Resolution-PC 96-86~ ~
jaESOLUTION P10. PC96-$6
A RESOLUTION OF THF ANAFiEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AA~:ENDING RESOLIlTION NO. PC94-7 ADOPTED IN (:ONNECTION rVl'iFi
CONUITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3654
WtiEREAS, on January 10, 1994, the Planning Commissfon adopted R~olution Na. PC94-7
appro~ing Condftional Use Permft No. 3654 to pertnft a 12,985 sq•ft sutomotNe repafr facqiry in an existing
b~tlding wtth waNer aF minimum number of parking spac~s;
WHERFIIS, subJect property f~ currentlydeveloped with the a~tomotive repafriacpiry, induding
vehide sales, located in Development Area 2'Expanded Industrial Area~ d SPeclflc Plan No. 341 'Northeast
Mea Speciflc Plan';
WHEREAS, sut~Ject request is the result d Code Erdorcemer~t actlon rel~ted to the sales of
automobqes whlch was not permitted In con~ection with subJect condftional use permft, as a~(ginally
app~oved.
WHEREAS, the petitioner sutlmitted a'iet'~ proposing i~cidentel vehide sales in conJunction
with the existing autwnothie repair facafty, and Indlcadng that tha vehides for sa~e wGi ~ be displayed
outside on the paiicing lot nor vWl the vehides be atored outdoors ovem(ght, and ind~ating that no
addftional advertising~ st~ch as flygs and banners, veGi be displayed unless pertnttted by C!ry Codes.
WHEREAS, tfYS City P~anning Commission dkl ho{d a puW{c hearing at tha Civic Center In
the Clty of Anaheim on August 19, 1996, at 1:30 p.m., notir.e d safd publlc heering having been duly given
as required by law and in accordance with the provisfons of the Ana'~eim Mun{cipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and considar evidence for and against said proposed amendment and to Irnestigato and make
8ndtngs and recommendatlons in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissio~~ after due Inspectlon, imiest~gedon etxi studY made by Itsetf
arxl In fts behatf, arxl after due consideration of ail evidence and reporta offerad at saki hearing, does Nnd
arsd determine the fdlowing facts:
1. That the petfcioner requests approval d a condRbnal use peRnit urxier autho~itY of Code
Section 18.110.070.050.0544 to permft vehide sales in conjunctton with en existing 12,958 sq.ft. automotl~e
repalr facUlty with the (dlowing waNer.
,~g~tion 18.110.070.100 - permttted encroachmerrt Irrto ~aulred varda.
2. That the requested waNer is heroby denied on the basls that the petftlonAr aubmitted e letter
prfor to the publ~ hea~ing ind~ating that there would be no encroachre~errts into requlred yarda because
there wouid be no outdoor dlsplay o( vehides for sale or for ovem{gM storage;
3. That the pro~, osed use, as amended, is propeiiy one for wh~h e condkio~al use pemift is
authorized by the Znning Code;
a. rt,at che proposed use, as amer,ded~ wu~ na ed~rerse``y aHea tt,e ad)aning land uses and
the growch and development of the area in wh~h ft fs proposed to be located beceuse the accessory
vehide sales, in conJunctbn with the autortwthie repair facUlty, wNt not affect the surroundinq Industrial and
protesslonal off~e uses;
CR2713MS.WP '~' P~~
~ ~
5. That the size and shape of the sfte tor the pro~sd use. as amended, !s ade~quate to allow
the full deveiopment of the p+'oµ;~d use ~n a mannor rwt dE,Mmer+tal to the partic~-'lar a~ ~ to the
peace, health. safety and general we~'iare because the vehide sales ares w-I be accessor~ co the existing
automoWe repair facility, and the sales area vvill encompass oniy tho desigr~ated 2,000 sq.ft. area within
the existing 12.958 sq.ft. rapa(r facQiry~ and that no vehldes shail be displayed in the parking lot, nor shail
any vehides be stored ou~side ~ bu0ding ovemigM:
use~ as arcended, wNl not impose ar: undue
6. That the trafflc ~enereted bY ~ ~~ to carry the iratflc in th~ area:
burden upon th,e streets a~d h~9hw~Ys d~
7. 1'hat the granting d G'~e conditlo~a! use PeRnk, under the cwnndftions Imposed, w81 not be
deMmentai to the p~ece~ he~tih, safetY and generai weflare d the cfUzens d the CicY d Anaheim~ arxi
bl~ hea~ing ln opposlcbn, and that na
e. That no ona indicated ~eor~ o~ b1 ~~~0".
