Resolution-PC 96-110~~
e eni ~,n10N NO P ~ ~
L'J
A RESOLUTION OF TNE ANAHEIM CIT`~ P~N~NG CO~~MISSION
~{pT pETITION FOR VARIANCE Nq• 429~ BE DENIED PB~~ fo~
heim Cfty Planning Commissfon did recoNe a veriHed ~~~~~
WHEREAS~ ~~uated in the City of Maheim~ Counry of Orange~ Sta
Varlance for certain real {xopenY
desc~ibed at~~
PARCEL 2, AS PER MP~P F~LED ~N BO~K 1 RE~RDER O~ ~~ ~U~•
• MppS~ IN THE OFFICE OF 7HE COUM'`~ ~~ hearing at the CNic Center h
missiors did hdd a p~ dW hren
WHEREAS, the CRY Planning Com ,~ ~~ ~~~ ~~n9 having been Y 9
14~ 1996~ at 1:30 P•~~ ~ the Anaheim Municipal Code~ ChaPter 18.03,
the CnY o~ Anaheim on Octobef ~~~ and to irnesti9ate and make flndings
as required by law and in acoordan~e ~~ ~~~~
to hear and co~sider ev~dence for and a9a
~~dations In connedio~ therewith; and ~de by itseif
and recom imestl9atbn and studY
WHEREAS, said Camm~ d ai/redvi~o ie~ b e~po~ offered at sald hearin9, does fl~d
a ~ d i n ft s bettisif, and sfter due consid
and det~rmine the fdlow~n9 ~~~
waNers d the fdlowing to constn~ct fouKeen (14) roof signs
1. That the peUtloner ProP~$
on a new roof paraPe~ art~ one 3-sfded m~~~ ~9n:
Minim'~ n~~~~~g,f i
~ ~R n5A43 0231 - ~~Mandinasla~•
~a~ tl,, ion 18 ~ ~ ~eyuired; 110 t,~ ~~~ ~~P°~~
~!n 'l~'44~Z r ~
~b~ G,,,~Q~ ~„~ 4~1 p~,4~]. - (Q~ permitted~ ~4 P~~P°sedl .
~~
~Wers are heroby denied•
2. That the above-mentioned ~Netion and enjoymerd of a
3. That the re4ues~ed `~riance is not necessary fa the Pr
by ~~ ~operty in the sartoe vfcirity and zone, and denied to the
substantial proQenY ~9M ~~
proPBKY tn ques~ton. variance wYl 4~e mater~ally detrimental to the Publ~ weHare or fnjurious
4. That the req~ested such vkMlty and zone In whlch the Pr°P8t'tY is located•
to the propertY a ~mprovemen~ o ~h ~ Size, shaPe.
ial circumstances aPp~~~e to subjed Rr P8 0~ In th~ ~c(nitjl
5. 'it~at there are no ~ich do not epdY to ou'~er kieMk~lly zoned P~ pe
t~grapt;y, location or surroundings, merciai shoPp~M~ center and Ks indfv{dual tenants
event eifedNe advertlsfng for the com ~ooi high~ 162.5 sq.ft. monumerK sign is an
and wh~h wa~d~ the SI9~ Code; and that the ProP~~
in accordance whfch with Code;
example of effedive adverUs~n9 e the propertY d~e9eE
That st~c aPp-~UO^ °f ~ Zoning Code does not deprh+
dass~icatbn in the vicinity ber.a~~ ~ere are no
6. les located so~h
enJoyed by other PPOPerties under identicai zoning e standards
approved variarx~s for roof sfgns in the immediat~ Zone Meriay and are subjae~ t~~ ~
of Orangettwrpe Avenue are in the Sce~k ~~ ~ not being dep~ed ~ any p~U~9~
whfch do not PermK rod si9ns; and~ ther~ and vfcin~ y°pe~Y
enjoyed by other Prope~~ In the aame pqg.110
-1-
CR2762DM
~ ~
~, That nn one indicated their presence at sald pub~ic hearin9 jr~ of~P°S~ion; and that no
corresponde~ce was receNed ~n oPPosnion to subJect petrt~on.
ALIF RMIA ENVIRONMENTA~ C"^' ~T~ A~ FINDING: 7he Planning Director or his
resentatNe has determined that the proposed Pf01~t ~°5 `"~hin the deflnition of Categoricai
authorized rep
Exemptions, Gass 11, as de8ned in the State EIR Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt rom
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW~ THEREFnRE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ciry Planning Cummission does
hereby deny subJect Petition for Variance on the basis of th~et~ amhe iPlaendn ng iComm~ss~on meeting of
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was ad p
October 14, 1996.
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM ITY PLAI~NING COMMISSION
ATTEST: .
SECRErAF~Y~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
SYATE OF CAUFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ~•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
i, Edfth L Harris„ Secretary of the Anaheim Ciry Planning Comm~ss~o~ Plannin Comm ss on
the forggoing resolution was p.~ssed and adopted at a meetin~ of the Anaheirr~ City 9
heid on October 14, 7996, bY !he following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS; N ~E ~CK,BOYDSTUN,BRISTOL,HENNINGER,MAYER,MESSE,PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE day of
~ have hereunto set my hand this ~
~N WI?NESS WHEREOF,
~~ 1996. - ~ _
SECRETAF3Y~ ANN~EIM CIT`f P NING COMMISSION
PC96-110
.2_