Resolution-PC 96-119 •
~
RESOLUTION NO PC96-119
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM p~TY PIA~vNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PF_..,~i( N0. 3880 BE GRANTED, IN PART
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commi~f Anaheim, County of pra ~etftState of Cal'rfoi nia!
Use Permit for certain real property situated in the Ciry
described as:
TViE `NEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
a CEPT TH~E SOUTH 2G3 FEET THEHEOP IN THE CITY OF ANANEIMBCOUNTY
EX
OF ORANGt, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the C'~ty Planning Commission di~! hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the C'ity
of Anaheim o w and nbacco5danc~e with h p ovisions of the Anaheim Mun ~9 ?~ CodE Ch pt r g8.03, to
required by la
hear and consider ev(dence far an d aga ins t s a i d p r o p o s e d c o n d i t i o n al use permft anci to !~vestigate an
make findings and recom-nendations in connection therewfth; and
WHEREAS, ue~ co ~ uerationnof ~allr ev dence and r ports iofferedaa dsalddhearng, does find and
its behalf, and after d
determine the follow~ ~y facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional us ~ P ~I ssroom additio bn
Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.2?.050.~ 7 2ts o~nclassroom bui ding a~an existing private ~ucational
conjuncServite H gh Schoo~) with3 aNers of tha iollowing:
fac~"'y ~
•!!^~im~m ~tr~ctur la heta`~t•
(a) Section 18.21.062.02 1 - g t 10 -fent t-~ia~d!~- ~rm~~ when located 17 to 21 feet
from adJa.cent to singie-family residential zoning; 24 t~-°t
hir,h_F,;~~11(iriC; ~rnr~osed)
Sartions 18 O6 0 0.~_ U?12 - ~~ ~~~"`~~' rt~~1 '-~f ~rkina spaces.
~b~ 18.06.050.0262 55n spar s rc~qc.`•.red by Code;
18.06.050•~368 30~ spacc',s ei<I`°i;~9 and recommended for approvai by the City
18. .OS Traffic anu Trensportation Managar)
and 18 21 066•010
2, That waiver (a) is hereby approved, in part, wfth a minimum 29-foot setback along the west
property line similar to the existing setback of the classroom building;
3. That there are special circumstances appiicabie to the property such as size shape,
topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other identicaliy zoned properties in the viciniry
because the propos ledbesco structed 29/feet f omutlhenwest'Iproperty II ~;from the view of the surrounding
l a n d u s e s s i n c e i t w
4. That strict application of the Zoning Code depr'Nes the property of prNileges enjoy e d bY
other properties u~mate1~830 elet and9 he pro'posal wilitbe thensameheight andXaligned Iwfth sai d ex istin g
is setback approx Y
building; PCgg-119
-1-
CR2783DM.WP
~ ~:
` wili not cause fewer off-street
Ths~.t the parkl~9 WaNer (b), under the cnnditions imposedes necessary to accommodate
5, eration
parking spaces to be provided for such use than the number of such fpa Se~~e ~o~~~iOns of op
ail vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasona Y rkin
rkin ana~ysis submitted bY the petftioner and pr~Pa~'ad ny Traff° Safery
of such use becaus? m~Pa 7 ~~} indicates that the project site has ad oqaat~e~o,ff~s~m of ~0 students;9
Engineers (dated SeP resent enrollment of 785 studsnts and uP
spaces to accommalate the p
wiil not increase the demand and
~i~ waNer, undu~ice t~ sj in the m mediate vicinity of the proposed use
g, That the pa 9 ~ ~he p
competition for parking spaces upo
use no evidence of school-related Parking enr.roachment onto adjacent residentia~ streets was observ
beca ~p~ucterl by the petitioner,
during the parking survey
will not incrE~ase the dEm.~nd an
rkin waiver, under tY~e conditfons inmpo `ed. ~~te vicinit!~ of the proposed use
7, That the pa 9 n ad acent prh~ate properh~ lance with
rking spaces upo 1 ~ i~ for such use under an agreement in r,omp~
competition for pa ~e~y P~o~~~ as pa ; g r~sidential houses
(which propercy is not exp ~use the :cho~ c~mPus is surrounded en fk n'g encroachment;
Section 18.06.010.020 of this Code) r4;in lots nearby for potential pa
and there are no vacant lots or commercial pa 9
rkin waiver, under'[he conditions imposed, will not increase traffic congest on
g, That the pa 9 rovirled for such use because the camP~=~ Parking lot has been
within the off-street parking areas or lots p
prope~ 'r ~±~signed to eiiminate potential traffic circulation congastion, ress
will not impede vehicular ing
rkin wa'iva;, ur~der the conditions imposed, ro ssd use
g, That the pa 9 ~n the public streets in the immedfate vicinfty of the p po
to or egn;ss from adjacent proaenies up or tharoughf;~re of la Palrra Avenue;
rkin lot wili not irnpede traffic ingress tn or
because ~access to the student parking !ot is only available on the maj
ood Avenue and Fairview Street;
and that t:he small volume of school :ratfic from the faculty pa
egress irc~m the adjacent residentisl properties along DO~ sion of an existing private educational facility,