correspondence wa,g rece~ved In oPP~
~. ue ch:"ROhMENTAL QUAL~T`~ AC7 FIND(bSa: ~~~~"~ ~ P~nning
~1UF ~+rv~.,
Cummisston has reviewed the propc~sal a-~d does hereby find that the Negative Dedaratlo~ proviou Y
approved in «~nneccion wtth Canditksnal Use Pemrx No. ~~I~ that the dedaration refl~ ted
ernironmental documerrtaUon in connection ~ that a has~cons~dered the prevlous~Y aPPro~ed N~tive
independent ~udgement d the lead agency the Wic revtaw process aM fu~ ~~Ing on
Declaration togethsr wtth arry c:ommeMs recsNed du~ing p~
the basis of the Initlal stud~y arxl any comments receNed that the~e is na substarrta! evidence that the
project wAI have e sibnfflc.~rd effect on ttw arnironment.
NOW THEAEFOAE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission da~s ~~b ~ ehide
Resolutlon No. PC9a-7, adopte~ in coRneFion with Condttional Use Permk tJo. 3654, t~e ~~
saiea -^+ conlunctlon with the e x i s Ung 1 2,~ i e a c l. n: a u t c m o W e re p a k f a c A ft Y under suchoricY
S8.ti:: ~7a.05J.0544, a~xl that the reQues~ed waNer d pertnitted enaoachmerrt into requlred ya r ds i s
hereby denied.
AND BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED THAT the oonditior~s af ePPra+e~ °~~"~~y ~Opt~ ln
cannectio~ with Aesdutior~ No. PC~4-7 are h~ereby emendad tc edd the foUowing conditlo~s:
11. That vehide sales sha11 ba accessory to the primary uss ot the automotNe repair iacility
cc~nducted on aubJec~t PropertY~ and that said vehlde sales use ahafi tertninate when the
automotNe re~air uses ceases•
12. That the vehide sales area ahall be limfted to the two thousand (2~000) sq.ic. a~ea inskie tha
exlstinQ buUding, and that no vehides for sa'e shall be eithe~ disP~y~ a~~~ ~~'
13. Thnt any future Keeatand~n0 a~9~6e shei~ be Iimfted to a monurneM siqn as Pe~-~itted by Chapter
18.110.070 d the Mahefm Munlcipal Code, p~e~inlny tc DevalopmaM Aree 2°S t~ ~Orth~~
Area Spec'rfic Plan (SP 94-1).
THE ~OREGOING RESOUITION was adopted at Pla^^~ C~m~~ ~ung ot
August 19, 1996.
~(
~R , q~~.{E~M Cf'T1( LANNIMG COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~ ~
SECRETARY, EIM GTY ~LANNINC COMM SSI~ ON
.2. Pp6-88
~r ~
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Soforio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Gommtssbn~ do hereby certity
that the foregoing resolutton was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Gty Planning
Commission held on August 19, 1996, by the fdlow(ng vote of the members thereaf:
AYES: COMiIAISSIONERS: BOSTWICK BOYDSTIlN, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE
NOES: COMMISSIQNERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PERA7~4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereurtto set my hand this ! U/~ day of _~f11 ~-~
1996. c~v' e^ 1 ,,' _
~tsl/Lvb
SECRETARY, ~, AHEIM CITY PW~lNING COMMISSION
~- ~C96-86