Resolution-PC 97-107~ ~
RESOLUTION NO PC97-107
A RESOLUTION OF TNE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3955 BE GRANTED, IN PART
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commisston did receive a verffled Petition for
Cond(tional Use Permft for certain real property sftuated in the Ciry of Anahe(m, County of Orange, State
of Califomia, described as:
AREA 1:
LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK 3 OF fHE OLIVE STREET TRACT, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED
IN BOOK 5, PAGE 3 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF OREWGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA
REA 2:
LOT 6 AND THE EASTERLY 3.28 FEE7 OF LOT 5 OF THE MCCARTER SUBDIVISION AS
SHOWN 4N A MAP FILED IN BOOK 6, PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AREA~:
LOTS 7 TO 10 OF THE MCCARTER Sl;BDIVISIUN AS SHOWN ON A b1AP PILED 1N
BOOK 6, PAGE 7 OF MISC[LLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CALJFORNIA; LOT 1 AND A PORTION OF LOTS 10, 11 AND 12 IN BLOCK D AND LOTS
10, 11 AN~ 12 IN BLOCK E OF HEINIANN AND SORRENSEN'S ADOITIONAL BUILDING
LOTS, AU_ AS SHOWN ON A MAP FIL.~D IN BOOK 3, PAGE 144 OF MISCELLANEOUS
RECORDS Or LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA; A PflRTION OF LOTS 5, 6 AND 7 OF THE
EYMANN SUBDIVISION, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 7, PAGE 19 QF
NfISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUMY, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission dki hold a pubfic inearing at the CNic Center
in the Ciry of Anaheim on August 4, 1997 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearin~ having been duly
gNen as required by lav~ and in accordance with the prov(sions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear and consider evldence for and against said proposi;d conditior~al use permR and to
investigate and make flndings and rocommendations in connection therewfth; and
WHERE~S, said Commission, after due inspection, investigatiorv and study made by ftself
and in its behalf, and after due considefation of all evidence and reports offered at sa:d hear~ng, does Hnd
and determine the following facts:
CR3009PLWP -1- PC97-107
~~
~~
PAR EL A:
t. That the proposed use ts Fropedy o~e foc whic•h a conditional use permit is authorized by
Anahetm Municipai Code SecUQn 18.32.050.045 to tonsti:~ct a 2-lot, 6-unit RM-2400 attached "affordabl$,
airspace' condominiurn subdivision wicti waivers of the follo~ving:
~,(i) G~~^tions 1t332.062.012 - Maximum stn.~cti;.a~ nelaht.
and 18 32 062.013 (1 stON permitt6d within 150 feet of single family zoning and
building heigM n~t to exceed one-half the setback ftom the
singie famlly zoning;
2 stories proposed and 24-foot high building proposed 11
feet ftom RS-5,000 zoning)
A(2) ~R~;tion 18.32.063.02$ - Mirfmum stnicttaral and !a^~~^'^°~ ~Qrt,ar.~c adiacent_t4
~ngie famitv developments•
A(3) Sections 18.32.066._~14 - Minimum number of oarkina saaces.
15.06.050.0121 (1~ required; .1~, proposed)
~,r,d 18.06.080
A(4) ~ection 18.~?_.080.010 - Macimum site cover~~e.
Mfnim~m rpaufred rer~~arion-lelsure areas.
A(5) Section 1 fi.32.Q80.020 - `Fn ~~,
k. oer dwellina unit, includln;~ ~~~bi~ recreational
iliti requ(red; ~'°'•^ °A~ ~^ ~'- ^gr dwellina unft and S
~,ssb_lg recreational fac(Iftig,~ proposed)
PAR FL B:
2. Petftioner requests approval of a condfticnal uso permh under author3ty of ~ad6 Section
18.31.050.090 to cor~struct a 43-Iot, 41-un?t RM~3000 detached `aHordable' one-+amily dweNing subdivtsion
witla waNers of the following: _
B{~) Section i8'"~1•U61.012 - Minimum build(na site area.
