Resolution-PC 96-55~ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM GTY i'LAWP!!NG COMA&ISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL US~ PERMiT NO. 3343 BE GRANY~D, IN PART
WHEREAS, the Anahelm C(ty Plar+ntng Cammission did receNe a verified Petftton fw
Conditional Use PertnEt for r,~!'~:~n real property sltuated in the Gry of Anahefm, Courriy of Ora~ge, State
of Calffomla, descri~d as:
~ TI'iE EAST 146.00 PEET OF THE NORTH 170.00 F~ET OF TF{E PdOFiT''rIEA~T
QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF YFiE NORTHEAST Q'JARTER O~F
TiiE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, IN TOWNSHIP 4 SCJ'!'!i F1,~PJGE
71 W~ST, iN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, NAAP BOOK 51, PAGE 15
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE CAUNTY.
- THE NURTH Sfi0.00 FEET OF THE WEST 50.00 FEET OF THE tAST 198.00 FF.ET
,, OF THE NORTH 260 FEET OF THE NGRTHEAST QUAFiTER OF THE
MORTHEAST DUARTER OF THE NORTHEAS'f ~UARTER OF SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH RANGE 19 WEST, RANCHO LOS COYOTES, MAP BOOK
51 PAGE 11, MISC~LLANEOUS MAPS OF ORANGE COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Gty Planning Commission d(d hoid a puW~ hea~ing at the Civic Cerrter
in the City of Anahe(m on June 10. 1996 at 1:30 p.rtt., notice of sald publk heering having been duiy given
as rcaquired by law and in accordance with the pravisions af the Anahelm Municlpal Code, Chaptor t8.03,
to hear and consfder evidence for and agalnst sald propo,ged cond~lonal use permft and to Irnestigate and
make ~ndings and recortxnerxi~tlons in connection therewfth; and
WHEREAS, said Commissior~, after due irupection, Irn~stigaUon a~d study macle by itsalf
and (n Rs behalf, and after due consideratbn of all evtdence and reports offered at said hearing, does ftnd
and determine the fdlowing facts:
1. ThaY the proposed usa is properly one for whlah a condittonal use pertnk ~S autho~ized by
Anaheim Mun~ipal Code Sectlons 18.44.650.060 and 18.44.050.085 to permit used automobGe sales and
automotive vehide repatr, with retap sales aruf In~allatlon of at~essory automob4e parts, in a fwmer
gasoline senrice statlon with waiver of the fdlo~uinp:
Section 18.44.064.030 - Permftted encroachmerrt into setback.
(~axfmum 36-tnch hiqh screen wall permitted In ftoM
10-foot setbacks, ~-foot h~h wrouqM iron fence proposed
along Uncdn and Magnolfa Avenues;
no outdoor dlsdav permftted in f~'ortt 10-foot setbacks.
,~J,sdav of ftve used vehides for sale proposed 3 feet from
Llncdn and Maondla Avenuesl
2. Tnac tr,e proposed waive~, r~rtain(ng to peRnkied encroacnmeras ~rno irora secbacks (co
permft a 6-foot high wrought iron fenc~ and outdoor d(splay (n the nor~i setbacks adjacera to Uncoln and
Mag~ol(a Avenues), is hereby denied on the basis tt~at there are no excepUor~al or extrr~ord(nary
circumstances appl~able to the property irndved because the site plan .~ be modffied, with no
substanUal knpact on the park(ng, to provtde the reqWred landscaping; and because constnictbn d the
proposed 6-foot high wrought kon fence adJacerU to l.lncdn Avenue arrd Magnolia Avenue would minimize
the effect of the requlred landscaping;
CR2n"69MS -1- PC96-55
k~
' (
L.J
3. That sWct aPP~~ation of tt-e Zoninp Code does nd cleprNe the property d p~iviie9es
enJoyed by other properties under identical zonkig dassiflcation in the v~cinRY because wrougM Iron
fencing and oubdoor dis~lay in tront setbacks has not been peRnftted on other CL za~ed propertles in the
immedlate area;
4. That tho proposed use, conslstl~9 d autort~tNe vehide repak w~h accessory uses, is
propedy one for wh~h a cond~ional use pertnk is authortzed by the Zoning Code;
5. TF~at the pcoposed use, as 9~arrted~ wYl not adversely affed the adjdning Iar-d uses and
the growth and developmeM d the area tn wh{ch 1t is proposed to be located;
s. mac tr,e size and shF-r~e a u,e sit~e ror u~e proposed use. as graraed, is adequate co al~ow
tne ful~ aevelopmera of U,e rxoposed i,,se In a maru~er noc detrfinerna~ to U,e part~tlar area nor co tr-e
p~ace~ haslth, safety, and general welfare;
7. That tFse traffic gE+neratect by~ the proposed use wpl not ImPose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways deslpr~ed a~d i~'oved to carrY the trafNc tn the area;
e. TFiat the yrantir-G d ths cxmdUlona! use Ferm~, under the c~nditions knposed~ wUl not be
deMmental to the peace~ health~ safety er~C general welfare oF the citiz~ns of the Ciry of Anaheim; and
9. That one person irxlic9ted her Pre`'.~en~e at said P~blic heariny in opposiilan; and that no
coResporxlence was receNed tn or~position to the subJect petition.
