Resolution-PC 95-99i.,; !
NESOI.uTIQN NQ_~-~
~~
A RES~OLUTION OF THE ,ANAHEIM CI7Y PLANNfNG COMMISSION
YHA7 PEi'ITION FOR CONGITIUNAL USG PE~iMIT N0. 3781 BE GRAN'TGU
Wf-IEREAS, the Anaheim City Planninc~ Comrnisslon did recofve a verifiod Petitian for
Conditional Uso Pormft for certain reai prope-ty ~(tuated in the City of Anafieim, Counly af Or~nge, State
of California, desc~•ibecl as:
PAh1CCL ~ OF PARCEL MAP NQ. 90-161, IN THE CITY OF ANAh~EI~JI, COUNTY
OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A NIAP RECCIRDED IN
B008C 26Q, PAG~S ~2 AND 4~ ~F PAaCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE QF TNE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAIQ COUNTY.
WhIEREAS, tha City Planning Cornmisalon did hotd ~ public hearing at the Civic Center
in the City of Anaheim arr A~~gust 21, ig95 at ~:30 p.m„ notice of said public hearing having been duly
givon as requlred by law and in accordanco with the provlsfons a~ the Anaheim Municfpal Cod~, Chapter
18.03, to haar and consi~er evidence for and agalnst safd propased conditionai uso permft and to
inyestigato and mako findings and recommendations in connoction therewith; ancl
WHEFiEAa, said Comrriission, after due inspection, invastigtation and study made by itself
and (n its bet~alf, and after due consideration of all evicience and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and determine the fullowing facts:
1. That the praposed use is property ane for which a conditional uso pormit is authoriz~d
by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.b1.050.613 eo permit a soif-storage ffacility with a carQtaker's unit
and with the followinc~ waivar:
,Sgction,~ 1t3.05.~5Q•121 - Minimum r~um~or of,~p~rkina spaces.
18.06.05U.Q31 (~4 requirE~d; a~ proposed a~~d concurrad with
1$.O~.Og.Q the Ciky ?raffic and Transportatlon Manager)
and 1 ~61.Qfi~.Q~.Q
2. That the requested parking wa(ver is mfnimai, amouniing less than a 10% deviatior fr~m
the Code requirement;
3. i hat the waiver, unaer tho condftions impased, will not causa fewer aff-street parking
spa~;es to ba provfded for such us~ than she number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all
vericles attributable to such use undor the norma! and reasonaUly foreseeablQ c~nditions of operation of
the; conditian~l use;
4. Ttiat the waiver, undQr the conditions imposed, will not incroase the demand and
~ompRtftion for parking sp~ces upon the puhlic streets (n the immed{ate vicinity of trie propossd
c~nditfona! use;
5. That the ~N~iver, undor the conditions impo~ed, will not inarPase the demanci and
com~etition for parking spaces upon ~dJacent private property in tlie immediate vfcinity of the proposed
condii!~n~! usQ (which proporty is not expressly pravided as parlcing for such use under an agreement !n
r,ompliance witi~ Section 18.0~.010.Q20 of this Code);
6. 7ha- thQ waiv~r, under the cunditions (mposed, ~afll not increase traif(c cangesti~ri, noise,
air oollution, or trafiic circulatiQn conNlcts, wtthfn the off-str~et pa~king areas or Icts provided for the
condiiional use;
CR2452DM.WP -1- PC9S-99
'~ ';
7. That the walvor, under the conditions imposed, will not (ncreaso traffic conc~estion, nafse,
air {~ollwtion, or impc~de vehicular (ngr~ss to or egross from acijacent propertios, upon thp public 5treets
fn the imm~diate vic(nity oF the proposed conditianal use;
8. That tl~e proposed u~e is properly one for which a conditional use permft is ~euthorized ~y
the Zt~ning Code;
q, 7hat tlie usa is approved for fiv~ years, until August 21, 2Aq0, to dotermine campatibility
~f the prc~poaed self-stora~e facility with future develapment imder tha recently adopted NArthe~st A~~a
5{~acffia Pl~n;
1A. That tho prUposed uso will no~ ad~~ersely af~ect the adJaining land usesWh chhis~andiack~d
