dJoinin~ land uses and the ~rowth and
development of the area in whic~i~tl'f $$ Wph tha gu bound n~J nolghbarhood ~nc1 cpmbmun ~y the exis~ing
cUmmercial shapping center aa
~ p. That tho sfxe and In R manner not dotrimenta~to the partictfl~ a ea no~ taI ha pqacel!
developmont Af ~the proposed use
health, safety, and qenerc~t welfaro;
11. That the ti~affic generim d~by~thiopGOPygted tr~ff,~~~in the ~poa~ ~rl undue burden c~pon the
stroots and highways designed and p
12. That the grantinfl a~ehnAa~ndit~in~n ~~I welf~ elof tt~crdc(tizens ~faheQClty ~ Anahvlmnando
detrim~ntal to 4ha (~eace, heaith, s ry 9
~~, That ane persori indfc~ted her presenGe at sald pubiic hoaring in favor; that a petitlon with
twenty throa (?.3) signatures in favor af stibJect propc~sal was submitted; unci that no corrospandence w~s
recoived in o~~po~ition ta iho subJect netition.
rp, I~nA~11A ENVIRO_N_~~A~~A~~ p~r ~"~~' That the Anaheim Cixy Pllnnin~
Cor~mission has reviewec~ the propas~al to permit a private community centar wltt~ waiver of minimum
numb~r of pAricing spaces on an irre~ularly-shapc~ccl parcol af fand consiating of Approximataly 5.'~oximate
locatod at the northwest corner uf Snnta An~ ~anyon Roa~i and imporial Highway, h~ving app
4rontage~ of 700 fee: on tho nor~h si~+9 of 8anta Ana Canyon I~oad and 500 feet on the west side of
imperial Mighw~y, and further described as 5555 - 5685 East Santa Ana Canyon Road (Imperlal Canyon
rave tha Netiat)v~ C7eclaration upon f(ndinfl th~t the dr~rlaration
5hopping C,onter); an d does h o r eb y a p p
retlects the indepdndent judgEmen v~t dure~d he~pubf c11devhewtp ocess ~ndrfu her find{ng ~nthe basis
tagether with any comm~nts rec.oi 9
ofi the InitiAl study and any commo Ir gnment ~~ that thers is no substantial ev(der~ce tt~at th~ project wiil
hav~ a signillcant effoct on the env o
N~W, THE~~FARC, E3E 17 RESAI.V~i~ that th~ AnahAim Cfty Pl~nning Commisslo~s does
hergby grant subjact Petitian far Conditlanal Uso Pormit, upon the foUowing aonditlons whEch are lieraby
found to be a n~c~ssary pi'erequisito ta the proposecl uso of the subject pro~erty In order to pre~erve 4h~
safety and genera! waifare of the Citizens of tha City of Anahoim:
1. That tho consumptfon oE alcoholic boverages on the premises uf 4ha private cammur~(ty center shall
be~ prohibit~cl.
2. That there shall be no kitchan facilltfes located within the private community centor.
PC95-82
-c-
,~,y, e
:~~, +~ r:
3. That tho maxiinum number of occupants shali be limiterl to:
Weokdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m; Sixry (60j porsans
We~kdays aftor ~6:Q0 p.tri.: Ninety (90) p~r.ons
5aturdays, Sund~ys and natfonal holidays: Nlnety (90) persans
4. That subject prap~arry shall be devoloped substantlally li: accordance with plans and spocffic~tion~
submitterJ to tho City of Anaheim by the p~titioner and ~:~~iich plar~s +~ra on file with th~ Planning
Dapartment mark~d Exhiblt Nas. 1 and 2.
S. That prlor ta final building and zaning inspectfons or wlthin a porfod of one (1) y~ar from Yho date
c~f thls resc~lutfon, v~hichover occurs first, Condition No. 4, above-rnentianed, shall be comnli~e~l with.
Exkenslons for further time to comnleto sald ~conditions may be graniQd in accordance with Sactlon
18.0~.090 of tha Anahaim Municlpal Code.
6. That subJoct use permft shall expfrp ~ne (1) year from the date of this r~solutlon, on May ::ti, 1996.
7. That approvmi of this appllcatfon consti4utes approval of tho proposed reyuest anly tn the e;Ktent that
it ~ompl(es wfth tl~e Anaheim iVlunialpal Zc~ning C~d~ and any ~ther applicable City, Stgto and Federal
r~gulations. Approval does not Includo any actlon ~r findings as to complfance or approval of tha
request rogarding any oth~er applicable ordinance, regul~tlon or roquiremont.
SE IT FUf~THER RES~LVED that the Anaheim City Plann(ng Commisslon does P~areby ~ind
and determine that adapt!on of this Resolutfon is ~xpressly predicated upon ~pplicant's compl(ance with
each and ali of the conditions herefnabov~ set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared (nvalid ar unenforceak~le by thv final jud~ment af any court of competent jurisdEctiari, then th(s
Rosolution, and any approvals her~in can~ained, shall be deemed nuil and vafd.
THE FOREGOING RESOI.UTlON was a ed at the Planninc~ Commission meeting of
May 31, 1995. ~i~ /~'~ ~~ .~,c.~.,,~.,
t...~- ~+~'u-'~ __.,.~.~._
O~IAIRW AN ANA-HEIM ITY P NNING COMMISSION
A1TE5T:
~ '
aECRETARY, MEiM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY UF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary c~f the Anahelm City Planning Gammfssion, do hereby ~ertify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a me~ting of th~ Anaheim Ciry Planning
Commisslon hold nn May 31, 1995, by the following vote of the members theroof:
AYES: CAMMISSIONrRS: COSTWICK, ElOYDS'TUN, CALDW~LL, HENNINCEF, MAYFR,
~~ESS~, PEC~AZA
NQES: COMMISSION~RS: NONE
ABSCNT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WlTNESS WHFFiEOF, I have hareunto set my liand this ~ day of • ~
1995.
~c~, ar~~~-15~,~~
SECRETARY, A A EIM CITY PLANNING ~OMMISSIaN
~3_ F'C95-82