Resolution-PC 99-109RESOLUI~ION NO. PC99-109
A RESOLUT!ON OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-2
TO (1) AMEND THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT SiANDARDS, DESIGN PAN ANQ
PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN AND (2) GRANT THE RE!:LASSIFICATION
WHEREAS, the City Council o~ the City of Anaheim adopted the Anaheim Resort
Specific Pian No. 92-2 on September 27, 1994, to provide a long range, comprehensive plan for future
dev2lopment of approximately 549.5-acres within the Anaheim Resort. The Specific Plan includes
zoning and development standards, design guidelines and a public facilities plan, and permits the
developmenf of hotel/motel, convention, retail and other visitor-serving uses; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the adoption of Specific Plan No. 92-2, the City Council
ceftified Environmental Impact Report No. 313, with a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement
of Overriding Consideration, and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085; and
WHEREAS, on June 3, 1997, the City Council adopted Specific Plan No. 92-2,
Amendment No. 1, which amendment revised the legal description and boundaries of the Anaheim
Resoft Specific Plan by reclassifying and incorporating a 4.67-acre parcel of land into the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone; and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 1999, the City Council adcpted Specific Plan No. 92-2,
Adjustment No. 1, which adjustment amended Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code pe~taining
to Specific Plan No. 92-2, Zoning and ~evelopment Standards, relating to structural setbacks and yard
requirements adjacent to Convention Way; and
WHEREAS, on April 26, 1999, pursuant to Chapters 18.03 and 18.93 of the Anaheim
Municipai Code, the Anaheim Cily Planning Commission, by its Resoiution No. PC99-6o, initiated
applications for General Plan Amendment No. 364 and Amendment No. 3 to the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan No. 92-2 (for the purpose of presenting the applications for study and consideration at a
public hearing) for an approximate 0.73-acre area encompassing four parcels of land located at the
northwest corner of Casa Grande Avenue and Casa Vista Street and having frontages of 286 feet on the
north side of Casa Grande Avenue and 75 feet on the west side of Casa Vista Street and further
described as 1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenue (a portion of Best Western Faviilions Motel) loczted in th2
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, more parlicularly described as:
LOTS 15, 16, 17 AND 18 OF TRACT NO. 3290, RECORDED IN BOOK 101,
PAGES 43 - 44 OF 1AISCELLANEOUS MAPS, FiLED NOVEMBER 20, 1957
IN THE ORANGE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE.
WHEREAS, the subject property is located adjacent to the approximate 1,051-acre
Anaheim Resort, which is designated on the City of Anaheim Generai Plan for Commercial Recreation
land uses; and
WH[REAS, the subject propeRy is developed with 44 rooms of the 100-room Best
Western Pavillions Motel (the balance of the rooms being located on an adjacent parcel which is within
the Anaheim Resort and is zoned Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan No. 92-2); and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 is
proposed to revise the legal description and boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by
reciassifying and incorporating the subject properiy from the RM-1200 (Residential, Multipla-Family)
Zone to tlie SP92-2 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, C-R District) Zone, and to amend the Specific Ptan
CR3664pk.doc -1- PC99-109
text, exhibit, legal description and Zoning and Development Standards (Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code) of the Specific F'lan to refleci said reclassification; and
WHEREAS, the Specific Plan identifies maximum development densities for all
properties in the Zone, and that the subject property is proposed to be designated "Low-Medium Density"
allowing a maxim~.im of 75 hotel or motel rooms per gross acre; and
WHEREAS, the amended Specific Plan docume~t will include a summary of the
resulting changes, a revised Development Plan and Table, a revised C-R District Development Plan and
Table, and a revised Legal Description, to show incorporation of the 0.73-acre into the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan Zone, as shown in Attachment C of the Staff RcNort to the Planning Commission dated
June 21, 1999; and
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold a public heai~ng at the
Anaheim Civic Center, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on June 21, 1999, at 1:30 P.M., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisEons of the
Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and eons°•'er evidence for and against said Specific Plan Amendment
and investigate and make findings and recornmendation in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission, after due consideration,
inspection, investigation and study made by itself and on its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 Area is unique in its location and
surro~ndings in that the property is located adjacent to and immediately abuis property located in the
Anaheim Resort; and, that said property is developed with 44 rooms of an existing 100-room motel of
which the balance of the motel (including the lobby area and 56 rooms) is located on property zoned
SP92-2 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan) and located in the Anaheim Resort area boundaries; and
2. That the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan is consistent with the goals,
objectives and policies of the Anaheim General Plan, including the standards and land use guidelines
provided therein; and, that it would encourage development of quality facilities which complement
convention, family entertainment and recreation in the community and enhance the City's position as a
nationally recognized t~urist center; and
3. That the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan would result in development of a
desirable character by permiiting land uses which are compatible with both the existing an~ proposed
development in the surrounding neighborhood; and, that future development of the property would be
enhanced by the special land use and development standards set forth in the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan No. 92-2 Zone; and
4. That the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan contributes to a balance of land uses
by providing a compatibie transition between the existing residential and commercial land uses; and
5. That the proposed amendment lo the Specific Flan respects environmental and
aesthetic resources consistent wi:n economic realities in that itie amendment area wo~~ld be subject to
the zoning and devetopment standar~ s, design guidelines and applicabie mitigation measures adopted in
conjunction with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 and incorporated herein; and
6. 'fhat no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to the subject action.
WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment No. 3 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No.
92-2 text, exhibits, legal description and Zoning and Development Standards are identified in Attachment
A to this Resolution and incorporated herein.