development of thR area (n which it is proposecl to be looated becauso tha property~
andliio and that the deQ e~pme tuasi proposedmmeets laliSSfteidevei~apmen statndaQd~rpertaininc~t~o ot
fac y
coverage, setbt~c:k, ~nd ~arking;
11. That the size and shape of the site fnr the propased use is adeq~aate ta aAow ttie full
development of the proposed use in a manner nct detrimentai to the particular area nor to the peace,
health, safoty, and general welfare;
y 2. rhat tiie traffic ~enerated by the proposed usa wili n~t impose an unc~ue burden upon the
streets ff`~ ~a9ha a t~~~use aequ va er~trbuilding sazo, ancJtwili~riot urduly b uden tMe streets and high ays
less t a
designed to carry traffic In the immediata area; and
i3. That the granting of the condiifonal use pormit under 4he conditfonG imposed wfll nok be
detrimentai to the peace, health, safety and gen~ral we!fare of tht citizens of ihe City ~f Anaheim; and
14. 1'hat no one indicated their presence at s~id pubiic hearing iry oppositian; and thai no
correspondence w:,s received in oppo~ition to the subJeat petition.
~LIFORNIti ~NVIRONM~I~TA~. Gl~ ~ALITY AC_ •_T F_. INO~~• That the Anahelm Cfty Pianninc~
Commission has reviewed the praposal to permlt a se~f-stora~e facility with ~ caretaker's tinit and waiver
of minimum number of parking spacos; and does horeby approve the Nsgative Declaration upon flnding
that the declaration reflects the ind~pendent judr~em~nt of the lead agency and that it has ~onsidered the
Nogative Declaratfon topethor with any comments recelv~d durinc~ the publfc review proces~ and fiirther
f(nding on the basis of the initfal study and any comments rc~ceived that thera is no substantial evidence
that the project will havo a signiticant effect on xhe ~nvironmont.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT' R~SO!-VED th3t the Anahoim ~ity F'I~nning Commissior; does
tiereby grant subject Petition tor Conditional Use i'ermit NU. 3781, upon tne following conditions which
are heroby found to be a necessary prerequisite t~ the prvposod use of the subjec:- property in r~rdor to
preserve the safery and gener~l weifare of the Citlzens of th~ CitY of Anahsim:
1. 7hat the outdoor st~rage shaif be compietely screened from all adjacent properties as well as fram
tho Riverside Fre~way and any visible ~rterial highways,
2. That a new tv alve (12) inch water main shall be insta{!ed with(n the road ancJ public utilitles easament
~t tho south prope~ty line raxtending from the ex(stiny watQr main to the east prc~perty line.
3. That the appropriate park and recroation in-Ileu fees ~hall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as astablish~d by City Council resolution.
_2_ PC95-99
~,
4. That trash stor~ge areas shall be provided and mafntained in ~ location acceptable tc, the Department
of Mafntenance and In accordance with approvod plans on file witl~ said Department. Such
information shall be sp~cifically shown an 4hc~ plans submittod f~r building permits.
5, That a plan shoet for solid wasto s~urage and callection and a plan for recycling shail be submitted
to the Department of M~intenance fnr revfew ~nd appraval.
6. That an on-site trash truck turn-around aro~ shall bP pravided and maintained t~ the satisfacti~n af
the Department of Mainten~nce. 5~id turn-around ~rea shall bo spQCffically shown on plans submltted
for buElding permits.
7. That plans shail be subrnltted to the City Traific anci Transportation Manager for his review and
approval showing conformance with the current verslons of Enginearing Standard Plan Nas. ~36, 601
and 602 pertainin~ to parking standards and driv~way lacations. Subject property stiall thereupon
be devoloped and m~intained in conform~nce with said plan.
