Resolution-PC 96-27~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC96-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAH~IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PcfITION i=OR CONdITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3820 BE GRANI'ED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commissfon did re~ceive a verified Petftion for
Cor~ditional Use Permit for certain real property sit~iated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of Caiifornia, describedl as:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF' OF THE NORTHWEST ~UARTER GF THE
SOUTHEAST DUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10
WEST, S.B.B. & M. G?ESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING A7 ~ HE CENTER LINE IMERSECTION OF ANAHEIM-OLiV~
FfOAC AND SUNKIST STREET, THENCE NORTH 0 DEG. 01' 19" EAST P~LONU
THE CENTER LINE OF SUNKIST STREET. 218.23 FEET; THENCE E.ASTERLY
ALONG A LINE AS MEASUREp AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTH 88 DEG. 58' 41"
RIGHT ANGLES SOUTH 01 DEG. 01' 19" WEST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO
AND 222.35 FEET EASTERLY OF SUNKIST STREET, 261.27 FEET TO THE
CENTER LINE OF ANAHEIM-OU~IE STREET; THENCE NORTH 78 DEG. 01' 24"
WEST ALOhCf THE CE(~TER LINE OF ANAHEIM-OLIVE ROAD, 926.48 FFFT TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
V, ~E'riEAS, the CitV Planning Cemm(ssion dfd hold a public hearing at the Civic Center
in the City of Anaheim on March 4, 1995 at.;:3u p.`m., notic~i qf said public hearing having been duly given
as required by law and in ai;cordanr,e wfth the provisions cs'r the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed condftional use permlt and to irvestigate and
rnake findings and recorrme~dations in connectEon therewfth; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, a~'cer due inspection, investigation and study made by ftself
and in fts b~ahalf, ancl after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hear(ng, does find
and deter-;iine the following facts:
1. Tfiat the proposed use is prcperly one for which a condftional use permit is authorized by
Anaheim Municipal Code Sections 18.44•050.080 and i 8.44•050.085 to permit a full servfce car wash, au[o
detailing and lubrication facility with waivers of the following:
(a) ?ection 18.44.063.046 - Minfmum str~~t ~~al setback and vard reauir~ments.
10-f t w(de landscaped setback abutting residential zone
boundaries with 18 t~e~ required; 1 to 5-foot wlde setback
abutt(ng RM-12G0 zoning to the north an~ east wfth 6 tre~s
proposed)
(b) Section 18•44•~68 - R~9S'-rPd sfte screenina.
6-foot hfgh masonry wall, earthen berm, or combination thereof
abutting residential zone boundary to nurth and east required;
none proposed)
_~ _ PC96-27
CR2615DM.WP
~ ~
2. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property consisting of fts location
and surroundings, which do not appf;r to other iden:ically zoned properties in the viciniry because subject
commercial property abuts a residential apartment complex on the north and east; and th~at pe r~neslof
of the existing carherebare o~iding aesolid and~continuoes sightisoreen betweenthe proposed use and
subject property Y P
existing residential uses;
3. That strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the praperty of p~~vntyas enJoyed by
other propertfes under id~nticaf zoning ciassiflcation in the vicin'dy;
4. That the pro~osed use is properly one for which a conditional ~se permit is authorize~J bY
the Zonino Co~e;
5. That the proposed use wiil not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the g~owtl~ and
develupment of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
g. That the size and shape of the site for thR proposed use is adequate to allow the fuil
devetopment of the proposed use in a manner ~~ot detrimental to tha partlcular area nor to tho peace,
health, safery, a~d general welfare;
7. That the traffic generated by the propo t~ traffic Iin the apea becau eUSUUject p opertyhs
streets and highways designed and improved to carry
located at the Intersection of two arterial highways capable of accommodating the anticipated vehlcular
traffic associated wYch the proposed use;
g. That the granting of the conditional use permit, under the conditiuns impased, will not be
detrirnantal tu the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the Ciry of Anaheim; and
g. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposftion to the subject petition.
ALIF RiJIA ENVIRONMENTAL ~UALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Ciry Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permft a full service car wash, auto detailing and I~brication
facility with waivers of m~Cemu~mand consiisting uf app oxfmately 0 54 acre locatred atrth northeast cor er
an irregularly-shaped pa roxim~ te irontages of 163 feet on the north side of
of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street, having app
Lincoln Avenue and 170 feet o~ove the Ne aYnre Declaraticmeupon flnd ng hat t e d clarac~ion oflecits the
Avenue; and does hereby appr 9
independent judgement of the lead agency and that it has,considered the Negative Declaration toqet er
with any comment ~ment ~re eived thatu hlere ise opsubstan ai fev dence that ~he pre ct willhhavei a
study and any co
significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFOR~, BE IT RE80LVED that the Anatieim Cicy Planning Commisslon does
hereby grant subJect Petftioere~uisite to itha c, os osed useuof~ he subjecwproperty ini o de` r to p e erve the
found to be a necessary p 9 p
safety and general welfare oF the Citizens of the Ciry of Anahefm:
t. That an eight (S) foot hign masonry block wall shall be constructed along thE east prop~o~~fence
the extreme northeast corner of the pcoperty to replace the existing combination masonry/
-2- PC96-27
~ ~l
located between the existing carport structures, and that all ~aps or holes li~ the existing masonry
or cZrport wal4s shall be filied or otheryvise repaired.
2. That low pressur6 air compressor hoses may be used to dry cars at the wash tunnei exit; provided,
however, that sound pressure levels shall not exceed the levels permitted in Chapter 6.70 "Sound
Pressure Levels."
