Resolution-PC 97-137~ ~
RESO~.U'i'fON NU 'PC97-137
A RESOLUTiON OF TNE APdAHE1M CITY PLANNING COMMISSI~I~
THp'I' pETIT[ON FOR COND~TIONAL USE PERMI'1 NO. 3949 BE Dz~*'dED
WHEREAS, the A.naheim Ciry Planning Commission did recei~~•~ :a verified
Petition far CondRtic~nal Use Permit for certain real properry situated in t:~~ Ciry ~f
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
THAT NORTH 6b FEE'f OF THC SOU1'H 528 FEGT ~~ '~E
W~ST 330 FEET O~' THE SOUTHWEST QUAR'I'GR +'JF "fHE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF NORTHWEST Q~f1NT~E42 OF
SEGTION 13, IN TOWNS~-lIP ~ SOUTi-I, RANG~ il'NEST, IN
THE RANCHO LOS CfJYOTES, CITY ~i; A_I'dAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANG~, STATE OF CALiFORNIA, AS
CHOWN O~t A Iv1AP THEREOF RECORDEU IN BOOK S1,
PAGE 1, MISCELLANEO~JS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID
ORANGE CaUN''!'Y•
~XCE.PT 1'~iE Vv ESTF.RLY 9?..00 ~EET '~'El EREOF.
WHEREAS, the City ~'lanning Commission did hold a pubtic hearing at the
C:i~~ic Center in the Citiy of Anaheim on Se~temher 29, 1997 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly ~iven as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim MuniciFal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence
for and against said pr~posed conditicnal use permit and to investigate and make findings
and recommendations in connect;on therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in iu behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reaorts
offered at said hearing, does ~nd and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditi~nal use permit is
authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44.050.160 to retain an existing two-story,
23-anit motel.
2, 'That the proposed use is hereby denied.
3, That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not adequate to
allow the full developmeni of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental ta the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the
City of Anaheim; ,
_~. PC97-137
CR3058PL.WP
~ ~
4. That the pxoposed use ~vill adversely affect the adjoining land uses and tl~e ;_:o~vth
and development of the area in ~vhich it is proposed to be located becai!se this motel operation
has been exercised in a manner which has resulted in an ir~.,rdinate number of calls for service
to this property, causing a disproportionate draw upon Police Department and Code Enforcement
Division resources and causing secondar~ detrimental impact to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim; and that the types of calls for Pclice
Department and Code Enforcemcnt Divisio~i service continue to involve incidents detrimental to
the public health, peace, safety and welfare;
$, That the granting of the conditional use permit will be detrimental to the peac~:;;
health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the c;;ntinuing
and ongoing Code violations and criminal activity indicate the owner's inability to operate this
business in compliance with City, County, and State regulations even afler revocation and/or
modification proceedings for the previous conditional use permit by the Planning Commission.
a Hearing Gfficer and the City Council;
G. That two people spoke in favor of subject request and two people spoke in
opposition to subject request at said public hearing; and that correspondence was recei~~r~_~ in
opposition to the subject petition.
CALIFO1tNIA ENV[RONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDiNG: The Planning
Director or his authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the
definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 21, as defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepar~ an EIR.
NOW, THEREEORE, BE IT RESOLVED that tt~e Araheim City Planning
Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use 1':s7~it, on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGUING RESOLL'TION~as adopte anning, Commission
meeting of Scpternber 29, 1997•
~ I 1.-
CHAIRPE ON - PR~U TEMPORE
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~OMMISSION
ATTEST:
~f~ . L~~
SECjtgTp' Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION
-2- P~97-137
~ ~
STATE OF CALIFOR~IIA )
COUN~'`c' ~F OFcA?~ZCF ) ss.
C1TY ~F ANAHEiM )
I, 11ilarg3rita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certi!'~: t>>at the foregoing resolutior. was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on September 29, 1997, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMIvlISS10NERS: BOYDS'IUN, BRISTUL, HENNINGfiR, MAYER, NAPOLES, PER~.ZA
NOES: CU:vIMiSSIONERS: NOPIE
ABSENT: CO:vIN.ISSIONERS: 00STWICK
IN WITNESS WHEREO~, I have hereunto set my hand this -3~~ day of
_L~~'=l.~a~ -' 1997.
~ ~~
SECRETAR . ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC97-137