Loading...
Resolution-PC 96-13~ " / ~ RESOLUTI!~M NO. PC96-1~ A AESOLUTION QF TME ANAHEIM CITY ~LAlVNING COMMISSION AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 93R-217 ADOPTED IN CONNECTIOM WI7H CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3630 WH~REP~S, on November 2, 1993 the Cfry CouncA adopted Resolution fVo. 93R-217 approving Condit6onai Use F'ermit No, 3630 (to p~rmit a public dance hali wfth o~-premises sales and consump!lon of alcoholic beve~rages in conjunction with an existing restaurant wfth watver of minimum number of parking spaces); and that Condition No. i of said resolution was subsequenUy amerxied by Resolution ~lo. PC94-128 to read as follows: ° 1. That subject condftional usa permft ts hereby granted for a period of one (1) year to expire on November ~2, 1995. ` V':HEREAS, subject property is currenUy developed with an approximately 15,745 sq.i4. two-story restaurant wfth public dance hall at 1169 South State Collsge Boulevard (E!:vaquero Family Restaurant) in the CL'Commercial, Limited" iono; and WHEREAS, the management of the EI Vaquero Family Restaurarrt has submftted a letter requesting modification or deletion of Condftion No. t of Resolution No. 93R-217, as amended by Resolution No. PC94- 128; and - WliEF3EAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the Ciry of Anaheim on January 22, 1996, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hesaring having been duly given as requireci by taw and in accordance with the provisions of the Anahe~m Munlcipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed amendm6nt and to investigate and make flndfngs and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said G~mmission, after due l~spection, irne~tigatie~ and study rr+~de by ftself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does flnd and determine the following facts: : ___=_- -, _. __ 1. That suuject usd permit is being exercised (n a manner not detrimental to the partictdar area and surrounding Iand uses noi to the pub!(c place health, safely and generai welfare; and 2. `. That no one indicated their presence at said p\b~fc hearing tn opposftion; and that no correspondence was receNed in opposit(on to the subJect petRion. JI ~CALIFORNIA EMVIRQNM,f~IT°'~ LZfJF.L~T~'`RCT"F!Rl~IINCa: That the Anaheim Cfry Planning Commissian:hsv~+uSievVeiJ'~the proposal and does hereby flnd that the NegatNe Decla~atlon previously „•. approved in connection with Condftional Use PeRniC No. 3630 is adequate to serve as the r~rWuir environmental documentation In connection wich this request upon finding that the dedaration refle~?~ the independent judgement of the lead agency and that ~;has considered the previously approved NegatNe Declaratfon together wfth any comments received cluring tho public review process and further finding on the basls of tho initial study and any commen*.s receNed that th~re is no substantial evidence that the project will have a signfficant effect on the environment. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby amend Resotution No. J3R-~17, as amended by Resolution No. PC94-128 and adopted in connection wfth Conditional Use Permit No. 3630, as foilows: CR2581 DM.WP '~" PC96-13 ~ ,~; (a) Th~at Condftlnn NDS. 1 and e shall be amended to read: ii~ ~ 1. That subje~~c use perm[t Is hereby grarded for a period of sbc (6) months, to expfre on ,iuly 22,1996. 8. That a4 any time entertafnment and/or dancing is provkJed on the premises, the appllcant shall provide a maximum of four (4) unfformed security gua~ds (licensec! and bonded) in the parking lot to mafntain order therein and to prevent any aThe ~~~hnu ber of If ensed securitY 9~~$ enjoyment by nearby restdents of thetr proper4y. is to be determined by the Ana7~eim Pdice Departmerrt. : (b) That Condition No. 13 shall be deletec! in its entirery (c) 7hat the following ne~r condition shall be added: 20. That the parking lot of the premises shall be er~uipped and permanenUy' maintained with maximum illuminstion cap3bilities wfthin the existing Ifght standards to make easily disc6mibie the appearance and conduct of any persons in or about the parking lot area, to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police DepArtment. ~uch Iighting=shall be directed so as not to interfere, illuminate or pose a riuisance ta any adjacent or adj!~ining,reside~tial propeRies. i, ~`;, ~_~~ THE FOR~GOING RESOLU7!ON was si~opted at the Planning Commission meeting of January 22, 1996. ` ~~~ _ - ~HqIFtMAN, PRO TEMPO ~~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN COMMISSION ATTES '~ !~~r,~, ~c~n!~ SECRETARY, AHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION STATE OF CAUFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim Cfry Planning Commtssion, do hereby certHy th^'<the foregoing resolution was passed~a followint ote of the memaerst he eof:heim City Planning Commission held on January 22, 1996, bY 9 AYES: ° Ct~MMISSIONERS: BOYD5TU~l, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MESSE, PERP7J\ NOES: :~MMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SOSTWICK, MA`YER IN WITN~SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thls •~ day of ,~. P~n.~ SECRETAR ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -2- PC96-13