Resolution-PC 96-88~ ~
RESOLUTION NO.~
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIAn CITY PIANNING COMiVIISSfON
THAT PEI'ITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE P~RMIT NO. 3852 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Ar~aheim City Planning Commission did receNe a veriNed Petftion for
Conditionai Use Pennit for certain rsal property situatec! in the Ciry af Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of Calffomia, described as:
PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 10 OF THE GOLDEN STATE
TRACT, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN DE SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP, 'THEREOF RECORDED IN
BOOK 4, PAGES 66 AND 67 OF MISGELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF
ORANGE COJNTY, CALlFORNIA D~SCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT
THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF 7HAT CERTAIN LAND CONVEYED TO
THE STATE OF CALIFQRNIA BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 2786, PAGE 260
OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE AI_ONG THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SAID LOT,
(FOR THE PUIiPOS[S OF THIS DESCRIPTION, SAID NORTHERLY LINE IS ALSO
THE SOUTHERLY LJNE OF ANAHEIM ROAQ AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP), NORTH
74 DEG. 00' 46' EAST 4.11 FEEI'; THENCE SOUTH 6i DEG. 52' 32' EAS7 289.00
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 61 DEG. 48' S5' EAST 290.16 FEET TO THE TRUE POi~dT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTIhUlNG SOUTH 61 DE3. 48' E~a`' ~ST 90.00
FEET; THENCE NORTH 31 DEG. OS' 18' EAST 77.73 FEFT; THENCE NORTH 44
DEG. 04' 19' EAST 259.64 FEET; THENCE ~lORTH 45 DEG. 05' 18' EAST 17•92
FEET; 1'HENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 45' 56' WEST 265.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
0 DEG. 14' 04' WEST 136.36 FEET; TiiENCE SOUTH 28 DEG. 11' 05' WEST
100.00 FEET TO THE SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hdd a pubifc hearing at the Civic Certer
in the Gity of Anahefm on Septemt~er 4, 1996 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said publ~ hear(ng having been duly
gNen as required by law and fn accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Munfcipal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said pruPosed conditi°nal ~se PermK end to
lnvestigate and rnake flndin4)s and recommendations in connectlon therewYch; and
WHEREAS, said Cummfssion, after due inspectlon, (rnest~gatl~n and study rr~ade by ftself
and in its behaif, and after due consideration of all evkJence and reports offered at satd hearing, does flnd
and determine the fdlowing tacts:
1. That the proposed use is property one for whfch a condRionai use pem-ft is authorized by
Anaheim Muntcipal Code Section 18•67.050.050 to permft an automobpe whdesale/auction facility.
2. That the proposed use is properly one for which a condftlonai use peRnft is authorized by
the Zoning Code;
3, 'That the proposed use will not adverse!y affect the adjoining land uses and the 9~owch and
developmerrt of the area in which ft is proposed to be located;
4. Tnat the sfze and shape of the sfte for the proposed use is adeguate to atlow the full
developmeM of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the parNcular area nor to the peace,
health, safety, arxJ general ,welfare;
_~ _ PC96-SS
CR2726DM
~ ~
5. Tt~~t the tra.ffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets ar~d highways designed and impr~ved to carry the traffic in the area;
6. That the granting of the conditional usa pem?;t, under the condftfons imposed wili not be
detrimentai to the peace, health, safe.y and general welfare of the cftizens of the Ciry af Anaheim; and
7. That 2 peopie indicated thefr presence at said puWtc hearing In opposftton; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition tn the subject petftion.
,~AUFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL ~UALITY ACT FlNOING: That the Anaheim Cfry Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permft an automobile whdesale/auction facility on an'.Regularly-
Shaped parcel of land consisttng of approxtmately 0.87 acre located 200 feet south of M(raloma Way,
having a maximum depth of 355 feet, and further desr;ribed as 2550 East Miraloma Avenue; and dces
hereby approve the NegatNe Dedaration upon finding that the dedaration reflects tha independent
Judgement of the lead agency snd that ft has consfdered the NegaUve Dedaration together with any
comments recefved during ths public review process and turiher flndlnq on the basis o6 the inftial study
and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence thai the project will have a signfficant
effect on the ernironmeM.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pianning Commfssion does
hereby grant subject Petition for Condftion~J Usc~ Permit, upon the fdlowing condRions which are hereby
found to be a nece~sary prerequisite to the (~roposed use of the subJect property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the Ciry of Anaheim:
1. That the existing abandoned freestanding pole sign sliall be removed.
2. That the outdoor display parkfng area shall be paved to mfnimize the chance of pollutants from the
vahides seoping fMO the groundwater.