10. That the proposed use, consest~ft fsfaut or¢ed.
is properly one for which a conditional use p actNNties located ins~de the
of classroom an~ libra o~h a~ development of the
11, That the proposed use, consisting to g50 students;
proposed building, will not adversely affect the adjofning ~and uses and the g
area because the student snroliment will not exceed the current enrollment of up uata to allow the full
e of the sfte for the proposed use is adeq ~ce, health,
12. That the size and shaP rticular area nor to the p
development of the proPos~ use in a manner not detsimental to the pa
safery, and general welfare; , se an undue burden upon the
13, That the'raffic generated by the proposed use will no~ impo
streets and highways designed and improved to carrY the traffic in the area;
rantin of the conditional use permit, ~~der the cond'Rions imposed~ will not be
and general welfare of the cftizens of ?he C'~cy of Anaheim; a~
~4, That the h~lth9safery
detrimental to the peace, ~~ic hearin9 ~~ oPP~s~ion; and that no
15, That no one indicatedsithon torthe subjec petit on.
correspondence was received in oppo
PC96-119
-2-
~ ~
CALiF RNIA ENV~IR ~MoNconstruct a 2- ory,F12D0~0 sq~ etfoot cassroom~ al~i~ate
Commission has reviewed the P~ 476 square-foot, 2-story c~a~room buiiding at an existing p
conjunction with the remodel of a 38. Wfth Waive~s of maximum stru ~ox mately 14•5 aicresu havin9a~
educational facility (Servfte High School) rcel consisting of app th of a roximatelY
of parking spaces on a rectan9ularly-shaP~ P~
approximate frontage of G50 f oxicnatelY 5 5htee eWe~° hecentertine o Oncndaga AveO4ee h NegatNe
~,p00 feet, being located aPP and does hereby apP enc and that
ndert ludc;ement of the lead ag Y
described as 1952 West La Palrs~a Avenue (Servfte High School ~ the public review
Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the indepe
it has cc~nsidered the NegatNo Declaratfon tog~ther with any comments receNed du ng
and an comments receNed that there is no
process and further finding onrt~heCba ill have a sfgn~ican effect on the environment.
substantiai evidence that the p j
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim C'ity Pianning Commission dces
i~ rt, upon the fdlowing co o~der t preserve
hereby grant subject Petftion for r~Condu s~~o e P ~~ ~ Qf tha subJect propertY
hereby found to be a necessaN P~ of Anahefm:
the safery a~d 9e~8~~ `^/elfare of the Cftizens of the Ctty emented
ress trees along the west propetty line shall be retained and supp~
rmanently inigated and
~. That the existing Italian Cyp ~, diseased ~r die.
with the pianting of~ptlyft~epaaced n t e even thattheyhbecome damag ~
maintained and p S5p Students.
2. That the ma~cimum enrollment of this school shall be eignt hund~ed f~' ~ ~ c~i~ly ~entrfying the
managemont plan (W~MP) spe
~utants from stormwater
3. That the developer shall submit z water qua~itY
best mana9ement practices that wili be used on-sfte to control predictabie Pol
runoff. Th? WaMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division,
for review and approvzl.
rkin waNer is contin~ent up°~f use as~conta ned in the pa kl 9 dem~~
4, That the granting of the pe g ration and .ntensiry vidatin IntensHyin9 or othervvlse
the assumptions relating to the ope
st~'y t~t farmed the bas~s for approval of said waNer. Exceedin9~ g'
deviati~:g fr~m any of said assumptions, as contained i~I~he~P~~ef ~h Ci h a~l subject this conditiona
a vi~latfon of the oxpressed cond'Rions imposed upo rovisions of Sections 18.03.091 and
uso permit to termination or modific:ation pursuant to the p
~E.03.092 of the Ai~at~eim Municiaal Code• er for his review and
5, That ~lans shall be submitted to the C'ity Traffic and Transportation Mana9
~a~~raval ~~owing conforma~ce `~'rith the current versiuns of Enginee~ing Standard Plan Nos. 436 a~d
gp2 pE~Rainin•~ to parkin;~ s~a~d~rds and driveway locat(on. SubJect proPertY shall thereupon be
. dr,velap~ a~d mafntafned in conformance wfth sald plans.
g, ` fnai 411 a'c conditioning facilities and other roof and ground maunted equfpment shall be prope~Y
-"!eide~ from view and the sound buffered from adJacent residentfal Properties. Such informatfon shall
~ Spe~if;~.311y shown on ~:~e plans submitted for building permits.