CR3664PK.DOC -2- PC99-109
CALIFORNIH ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS: That the Anaheim City
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed Amenument No. 3 to the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan No. 92-2 and does hereby find and recommends that the City Council determine that the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No, 0108 (attached hereto as Attachment B and
hereby incorporated herein as though set forth in full) are adequate to serve as the required
environrnertal documentation for the proposed project action, based upon a fiin~ing by the Pianning
Commission that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency; and, that it has
considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Dectaration togeiher with any comments received during the
public review process and further finding on the basis of the Initial Study that there is no substantial
evidence, with the imposition of mitigation measures, that the project will have a significant effect on the
envimnment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I7 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, the
Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of
Anaheim take the following actions:
A. Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 to:
1. Revse the legal description and the depiction of the Legal Description
Areas set forth as Attachment A to Ordinance No. 5454 to add the Property as Legal ~escription
"Area 8" as set forth in Attachment A to this Resolution which attachment is incorporated herein by
this reference; and,
2. Revise the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 text, exhi4its and
Zoning and Development Standards as set foRh in Attachment A to this Resolution, which
attachment is hereby incorporaled herein as though set forth in full.
B. Authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipaf Code to
exclude the above described property from the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone and to
incorporate said described property into the SP92-2 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, C-R District with a
Low-Medium Density designation) Zone, upon the following conditions of approval which are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed uses of the subject property in order to preserve the
safety and generai welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1• That completion of these reclassification proceedings to amend the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan No. 92-2 is contingenl u;~on the City Council's adoption of General Plan Amendment
PJo. 364.
2. 7hat the Specific ?lan Amendment No. 3 Area (described as "Area 8" in the Specific Plan
Legal Descripiion) shall be su"ject ;o a!~ of ihe conditions of approval adopted by the City Council
on September 27, 1994 in conneclion with the prior approval of Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No.
92-2 as set forth in Ordinanca No. 5454 and incorporated herein by reference.
3• That the "Area 8" property owner/developer shall be responsible for complying with the
mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108 (provided as Attachment
B to this Resolution and incorporated herein in its entirety) which incorporates aIl of the appropiiate
mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085 adopted by the City
Councit on September 27, 1994 in connection with the adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan No. 92-2, and for complying with the monitoring and reporting requirements established by
the City in compliance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code. Furlhermore, the
property owner/developer shall be responsible for any direct costs associated with the monitoring
and reporting requirements to ensure implementation of the mitigation mea~ures which are made a
part of these conditions of approval by reference.
CR3664PK.DOC -3- PC99-109
4. That the subject property shali be limited to a maximum density of 75 hotel/motel rooms
per gross acre based on the total gross acreage of the four lots and not on a per lot nr parcel basis.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ci;y Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of ihis Resolution is expressly Fredicated upon compliance with each
and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any ~art thereof, be
declarad invaiid or unenforceable by the finai judgment of any couri of competent jurisdiction, then this
Resoiution, and any approvais herein contained, shall be deemed nuli and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a
commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezonir.g shaii require an ordinance of
the City Ccuncil which shall be a legislative act which may be approved or denied by the City Council at
its sole discretion.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION wa~s. a pte at thg~,q~heim City Planning
Commission meeting of June 21, 1999. , //
CHAIRPERS6~1d, ANAF{~IM ~ITY PLANNING COMMISSiON
ATi'EST:
~(J'UNU7"
SECRETAR , ANAH I CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Soiorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby
cer[ify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopled at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on June 21, 1999, by the following vofe of ?he members thereof:
AYES: COM(v11SSIONERS: BUYDSTUN, BRISTOL, ESPING, KOOS, NAPOLES,
VANDERBILT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK
IN WI7NESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this ~~~ day of
, 1999.
~~~1~~T[-l.7GL.~ p~~I~-~
SECRETAR ANAHEiM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
CR3664PK.DOC -4- PC99-109
ATTAC~~I~T~' A
Anaheim Resort Specifc Plan No. 92-2, Amendment No. 3
On __ (insert date) the Anaheim City Council adopted Ordinance No. insert approving
the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, Amendment No. 3, to incorporate a 0.73-acre
parcel of land located at the northwest comer of Casa Grande Avenue and Casa Vista Street
and having frontages of 286 feet on the north side af Casa Grande Avenue and 75 feet on the
west side of Casa Vista Street and further described as 1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenue, into
the approximate 554-acre Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Zone, C-R District, wiYh a
development density designation of Low-Medium Density (up to 75 hotel/motel rooms per
gross acre). Following are revised exhibits (Development Summary Plan, C-R District
Development Density Plan, and Legal Description) which reflect these changes.
The 4naheim ResoA Spe._ .,~ p~a~ .~. ~ection 1.0: .~xecu~iue Summary
Anahe m ResorP Speciflc Plan Devslopment Sum
mary
Disiricts/Right-of-Way Land Use
Approximate
Acreage
Commerclal RecreaUon (C-R) Hotel/motel, restaurant and other vis-
Dtstrict (Development Area 1) ltor-serving uses 323
Public Recreation (Pft) pis_ p,nahelm Conventlon Center and ac-
62 $
trict (Devclopment Atea 2) cessory uscs, hotel uses
I-5 Freeway Widentng prea• (,and destgnated for I-5 Freeway wid- 15.1
enin~ wlthln the Speciflc Plan Area
Public Right-of-Way Land de ' iated for the ublic
~ p ~t' 154.0
of-way within the Specific Ptan Arca
TOTAI,
554.9
Mobflehome Park (MHp) Existing Mobllehomes
C?verlay /n the C-R DLstrlct 31.5
' Approxlmately 1.5.1 acres of the Anahetm Resort Speclflc Plan area are d~,yi~ted for
fi:ruc I-5 FY~ea+-~y rl~hi-of-Ray. Uct11 su~ time as this land !s acquired by Caltrans. it
will bc subject to ihe Anaheim Resart Speciflc Plan 2one. C-R L)ishict ond 2he de.nsity
3e~~~Ons g~marized 1n Exhl.blt 1.7o--C-R Dlstrict Development Denslty Pian Tab-
ulatian and shown on Exhlblt 1.7d-C-R Dls~ict Development Density Plan, p-ans
showing the properties affeeted by thc I-5 Frr.~eway widening are on ffie with the Clty Pub-
lic i~Varks-Engtneering Depar~ent.