(~•000 sa•it• Pequired for detached one-famny dwellfngs; 2.615
to 2.99Q sa.ft. propose:S)
~3(~t ~t on~.18.31.06z.Qj 2 - M~ Y~mnm gtfUCt~l'81 h@Iaht.
na d fi8,$~ 04?2 1 1 t pennitted wfthin 150 feet of a single-fam(ly residentlal
zoning and b~llding height not to exceed one-half the
setback from the single famUy zoning;
2 stories proposed and 22X-foot high detached
condominlums proposed 2Y4 to 20 feet from RS-5,000
z~ning)
B(3) $ertion 18.31.063.012 - ~,Ainimum structural setback ~~acent to a lo street.
- 1 f t fully landscaped required; 6 to 13 f~ proposed an
Cypress Street, Adele Street, Sabina Street and Pauline
Street)
_2_ PC97-107
~
Fs{4) Section 18 31.063.021 - VLIlnirnum ~trurturao setback for buitdina walis
wfth froM errtrancas• 14 f t requtred; 6 to 11 feet proposed
along prNato stre~t}
B(5) Section 18.31.063•024 - M9nimum ~~4~~~ ~~tback adjacent to sinsal milv
y~velonr~gn_t,~.
( p f~et with trees planted on maximum 2p-foot centers
requtred; ~ to 1634 feet with trees planted on 1~} to 40-foot
S~t~ ProPosed)
g(6) ,~~ons 1~.31.d~031 - inim ir r tl ~
(1.A00 sa.it. recreatfon-leisur~ area per unft requlred when
private yard areas are proposed;
7~7X to 2 894.5 sq.ft. preposedl
Bm c~,.ri,,,, ~aat,o6~.G11 - FAlnimum distance bQtween butldina walis.
(17 feet required; 14.t9~.~ Proposod)
B(S) ,~~t(on 18 31.D66.052 - Min(mu°n off ~treet vehlde access rea~!(rements.
~~ehicles baclcing onto pubtic streets ftom park~ng areas
proh~bfted; backing from garages and drive•~nrays onto
Gypress Street, Sabina Street and Paullne Street proposed)
3, That the proposed uses are properly ones for which a corxlftional use permit is authorized
by tha Zoning Code;
4. That t~he proposed uses will not adversely affect tha adjoining land uses and the growth
antl development of the area in which ft is proposed to be located be~u~e !! will provide ownership
hausir~g tn an area assembled by the Redevelopmeni Agency to provide replacerr+ent housing for the
mixed density housing which existed on the project site for several decades;
5. That the size and shape of the sftes for the proposed uses are adequate to allow the h~tf
development of the proposed uses in a manner not detrimental to the partioular area nor to the peace,
health, safety and general weffare;
g, That the 4~~ffic generated by the proposed uses w~l not impose an uruiue burden upon
the streets and ~ighways designed and improved to carry the crafflc In the area;
7. That the granting of the conditionat use permft, under the condftions (mposed, will not ba
detrimental to the peace, health, safery and general welfare of the citizens of the Ciry of Anahe~r'n,
6, That wafver A(1), maximum structural height, is hereby approved on the b~sis ti~at there
are specia! ci~cumstances appltcable to the property conststing of its locatton and surroundings, which do
~ot app~y to other iderrtically zoned properties in ihe vicinity anc! that strict applicatlon of the Zonirr~ Code
dsp~ives the property of prNpe9es enjoyed by other properties under identfcal zoning dassffication in the
v~iniry because the majo-ity of the adjaceM and nearby single-tamqy zoned properties are developed with
uses other than single-famGy reslderitial and that the pro~osed 24foot high structures are simUar to the
heigMs of thase surrounding residentlal structures;
g. That waNers A(2), minimum structural and landscaped setback adjacerrt to single family
developments, and A(4), maximum sfte coverage, are hereby denied on the basis that they were deleted
following public notiflcation;
~. PC97-107
r~' ~
10. That wafver A(3), minimum number of partcing spaces, is here'~y aAproved on the basis
of 3 addftiona! parking spaaes cn Private Street 'A' being counte~ towarc( the requirerJ pa~{cing; that
these add~ional space~ will be wRhin the boundaries of the tract map and the future homeownars
assaciation will own the underlying land; and that the CC&R's for the project wllE incltxle covenants wh(ch
require the homeowners' assaciatfon to maintain the streat, curbs, sidewalks, parkway landscaping,
parking, signage, etc., s~dJacent to the project on Pauline Street and, therefore, thiese parking spaces will
be an integral part oi thr~ stte;
11. That the parking waNer A(3), u~der the condftions imposed, will not cause fewer off-street
