Resolution-PC 96-128• ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC96-128
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOH CONDITIOtvAL USE PERMIT NO. 3898 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Comm!ssion did receivE- a verified Petftion for
Conditioeial Use Permit for certain real properry situated in the Ciry of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of CalHomia, describai as:
LOTS 54, 55, 56, 62, 63, 64 AND 7HE EASTERLY RECTAP~GULAR 2 INCHES OF
THE NORTHERLY RECTANGUTAR 20 FEET OF LOT 57 IN BLOCK 'E' OF
HEIMANN AND GEORGE'S MAP OF ADD~TION BUILDING LOTS, AS SHOWN ON
A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 249 OF MISCEUANEOUS RECORDS OF
LOS ANGLES COUNTY, CAUF09NiA.
IXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTHERLY THREE AND GNE HALF INCHES OF
~OT 56.
WHEREAS, the Ciry Planning Commission did hdd a pub{ic hearing at the Civic Center
in the Ciry of Anaheim on December 9, 1996 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said publlc hearfng having been duly
gNen as required by law and in accordance with the provlsions of the Anahsim Municipal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear and consider evkience for arxi against satd proposed condi~ional use permft and to
investigate and make flndings and recommendatfons in connection therewfth; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, irn~estigation and study made by ftself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of ail evidence and repoRS offered at said hearing, does find
and determine the folluwing facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a condftional use perm{t is authorized by
Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44.050.085 to permft an automotNe repair and body facility in two
existing buildings (18,235 sq•ft. !otal) wfth waiver of:
Section 18.06.Oa0.022~ - Minimum number of rkina s~Ce~•
a~ ~ g q,ti ~,p~Q (90 soaces required; 25 soaces existing, indudes 6 inside the building)
2. That the parlcing waiver, under the corxlft(ons imposed, will not cause fewer oH-street
parking spaces to be provided for such use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate
all vehi~les att~ibucclWe to such use under the norrnal and reasonaWy foreseeable conditions of operation
of such use because the parking analysis, submitted by the petftloner, ind~ates that the project site has
adequate oH-street park~nfl to eccommodate the customers, the custome~s' vehides under repair, and the
seven (7) employees for the proposed facGity;
3. That the wafver, under the condftions imposed, wil~ not increase the demand a~d
competftion for parking spaces upc~n th9 public streets fn the immediate v~inity of the proposad use
p of poused fbaci~liry~andthe bJect ~operty ontains 43 spaces 1 uding pepair baysywh~h etegenough
to handle all the parking on-sfte;
4. That the wafver, under tho condftbns Imposed, will nat Increase the demand and
competit~n for park~ng spaces upon adJacent prfvate propeRy in the Immediate v~intty of the pro~osed
use (which propeRy Is not expressly p-ovided as Park~ng for such use under an agreemeM in compllance
whh Seccion 18.06.010.020 of the Anaheim Mun~ipal Code) because the facAity, as proposed, wi1~ be se~f-
contnined wkh all vehides under repair located inside the bulkiing; and that there wNl be no ou:do~r
ar.tNhfes and, with the ant~ipatlon af one or two custort-~rs per day, the park~n9 ~PP~Y ~-g~e wql be
sufficient ar~d not create any additional competttion 1or off-sfte park~n9.