8. Th~t the developer shall submft a water qu~lfty mana~ement pian (WC1MP) specific~lly idontifying tho
best management practic~s that will be used on-she to control predictabla pollutants from atorm water
runoff. The WQMt' shall be submitted to tha ~ ubiic Works Department, Development SRrv(ces
Division, for revlew and approval.
9. That all signage shall conform to the app!(cahle Cods r~quirements in ~ffect at thg time si~r~ p~rmits
are oatained.
10. 1"h~t the existing abandoned woad-frame sign structure lacated at the extrems sauthwest carner of
the property sl~~li b~ ~emoved.
11. That the leg~l owner of subject property shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim a
maximum sixty (60) foot wfde road and public uti!ities Aasemen4 along the south ~+,•oper~y line, as
requlred by the Cammunity Develapment Directar.
12. That a landscape ~nd frrigation pl~n for subject property, Including that partian of tho unimproved
sixty (60) foot wide road and public ~atilit~~ easement shall be submitted to tho Zaning Division for
revi~w and appraval.
13. That the sub~ect conditi~nal uso pE3rmit shall expire August 21, 2000.
14. That subject property shall be devel~ped subst~ntiaHy in accordanc;~ with plans and specifications
submitted to the Ciry of Anaheim by the p~tfti~ner and which ~ians are ~n file with the Plannin~
Department markecl Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
15. That prior to the issu~nce of a building perrnft or within a perfod of one (1) year from tho date of this
resolutfan, whir,hever or,ci~~s ~`irst, ~:onditian Nas. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, S, 1A, 11 and 1?, above-mentianed,
shall be ~omplfed wMii. E~.7ensions for further timp to camplete safd cond~tions may ba granted in
accordanco with Section 18.03.090 of the Anahefm Municipal Cod~.
; 16. That p~ior to finai bufldinc~ and z~ning inspQCtions, Condition Nos. 1, 7 and 14, above-mentfoned, sh~ali
be compl(ed with.
~.
~~ 17. That approval of thfs applicatio~ c~nstitutes approval of the proposed rea,uc~st only to the excont that
lt complles with the Anaheim ~lunicipal Zoning Cais anci any other applicable City, State and Federal
ragula4fons,. Approval does not inc{ude any action or fi~din~s as to cAmpliance or approval of the
~ request ragardin~ any other applicable Ardins~nco, ragulatian ~r requiren~Qnt. ~onditions marked with
an asterisk (*) are required by established laws, codes, segulations and agreaments and are,
therefore, not subject to neqatiation.
-3- PC9a-99
:~~ ~
BE IT FURTHER RE50LVCI~ that tP~~ Anahefm City Planning Corr~mission does hereby tind
and determine that adoptior~ of this Resolution is oxpressly predicted upon appliGnnt's compliance with
each and all of the canditlons horefnabove set farth. 5hauld any such aondition, or any ~~rt thereof, be
declared invalid ar unenforcoable by the final Jud~ement of any caurt of compotent jurisdi;:tion, then this
Rcasolution, an~ any approvals iiorein contained, shafl be deemed null ancl void.
TN~ FQREGOING R~~(3l.UTION was adopted at the Plannir~g Commisslon meeting of
~lugust 2i, 1995.
' ~____~~Z
C RWOMAN ANAhiEIM CITY NNING COMMIS5I~N
ATTEBT:
i ~ ,
~_
SECRETARY, A EIM CITY PLA.NNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ONAIVGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Comrnissfon, do hereby certify
that the foregoing rQSOlution was passed and adopted at a me~ting of the Anaheim City Plannin~
Cornmissfon hold on August ?_1, 1995, by the foilowirig vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONEFiS: ~OSTWIGK, BOYDS'~UN, E3RIS7AL, HENNIN~ER, MAY~R, MESSE,
PEF~AZA
NOES: COMMISSIpNEp5: ~JONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: N7N~
IN WiTN~SS WWENEQF, I have hereunto sot my hand this ~ day of ~~~r~~~/Z ,
1995.
~ -~
uE~RETA Y, HEIM CITY PLANNING GOMMISSIQN
_4- PC9:i-~9