Resolution-PC 96-109~ ~
oceni ~,mQN NO P~-~
A RESOLU710N OCER ~~NDITIONS O APPROVOAL OF SION
AMENDING
RESOLUTI ~ND ON ~ PERMIT pNN~'ON K'ITH
WHEREAS, on March 22, 1993, the Planning Commissfon adoptad Resolution No. Pp3~4
Condftional l:se Pertnft No. 3595 to Permft a 5,143 sq.ft. church in an existing indu ~ ~Y s~e~
approving
~~ complex in the ML "IndusUlal, Umited' zone wtch a waNer of the minimum number of pa 9 Pa
(616 required, 587 existi~9~~ ~~
WHEREAS~ Co~ditio~ No. 6 of said resolutlon specfFles:
hat sub ect church facqity shall be Iimited, as fd~ow hu ch~i~~~ o~es) n 18.61.~50.614 of the
~ ~ {ni to Eimftations fu
Anaheim Municipnl Coc1~ (pe~ ^9
3 ears duration,
~a) The chu~ch is IlmRed to a rr-a~mum inttial three () Y roval by the
(b) Two (2) tlme excensions up to three [3] years each) may be permitted subJect to apP
Planning Commission °r C~Y COU~p at a noticed public hea~ing; and
(cj Church ~ctNities~ o~hef ~n church office staff~ S~~ ~~~~~~ ~°r to 6:00 p.m. Mondays
through Fridays.'
WHEREAS, M~n~ No. 6.minisiratton of Way of Life Ministr(es, has submitted a letter
request(ng a deletion d said ~ Plan' was
WHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, Specffic No. SP 94-1'N ~eea Ind~us~i ~ said speciFic
adopted; and that subJed {xoPe1'h~ ~ located I~s DevelopmeM 6~'ea 2'Expa
plan; and ~uncU amended SecUon
WHEREAS, on August 20, 139G, the Anaheim Ciry
18.110.08~.050.0511 of the Z~ P~~ a~d ~refore, ICode erw~ po ons for churches in Development ea
rmtts churches in Development Area 2
2 of tha NoRheast Area SPec ~ically condftbned in con;unction wfth the
by conditfonal use Pem~h `~~0~ a time limitaticx~ unless sPe~
conditiona! use psrmfL
WHEREAS~ subJed ProPBnY ~ d~~O~ Wnh four industria~ buildings; and is located wnhin
the RedeveloPm6M Agency's P~°Je~ ~~ a~'
WHEREAS~ the Clty Planning Commission did hold a publ~ hearing at the Cfv~ Center M
bl~ hearing having beeri duly
the Ciry of Anaheim on October 14, 199~6, at 1:30 P.m., notice of said P~
ovisions of the Anaheirt: Municlpai Code~ ChaPter
gNer as required by iaw and in accordan~e w~h ~ P~ a~~~nt and to irnesd9ate and
18.03~ to hear and con~ider e~vidence for and aga~nst sa(d proPo~
makA firxiings and recommendatbns in connectbn therewtth~ and
Irrvestigdtlon and study made by Itself
WHERFJ~S~ sald Gommisaion~ efter due Inspectio~~ offered at sald hearing~ does flnd
and in its behalf, and after d~~ fderation d ali ev~denc.e and reports
and determine the fdlowirKa bie ~~ °~ ~
t. That modiflc:ation of the time UmNation Is necessary to Permn reasona ~
church as granted under subjed co~dnior~a~ ~ P~T~~'
-1-
PC96-109
CR2761 DM
~ ~
2, That subject use permit is bEing exercised in a manner not detrimental to th~ particular area
and surroundin9 land uses, nor to the pubtic p~ace, health, safery and general welfare; and
3_ That no one indicated their presence at said public hear:ng in opaosition; and that no
osftion to the subject petftio~.
corcespondence was received ~n opp
CALIF~RNIA E BVIR~o o~E andLdoes hereby~~-dlNhatN he NegatNe Dneclaratio pPeviously
Commission has reviewed t p P
approved in connection tjon in connject on with thif s equest uF+onif~ndin9 hat the declaration reflects the
environmental documenta enc and that it has considered the previousiy approved Negative
i~dependent judgement of the lead a9 Y the public review process and further finding on
Declaration together with any comments received durEng
the basis of the inRial study effectnon the ernironment~ that there is no substantial evidence that the
project wi~~ have a signfficant
NOW THE No~6 ~f Resolut on NLo. PC93-34had Ptedl n connectionn v~Rh Conditional~Use
hereby amend Condition
perrnit No. 3595, to read as follows:
•g. That in accordance wit~i Section 18.110.070.050.0571 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Pe~~n ~9for
ecific Plan) subject church activities other than
~irtsitations for churches in the NOe~mmed p oS o 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, excep
church affice staff, shali _nQt be p
r~ognized religious hdidays which may be observec! on the day of 4he actual holiday regardless o
the day of the week "
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopt~ at the Planning Cummission meeting of
October 14, 1996. '7 /~, Y ~_
~Y~ ~~
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: . -
SECRETAR , ANAHEIM C TY P NNI~dG COMMISSION
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )
COUN'iY OF ORANGE ) ss•
C~TY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commtssion, Plannin bComm ss on
the foregoin9 resolutlon was passEd and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim C'rty 9
held on October 14, 1996, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOONE ICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOI.~ HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERA7~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS.
ABBENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~lONE G~t/ day of ~,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this _,-1 v=
1996. ~~~~.~'/ , ~ .
,~ .vU~.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PIANNING CAM~~SSION
PC96-109
-2-