Resolution-PC 96-127~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. P_ 127
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSICN
THAT ?ETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 96-97-02 BE GRANTEQ, UNCONDITIONALLY
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Ciry Planning wmmission did receive a verified petftion far
Reclass~ication for real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Coun:y of Orango, Stata of Calffomia,
describes! as fdlows:
LOTS 54, 55, 56, 62, 63, 64 AND THE EASTERLY RECTANGULRFI2 INCHES OF
THE NORTHERLY RECTANGUTAR 20 FEET OF LOT 57 IN BLOCK 'E' OF
I~EIMANN AND GEORuE'S MAP OF ADDITION BUlLDItv~ LOTS, AS SHOWN ON
A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 249 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF
LOS ANGLES COUNTY, CAIJFORyIA.
D(CEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTHERLY THREE AND ONE HALF INCHES OF
LOT 56.
WHEREAS, the Ciry Plann(ng Commission dkl hdd a publfc hear(ng at the CNic Center in
the City of Anaheim on December 9, i996 at 1:30 p.m., not(ce of said public hearin~ having been duly given
as required by law and in accordance wfth the provisions of the Anaheim Munlcipai Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reciass~ication and to irnestigate und make
flnd(ngs and recommendatfons in connection therewfth; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due fnspaction, irnestigatlon and study made by itself
ancf in fts behalf, and after due considerat(on of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and determine the following tacts:
1. That ths proposed reclassiflcation of subJect property is frc,m the CG (Commercial, General)
Zone to the CL (Commercial, LJmited) Zono;
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for General Commercia~ land
uses;
3. That the reclassif(cation conforms to the Anaheim General Plan land use designation for
subject property for and the reclass~ication complies with the axistinq Planning Commissfon and City Council
policy to reclassiy CG "General Commercial' and CH "Heavy Commercial' zoned properties to the CL
'Limited Commercial' Zone;
4. That the proposed reclassHication of subJect property Is necessary and/or desirable for the
orderly and proper development of the community;
5. That the proposed reclassification of subJect property does properly relate to tha zones and
their permitted uses locally estaWished in dose proximity to subJect property and to the zones and their
permitted uses generally estaWished throughout the community; and
f. 7hat one person indicated his presence at said publk hear(ng in opposttion; and that no
correspondence was receNe~ in cpposition to subject ~etftion.
CR2794MS.WP -1- PC96-127
ae~ ~
CAUFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL (~UALITY ACT FINDIN~: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposat to reclassffy subject property nom the CG (Commerciai, General)
Zor~e to the CL (Commercial, Limfted) Zone to permft an sutomotive ~epair and body facility in tw~ existing
buildings (18,235 sq.ft. total) with waiver of min(mum number of parking spaces an a rectangulary-shaped
parcel aonststing of approximately 0.74 acre located at the southeast comer of Anahefm Bouleva~ and Adele
Street, having approximate frontages of 135 feet on ihe east side of Anaheim Boulevard and 215 feet on the
so!~th side of Adele Straet, and further descr(bed as 320 North Anaheim Boulevard; and does hereby approve
th~ ~legative Declaration upen flnding that the dedarat{on reNects the independent judgement of the Iead
agency and that R has considered the Negative Dedaration together with any comments received during the
public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that
there is no substaMfal evidence that the proJect will have a s(gniflcant effect on the ernfronment.
NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby approva the subject Pethion for ReclasstAcat(on to authorize an amendment to the Zonin~ Map of the
Anaheim Municipal Code to exGude the above-desC~ibed property from the CG (Commerc(al, General) Zone
and to incorporate said dsscribed property into the CL (Commercial, Umfted) Zone, unconditionally.
BE IT FURTFiER RESOLVED that approval of this ap~lication constftutes approval of the
proposed request only to the extent that ft compi(es wfth the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other
applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval dces not tndude any action or Nndings as to
compliance or approval of the request regard(ng any ather applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolutlon shall not constkute a razoning of, or a
commftment by the City to rezone, the subJect property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the
City Council which shall be a legislative act which may be approved or denied by the Cfry Council at fts sote
discretfon.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at tha Planning Commiss(on meeting of
December 5, 1996 C~
CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
lY~
SECRErARY, AHEIM CITY PLANtJING COMMISSION
STATC OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Sdorio, Secretary of the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commisston, do hereby certNy
that tne faregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on December 9, 1996, by the fdlowing vote of the membRrs thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERA7A
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BHISl'OL
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand th(s ~~ day
1997.
l~,b~iR(~
SECR ARY, EIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
-2- PC96-127