Loading...
Resolution-PC 98-125RESOLUTION NO. PC98-125 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CI'fY PLANNING COMMISSION DENYlNG A REQUEST TO AMEND (;ERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. PC97-42 ADOP'fED IN CONNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3921 WHEREAS, on April 28, 1997, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC97- 42 approving Conditional Use PermiY No. 3921, in part, to permit a 2,200 sq. ft. convenience market with retail sales of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption at 1112 North Brookhurst Street; and that the off-premises sale of alcoholic beverages will expire on April 28, 1999; and that said resolution includes the following condition: "9. That the business liours of the subject business shall be limited to 8 a.m. to 11 p.m:' WHEREAS, this property is developed with a 9,860 sq. ft. commercial retail center in the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone; .that the Anaheim General Pl.:,n Land Use Element designates the property for Commercial Professional land uses; and that t.he property is located in Community Planning Area No. 1 and the West Anaheim Commercial Corridor Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, the petitioner requests amendment or deletion of Condition No. 9 of Resolution No. PC97-42 pertaining to the hours of operation; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 17, 1998, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim 1Aunicipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed amendment and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed deletion of Condition No. 9, restricting the business hours of this use, is not reasonably necessary to protect tne public peace, health, safety or general welfare, nor is it necessary to permit reasonable operation under the conditional use permit as granted. 2. That the petitioner has not complied with the terms and conditions of Resolution No. PC97-42, specifically Condition Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5(pertaining to removing the exterior telephone, increasing the number of parking spaces if hot food or self-service soft drinks are availabie, obtaining approval of a landscaping plan for the entire site and installing the landscaping, and eliminating window signs for unobstructed visibility into the store interior). 3. That the existing condition of the property, the failure to comply with conditions of approval, and ongoing Code violations constitute this use being exercised in e manner which is detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and general welfare. 4. That this request to lengthen the hours of operation for a business with retail sales of alcoholic beverages, and ihe manner in which this permit is cu,rently being exercised, is not consistent with the goals of the West Anaheim Commercial Corridor Redevelopment Pian. CR3393PL.DOC -1- PC98-125 5. That one person spoke in opposition to the proposai at the public he2ring; and that pictures were received in opposition 4o this petition. • CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL UUALIN ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and does hereby find that the Negative Declaration previously approved in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 3921 is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation in connection with this request upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the previously approved Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny the request to amend the conditions of approval of Resolution No. PC9-97-42, adopted in connection with Conditionai Use Permit No. 3921, on the basis of the fore oing findings. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTI a~ ed at t PI n' Commission meeting of August 17, 1998. l _ ~ ~ CHAIRPERS NA . CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATfES . ~L~U.~(~J ~J ~ SECRETARY, NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adoFted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 17, 1998, by the following vote of the members thereof: , AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOS'fWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, NAPOLES, PERAZA, WILLIAMS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE VACANCY: ONE SEAT VACANT /~~, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~'~ day of UN U~ , 1998. ~U~J~~ SECRET Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~OMMISSION -2- PC98-125