3. That the vacuum and dryer equipment shail be eniirely enciosed in the equipment raom, and that the
do~rs to the equipment room shall be solid core construction and ~auipped with seff-closing devices.
4. ThaY the car wash system shall include the D~ser: Car Wash Systems Noise Redr.~ction Package, or
uther equaily or more effective noise reduction paakage, as recommended (n the ac,~ustical analysis
for the proposed faciliry prepared by R~chard Colia of Coila Acoustical Consultai~ts and dated
December 18, 1995.
5. That all paging systems shall be located on building elevations facing away from adjacent residential
properties.
6. T~at any parking lot or securiry :ighting shall be low inten~ity and d(rected away from adjacein
residential properties.
7. That the property owner/developer shall Iandscape and permanendy maintain that unimproved portion
of the ultimate public right-of-way along Uncoln Avanue located Immediately adjacent to the subject
pr~p°rry until such time as the permanent public improvements to the r(ght-of-way are completed.
3. That fast growing clinging vines shall be planted and permanently maintained around the perimeter
of the trash enclosure to discourage graffiti and to provide adequate screening of the enclosure.
Vines shall not b9 less than one (1) flallon in sizs at the time ~f plant(ng and shall not be spaced
more than three (3) feet apart on-centers.
9. That the owner of subject property shall submit a letter requesting termination of Conditional Use
Permft No. 525 (to establish a service station) ta the Zo~ing Dhisian.
10. That a minimum (3) foot wide landscaped be~n shall be incorporated into the lansJscaped setbacks
adJacent to Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist 5treet. Said landscaped setbacks shali also be planted wfth
minimum iifteen (15) gallon trees wfth not less than ~ne (1) tree for each twenry (20) Iinear teet of
street frontage, in compliance with Code Section 18.04.060.
11. That no b~inners or other advertis(ng visible to adjacent streets shall be displayed ins~de the car wash
tunnels or ,service bays unless a Special Events permft is first obtained.
12. That any pi;oposed freestanding sign on subject property shail be a monument-type not exceeding
eight (8) fest in height and shall be subJeci to the review and approval of the Ciry Traffic and
Transportation Manager to determfne adequate I(nes-of-sight prfor to construction.
13 unaessha varian el alhowing s gIn waivers is flrsgapproved by the Cfry Council Planiniing Com issio~
or Zoning Admfnistrator.
14. That tha subJect automobfle lube/oll change tacility shall be 1(mited to lube and oil change services
only.
~- PC96-27
~ ~
15. That all air condftlonfng facllities and other roof and ground mounted equipment shall be prope~ly
shielded from vlew and the sound buffered from adjacent resident(al properties. Such shielding shall
be specffically shown on the ptans submitted for buiiding permits.
16. That pians shali be submitted to the Ciry Traffic and Transportation Manager for his re~view and
approval showing conformance with the latest rev(sions of Engineering Standard Plan Nos. 436 and
601 pertaining to parking standards and driveway locatlons for commerciai uses. Subject propert~
shall thereupon be develaped and maintained in conformance with said plans.
17. That the proposed driveway on Sunkist Street shall be constructed with ten (70) foot rad(us curb
returns as required by the City Engfneer in conformance with Engineering Standards.
18. That the legal property owner shall ircevocably offer to ded(cate to the C'rty of Anaheim an easement
s~xcy (60) feet in width from the centeri(ne of the street along Uncoln Avenue for street widening
purposes. In addition, the legal properry owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate a comer cutoff for
access ramping in accords~nce wfth Ciry Standard Detail No. 124 and Anaheim Municipal Code
Section 1f3.04.08U.010.
19. That the developer shall submft a water qualfty management plan (WOMP) specifically idenCifying the
bunoff. a The W~MP shallsbeas bmittQd o~he P biic WorksrDeipartm nt i~ Develop ent Sr ervlctes
Division, for review and approval.
20. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specffications
submftted to the Cfry of Anaheim by the petitloner and which plans are on file wi:h the Planning
Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 10.
21. That prior to issuance of a building permft or within a period of one (1) year from the date af this
resolution, whichever occurs first, Condftion Nos. 9, 75, 16, 18 and 19, above-mentioned, shail be
complied with. Extensions for furthe~ time to c~~mplete sald conditions may be granted in accordance
with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Munir.ipal Code.
22. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. ~, 3, 4, 5, 6, ', 8, 10, 17, 20 and
23, herein-ment(oned, shall be comptled wfth.
23. That the carport walls along the north and east property Iines shall be screened wfth landscape
screening includ(ng trellis and vines.
24. That approval of this applicatfon constftutes approval of the proposed request only to tl~a extent that
it complies wfth the P.nahelm Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicabla City, State and Federal
regulations. Approval does not include any actioi~ or findings as to compliance or appro.ral of the
request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOWED that the Anaheim Ctry Plann(ng Commission d~es liereby find
and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon app~icant's compliance wfth
each and all of the condftions herefnabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared irnaiid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent Jurisdiction, then this
Resolution, and any approvals herefn r.,onta(ned, shall be deemed null and vofd.
~_ PC96-27
~ ~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
March 4, 1996. _ . ,
.~~ ~
~ i~ ~%~ l~Ct` ~~- -
CF~i WOMAN ANAHEIM CITY f~ NNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~ ~, i
~1!~.Ml1'
SECRETA Y, AHEIM CITY PLANNING CONiMISS10N
STATE OF CAUFORNiA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarfta Solorio, Secrrntary of the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Cornmission held on March 4, 1996, b~ the following vote of the members thereof:
AYcS: COMMISSIONERS: k30STWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS Wi ~EREQF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~J~ day of o Ll~ ~
1996.
., ~ r~ ~~~'
SECRETARY, NAH IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-5- PC96-27