^"!~FORNIA Eh""RONti"ENTAL QUA~lT~l ACT FINDING: That the Anahefm Gty Planning
Comm(ssbn has reviewed the proposal to pem~~ used autanobqe sales and aucomotNe vehide repalr,
with retap saies arxl installatton of accessory sutomobCe parts, in a fortner gasdine servke station wfth
waiver d permftted errcroa~h~nents irrto fta~t setbacks on an kregularly-shaPed Parcel of land conslsUng
of approx(mately 029 acre locatad at the souchwast comer of Uncdn Avenue and Magnoiia Avenue,
havtng ftontages of approxtmately 128 feet on the soutt- side oF Uncdn Avenue and 85 feet on the west
side of M~gndla Avenue, and further described as 2600 West Lf~co~n Avenue; and does hereby appro~re
the Negative Dedaratlon upon Hriding tl~at the dedaratlo~ reflecxs the indeperxJent JudflemeM of the lead
agency and that k has considered the Negatlve Dederatbn to~ether with anY comments received du~ing
the pubib ravlew process ar+d furtF~e~ flnding on the basis of the inittal study and any comments received
cr,ac cneae is no sut~stantial evidence u,at u,e pro~ecc w~u nave a signiftc~nc effecc on cne ern~ironment.
NOW, THE~EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City PlanNn~ Commisslon does
hereby graM subJect Petition for Condttbnal Use Perma, tn parl, upon tha fdlowing conditions ~~ to
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisfte ta the proposed use of the subJect property
preserve the saf~y and general welfare of the CClttzens of the Cfty of Anahelm:
t. Tiiat the ovvner of subJect properry sttall submft a Iet4er requesUnq term(natton d Cor~dftional Use
Permit No. ~592 (pe~niuir~g wck arxt uauer rst,rals In c~nJuncuon wftr, an exlstlr~y pssd~ne stacionl
to the Zoni~9 Division.
2. 'That thls pertnit shall oxpire ane (1) year from th~a date of this resaludion on June 10. ~ss~.
3. That the park(ng lot shall be compietely paved with either cemeM or asphalt TF-e park(ng loi surface
shall be malntained arxf repaired when necessary to prevent poUioles and uneven surfaces.
4. That no outdoor storage of, displsy of~ or work on vehides or veh~ular parts shall be peRnftted.
5. That no banners, pe+mants or balloons shall be Permicted uNess a Special Everrt Permft is ftrst
oWain~d.
-2- PC96-55
~
6. That the e~dstfny pole alyn shaU be removed~ and ti~at anY ProPo~ fr~~~ ~9~~ 8~1 be
a morwmera rype and ahau noc exc~ed eigra (e) teec In r~elgr~t. a~ otner sigr~age sr,a~~ comply with
the Code requkements uf the CL'Corrwr~erclal~ Umited' Zone ttnless a variarx~ altowing slgn wafvers
Is appronred by the Pler~ninp Camtnfssion.
7. That flnel IandscaPe Plans stwwkq tninknutn flfteen (15) pellat slzed trees~ equalin9 a ml~kn~xn of
one ~~~ vee ror e„ery ewer,ry ~~o> ik,ear reec a s~reet froMa~e, in mtnimum te~ (10) foot wide
laridacaped setbacks alony the north (Uncdn Averxie) and east (Magnol(a Avenue) Prope~'h~ Itna~a
shall be sutxnitted to the Zoninq Dwision of the Plaruikq DeQartment for review and approval by the
Planning Cortxn(ssion as a Reports ard Recorrunetxiations item.
8. That no banners or other advertising shall be displayed withhin the servtce bays facing the publ~
vights~of-way ur~less a Speclal Event Permlt has flrst been tssued.
