Resolution-PC 97-60~ ~
RESOLUTION NO PC97~0
A RESOUJTION OF THE ANAHEIb1 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TMAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL l1SE PERMIT NO. 3931 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a ver'rfied Petition for
Condftional Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of Calffom(a, described as:
PARCEL NO. 8, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 88, PAGE 213 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Ciry Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the C(vic Center
in the City of Anahe(m on May 12, 1997 at 1:30 p.m., notfce of said public hearing having bgen duly given
as required by la~ and in accordance wfth the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider ev(dence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make flndings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspect(on, investigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due conside~ation of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does flnd
and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properfy one for which a condftiona! use permft is authorized by
Anahefm Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.070 to permft an automobile and marine repair facility within
an existing 9,908 sq.ft. fndustrial building wfth waNer of the following:
Sections 18.06.050.0212 - Minimum number of r~arkina soaces.
18.06.050.0222 (~4 required; 24 spaces proposed and recommended for approval
~g, , by the Ciry Traffic and Transportation Manager)
and 18.61.066.050
2. That the parking waNer, under the conditions imposed, will nAt cause iewer off-street
parking spaces to be provided for such use than the number of such spacES necessary to accommodate
all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable condftions of operation
of such use because the submitted parking analysis ind(cates that the proposed site has more than twice
as many parking spaces as provided for the existing locatton and, furthermore, the parking demand survey
indicates that the parking spaces at the existing site are under-ut(iized;
~. That the mafn parking lot (17 spaces) is physically separated from the adjacent parking
lot, the 17-space lot is more than adequate to accommodate the projected future peak demand (10
spaces), 7 more spaces are available along the north skle of the building vfa the Simpson C(rcle drfveway,
and ft is unlikely that park(ng will encroach onto adJacent properties because of the ample parkfng;
4. That the waiver, under the corxiftfons imposed, will not in~crease the demand and
competkion for parking spaces on pubiic streets in the fmmediate vicinity of the proposal because no
evidence of parking encroachment onto nearby publ(c streets was observed during parking surveys of the
existing business location and there is no reason f4r encroaching because the on-sfte parkfng lot provides
ample parking as indicated in the parking anai~qsis; that the proposed site is loc~ted at an intersection with
access driveways on both Winston Road and Simpson Circle, and the maJoriry of pro~ect traffic wiil utilize
the drNeway on Winston Road to access the main parking lot; and that the extremely small vdume of
parking traffic (4 to 5 vehfcles) wiil not f`npede traffic into and out of the adjacent properties;
CR2911 PLWP -~- P~~~
~ ~
5. That the waNer, under the conditions imposiedthe immediate v c(niEy of he proposed
competition for parking spar.es upon adjacent prNate property
use (which property is not expressly provided as parking for such use under an agreement in compliance
with Section 18.06.010.020 of this Code):
6. That the waNer, under the condftlons imposed, will no[ increase traffic congestion wfthfn
tha off-street parking areas or lots provided for such use because the proposed on-site parking lot has
been property deslgned to eliminate potential traffic circulatfon congestion and that the pa~rking lot is easily
accessible ftom either Winston Road or Simpson Circle;
7. That the waNer, under the conditions imposed, will not impede vehicular ingress to or
egress from adjacent properties upon the pubUc streets in the immediate vicin'ity of the proposed use;
8. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and
development of the area in which ft is proposed to be located because the repair work wiil be conducted
inside the building;
9. 7hat the size and shape of the sfte for the proposed use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a rnanner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace,
health, safety and general welfare;
10. That the tra~c generated by the propose~ use will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because tfiis facilfty is 4,800
square feet larger than the present location in the Ciry of Anaheim and no business expansion or increase
in employees is anticipated;
11. That the granting of the condftional use permit. under the condftions imposed, will not be
detrimental to the peace, liealth, safery and general weifare of the citizens of the Ciry of Anaheim; and
12. That no one indicated their presence at said public hea~ing in opposkion; and that no
carrespondence was recetved in opposition to the subject petition.
~ALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIT~ ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Ciry Planning
Commission has revi2wed the proposal to permd an aucomobde and ~marin i~~t~fon t e noni!saast comer
9,908 s q.ft. indusMal building on a 0.57-acre rectangularly-shaped P PertY
of Simpson Circle and Winston Road, and having frontages of 134 fee t on S( m pson Circle and 101 feet
on Winston Road (2411 East Winston Road); and dces hereby approve the NegatNe Declaration upon
Flnding that the declaration reflects the independent judgement of the lead agency and that ft has
considered the NegatNe Declaratfon together with any comments receNed during the ~ublic review
process and further flnding on the basis of the initial study and any comments receNed that there is no
substantial evide~ce that the proJect wili have a signfficant eftect on the ernironment.