parking spaces to be provlded far such use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate
all vehicles attributable tn such use under the normal a-*d reasonably foreseeable condftions of operation
of such use;
12. That the parking waiver; under the cond'Rions imposed, will not increase the derrurid and
competttion for parking spaces upon the public streets in the Immediato viciniry af the proposed use;
13. That the parking wafver, under the condicions imposed, will not increase the demand and
compethion for parking spaces upon adjacent prNate property in the Immedfate vicinity cf the proposed
use (wfiich property is not expressly provided as parking for such usa under an ~greement in complfance
wfth Section if3.06.010.020 of this Code);
14. That the parkSng wa:ver, under the conditlons imposed, will not Increase traffic congest(on
whhin the off-street parking areas or lots provided for such use;
15. That the parking waiver, under the condY•ions imposed, wU~ not Impede vehicular ingress
to or egress from adJacent properties upon the publ(c streets in the immediate vtciniry of the propos~d
us~e;
16. That waiver A(5), minlmum recreationai-lefsure area, ts hereby approved on the basis that
salcf requirement can be compited with by inciuding areas located In the front setbacks which will be
fenced or hedged far use by individual condominium owners as prNate space; that there are specfal
circumstances applicable to the properry such as location and surroundings, which do not apply to other
identicaliy zoned properties in the viciniry; and that strlct, appli~ation of the Zoning Code deprhies the
property of ~rivileges enjoyed by other properties under identica~ zoning classfficatlon in the vicfntty
because this waiver has previously been granted for other similar projects in the Ctry;
17. That waiver B(1), minim,um build(ng site area, is hereby approved on the basis that an
avarage of 3,187 sc~.ft of larx! area per unft is provided which exceeds the Code requirement; and that
the proJect consists nf assembled parcels creating a hardship upan the development af the property;
18. That waivers B(2), maximum structural height, and B(5), minimum sVUCtural setback
adJacent to sir~gla family deve,topments, are hereby approved on the basis that the properties adJecent to
Parcel B, although zoned RM-5000 (single family residential), are actually deve~oped as multiple family
dwellin~s as a result of the Cfty down zoning the entfre area f~s 1991 in order to discourage any new
multiple family apartments and to encourage qualiry single family developments In the area;
~ PC97-107
~ ~~
19. That waivers B(3), min(mum structural setback adJaceM to a local street, B(4)~ mfn(murn
siiuctural setback for buAding walls with firont entrances, B(~, rr-in(mum distances betwaen br~f~ding w'alls,
and B(8), minirnum off-street vehlde access requirements, are hereby approved on the basis RMat the stngle
family detacheci design of the unfts is not at~uays compatible wfth traditional Code requirem~snts rr~htch
assume an attached design; that although attached unit design provides greater land area~ for setba~cfcs
anc! commc-n recreational-leisure areas, ft does not provide the amenfties this detached project does
~including large p~vate yards, setbacks be'tween units, greater privacy within an owned un~, and private
t,,ra-ca~ garlges wfth nnro-car private drtvaways comparabfe to single famUy homes wfthir~ the R'S zoning
categories);
20. That wraiver B(6), minimum required recreaUon-Ielsure aroas, (s hereby approved on the
basis that the overall average prNate yards in the proposa! meets Code requiremerits and Yha[ Yhe pr'wate
frord yarcls increase the recreatfon-lelsura area although they are not counted toward Code rec~Ufrpzne~nts~
21, TFrat there are special circumstances applicablo to both Parcel A and Pancel B crrns(sting
of location and surroundings, which d~ not apply ta other kientically zoned properttes in the rr1cinfty;
22, That strict applicat3o~ of the Zoning Code deprhres both parcel ~A arid P.arcel Q of p~rileges
Anjoyed by other proparttes under identical zaning ciassfficafion In tha viciniry; $nd
23. Thai o~ne pe~son spoke in ir~vor of subject request at said public hearing; and that no ~one
spoka in oppcsRlon and no correspondence was recefved in opposftion to the subJect pst~lon.
