Resolution-PC 97-154~ ~
~E,SOA...7TInN NO- PCii7-154
A RESOLUTION OF THE AN.aH~lM CITY PLASdNING COMMISSION
AMENDING CERTAIN CO~D:~fIONS C.'- APPROVAL OF
RESOLUTIC)N NO. 92R-1]1 ADa?T~D 1N C:ONM1ECT[ON WITH
CONDITIONA~. USF r'ERMIT ~C1, 35?G
WHEREAS, on lunc ~i, 1~~11., thc Ci-Y Counci! adoptcd T:esol:,(ion i~Jo. 92R-111 to
approvc Conditiona! Usc Pcrmit No. 351G and pc?an~t a sclf storagc an:] rcerca~icnal •vchidc sto~aga fa~~~~tY with
waivcrs of {~rmillcd Gcc standing siyi locatie~n, minimum numbcr of p•rrkdng spaccs ar+d pcrmittcd numU^.r of
carctakcrs' units; anJ lhat Condition No. 1 c: said resolution spccifics "That subjcct usc shall lw limitcd to a
pcricxl of fi(tccn (15) ycars; providcd, howcvcr, that acfditional timc pcrioJs may hc rcqucsled by thc pctitioncr
pursuant to thc proccdures scl fo~:th in ticction 18•03•(MJ3 of thc Anahcim Municipal Codc:."
~ ~...
WHEREAS, subJect ProPcrlY ~s ~~°~16ix", ~'`'~~h '~ s~lf steragc and rcercational vchiclc storagc
facilily (All Aboard Mini Sloragc) in thc ML (Limited Industrial) z~mc.
WHEREAti, L:+ncc U. Alworlh, rcprescnting All Aboard Mini Sloragc, has rcqucstcd an
amendmcnt to, ur dclctiim ~,f, said Condiliiin Nu. 1, ~::rtainin~! to thc timc limitation, ln pcrmit thc usc for an
adJitiunal 25 ycars'ant~~ D~~~mbcr 31, 21132. hccausc a Icndcr, in conncetion with pcrmancnt finuncing, rcquires
~hat thc timc pcriuJ fur lhc conJi~iunal usc pcrmit I~c 10 ycars bcyor.J thc cxpira~ion dalc of lhc loan.
WHEKL"Ati, thc City Planning Cummitisirn did huld a public hc;uing ~U the Civic Ccnlcr in thc
City of Anahcim on Oclubcr 2?, 1997, al l::ill p.m.. noticc <if s:iid public hcaring ha~~ing bccn July y~cn as
requircJ by law an~,1 in accorJancc with thc pruvitiionti uf ~hc Anahcim Municipal Codc, Chaplcr 18.03, to hcar
anJ cunsidcr ~;vidcna•. for and against said prup~~scd amcndmcnt ans to invcstigatc and m~kc findin~.s and
rceummcndatic~ns in cunncction thcrcwith; and
WHER:r~lS, saiJ Cumm:ssiun, aftcr duc inspcctiun, invcstig:dion and sludy madc by ilscl( and
in i~s Uchal(, and aftcr duc considcraticn of all cvidcncc anJ rcports uffcrcJ at said hcaring, dcx.s find and
Jctcrminc thc fullowing facts:
1, `Thal subjcet cundilion~l usc pcrmil is bcing cxcrci~cJ in thc samc mxnncr and in conformancc
with all conditions and stipulations :ts originally upprovcd;
2, That subjccl usc has opcrated for Gvc ycars ia a manncr not dctrimcntal to thc lcxation nor to
thc surroundinb land uscs, nor to thc public pcua', hcalth, saf~.ty :inJ gcncral wclfarc; xnd thal therc arc no
rcportcd CoJc Enfurccmcnt ar Police Dcpartma~l ~roblcros a.aociatcJ with thc usc;
3, Tbat thc subjccl pn>pcrry ~s IucalcJ in lhc Anahcim Sladium Arca which is currcnlly undcr swdy
but that fulurc ~cvclop-r.cnl in thc arca, including thc Katclla "smart titrcct" corriJor, arc not cxpccted to
advcrscly impact this propcrly, nor is Ihi„ ~~~r~~s~- cxpcctcd to advcrscly impact [uturc plans for the aroa
bccausc subjcct propcrty is irrc~;ularly-sh~ipcd (long ~+nd narrow), it has IimiieJ strcct frontagc, and it adjoins
railroaJ tracks an~~, thcrcforo, ha!: limitcd suitability for morc comcntional lund uscs;
1 PC'~I7-154
CR:,(P)~PL.WP
~ ~
4. That dclction oC Condition No. 1 lo eliminatc thc timc limilation is ncccssary to pcrmit
reasonablc operation undcr the conditional usc pcrmit as originally grantcd; and
5. That no onc indicated thcir prescncc at sai3 public hcaring in opposition; and that no
corcespondence was rcccived in opposition to thc subjeci petilion.
~ALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALiTY AGT FIPJDIN(i: That thc Anahcim City
Planning Commission has reviewcd lhe proposal and docs hercby lind thal the Ncgalive Dcclaration previously
approvcd in conncclion with Con3itionu! Usc Pcrmit is adcquatc to scrvc as thc rcauircd cnvironmental
documcnlntion in conncction wilh this rcqucst upon finding thut thc dcclaration rellcc4s thc indcpcndcnt
judgcmcnt of the; lcad agency and that it has cnnsidcrcd thc previously approvcd Ncgativc Dcdaration togcthcr
with any commcnts receivcd during the public review proccss and furthcr Gnding ~n thc basis o[ t6e initial
study anJ any commcnts rcccivcd that thcrc is no substantial :viJcncc that thc projcct will havc a significant
cffcct on thc cnv~.ronmcnt.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEU that thc Anahcim City Planning G~m+nission does h.rcby
dclctc Condition No. l, in its entircty, from Rcsolution Nn. 92R-111, aJoptcd in conncction with Conclitional
Usc Pcrmit No. 351G.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adoptcd at the Planning Commission meeting of
Octobcr 27, t'J97.
~_~~~ z~~~- ~
CHAIRPERtiON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANI~[NG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
t
SECRETAR , ANAHEIIvI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
C1TY OF ANAHGAM )
l, Margarita Solorio, Sccrctary of thc Anahcim Ciry Planning Commission, do hcrcby ccrtify that
lhc forcgoing resolulioa was passcd and adoplcd al u mccting of lhc Anahcim City Planning Commission hcld
un OctoUcr 27, 1997, by thc fullowing votc of thc mcmbcrs thcreoL•
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, Hi~NNINGER, NAPOLES,
NOGS: COMMISSI0I~ERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MAYER, PERAZA
IN WITNFSS WHEREOF, 1 h,~vc hcrcunto sct my hand this ~ day of O~u'/'r~^-c
1997,
~_.,~c~~~
SECRET Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLAtVNING COMMISSION
_2_ PC97-154