CR2795MS.WP -t- PC96-128
~ ~
J
,
5. That tha waiver, uncler the canditions imposed, ~vili ~ot increase traffic ca~gestion witPdn
the off-street parkl~g areas or lots'i' provided for such use because the parking lot has been praperly
designed 4o support the pssking and circulation requiremeMs for the pro~sd facll! ;;
___, _
6. That the v~aNer, under tne cnnditions imposed, will not impede vehlcular ingress to or
egress ftom adjacerrt properties upon the pub!(c's~~sets in the immediate viciniry of the proposed use
because access is provided by existing driveways which do ~.~tc;onflict with any suROUndEng properties;
<_. -
7. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjaining lanu ~~ses and the growth and
dsvelopment of the area in which it is propo,ed to be located because the proposo - business is
compatible with the sunounding neighborhoai;
8. ?hat the size arxi shape of the sfte for the proposed use is adequate to a11ow the #uli
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimenta! to the particular area nor to the peace,
health, safery, and ~eneral welfare because the proposed auto repair and body shop and all associated
activities (inciuding the ovemight storage of vehicles) will be conducted whdly inside the build(ng;
9. That the traffic generated by the proposed use wfll nct fmpose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways dssigned and improved to carry the traffic ii~ the area;
10. That the granting of the conditional use permit, untler the conditions imposed will not be
detrimental to the p~ace, ~health, safery and general welfare of the citizens of the Ciry of Anaheim; and
11. That one person indicatsd his presence at said public hea~ing in opposition; and that no
correspondenca was received in opposicion to the subject petftion.
['AUFORNIp ENVIRONMEPI'TAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anai~eim Ciry Planning
Commission has reviesved the proposai to reclassify subject property from the CG (Commercial, General)
Zone ta the CL (Commerciai, Limited) Zone to permit an automotNe repair and body faciliry En two existing
buildings (18,235 sq.ft. total) wfth waNer of minimum number of parking spaces on a rectangularly-shaped
parcel: ca~ssisting of approximately 0.74 acre located at the southeast comer ofi Anaheim Boulevard and
Adele Street, having approxfmate frarrtages of 135 feet on the east side of Anaheim Boulevard and 215
feet on the south sibo of Adeie Street, and further describsci as 320 North Anaheim Boulevard; and daes
hereby approve the NegatNe Dedaration upon 8nciing that the declaration reflects the independent
judgement of the lead agency and that (t has considered the Negative Dedaration together with any
comments receNed during the public review process and further finding on the-basis of the inftial study
and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the_arnironment.
NOYU, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOWED that the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commission does
hereby graM subject Petition for Condit(onal Use PermR, upon the following cond(tions which are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subje~ct property in order to preserve the
safety and gene!al wclfare cf the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: --,_ __
1. That the property owner/petttioner shail submft a revised la~scape plan to the Zonfn~=ryivision,
showing minimum ten (10) faot diame~er in-ground tree wefls, each plarrted wfth three (3) minimum
6ifteen (15) gallon trees, adjacent to Anahefm Boulevard; arxl that the fandscaping for the southeast ~
comer of subject properry shall tndude mfnimum,one,(1),_gallon_vines, p-amed on max~mum three
(3) foot ~snters, Yo screen the trash endosure (which is to be set back a min(mum five (5) feet ftom
Gaudina Street) for review and approval by staff.
2. That any on-site public t~iephones shall be lorated inside a building.
-2- PG96-128
~ ~
3 That the properiy owner/petitloner shall submit a sign plan for Planning Commission review and
approval as a'~teports and Recommendations" ftem. Freestanding signs shall be prohibfted on
subject property.
4. That no banners or other temporary advertising displays shall be visible to the streets or nearby
prop~rties ftom inside the work bays or on the roli-up doosways without a Special Everrt Permit firM
having been obtained.
5. That there shall be no outdonr work cr storage of vehides, incluciing ovemigF~t storage, on subjeci
property. All actNities and vehide storage shatl be conducted whdly inside the buildings.
6 That the develaper shall submit a water quallry mana9ement plan (WQMP) speciflca~~y identffying the
best management practic~ that will be used on site to contrd predictabie polutants from stormwater
runoff. 'Phe WQM~ shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Department, De~~elopmeM
Services Division, for review and approvaL ~.~,
7. Thac a plan sheet for solid waste storage and collection and a plan for recyciing shall be submitted
to the Publtc Works DepartmeM,, Streets and Sanftation Division, for review and approval.
8. That an ort^sRe trash ~truck tum-around area shall be provided and maintained to the satisfaction of
the Pubiic Works Qepartment, Streets and Sanitation Di~ision. Said tum-around area shall be
speciflcally shown on plans submitted to the Streets and Sanitatinn DNision.