~AUFOPihIA ENVIFiONMEN'fAL QUAI ITY ACT FlNDtNG: That the Mahefm City Plarning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to construct a 2-lot, 6-ureR RM-2400 attached 'affo~cisbie, airspe.ce'
condominium subdNtsion wfth walvers of maximum strt~ctural helght, minlmum structurai and landscaped
setb,ack adJaaont to single fampy developments, minimum number of parking spaces, ma~mum site
caverage and min(mum requtred recreation-letsuro areas of Parcei A; and to conswct a 43-lat, 41-unit
RM~000 detached 'affordable' or~e-famGy dwelling subdNtslon wi~h waNers of minimum buGding site ~rea,
maximum structural height, m3nimum structural setback adJacent to a focal street, minimum structr~ral
setback for buflding walis, minlmum structural setback adJaceni to singla famUy developments, minimum
requfred ~ecreation-leisure aroas, minimum distance between buiidfng walls and minimum off-streot vehicle
access requirements on Parcel B; arsd that Parcel A and Parc~l B consist of a 4.6 acre irregularty-shaped
property identifted as the "Cypress Irrfi~l' proJect araa; and does hereby approve 'the NegaWe Dedaration
upon flnding that the dedaraUon reflects the independerot Judgement of the I+aa~d agency and that it has
consGdered the Negative Dedaration together wfth any c;ommems receNotf during the publtc review
procgss and further flnding on the basis of the Initiai stutly and r: ny ~om~nents recetvod Ynat tTreKe is no
substantial evidence that the proJect will have a signiflcant effect on the ernirortment
NOW, TNEREFOFiE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anah~im Ctt~r Planning Connmisstan does
hereby grant subJect Petftion for CandRlonal Use Permtt, up~s~ the foli~wing condftions vrhich are hereby
found to be a ne~essary prerequ[she to the proposed use of the subject property ~n order to preserve the
safery and general welfare of the Cftizens Gf the Ctty of Anaheim:
1. That this condftional use permft is granted subJect to adoptlon of a zoning ord(nance in connection
with RedassHication No. 97-98-01 {Parcel B), now panding.
2. That prior to approval ot a precise grading plan, ai~ conduminium unfts shall be assigned a street
adciress by the Eluilding Dfvision.
3. Ti^at a prP,cise grading plan shall be submittad to the Put,lic Works Departmerrt, Developmert
S~arvices'~Nision, for approval by the Ciry Engineer.
~- PC97-107
~/$', ,
~
~~11~n
,}, '~~x ~primT qo grad,[ng plan appravai, 2Me dsveloPer shail recnrd a Saae Harmiess Agreement in a form
approaed by the C~ty Attomey ~o a~cept p~ebtic drainage.
5, 'f~na~ prior to grading plan appsauai, 'Che de~eioper shall submft evldsnca ~o the Pubiic Works
Uepartmsnt, Develvpment Services nNision, that clear tiUe has been obtained for all properties
in~t~ded on th~a tencative tract rnap-
6. ThaY trash storage areas sha~t be provlded and maint~4ned in locattons acceptable to the Pubiic
Works Departmerd, Streets ar+d San~t7on Dfi~ision, acxl 'In accordance wfth approved plans an flle
with sa&i D~par~mer~t. S~~ct~ infarmatfon s1~a11 be specifica9y shown on ihe plans submitted fo~
building pertnRs•
7 o~t~ Public Wflrks Departme~t, Streets a+xf San'itation D(vis on for~ov(ew and ap,orc~ submhied
g bepartmer~an+d9n accordancs with speciflcation~s on Hie wikhl sr31d d~~pau~~n y~e PubBc Wocks
g. That the purc:~aser of each residentlal dwe~lin9 unlt shall be provided with v~itten ~nformation
conceming Anahe~-w Municipal Code Section 14.32.500 pertaining to 'parlcfng restricted to tacilitate
street sweeping' Such wr4tten fnformation shalf clearly indicate w~hen on-streei parkin9 ts pzohibfted
arxi the penalty for violation.
t0. That an on-sfte trash truck tum-around area shall be provided and mr~~ntai~ned to the sztfsfaction of
the Publlc Works Department, Streets and Sanftation Division, in accordance with submftted and
approved ~tans. Said tum-around area shatl be speciflcaAy shown on plans submitted for buUcJing
peRnfts. Addftionaliy, a detailed plan for trash barrel collectionr~ ~' ~`~9~t~~1 ~an shalil be
sunmltted to the Streets and Sanitatior~ DNisi~n for review and app
induded in the development agreament (CC & R's)
~ 1. That maintenance of the dead end portlon bf the west end of th~ alley shaii be the responsibUity of
the homeowners assoclation becsuse Ctty sweepe~rs ~cannot access th(s areE; and that said
responsibll'~r shall be included In the Condftlons, Covenants and Restrictions (CC & R's).