Exhfbff 1.7a-AnaheYn Resort Speciflc plan Dtshlcf Devplopment Summcry
Page 1-JO
Revieed AmendmenE N3
'"'"'•' ''~'~='' ~~--~ - ; Section 1.U: Execu~ e Summary
.
~\ ...~
~
~ ~ ^
,~:%~:
~ ~ •.~;'1
a'~~
~~ i
1
. °'_~
'~;~
~
w.~ I`~~';`:~~Q~` ;
:
~~~ ~;.,~.~,:.:..~:
,.
~ J; :`
~ ~,
`:°= I
'. - r=
.;
_ j ~ ,
«
,
~ i -
-_
~~ ;
~~~
~----
i
s
~ v ~\~
=
~~~
~~
I._, ~
Yq
~
~ ~.
~ ~
\
`
~` ' - ° i' ' ~ ~ I`.~~.
~
~~.~
y,
.`~
,,
~~CY011Awti~
~ ~ ,
i
.t• 1~~
, ~~l.• i~;
j
•
'
I i ~ ~
1 s
\
~
_-
~ '~
~
~ \
~4 - r..s, ara.
--
.
__ 8 .~n~
_ -~
; 'i ,, .
ju~~
--- ~ ---
Ths Anahelm Resort SpmcMc Plan
Anaheim, Ca9fomio.
Developmen4 Summary Plan
-_~_ rn
F-°r--}
0 1~p 2f700fge1 ~ Kp}~
o~~ Destpnotetl Future AUgnment tn
General Ptan Ctrculotbn Hemenr
~, _„~ L1rNi oi Anahe#n Resort
.~. ~ Desipnated for Future Extensbn tri
Ger~eral Plan Clrcult~tlort Element
. :::; {::'~ C-R Dlstrlct (Devebpment Area 1)
~~~~~ PR DBtrlct (Development Areo 2)
MobYehane Pork (AAHP) Ov9rlay
7n connecnon wrm T~o puneyWnC Resort ~ Zone wlthln tne C-R 0lstACt
Spectfk Plan, Cermas Avenue Ls plannetl to
be rebcpted 1,000 to 1,100 teet northerty ~ Central Core
and a portb~ or west rneer Is plcnneC to
becanv a cuwe-sac (wsit ploce)
Exnib~l 1.7b-fhe Anaheim Reson Spec~hc Pian Developmenl Summary Plan
Revised Amendment N3
rne Anahoim Resort Spec~f~c Plan .•. Section I.O: Executiue Summary
C-R Dlstrict Qevelopment Density Summpry Tabulation
Density Designation Maxlmum Approximate
Exisiin
~y
i
Dens *
~Y
Acres g
Hotel/FAotel ax
~~um Hotel/
(rounded)
Rooms Miot~l Rooms*
Low Up to 50 71.4
1.926
3,777•°
rooms/acre
Low•IrIedlum Up to 75 177
0
roomslacre . 4.523 13,277
Medium Up to 100 19.2
422
rooms/acrc 1,920
Convenrion Center Up to 125 55
4
(CC) Medium
rooms/ . 2'719 6,926
acre•'•
Totai
323 9.590 25,900
~ Th~ ma~dmum density for each lot or parcd !s the numbet of hotel/motel rooms/acre noted in thls table
or 75 rooms per lot/parcel exlsting on the date of adopu~n of the Anaheim Rcsort SpeMHc f"~w. v•~uchever
ls greate:. For parcels that are developed wiih hotel or tnotd rooms wh~¢h px~ ~e ii1~;;;,;;m dmnsiey
designatlon, the number of rooms e~datlnq on the date o( adoptlnu o[ : the AnaheL~ ~te~~~ g~~„ ~lian
bY a Pted General P~ed at thelr odstlng deasity. Due -to the anaasdccc~ i~ltlcoal~~ Nv~4c-d~-~y r~qu({~~a
Amendment No. 331 (or Hazbor Po~~~~~ ~-, ~(~12 ~frU. t~at~1 ~y~nua ~23 teeU. ,
°reedman Way (1 1 I/Z fecq and West Stzeet/Disney,ia~d Urtvo north of Ball ~~r~ l lo ceet~ ~~ ~~Ee: 1~
Cerritos Avenue and Katella Avenue (2 1/2 leeU, to tmplement the publie Re~lttf ~~ S ct[sc'rj7~' P* ~ ~~,.~+ , pDrop-
erUes along chese streets may lndude the additlonal rlght~ .-way widths in thelr ;;;~ ~a; ;.ra~r~~ ~`.h~~,
computlng denstty.
" The ma;cimum aumber of hotel/motel rooms tncludes the e~lstln,~+ 50'7•rcwm p~ ~pnrStHc FLotc ~.
"' 'i'tse trlp geaaratlon charactcrisUcs uf these hotel/motel rooms ghd?! ;~ ~c~ated ta che ec~ulw~.~~t ot
100 rooms per gross acre.
Summary of Density DesignaHons for fhe I-5 Fu}ure Wid'enfng Ri~ht•ot-Wcy Area
Low t~p co 50 3.8
190
roums / acre
Low-Medlum Up to 75 ~ ~
579
rooms / acre
`~~~u~ Up to 100 3.6
360
rooms/acre
Total L 5.1
1,129
Exn~bi~ 1.7c-C•~ Oisrnct Deveropmenl Densiry Summory fabulction
Page I -12
n~~__~ ~~__~_
fie Anaheim R~tort Sp~clnc Plan ~~~ $eCt~pii j.0: EXeCiit~ St~qTy
~ ~ ~~
~M~..~ v~"
~ ~.~ ~~;`'~ ~
.o„~ ° ~ ~~.~ ~.-~ ~`.