9. That plans shall be submitted to the Cft~c Traffic and Transportatinn Manager for hi;, review and
approval showing co~orman~e wfth the late~st revisions°~ Engineering Standard Plan PJos• 436 and
602 pertaining to parking standards artd driveway locatir,ns. Subject properry shall thereupon be
developed and maintainod in conformance with said plans.
10. That the parking lot shalf be slurry-sealed and rsstripfld to match what is shown on Exhibit No. 1.
11. That the existi~ig chair.link fence adJacent to Adele Street and qaudina Street shall be replaced wtth
wrought-icon fencing. Any gates are to remaEn open durin~ business hours.
12. That subjecc pro,~~rty shall be cieveloped substantially in accordance wfth plans and specifications
submi:ted to the City of Anaheim by the c~etftioner and which plans are on file wfth the Planning
Depanment marEced Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. .
13. That prior to the commencement oE the activity authorized by this resolucion, o: ~~lor to final nufiding
and zoning inspections, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this resolution, whichever
occurs ftrst, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, g arx: 9, above-mentioned, shall be corr~pli9d wfth•
Extensions for further time fo complete said candition~ may be 9ranted lii accordance wfth SectEon
18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code•
14. That prior to commencement of the activ:ry herein approved, Condition Nos. 10, 19 and 12, above-
mentioned, sghall be complied with.
15. That the granting of the parking waNer is contingent upon operation of the use in conformance vvith
the assumptions retaiing to the operation and intensiry of use as cont2ined in the park~ng demand
study that formed the basis for approval of said waiver. Exceeding, vidating, intensifyirig or otherwise
deviating from any of said assumptions, as contained in the parking demand studY, s~.:!t be deemed
a vidation of the expressed conditions imposod upon said waiver which shall subject this conditional
use permit to termination or mod~ication pursuant to the provisions of Sections 18.03.09t and
18.03.092 of the Anaheim Municipat Code.
16. That the rdl up door facing south shail remain dosed during business hours, except for deliveries.
~~, ; ; , PC~-128
~
~
17. That the opening and dosing °f If o rn'1~9 he~dooribecoGmei PSo~ m~~~ emaien closed during
the Code Enforcement DFrisfo pe remain o n
(ousi;~ess hours, but if Code Er~forcement determines there are no problems, then ft may P8 •
18. 'f hat fo~titon. SaidnlnsRsc~e°~S~~~~ ~~ omby the ap jicant~l ~ke place during the flrst year
of ope
19. That approval of this application constftuces approval of the proposed re4uest oniy to the extent that
State and Federal
ft camplies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other appUcable City,
regulations. Approval does ~ p ~i~~e ordinan e~regulatton oeroquiremen~nce or approval of the
request regard~ng any othet a pl
BE IT FURTHER RESOLV~ED that the Anaheim ~~{~~U~9 ~P~i~~ s~m~~nce w~
and determine ihat adoption o# this Resolution is expressly p n tt~ereof, be
each and all of 4he conditions hereinabove set forth. Sho~ld sny such condftian, or any pa
declared invalid or unenforceable by the flnal 1ud9ment of any coun of campeteni jurisdictlon, then this
Resolution, and any approvals herein caMained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planntng Commission meeting of
December 9, 1996• /~ J """('
_~==-'
~=~--- CHAIRPERSON ANAHE CIN PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: , ~
~
SECRET RY, A AHEINi CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CAI.IFOR~IIA ) ;;'
COUNTY QF ORANGE ) ss• ~ i
C~'TY OF ANAHEIM ) ~ "
I, Margarita Sdorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify
th+at the foregoing resdution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Ciry Pl~inning
Commission held on December 9, 1996, by the fdlo~ving vote of the mombers iherec~f:
AYES: CAMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERAZA'
NOES: COMMISSIOI~ERS: NONE i
ABSENT: COMMISSIONEHS: BRISTOL
1~ day of ~ u~~.~
IN WITNESS WtiEREOF, I have hereunto set my !'-and this _ - J
1~J97. T '~
i
SECRET RY, AN EIM CITY PLANNING C~)MMISSION
PC96-128
~-