12. That the owner of th(s property shatl submtt a tetter requesting terminati~n of Condftional Use Permft
No. 3906 (to permit a 51 unR, 2 story aHordable condominfurr~ com~leu wfth waiver of maxlmum
structural height, minimum structura! setback, minlm~~m ~istance between bupdings, minimum number
of required parkin9 sP~~es and minrmum recreatfon-lolsura area) ~o the funing Divlslon.
13. That alt exlsting drNe~vaYs shall be rer~~oved ar-d re~lac~d v+fth s;tar~ard curb, 9utter, skiewalk and
Iandscaping.
14. T~vate streetst~ pravided,~howe er~that s~id iewalks may tr9 ~ nstructed oMy on~the Lauth skie of h
P
street
15. That plans shall be submitted to the Ciry Traffic and TransporcaUon M;~~ager for review a~d aPP~~
showing co~ormance with the tatest revisians af En~(~aer!n~ ~ta~-dard 0!~8 N~~ The~eupon be
pertaining to parking standards and drt•~aw~y lacatEons. Su6j~+ct P P RY
developed and maintained in confomtiance ~~Ith sak3 ~lans,
~- PC97-107
~ ~
16. That prfor to is~uance of a bui(ding peRnft or within a period of ntnety (9t]) days from ths date of ihis
resolution, the developer shall pay a trafflc and transportaUan imRrovemeM fee ta the Cfty of
Ar~aheim, T.rafflc Engineering ~h-ision, tn the amount established by the Clty Councp resducton. This
fee wUl be used to fund Vafftc and transportation improvemerds wicl'-in the area impacted by this
pro~ect. Said tee stial~ be subject to adJustmerrt by the ~Ciry CouncA.
17. That rdi-up gara9e doors shall be shown on pians submitted for buUding perrnits. Said dooss ~~
be Installed and mafnta-ned as shown on approved plans.
18. That pians sfiall be submitted to the City Traffic and TranspartaNon Manager for review and apProval
showing car~formance with E~ginee~ing Standard No. 137 perta(ning to sight distance visibiliry far
fences, walis, iandscaping and sign locatlons.
19. That dothes washer and dryer hookups shall be incorporated Into each dwelling unft and sh~ll be
shown on the plans submitted for bupding permics.
20. That an unsubordinat~t! covenar~t shall be recorded wtth the Offlce of the Orange County RecorcSer
agreeina to provf~e the buyer of each dwetling unft wtth w~itten I~ormaUon obtained nom the school
dEstricts perta~nin~ to possibla overcrcwded condftions arxl busing status oi the schc~ois serving the
dwelling unit A copy oF the covenant shali be submitted to and approved by the Ctry Atiomey prior
to recorciatlon. A copy •~f t3~~e recorded covenant shal~ be submitted to the Zoning Oivisfon.
21. That an AHordaW~ Housing A~reement shail be recorded wfth the Office ot the OranQe Counry
Rec~order that a minimum of twenry five percent (25%) of ihe units shall be affordable to lower Income
persons and fampies a~ the remaining seventy Me (7596) of the unfts shall be aifordable to rnoderate
income persons and famairs.
~. for ~evie and PP ~~ g~Y decisionr mado byrthe Zoni QID Islo~rtr garding sad~plan nayibe
appealed to the Planning Commission.
23. That minimum fifteen (15j gallon sized trees (or larger, as shown on the preliminary landscape plansS,
wfth appropriate irrigatlon facilhies, shall be planted and maintained as shown on ap~rovecl exhibtts
and as may be further conditioned herein. My tree planted on•sfte shail be replaced in a timeiy
manner in the everst that ft is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead.
24. That minim~m flve {5) gallon slzed dinging vines shall be planted on maximum fNe (5) foot centers
and maic~talned along and on all sdid fenae surfaces.
25. That three (3) to four (4) foot high wrounht Iron fencing shall be Instal~ed along the pertmeter of the
apen recreational-leisure lot at the northeast comer of CYpress Screet and Prtvat~ Street A Said
'Fe~cing shall be submftted to the Planning Departme~: ~or review and approve~ prior to issuar~ce o#
a buUding permft.