3. (CondlUon No. 3 was deleted et the Septemt~er 4, 199G Planning Commisslon publlc hearing.)
4. That a Water Qualiry Management Plan (W~MP) speciflcaliy ideMifying the bast management
practfces that will be used on-sfte to controi predictable polutaMs ftom storm wates runoff shall be
submftted to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division, for review and approval.
5. That plans shall be submitted tu the Ciry Traffic and Transportation Manager for hfs review and
appraval showing conformance wfth the cuRent verslons of Engtneering Standard Plan No~. 436 and
602 pertaiNng to parking standards and drNeway locatlon. Subject property shall thereupon be
developed and mairrtafned in co~ormance wfth sa(d ~lans.
6. That the automob(le auction shall be conducted a max~mum of one (1) day per week wfth auction
hours Iimited to 12 noon to 5 p.m.
7. That no flags, banners, balloons, or other temporary advartlsing devices shall be pe~rnitted in
conjunr.tion wfth subJect use.
8. That subJect property shall be deveioped substanttally in ~ccordance wich plans and speciflcations
submitted to the Ciry of Ar~aheim by the petitioner and which plans are on flle wfth the Planning
Departmertt marked Exhibft No. 1.
9. That priw to comntiancemeM of the activity suthorized by this resoluUai, or wtth a period of one (1)
year from the date of the resdutlon, which ever occure flrst, Cored~lon Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, e and 12,
herein-mentioned, shall be complied with• Ext9nsions for further Ume ta complete saki corxiitta~s
may be grarned in accordarx:e with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Mun~ipal Code.
-2- PC96-88
~
~
10. That approval of this application constitut~s approval of the propcsed re4uest only to the extent that
tt complfes wfth tha Anaheim Municfpal Zoning Code and any other applic~ble City, State arxi Federal
requ1est regard ~9r anY ather aPplicableeordynancenregulation requirerrx~~"~~ or approval of the
11. That no loading ar~d/or unloading of trucks shall be permftted on any public street.
~2. That a revised landscape pian showing specffic types, slze and ~ocatlon of landscape n'~aterials shall
be submitted to the Zoning Divfston of the Planning Departmerrt for staff review and approval.
13. That no cars shall b~ delNered to this site by transport truck-haulers over thirty (30) feet in length.
14. That all customer and employee parking shall be mafntained on-sfte.
15. That there shal! be no park(ng or display of cars on IandscaPed areas.
for ~p to two (2) Code Enforcement inspections per month, if cletermfned
16. That the applicatrt shail pay
to be necessary by the Code EnforcemeM Division.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anahefm City Planning Commfssfon does hereby find
and detertnine that adoptlon of this Resdution i~ expressly predicated upon appllcanYs compliance whh
each and all of the condftions herelnabove set forth. Should any such condfifon, or any part thereof, be
Re~solution,~and any a provals herelntcontanin d, shall be d emed nul and vo~tent Jurisdictfon, then this
September 4,
ATI'EST:
/Ylc~~u~w ~f~
SECR ARY, AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margartta Sdorb, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commiss~on, do hereby certffy
that the foregoing resdut~on was Passed ~d adopted at a maeting of tt-e Anaheim Cfcy Planning
Commission held on September 4, 1996, by the fdlowing vota of the members thereaF:
AY~S: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK BOYDSTUN, BRISTOI., HENNING~R, MESSE, PERA7A
NOES: CGMMISSIONERS: NONE
AE3SEMT: COMMISSfiONERS: MAYER ~,~~,,,.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, i have hereurrto set my hand this ?~ day of -~~~~e{/v~v~ ~
1996.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted a e Planning Commissfon meeting of
1996.
CHAIRMAN ANAHE~M CITY UWNING COMMISSION
~ C~l~U ~l'~
SECRETARY, FiEIM CITY PLANNIDIG COMMISSION
~ PC96~98