7, That any lighting f'uctures located adjacent to the residential propertfes to the west shafl be down-li9hted
with a maximum hefght of twelve (12) feet. Said Iighting fixiures shall be direct~d away from adjacen
to rotect the residential integriry of the area and said sPecffications shall be
residential propeRY lines p
shown on the plans submitted for building permfts.
PC96-119
-3-
8.
9.
10.
11
1
a1 ~
+p~'
tree anted on-sfte shali be replaced in a time~y marner in the event that it is removed,
That any ~is~s~ a~~or dead•
dama9ed~ building shaU be derestory only, as shown on
T~t windows on the west ele~ation of the new 2-story
submitted Ekhibit No. 2. ~~ for the new
eriad of ninety (9~) days from the issuance ofC,toh~nio ~ Ut~ Pe~ft No. 3745 sha~~ be
That within a p ~m~ bY the termination of Condrilonal
2-story building, the two mod~~ar classrooms PB rivate
and, further, that the petitioner sha~l submft a letter requestin9
removed; ~n tempo~~'Y m~ular classr ~ula( ~a~~~tt°S Wfth an existing p
Use Permit No. 3745 (to Pe ~ffiti within
high school) concuReM with the removal of the subJect an-site 9
. That the owner of subject prope~Y 5~~~ ~ feS~nsible for the removal of any
twenry four (24) hours of it~ app~f~tion. cifications
substantially in accordance with p-ans and sPe
2 That subject prope~'tY 5~~~ ~ developed ~titioner and wh-~h plans are on file with the Planning
submitted to the City of Anaheim bY h 3; rovkied, ho'~+ever, that the minimum setback alon9
Department marked Exh~bn Nos. 1 throug29 feet and that the proPos~ ~evatx shall be located on
nine () b~ no closer than twenry nine (291 feet to the
the west propeRY line shal~ be'ta'enty
the west side of the souch stairwaY as shown on Plan A,
west properry ~~~8• r from the date ~f this
~mit or wfthin a period of ~ne (1) Y~ shall be comp~i~
13, That p~or to issuance of a buflding pe 6 and 7~ above•mentio~ed,
e~e sa~d ~o~~~~~S ~Y ~ 9~~te~J in accordance with
resoludon. `Nh~chever occurs first, Conditlon Nos. 3, 5,
Wiq~, Extensions for fuRher time to comp~ •
Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipa~ Code•
bullding and zo~~ng inspections, Condftf~n Nos.1, 9 and 12, above-mentioned, shall
14, i hat prior to fina~
be complied wfth• mnasium (~•e•, no concurrent
~ 5, That there shall be no "cross-scheduling' belween the theater and the 9y ~tion Mana9er
events).
m Anaheim 7~ff~inn shall be provided on-sRe,
18, That parking arrangements sha~~ bQ rr~de Wnh ~I even s and/or that pa 9
to allow parking on La Pa~ma Avenue for spec
on the track field. ~o S~ request only to the ea'~ent that
roval of ihis app~~~tion :.onstitutes approval of the p P~ i~~e ~~ g~te and Pecieral
e a~ a~y other app~ roval of the
17. 7hat apP lance or aPP
it comp~ieS W~1h the Anaheim Municipa~ Zonin action or findings as to comp~
regulations. Aparoval does not i`~~ eof~i~nce, regulation or requfrement.
request regarding any oYher app~
mmission does horeby find
n a fcant's complfance with
BE IT FUR7FiER RESOLVED that the Anahefm ~i~i~n~~ p~ rt thereot, be
and determine that adoption of this Reso~u~ia~ is expressly p such condftioi n~ u~is~d ~1~~nn, then this
each and a~l of the conditfons hereinabo~e sat forth. Shoul a~y null ai~d void.
the tinal jud9ment of any couR of compe 1
declared irnalid or une~o a~~~rein cc~~in~, S~~ ~ d~med
Resolution, and any app
-4-
PC95-119
~ ~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
November 25, 1996•
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANtvING COMMISSION
ATTEST: `>~
l
SECRETARY, A HEIM CITY PI~INNING CQMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solario, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby cer!Hy
resolutfon was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anahef~*~ ~iry Pianning
that the foregoing ~~ by the followin9 vote of the members thereof:
Commission held on November 25,
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BONE ICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERPZA
NOES: COMMI~,SIONERS: NO ~
ABSENT: COMMI3SIONERS: NQNE ~ day of -1aA1UA/ ~
IN W~TNESS WHERECF, I have hereunto set my hand this
1997. ~ ~
SECR , AHEIM CITY Pl~1NNING COMMISSION
-5-
P(;g6-119
~