Resolution-PC 97-5~ ~
RESOLUTIOPI NO. PC97-5
A RESOLUTION OF THE AR'AtiEIM CI'fY PLAtdNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FdR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 96-97-04 BE GRAMED, UNCONDITIO 'MLLY
VIlHEREAS, the Anaheim Ciry Piannir~g Cort~~iss(on did receNe a verifled petRion for
Recla~SiFlcation for real property sftuated in the Ciry of Anaheim, Courriy of Orange, State of Califomia,
described as foliows:
LOT 1 OF TRAGT NO. 2222, 1N THC CITY OF ANAHEIM, CGUNTY OF OREWGE,
STATE OF CAIJFORNIA, AS SHOWN AN A MAP RECARDED_ IN BOOK 113,
PAGEB 23 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MA~°S, IN THE OFFlCE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY., 1997
FJ:CEPTING THEREFROM THE Y~ESTERLY 540.00 PEET.
WHEREAS, the Ciry Planning Commission did hold a public heartng at the Civic Canter in
the City of Anahc?im on January 6, ~997 at 1:30 p.m., notlce of sal~ publ~ hearing having been aWy given
us required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapt~r 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed redassffication ar-d to imestigate and make
findings and cacommendations in connection therewith; and that safd public hearing was continugd to the
January 22, 1997 Planning Commission meeting; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, irnestigation and study mada by ftseif
and In its ~ehaif, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does flnd
and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclass~ication of subject propsrcy from the CG (f,ommerc(al,
General) Zone to ths CL (Cornmercfal, Lim~ed) Zone.
2. That the A^aheim General Plan designates subject property for Gensrat Commerctal land
uses.
3. That the propos Jcl reclassification of subject property is necessary arxi/or desirable for the
orderiy and pr~per development of thP communtry.
4. That the proposed reclassiflcation of subject property does prope~iy relate to the zones and
their permitted. uses locally e:.~blished in close proximity to subJect property and to the zones and their
perinitted uses generally established throughou[ the commun!ry.
5. That subject property is cuneMly develo~+ed with a 4,206 sq.ft. commercial complex
consisting of a 1,826 sq.ft. retail ~uilding and a 2,380 sq.R. office building.
6. That reclassification of the property to the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone wNl conform to
the General Pian Designation for General Commercial land uses; and that the existing office a~~d cornmerciai
uses being conducterl on subje~.K propercy co~orm to the permitted uses listed (n the CL Zune standards.
7. That the proposed reclassiflcatlon complies wfth existing Planning Commissiors and C'ity
Council policy to reclassffy CG zoned propertl6s to the CL Zone.
8. That no one indicated thefr presence at said pubiic hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in oppositfon to subject petftion.
CR2808DM.WP -1- PC97-5
y~- • '~
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUAU7Y ACT FINDIN~C: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposai to reclassify subJect proper':y from the CG (Commercial, General)
Zone to the CL (Commercial, Umlted) Zone on a rectar.gulatly-shaped parcel af land cor~sis4ing of
approximately 0.82 acre, h~ving a frontage of approximately 58 feeY on the north side of Katella Avenue,
having a maximum depth of approximately 299 feet, being iocated a{~,proxtmately 320 feet west of the
centerline of Humcr Drive, and further desc~ibed as 1801 West Katella Aver~ue; and does he~eby approve
the NegatNe [~ecEaration upon ftnding that the declaration reflects the independerrt Judgement or the lead
agency and that ft has considered the Negative Declarat:on together with any comments rece?ved during
i~ie public review process and further finding on the basts of the initlal stt~y and any comments receNed
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a signiNcant effect on the ernironment.
NOW, THEREFORE, B~ IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Cfty Planning Commission does
hereby approv~ i:he subject Petition for Redassiflcation to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map af
the Anaheim Mw ~iclpal Code to exclude ihe above-described property from the CG ~Commercial, General)
Zone and t~ incorpora4e said described property into the CL (Commercial, Limfted) Zone, uncondftionally.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of th(s appl(cation constitutes approval of the
proposed request on~y to the extent that R complies with the Anaheim AAunfcipal Zoning Code and any other
appiicable Ciry, State, and Fetferal regulations. Approval does not indude any action or ftr~dings as ta
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applfcabie ordfnance, regulatlon or requiremerrt.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this a~esdution shall not constftute a rezaning of, or a
cammitment by the City to rezone, the subJect properry; any such rezontn~ shall require an ordinancs of
the Ciry Council which shall be a leg(slative act which may be approved or dented by the Ctry Council at
fts sole discretion.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Plannin~ Commission meeNng of
January 22, 1997
CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:~ n
SECFtETARYf ANAHEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION
lJ
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretar~ of the Rnaheim Cfry Pfanning Commission, do hereby ceKi(y
ihat the foreyoing resoluilon was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Ar~aheim C(ry Pl~nning
Commission held on January 22, 1997, by the fdlowing vote of the members thereoF:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, B~YDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGE~t, MAYER, MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: iVONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuMo set my hand 4his ~~ day of~.b~~,
1997.
0~/1~f
SECRETARY, A HEIM GITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION
-2- PC97-5