_ -r-- _\~-~,~ 1
, . ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ---
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
_ _ _ _ ~ ;` , ~ . - _._~
I, - ~ . -
_. i_ i~ _ -. ~ ~~. %--_-'-.~
. v.---- -
i~ . ~.' ~ ~\~_..~.~:,
~ _ ~.~,...,.,. ~ --- ~ ,, \\ ~ - --"_.
~
_ ~ i , ~~ ---~~ j _ -L-~~~' ~~. ~-,ao
. ;i~y ,.~:.-. 1~~~\ J
-- I r-_~ ~ d --...__ r...e~o, ww '.' -~ \ ~
- ~'~~ : .._.. ^ _?~~..-- \
--, ~~ - -i-E . _-_ `, ~'7~'~~ ~S\~~iil»\
I KeMVA~wA~=' ", r ~ __ V~'~/~j+'~~ . ~ . ~ \~ \
_._ !lJ~~_ _a.~€~~\~
_: - ~`'~ j;~1 _ . : :~, -',~ ~ I ,
_ ,<_ . , ~ r----~
s '-~j ~~~.~~~~ ~ I
~_'_. _ ~ -_:.' ; ! __-. =`~1\1 ; ~
--' ~ II' ` =7. ~
~+ I ' \\\ ~
,~ !1 ~
_..~."~~ ~_~"_ I~`ootlAVMN/~_- `i
The Anaheim Resort Speciffc Plan
Anaheim, CalRomla
C-R District Development
Density Plcn
2000
~~2~ teet ~ Norfh
,~ ~ ~ Deslgnotecf Future Allgnment In
Generol Plan Clrculat;on Elem3nt•
•In connecilon wttt~ The DGneyland Resort
SFacttlC Plcn, Certttos Avenue Is planned to
be relocatea 1,000 to 1,100 feet northerly
and a portlon oi West Street Is planned to
become o cul•tle-sac {West Place)
~GM~p ANMw dprMrft
h cmn.cron.en ~s
^~+~0. iN S~eron a0
a m. twcrc ra,
~~M~~ :a omw I.s
\~ ~~h.
~\'~
~:, .
~~~~\
;fi~ ~. ~.
~-/,~~~
c~~'~~
NCO AMnu~
~egend
„ ~„~ Ltmli of AnaheYT Resort
~ ~ '~ Designated tor Future Extenslon In General
Plan Clrculatlon Element
Low Denslty: Up to 50 Hotel Roortu/Gross
Acre or 75 roortu, whichever Ls preoter
~j//~ Low•Medium Densliy: Up to 75 Hotel Rooms/
Gross Acre or 75 roortu, whkhever Is greater
\\\\\\~ Medlum Denstty; Up to 100 Hotel Roortu/
Gross Acre or 75 rooms, whlchever Is gteater
\\\\\ Convenibn Center Medlum: Up to
125 Hotel Rooms/Grou Acre or 75
fo0R15. whlCh@vef IS gre0lef"
~Wtth trlp generction charaCterlstlcs
mttigated to the equNalent of 100 roortu
per gross aCte
Exhlb/11,7d-C-ROfsfrlctDeve/oomenlDensltvPlan o:..:__~ .
The Anaheim Resort S~,ecific Plan -I- Section 9.0: Leg~ct Descriptiott
9.1 Aree 1 Beginning at a point or. the centerline of Ball Raad, said poizt being S
89° 56' O1" W, 145 feet more or less from the centerline intersection of
Ball Road and Cambridge Street as shown on Tract No. 1909 as
record-d in Book 59, pages 13 and 14 of Orange County records;
thence Westerly along the centerline of Ball Road to the centerline
intersection of Ball Road and Harbor Boulevard thence Southerly
along the centerline of Hazbor Boulevard to the intersection of the
centerline of Hazbor Boulevard with the centerline of Interstate 5
(Santa Ana Freeway); thence Northwcsterly along the centerline of
Interstate 5 to the intersection with the centerline of Ball Road; thence
Westerly along the centcrline of Ball Road to the intersection of the
centerline of Ball Road and the Northerly prolongation of ti'~e West line
of Parcel2 as shown on a map recorded in Book 78, page 42 of Orange
County records; thence Southerly along said Westerly line of Parcel2
to thc South line of said Parcel 2; thence Westerly along the Westcrly
prolongation of the South line of said Parcel 2 to the ir_tersecdon with
the centerline of West Street; thence Northerly along the centerline of
West Street to the intersection of the Easterly prolongation of the
Southerly line of Parcel2 as shown on a map recorded in F3ook 29,
page 14 of Orange Cour .ty records; thence Westerly along said
Southerly line of Parcel2 to the Southwest corner of said Parcel 2;
thence Northerly along the Westerly line and the Northerly
prolonga[ion thereof of saic( parcel 2 to the intersec;ion with the
centerline of Ball Road; thence Easterly along the centerline of Ball
Road to a pnint 53 feet South of the Southeast comer of Tract No.