26. That gates sha~l ~I he installed across any drNeway or p~ivate st~egt in a manner which may
adversely gffect vehicular uaffic In the adJacent public streets. Installation ofi any gates st~ll cortform
to Enginee~ing Sta ~a O~P~a~9o P~o io ~~~nce of a buAd ng pe ~~~ppf ~~ by ~e Ctty
7raiflc and Tran„po
27, That al~ garages shall bo constructed wich minimum interior dimensions of twenh/ (2QI feet by twenty
(20) fee:, whlch shall be speciflcal~Y shown on pians submitted ¢or bupding permfcs•
28 That plans sh~~ving hav~ the vehlcWar security gates and vehide tu~n-around area w01 function shall
be submftted to the City Trafflc and Transportxtlon Manager for revtew and aPP~oval•
-7- PC97-107
~~ ~
29. That subject properry sFia~l be devetoped :S~~antlally In ~ccordance wfth pians and speclflcations
submitted to the ~th~ ~f Anahetm by the ~~etRiarv.~r and whfch ~lans are on file wfth the P~anni~g
Department marked EEchlbft t•Jos. 7 through` ~; and as corxlhioned herein.
30. That piior to i~s>~aa~ce of a bufiding permft or within a period of one (1) year ftom the date of this
resolution, wFi.+»haJar occurs ftrst, CondtUon Nos. 1, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 13, 19, 20, 21, 22,
25, 27 ancf 2g, aber~s-mentianed, shall be compl{ed with. Fxtenslons for further Ume to compiete sald
condltiorrR t~iay uo granted in acco~dance witf~ Sectlon 18.03.090 of the Anahefm Mun~ipal Code.
31. Tt~t p~lor co ~inal bunding and zaning insp~ctions, Cond~lon Nos. S, 13, 14, 19, 23, 24, 29. 33. 35
arxi 36, a~c~?n-mers'tioned, shall be complied ~ith.
32. TF;~ pitar to grading plan approval, Condft(on Nos. 2, 4 and 5, above-menttoned, shall be compl~ed
u~th.
33, Ths* skiewalks shall be rsconstructs~ along O!tve Stree~
34. That all river rack or stone shall be real rather than simulated ma4erials.
~5. That the homeowners' assoctation shall be responstble for matrrtalning the trees adjacerrt to the RS-
5,006 zone boundaries and the landscaping between the p~blfc riyhts-of-way and the scructures; and
' that said responsibillty shall be Included In the Condftions. Covenaiits and Restrictfons {CG & R's).
36. That the parktng and access between Parcels A and B shail be shared and maintained by eil:ier a
singte assoclation or other mechanism, acceptable to the Ciry, which ~rAI keep them together, as
preseMed to the Planning Commission at t~he August 4, 1997 public hearing.
37. That ap~roval of this appEicatlon constitutes approval of the propased request only to the excont that
ft complles wfth the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable Ctcy, State and Federa~
regulations. Approwal does not indude any actiun or ftndings as to compliance or approval of the
request regard(ng any ntt7er applicable ordinance, reguiation or requirement
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commtssion does hereby flnd
and determine that adeption of this Resolutton Is expressly predlcated upon appl(cant's compliance wfth
each and al~ of the cond~tons hereinsbove set #orth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared Irnrai(d or unenforceable by the tinal judgment of any court of competent jur(sdiction, then this
ResolWon, and any approvals herefn conisined, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeUng of
August 4, 1997.
/ ) LtiC~~ "'c- .
CHAIRPERSON ANAHEIM CI71f PLANNING CAMMISSION
ATTEST: „
/IT a ~.~,~~
SECRE?ARY, AHEIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
~ PC97-107
s
~ ~~
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )
CAUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. -
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Sdor(o, 3ecretary of the lL~helm Cl~,~ PlaRning Commission, do hereby ~ertify
that the fnregoing resdtrtion w~s pas.sad and adopted at a r.~-ast.lrsu of the Anahefm City Plannfng
Commisston held on Augusc a, 1997, by the fc~lowing voxe of the members tl?einof:
AYES: COMMISSlONERS: BOSTWICK BOYDSTUN, B~i1STOL, HENNINGER, MAYER, NAPflLE~, PEFlA~~4
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~70NE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~ day of _~~~~';
1997. ~ ~
/~'lan~~/'.~A ~ ~..~~ -
SECRETARY, EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ - PC97-107