9. That any Vee plaMed on-site shell be -epiaced in a timely manner in the evssst 4hat It Is ramoved,
damagad~ diseased and/or dies.
10. That the eocistiny c~rwPtes (o~tnally a part c~ the prevlous service statio~ cor.stnx~lon) siwU be
removed.
11. That the ex(sttng bu0d~ng she~l be eMirely repa.4-4eci.
12. That the fences endosing ths e~derior storage area to the rear (sauth) and slde (west) of the bupdfng
shall be rernoved and that no exterlor storage oE any type shall be pormitted.
13. That the trash enclo~ure ahall be relocated to the west slde of the exisiing buqding. That doors
(ope~ings) of the trasFi endosure shall,~ be orieMed towards Lincoln Avenue and, furth~~ that vk~s
shall t~ planted ~dJacerd to the waus of the trash endosure to provkie screenir~y d the endos~ue
and to prevent ~rafffti opporwnitles. The exacx loc~tion oF the trash endosure (on the west side of
thc buYdin~ st~aU be subJect to the eevlew end approval d the Depactment d Publ~ Wo~fcs,
Sanlt~Uon Division.
~ a. ~rr,ac revised ~arxlscape pans sr~au be sutxs,itted to che zonU~y ~Ivis~or, for review and approva~. sa~d
ptans stx~il show compliance wkh el! conditbns uf approval and Code requirements perteining to
landscaping.
15. That within a period of nine•.y (90) days irom ihe date d this resdutfon, Condidon Nos. 1, 3, 6, 7, 10.
11, 12, 13, 14 and 17, herein-merdioned, shall be completed.
16. That subject pr~peny shaU be developed substardtally In acxordance with plans and specfftcatbns
submitted to the City oF Anahelm by the petltia~er arxi whlch ptans are on file with the Plann(ng
Departmerd marked Exhibh No. 1.
17. That no ca~s shall be dlsptayed and/or so{d untN the required Iandscaping is InsteUed and all other
requlred Improvemerits are competod.
18. That a maximum d tour (4~ aara at~a{i be displayed at sny or~a Ume.
~s. mat tne applccaru shau pay ror gbc (s) c,ode enrorcement (nspecclons t~ be conducted ranaorr~ly
throughout the one (1) Y~ ePPr~ P~~•
20. That prbr to flnal bupding and zonk~q inspections, Condftton No. 16, ebove-menttoned, shell be
compted wfU,.
~ PCi)6-55
~ ~
21. rnac approval of tr,is aPP~ic:ac~on constuutes epprawa~ of the Proposed ~1"~ °~y to the e~ae~d tl,ac
k complfes with the Anahefm Mun~ipal Zonin9 Code and anY o~er aPWk~ble CitY, State and Federal
regWations. npprovai does not ~ndude s~y aaro~ «flndinps as co c«npliance a aPPro~ a~
req~+est repard~~9 anY M~ aPP~(c~ble ondinance~ repulation or requkemeM.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim CItY P~ennin~ Comr~ssion does herebY flrtd
and detem~ine thet adc~ptb~ of this Resduc.w: ~s s~esslY Predk~tsd upon appik~'s ~~ w~,
each arxi aU of ttre cor-~~~~s herekiabove set forth. ShnWd arry s~x~ condltffon~ or any part thereof, be
deda~e:! G-svaiki or ~u~er~#o~ceable by the flnal Jud~menc d any court of competerrt lu~isdk;tion, then th~s
Resdutlon~ snd a~Y aPPrava~$ herein c~r-tak~ed~ shaU be deerried nwl and vdd.
THE FOi~E~OiNG RESOLUTION was ad et the Plann~9 ~~''~O~ ~~ °f
June 10, 1996.
~ ,~~_
(~lP~,w~ PRO TEM RE
ANAHEIM GTY PLAN ING COMMISSION
AITEST: _,,
~.Q,m_,~~
SECRETARY, IAHEIM CI~Y Pi.A~VNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY ~F ANAHEIM )
I, Mar~arka Solorlo. Secretary of the Anahelm Clry Plannl~9 Commissbn, do hereby certifY
dhat tha foregoln~ resolution was passed and adopted at a meeUng of the Anaheim City Planning
~mmi8sion held on June 10, 1396, by the fdlow(ny vote oF t1~e members tFierea.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, FIEPININGER, M~SSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BO~THIICK
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MAYER
IN 1WITNESS ~NfiEREaF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~ daY ~~'
1996.
,nr~t~a
SECREfAF1Y, EIM GTY PUWNING COMMISSION
~
PC9&-55