NOW, TliEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning CAmmission does
hereby grant subJect Petftion for Condftional Use Permft, upon the fdlowing condk~lo~ns~e o p eservee the
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject properry
safery arxl gsnaral welfare af the Citizens of the C'rty of Anaheim:
~. That no outdoor stora9e ~f, display of, or worlc on vehicles or veh~ular parts shall be permitted•
2. That no banners or other advertising shali be displayed wfthin the serv(ce bays Sacing Simpson Circle.
-2- PC97-60
~~ ~
3. That landscape maintenance shall be performed by a licensed arborist and the existing mature trees
shall not be removed unless they are damaged, diseased and/or dead. That trees shall not be
unreasonably trimmed to increase visibil'rty of the faciliry.
4. That no required parking area shall be fenced or othervvise enclo~ed for storage or other outdoor
uses.
5. That the signs for ~ubJect facility shall be Iimfted to that which ts speciflcally shown on the exhibfts
submitted by the petitioner showing one (1), four (4) fioot high by six (6) foot wide, monument sign.
Wall signs shall be limited to the existing 'cabinet" sfgns on the south and west elevations or such
other signs as may be rev~ewed and approved by the Planning Commission as a'Reports and
Recommendations" item.
6. That the granting of the parking waiver is cont(ngent upon operatlon of the use in conformance with
the assumptions relat(ng to the operation and intensity of use as cor,tained in the parking demand
study that formed the basis for approvai of sai~ waNer. Exceeding, vidating, intensifying or otherwise
deviating ftom any of said assumptions, as contained in the parking demand study, shall be deemed
a vidation of the expressed corxlftions imposed upon said waNer which shall subject this conditionai
use permft to termination or mod~ication pursuant to the prov(sions of Sections 18.03.091 anci
18.03.092 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
7. That the existing rolling chain Iink fence located along Winston Road shall be replaced wfth a wrought
iron fence~ In compUance with Cfry standards.
8. That the on-site landscaping and i~igation system shall be refurb(shed and maintained in complfance
wfth Ciry standards.
9. That all existiny mature !raes shall be maintained except for one (t) tree adjacent to the south
building elevation (Winston Road), which is causing building damage and which may tae removed and
replaced with one (1), minimum fifteen (15) gallon sized, tree.
10. That a minirnum of twenty four (24) on-sfte parking spaces shall be maintained at aS times.
11. That the gated parking lot (to the east) shall remain uniocked and open during bus:ness hours to
provide vehicular and pe~jestrfan access to required on-stte parking.
12. That the developer shall submR a water qualfty mana9ement plan (WQMP) speciFically identifying the
best management practices that w{II be used on site to control pret3lctable pollutants from stormwater
runoff. The W~MP shall be submftted to the Public Works Engineering Department, De~elopment
Services DNision, for review anc~ approval.
13. That subject propercy shall be developed substantially in accordance wfth pians and specffications
submitted to the Ciry of Anaheim by the petitinner and which plans are on file wfth the Planning
Department marked Exhibft Nos. 1, 2 and 3, ar~d as conditioned herein.
14. That there shall be no auto body or palnting work permitted, as stipulated by the applicant.
15. That prior to commencement of the activity authorized by this resolution, or prior to final building and
zoning inspections, or within a period of o~e (7) from the date of this reso!u:ion, whichever occurs
first, Condftion Nos. 5, 7, 8, 12 ar~ 13, above-mentioned, shail be complied with. Extenslons for
further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance wfth Section 18.03.090 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
~- PC97~0
~ ~
16. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the e~ent that
it complfes wfth the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal
regulations. Approval cices not include any action or Bndings as to compliance or approval of the
request rega~ding any other applicabie ordinan~e, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESQLVED that tha Anaheim City Plannir~g Commission does hereby flnd
and determine that adoptlon of this Resdution is expresst;~ predicated upon applicanYs compliance wRh
each and ail of the conditions hereirsabove set foRh. Should any such condition, or any paK thereof, be
declared irnalid or unenforcea~le by the final Judgment of any court of competent Jurisdiction, then this
Resolution, and any approvals herein contafned, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
May 12, 1997.
CHAIRPERSQN ANAHEIM ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, ANA EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIQN
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
C!TY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Sdorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Ptanr~ing Commission, do hereby certiiy
that the foregofng resolution vias passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Comm(ssion held on May 12, 1997, by the fdlo~Ning vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSiONERS: MAYER
IN ~'~ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~ day of ~,
1997.
Y
SECRETARY, A AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~_ PC97-60