1620; thence Northerly along the east houndary of said Tract to the
centerline of Veimont Avenue; thence Nor[heaster:y along the
centerline of Vermont Avenue to the centerlinc of West Street; thence
[Yotthwesterly alon~ the centerline of West Street to a poin[ on the
prolongation of the centerline of Locust Street thence No:theasterly
along said prolongation of thc centerline of Locust Street to the
centerline of Interstate 5(Santa Ana Freeway); thejice Southeasterly
along the centerline of Interstate S to the intersection witt~ tkie
centerline of Ball Road; thencc Easterly along the centerline of Ball
Road to a point approximately 140 feet West of the centerline of
The.~~:iaheim Resort S,.ecific Plan ~ Section 9.0: Legul Lesctiption
Harbor Eioulevard; thence Northwesterly to the Southeast corner oF
Tract tYo. 10954; thezice Northwesterly along the Easterly bound~uy of
said Tract to the Northeast corner of said Tract; thence Southwesterly
along the Tract boundary; thence Northwesterly along ihe Tract
boundary and the extension thereof to a point which is approximately
442 feet South of the centerline of Vermont Avenue; thence
Northeasterly to the Southwest comer of Pazr.el 2 per Lot Line
Adjustment Piat No. 110 recorded in Book 50, page 9 0: ~range
County records; thence Northwesterly along the West line of said
Pazcel 2 to the Northwes[ corner of said Parcel2; thence along the
property tine Northeasterly, 49 feet; trtenc~ Northwesterly along the
property line 21 feet to the Southwest corner of Parcel 1 of said Lot
Line Adjustment Plat No. 110; thence Northeasterly to the Southeast
corner of said Pazcel 1; thence Northwesterly along the East line of
said Pazcel 1 and the prolongation Uiereof to the centerline of Ver~ont
Avenue; thence Northeasterly along the centerline of Ve:mont Avenue
to the ceaterluie of Harbor Boulevard; thence Southeasterly along the
centerline of Hazbor Boulevard to the intersection of the prolongation
of the North line of Lot 27 of Anaheim Extension and the centerline of
Harbor Boulevard; thence Northeasterly along said North line of said
Lot 27 to the Northeast comer uf said Lot 27; thence Southeasterly
approximatety 230 feet to the Northwest corner of Tract No. 1909;
thence continuing Southeasterly along the West boundary of Tract No.
1909 to the Southwest corner of Tract No. 1909; thence continuing
Southeasterly along the prolongation of the West line of said Tract to
the point of intersection with the centerline of Ball Road, said
intersection being the original point of Beginning,
9.2 A~eB 2 Beginning at the centerline intersection of Hazbor Boulevard and
Interstate 5(Santa Ana Freeway); thence Southeasterly along the
centerline of' Interstate 5 to the intersectlon of the Easterly
prolongation of the North line of Alro Way as shown on a map recorded
in Book 112, pages 11 and 12 of Pazcel Maps records of Oxange
County; thence Westerfy along said North line to Alro Way and the
Westerly prolongation thereof a distance of 1450 feei more or less;
thence Southerly 505 feet more or less to the North line of Southern
'the Anahsim Rsaort Sp~clflc r~an a~°,o S~Ctifln 9.0: Lega1 DP.aCtiptipyi
~•.
~ \`\`,
u
v~^.°n~ ~~
e
. ~~
~~
._~~ ~,~ , ,~
. i1
.
edaooo
.._.. .$
~
~~ ~ ~~
1' 3.• o ~~
~ ' ~
. r
~~~
`. 0
~
1
-- _r o~...-'..
T, r ~ .~s~ar'~ ~. v~ ~
. ~
~
_ I~ ` ~ A~ ~ i~ i ~,,:::.__ -_
A
ea b
_ ~ +
~
~
-- = _..... :~
~
' ~
~
n~
+
'_' _. ,
, .
---
. ; ,
~
,; ~
' •
_ --_-
' __ _ :: .
~; - -
~
~ -__
I•--• ,
, ~
. ..
a. _.....~ . ;.......r
~ i~--''- . ~; .5
, i :
_. .-_..~ ~.~~,~,.,.
~- ~ !~- ~~` ,~~.
--=
-
i
. .
;;~i .`
~i ~
i
=
Il-~tea2 t':~\
~
'
;~ .1 i I `
-~ I __ I~f6C ~J '-~ ~ ~°e~
. :--~..a. _ ~
a
~
~;ii- ~
-- I i ~L~ .__! .`
a+~v~ wa . .
..:~ ^~\
. ~;'~
:t~. ~\~
.~ ~~,~:,~.
~`~ ~..
,o _,~~
---~t r€_'"~~~
' :~ ~ f/,~^~•.
- ~ ..~., i ~ .r_ ,;a~
' I; ~Ot~COAYMMA
i=
IIti
;j
'--~ i x
Tne Anaheim Resort Speciflc Plan
Anaheim, CalKomla
Legal Description Areas
0 1000 2000 feet ~ North
ExhlbH 9.1 a-1.e8a1 PescnpHon Areas
Legend
L.._..! ~n ot Anaheim Resort
~~ Anaheim Res~^rt Specmc Plan Legol
'~~ Area Boundaries
~-- -~ Designafed for Future Extenslon tn
c~enerot Pbn ~ ~<culation Element
Page 9-5
The Anaheim Resort bNeci~c Plan -I~ 5ection 9.0: Leg~Y Descreption.
California ';dison property; thence Westerly along said North iine and
th.e prolongation thereof to the intersection with the centerline of
Harbor Boulevard; thence Northerly along the centeriine of Harbor
Boulevazd to the intersection with the centerline of Interstste S, being
Ute point of begiruzing of this description.
9.3 Area 3 Eiegizuling at a point bein~ the intersection of the Westerly
prolongation of the centerline of Gene Autry ~Vay (formerly Pacifico
Avenue) and the centerline of Interstate 5; thence Westerly along said
Westerly prolongation of the centerline of Gene Autry Way to the
intersection of the centerline of Haster Street; thence Northerly along
the centerline of Haster Street 1050 feet more or less; thence Westerly
660 feet more or less; thence N~rtherly 265 feet more or less to the
centerlina of Katella Avenue; thence Westerly along said centerline to
the intersection with the centerline of Clementine Street; thence
Plortherly along the centerline of Clementine Street to the intersection
with the centerline oi Freedman Way; thence Southeasterly along the
centerline of Freedman Way 550 feet more or less to a point; thence
perpendiculaz to the centerline of Freedman Way and Northeasterly to
the intersection of the centerline of Interstate 5(Santa Ana Freeway);
thence Southeastesly along the centerline of said Interstate 5 to the
point of beginnin~.
Except~lug Hotel CircYc .4rea:
Begirining at the centerline intersection of FCatella Avenue and
Clementine S~reet; thence Northerly along the centerline of
Clementine Street to the intersection with the Westerly pr~longation
of the Northerly line of Lot 7 of Tract No. 3330 as recorded in Book
113, pages 21 and 22 of Orange County records; thence Easterly along
said North line of said Lot 7 to the Sourhwest corner of Lot 5 of Tract
3084 as recorded in Book 96, pages 39 and 40; thence Northerly along
the West ]ir-e of said Lot 5 to the Northwest corner of said Lot 5;
thence Easterly along the NorCh line of said Loi 5 to the Easterly
prolongation thereof to the intersection with the cenierline of Haster
Street; thence Southerly along the centerline of Haster Street 285 feet
The Anaheim Resort Srzcific Plsn •I- Section 9.0: Leg.c[ Description
more or less; thenca Westerly 225 feet more or less; thence Nor[herly
185 feet more or less; thence Westerly 230 feet more or less to the
intez~section with the centerline of Zeyn Street; thence Southerly along
the centerline of Zeyn Street to the intersection wzth Che centerline of
Katella Avenue; thence Westerly along the centerline of Katella
Avenue 284 feet more or less to a point on the Southeriy prolongation
of the East line of Farcel2 as shown on a map recorded in Book 10,
page 12 of Pazcel maps records of Orange County; thence Northerly
along the Southerly prolongation of said East line and the East line of
said Pa: ce12 to a point on the South line of Lot 8 of said Tract 3330;
thence Westerly along the South line of said Lot 8 to the centerline of
C;ementine Street; thence Northerly along the centerline of
Clementine Street to the point of Ueguuung.
9.4 Area 4 Begi.ruiing at the Northeast corner of Pazcel 1 per Parcel Map recorded
in Book 98, page 39; thence Southerly along the West line of said
Parcel 1 to a point in the centerline of Oran~ewood Avenue; thence
Westerly along the centerline of Orangewc r,d Avenue to the East line
ofTract No. 3029; thence Northerly along the East line to the North
line of said Tract No. 3029; Uience Westerly to the West line of said
Tract; thence continuing Westerly along the Westerly prolongation of
said Northerly Tract boundary to a point in the centerline of West
Street; thence Northerly along the centerline of West Street to the
Northeast comer of Tract No. 3204 per map recorded in Book 97,
pages 1, 2 and. 3; thence Westerly along the North boundary of said
Tract to the Southeast comer of Tract No. 3290 per map recorded in
Book 101, pages 43 and 44; thence Northerly along the Easterly
boundary of said Tract to the Northeast comer of said Tract; thence S
89°~25' S3" W, 40 feet; thence S 44° 25' S3" W, 28 feet; thence S 89°
25' S3" W, 531 feet; thence 5 0° 45' S2" E, 60 feet; thence S 89° 25' 22"
W, to the intersection of the Gast buundary ofTrac[ No. 2?89 and the
centerline of Stella Avenue per map recorded in Book 83, pages 5, 6
and 7; thence Northerly to the centerline intersection of Katella
Avenue and Walnut Street; thence Easterly along the centerline of
Katella Avenue to the intersection with the centerline of Harbor
Boulevard; thence Northerly aiong the centerline of Harbor Boulevazd
The Anaheim Resort S~,cific Pian -H 5ection 9.0: Leg._c Description
675 feet more or less; thnnce Easterly 835 feet more or less; thence
Soufherly 675 feet more or less to the centerline of Katella Avenue;
thence Easterly along the centerline of Katella Avenue 55 feet more or
less; thence Southerly 265 feet more or less; thence Westerly 430 feet
more or less; thence Southerly 390 feet more or less; thence Easterly
1510 feet more or less; thence Southerly parallel with the centerline of
Haster Street 1300 feet more or less; thence Westerly 1670 feet more
or less to the point of beginning,
9.5 Area 5 Begirming at the cer,terline intersection of Katella Avenue and West
Street; thence Northerly along the centerline of West Street 825 feet
more or less to the point of begiruung; thence Westerly 500 feet more
cr less; thence Northerly S00 feet more or less; thence Easterly 500
feet more or less; thence Southerly 500 feet more or less to the point
of beginning,
9.6 AI'ea 6 Parcels 1 and 2 as shown on a map recorded in $ook 10, page 44 of
Parcel Maps records of Orange County.
9.7 Area 7 Pazcel 1, in the City of Anaheim, County of ~range, State of Califbrnia,
as shown on a map recorded in Book 98, pages 39 of Parcel Maps, in
the O$.ce of the County Recorder of said County.
9.$ APea 8 Lots 15, 16, 17 and 18 ofTract No. 3290, recorded in Book 101, pages
43 - 44 of Miscellaneous Maps, filed No~~ember 20, 1957 in the ~range
County Recorder's Office.
Amendment IVo. 3 to the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2
Proposed Amendments to the
Zoning and Development Standards
(Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code)
(New wording depicted in bold print. An explanation of the proposed anendment is provided in
kalic print)
(A) That Subsection .030 (Low-Medium Density) of Section 18.4II.060 entitled, "LAND USE
AND SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS-COMMERCIAL RECREATION (C-R)
DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT DENSITY AREAS" be amended to read as follows:
".030 Low-Medium Density. For properties designated Low-Medium
Density, up to sevenly-flve (75) hotel/motel rooms per gross acre or seventy-five
p5) hotel/motel rooms per lot or parcel existing an the date of adoption of the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, whichever is flreater.
(a) Exception. For thaf area identified as Area 8 on Exhibi4 9.1a
of the Specific Plan document ;anti4led, "Lsgal Description Areas"
(Amendment No. 3), the maximum density shall be seventy-five (75)
hotel/motel rooms per gross acre."
(The proposed amendment wou/d base the maximum allowable density calcu/ation on
the tofal cumulafive acreage of the four lots rather than on a perlet or parcef basis.)
(B} That Paragraph .0901 (Setbacks - Abutting Public Rights-of-Way) of 5ection
18.48.070.090 entitled, "S7RUCTURAL SETBACK AND YARD REQUIREMENTS" be
amended to read as follows:
".0901 Setbacks - Abutting Public Rights-of-Way. Such setbacks shall
be measured from the ultimate planned right-of-way as designated on the
Circulation Element of the General Plan and as funher described in Seciions 4.0
(Pub!ic Facilities Plan) and 5.0 (Design Plan) of the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan documenl.
(a) Lots abutting Katella Avenue between Walnut Street and
Interstate 5(Santa Ana Freeway) shall have a minimum fully landscaped front
yard setback of eleven (11) feet.
(b) Lots abutting Harbor Boulevard between Interstate 5 and
Orangewood Avenue shall have a minimum fully landscaped front yard setback
of twenty-six (26) feet.
(c) Adjacent to t~e ~_~ilowing Major, Primary and Secondary roads
within the Specific Plan area, the minimum setback for buildings seventy-five
(75) feet tall or less shall be twenty (20) feet; for buildinc~s greater than seventy-
five (75) feet, the minimum setback shall be thiriy (30) feet:
(1) Ball Road.
(2) Ciementine Street.
(3) Freedman Way.
(4) Harbor Boulevard north of Interstate ~.
(5) Haster StreeVAnaheim Boulevarcl.
(6) Manchester Avenue.
(~ Oranc~ewood Avenue.
(8) Pacifico Avenue (Alignment shown on the Circulation
Elemeni of the City of A.naheim General Plan).
(9) West StreeUDisneyland Drive north of Bail Road.
(10) West Street south of Katella Avenue.
(d) Adjacent to local slreets within the Specific Plsn area, the
minimum setback for buildings thirty-five (35) feet tall or less sha;l be ten (10)
feat; for buildings greater than thirty-five (35) feet, the minimum setback shali be
twenty (2~) feet. Loal streets inciude:
(1) Alro Way.
(2) Casa Vista Street.
(3) Mouniain View Avenue.
(4) Ox Road.
(5) Vermont Avenue.
(6) West Place (Portion of 1Nest Street south
of Ball Road within the Specifia Plan area).
(7) Zeyn Street.
(e) For West StreeUDisneyland Drive between Katelia Avenue
and Ball Road, the minimum ;>.::. ~~ck shall be nineteen (19) feet.
(~ Adjacent to Walnut Street, the mir.imum setback shail be thiriy
(30) feet.
(g) Adjacent to Convention Way, the minimum setback for
buildings seventy-five (75) feet tall or less shall be twenty (20) feet; for buildings
greater than seventy-five (75) feet, the minimum setback shall be thirty (30) feet.
(h) Adjacent to Casa Grande Avenue, tt~e minimum setback
shall be twenty (20) feet"
(The proposed amendment would add a new sub-paragraph (h) to provide a
minimum setback requirement adjacent ;~ Casa Grande Avenue.)
(C) Paragrapi~ .1105 (Screening of Parfcing Areas) of Section 18.48.070.110 entitled,
"REQUIRED SITE SCREENING" is proposed to ba amended to read as folicws;
".1105 Screening of Parking Areas. Where parking is visible from a
public right-of-way, the parking shall be screened with a landscape area in
compliance with the Design Plan. Said landscape area shall consist of:
(a) shrubs or bushes which can attain a minimum height of thirty-
six (36j inches :vithin two (2) years of instailation;
(b) landscaped berms with a minimum height of thirty-six (36) inches
(including the mature height of landscape pianted thereon); or
(c) decorative walls or fences upon which are planted clinging
vines, and shail be landscaped, irrigated and maintained in compliance with the
Uesign ?lan and the Engineering Standard Detail No. 137 entitted, "Commercial
Drive Approach "
(d) Exception: Surtace parking areas adjacent to Casa
Grande Avenue shall be screened by an eight {8) foot high decorative
masonry wail. Said wail shal! no4 encroach inYo the required front yard
setback area and shail be planted with either clinging vines and/or fast-
g~owing shrubbery which wiii screen the wall surl'ace within two (2) years
of insta(lation "
(Triis provides for the construction of a wafl adjacent to Casa Grande Avenue to
cornpletely screen suri'ace parking areas from. th~ adJacent residential uses in the event
the existing mote! structures are demolished and the property is reconstruc!ed in
accordance with the zoning and site development standards of the SP92-2 Zone.)
t~. A g t~~~~lr 1 D
5-13-155y
MITIGATIOA MONI'ORln1G Pk~OGR'i,! t-5~. 0108
F'OR
ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFlC PLAN NO. 92-2, til'AENCMENT N0. 3
CEQA Aclion: Mi!igated Negative Declaration
Proiect Description: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 52-2
F~roiect Location: 1175 - 1193 Casa Granae Avenue, Anaheim
Terms and'Jefinitions:
1. Property Owner/Developer - Any owner or developer of real property within the Anaheim ResoR Specific Plan, Amendmenl No. 3, area.
2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing - Any Miligation Measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or suoerior result and will ha ie
same or superior effect on the environment. i he Planning Department, in conjunctian with any appropriate agencies ar City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any
proposed "environmental equivalenUtiming" and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information ~equired
in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be borne by the property owner/developer. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials
basis at the rate in the City's adopted fee schedule.
3 Timing - This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance
associated with tf~e mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action itt~m has been complied with, no additional monitoring pur ~ant to the Mitigation Monitoring
Program will occur, as routine City praclices and p•ocedures will ensure that the intent of the measure t~aa been complied with. For example, if the timing is "to be shown on approved
building plans" subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the app~oved plans will be !~nal building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit t~ ensure
compliance.
4. ResponsfblHty for Monitoring - Shall mean lhat compliance wilh the subject mitigation m~asure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by ali departments listed for each
mitigation measure.
5 Ongoing Mitigat(on Measures - The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this mitigation monitoring program will be monitored in the
form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year stating how compliance with the subject measure(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a
measure has bnen demonstrat~d for a period of one year, monitoring of the measura will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be
monitored "Ongoing During Construction", the annual letter will review those measures only while construction fs occurring; monitoring will be discontinuod after construc~ is
complete.
6. BulldinQ Permit - For purposes of this mitigation monitoring program, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construclion of a new bui~ding or structurai
expansion or modification of any existing building, but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure ur building.
.'. Note: Mitigation Measures 3.3-6, 3.10-5 and 3.10-6 of Mitigatio~ Monitoring Program No. 0085 adopted in connection wilh the adoption of the Anaheim Re~ort Specific Plan No. J2-2
were intentionally deloted from this Program as they are not applicable to this area.
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Progr3m No. 0108
Project: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resnrr 4nPC~f~ pta., N„ o~_~ ~i i~c_, io~ r.,~., n_.,..,,,, ~...._
Mftlgation
Measure
Timing -- - ~~„~
Measure
Responsible for
Completion
Number Monitoring
LAND USE-RELATED PLANS AND FOLICIES
3 ~_~ Prior to Approval of Each Final site plans wili be reviewed for future developments within the Planning
Final Site Plan Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area for consistency with the Specific Department,
Pian. Planning Division
TRANSPORTATION AN~ CIRCULATION
3.3-1 Prior to First Final Site Pian The property owner/developer of development forecasl to generate Public
Approval (Excluding Signage 100 or more peak hour trips, as det~rmined by the City Traffic and WorkslEngineering
Plans) Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Tra(fic Analysis Modei Trip Department, Traffic
Generation Rates, shall be required to pay the City of Anaheim for ~II and Transportaticn
costs associated with updating the City o! Anaheim Resort Division
Transportation Model to inciude lhe trips associated with their
proposed development. This model update will be used to determine
and program the extent and phasing of impravements necessary to
accommodate the proposed development.
a. If the model demonstrates that the proposed development will
cause an intersection to operate at LOS E or worse, prior to the
issuance of whichever building permil necessitates an
improvement(s), the constructlon conlra~t for said improvement(s)
must have been awarded; and, prior to finai building and zuning
inspections for the applicable buiiding permit, lhe improvemenl(s)
shall be accepted by the City. The extent of improvements
, required far tull buildout of the Anaheim Resort are tisted in
, Tables 3.3-2, 3.3-4 and 3.3-6 of Section 3.3, Transportation and
~
i Circulation, ot EIR No. 313.
The property owner/developer shall have the option to: (1) ~vait
until the improvemenl;s) is constnict~d by olhers or, (2) construct
~ or pay the actual total cosls of lhe improvemeM(s) which shall
include the payment for consultar~Vconlractor services tor
preliminary and final enrineering, suils snalysis, right-of•way
acquisition, demolition, relocation, construction and inspeclion,
and any other related expenses. The City Engineer may make
the determination that Option (2) may be waived based on the
status and phased implementaHon of the p;anned improvement(s)
and based on lhe supporting environmental analysis contafned in
EIR No. 313 or in supplemental environmental documentation.
Anaheim Resort Mitigation ivlanitoring Program No. 0108
Prolect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort Snecific Plan No_ 92-2 (1175-i ]93 Cata Grande Avenuel
Mitigatlon
AAeasure
Number Timing Measure
- Responsible for
Monitoring Comp-etion
3.3-1 The City may have the ability to reimburse for the additionai
con't expense beyond the propeRy owner/developer's fair share
contribution of improvement(s) based on the colleclion of other
transportation improvement fees or funding through other public
sources. However, if a reimbursement e~ fair share program has
not been established by the City, to the extent :h2t the property
owner/developers costs exceed their "fair share" contribution for
said improvement(s), the proper;y owner/developer may petition
the City Council to establish a reimbursement agreement or
benefit district to include other benefiting properties. All costs
associated with the establishment of ariy such agre; ~^nUdistrict
shall be at the expense of ihe property owneddeveloH.:r.
b. If the updated model demonstrates that LOS E will not be
exceeded, no addit?onal transportation improverrent(s) wiil be
required of the proaosed development. In this instance, the
property owner/developer shall, priur to the issuance of each
building permit, pay to the City of Ananeim ali applicable
transportation fees in an amount determined by City Council
i Resolution in effect at tl~e !ime o~ issuance of the building permit
~ and participate in all appiicable reimbursement or benefit districts
which have been established.
3.3-2 Prior to Issuance of Each Appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees and 1'raffic Impact and Planning
Building Fermit Improvement Fees shall be paid by the propeAy owner/developer to Department,
ihe City of Anaheim in amounts delermined by the City Council Building Division
Resolution in effect at tlSe time of issuance of the b~~lding peimit with (fee payment);
credit given fui City-authorized improvemanls provided by the p~operty Public
owneddeveloFer; and, participat~~ in ali applicahle reimbursement or Works/Engineering
benefit districts which have been established. Departmenl, Tr~:` ic
and Transportation
Division
(credits/districls)
m~ip0108.Juc
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Proiect: Atnendment No. 3 to Anaheim Recnrt Cnecifir. Plan T~Tn 92_~ (1175_11~?? l~aca C:ra.,rlP AVPNIP~
Mitigation Timinp Measure Responsible for Campletion
Ivieasure Monitoring
Numbe~
3.3-3 Prior io Ap~rovai of First The property owneddeveloper shall irrevocably offer for dedication Public
Final S~bdivision Map or (with subordinatian of easements), including necessary constn~ction Worksl~ngineering
Issuance of Firsf Buil~+ing easer~~enls, the ultimate right(s)-of-way as shown ir the Circulatien Department,
Permit, Whichever Occurs Element of the Anaheim General Plan adjacent to their property. