Resolution-PC 98-168RfS.QLUTI S,~M NC hsC.~B-16$
A RESOWTION O:~ THE AN.IHEIM CITY F~`iNNINu CGMMISSI~N
Fh+.F`vDIN~ ~FS~LIlTION tQ0.5~~,:`.e~Ees 19E2•62,
ADOPTEC: c~l G~NiVEi.; i tON W'."fH CONDITIONP.i. ~.ISc PERiv11T NO. 310
WHEREA:~I, on ~'>ctober 29, 1962, the Anaho~~, ; G:~ Fianni~g Commission adopted
Resolution No. 518, Series 1962- 3, to aoprove Cond~liona'. .~~,P permit 1Vo. 310 to establish a ba~ik in an
existing industriai building at 1025 East Oran~ethorNo r1:~sn;~o; a~id that Con~iNon No. 4 specifies that the
property be deveioped substantially in accorcir•.nce :vitF~ Exhibil'Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4(site plan, floor plan and
front elevation, roof framing plan, and b~iid?n!~ .-levati~ns); ~;~d
WHEREAS, the property is develop~f~ v;+iih a 24,000 sq.ft, buiiding (currently vacant but
previously used as a bank) in the ML (Limited Industrial) ?~~ne; and
WHEREAS, the petitioner re~uests .,pproval to retain two automated telier machines
(ATMs) at the former Wells Fargo Bank at 1025 East Orangethorpe Avenue; that the faciiity consists of
lwo unmanned ATPv1's machines with a inside service sr,am and an exterior interface on the east wall of
the former bank building; that the facility will operate on a 24 hour basis; and lhat plans were submitted
illustrating the proposal (Revision No. 1 of Exhibit No. 1 and Exhibit No. 5); and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on October 26, 1998 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly
given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith.
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation ano study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of ail evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use, two automated bank teller machines, Is properly one for which a
conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.075.
2. That the proposed use wlli not adverse;;i >7ffect the adjoining land uses and the growth
and development of the area in which it is located.
3. That the size and shape of the site for the proposal is adequste to allow full development
of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to lhe peace, health, safety and
general welfare because the property is large enough to support the existing structure, its future office and
industrial tenant(s) and the proposed ATM bank services without affecting the adjoining properties or
preventing future growth or development of the surrounding induslrial neighborhood.
4. 7hat the traffic generated by the psoposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry thQ tra~c in the area because the ATM facility will
not cause an} additional burden upon the adjacent streets which serves this area.
5. That amending this conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, will not be
detrimental to the peace, b+~alth, safety and general welfare of the citizens of lhe City of Anaheim because
the previous bank operations, inciuding ATM transactions, did not generated complaints due to on-site
customer activities.
6. '.': ~at no one indicated their presence at the pubiic hearing in opposition; and that no
corre°^~ndence was received in opposition to the subject petition.
CR3463PK.DOC -1- PC98-166
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMEN'TAL Qll~~,ll'1~' ~CT FINDING: That the Anaheim City
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to ama~:? the previously-app:ovEd conditional use•
permit to retain two automated teller machines (ATM'sj fn a former bank buitdin~ on an irregularly-shaped
'i .67-acre property having frontage of 270 feet on the north side of Orangethorpe Ar•enue and a maximum
depth of 312 feet, and being located 193 feet west of.the centerline of Raymond Avenue (former Well's
Farga Bank at 1025 East Orangethorpe Avenue); and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration
upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgement of the lead agency and that it has
cons(dered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the pubiic review
process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby amend Resolulion No. 518, Series 1962-63, adopled in connection with Conditional Use
Permit No. 310, to permit two (2) automatsd teiler machines (ATM's) to rem~in in connecNon with a former
bank buiiding; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEa that the condiqons of approval are hereby amended in their
entirety to read as follows:
1. That signage for this facility shall be limited to that which fs shown on Exhibit No. 6 submitted by
the petitioner. Any additional signage shall be subject to priar review and approvai by the
Piannir~g Commission as ~"Reports and Recommendations" item.
2. That pians shall be submitted to the City Tra~c anci Transpartation Manager for his review and
approvai showing the lacation of the ATM's and the desig~~ated customer parking spaces.
Subject r.rcparty shall thereupon be developed and m2lntained in conformance with said plans.
3. That tt~is coriditional use permit shall expire five (5) years from the date of this resoiution, on
October 26, 2003.
4. That within a period of ane (1) month from the date of thi~ resolution, Condition No. 2, above
mentioned, sh211 be complied with, Extensions for further timo to complete said conditions may
be granted in accordanco with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
5. That subJect property shall be devetoped substantially in accordance with plans and specifications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department marked Rc~vision No. 1 of Exhibit No. 1(site plan), and Exhibit Nos. 5(Floor plan and
eievat(7n) and 6(sigr~~3g.~), and as conditioned herein.
6, That ~oproval of this ap!alication constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent
that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicabie City, State and
Federal regulations. tig ~~?roval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or
approval of the req~ea,~ r~y~rdi;~g any other applicable ordinance, rc;gulatfon or requirement.
BE IT Fi~:~T~iER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that 2~doption of this Resolulion is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof,
be deciared invalid or unenForceable by the final judgment of any court of competent Jurisdiclion, then this
Resulution, and any appr~~vals herein contained, shail be deemed null and void.
-2- PC98-168
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION wa ad te a e PI ning Commission meeting of
Cctober ~5, 1998.
~
CHAIRPER , ANA M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~LQ~~~ n~W~QJ
SECRETARY, AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
~OUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Maheim C(ty Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning .
Commission h~ld on October 26, 1998, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, ESPING, KOOS, NAPOLES
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: WILLIAMS
~~I , ~N WITNESS WHEREOF,1 have hereunto set my hand this (~5~"}' day of
~~r~ , ~sss.
~kc~~an~ .~~
SECRETARVUANAHEIM CI'fY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC98-168