Resolution-PC 97-65~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC97-65
4 RESOLUTlON OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PtANNING COMMISSlON
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFlCATION NO. 96-97-07 BE ~RANTED, UNCONDITIONALLY
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Ciry Pianning Commission did receive a veriHed petftion for
ReclassiFlcation for real prope-ty sftuated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of CalHomfa,
described as fdiows:
PARCELS 3 AND 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 83-251, IN
BOOK 187, PAGES 20 TO 24 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL
MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY.
WHERE4~, the Ciry Planning Commission did hd~ a publfc hear(ng at the CNic Center in
the City of Anaheim on hlay 12, 1997 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly gNen as
hear~andbco sfder~evtdence~or and aganst safds~propused redassiHcation and to~irnestigaterand make
flndings and recommendations in connection therewfth; and that said pub~Ic hea~ing was contfnued to
May 28, 1997 Planning CommEssion meeting; and
WHEREAS, said Commissfon, after due inspectlon, irnestigation and study rt-ade by ftself
and in fts behalf, and after due consideration of all evkience and reports offered at said hearing, does flnd
and determine the fdlowing tacts: .
1. That the proposed redassification will bring the subJect properry into co~ormance wfth the
existing General Plan Land Use des(gnation (General Commercial) and that sald zonfng will match the
sunounding properties which are aiready zoned CL;
2. That the existing land use {a business school) Is compatible wfth the CL Zone starxlards
and the nearby land uses; and
3. That the petftioner proposes redassiflcation of subJect property trom the ML (Limfted
Industrial) to the CL (Commer~:ai, UmRed) Zone.
4. That the Anahalm General Plan desl~nates 3ubject property tor General Commerclal land
uses.
5. That the proposed redassifir.etion oF subJect property fs necessary and/or deslrable tor the
orderly and proper development of the communiry.
6. Thai the proposed r~dassiflcation of subJect properry does properly relate to the zones and
their permitted uses locally esteblished in do~e proximfty to subJect properry and to the zones and their
permitted uses generally established throughout the communfty.
7. That r.o one indicated thelr presence at said public hearing in oppositlon; and that no
coRespondence was ~eceNed in opposkion to subJect petftbn.
CR2921 PLWP -1- PC97~fi5
~ ~
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassHy subJect properry from the ML (Lirnited Industrial) Zone
to the CL (Commercial, Lir.iiteci) Zone on a 4.8 acre irregulariy-shaped parcel of land with a frontage of
approximately 77 feet at the westerty end of Sanderson Avenue and being located 690 feet west of the
centerline of Phoenix (;lub Drive (1380 East Sanderson Avenue); and does hereby approve the IVegaiNe
Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgement of the lead agency and that
ft has considered the NegatNa Declaration together with any comments received during the public review
process and further flnding on the basis of the initfal sturly and any comments received that there is rto
substantial evidence that the proJect will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that thR Anahelm City Planning Commission does
hereby approve the subJect Petftion for Reclassification, unconditionally to authorize an amer~iment to the
Zonfng Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to exclude the above-descrfbed properry from the ML (LimRed
Industrial) Zone and to incorporate said described property into the CL (Commercial, Limfted) Zone.
BE IT FURTH~R RESOLVED that approval of this apptlcation constftutES approval of the
proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anahe(m Mu~icipai Zoning Code and any other
applicable Ciry, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or ftndings as to
complfance or approval of the request regarding any other appl(cable ordinance, regulation or requfrement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezonfng of, or a
commftment by the Ciry to rezone, the subJect property; any such rezonfng shall require an ordinance of
the Ciry Council which shall be a legislative act which may be approved or der!.;c by the C'tty Council at
fts sole discretion.
May 28, 1997.
THE FOREGOING RESOLl1TION
ATTEST:
~~l.tJ~ wb
SECRETARY, ANA IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORhNGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commission, do hereby certrfy
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adop:ed at a meeting of the Anahe(m City Planning
Commission held on pvlay 28, ?997, by the following vote of the members thereof:
~+YES: COMNIISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, MAYEFi
IIJ WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto ~et my hand this ~ day of 5M/Il)u _,
7T-
1997. V
~
SECRETARY, HI',EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ PC97~65
-2-
was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
CHAIRPERSON, ANAH M CITY PIANI~ING COP~AMISSION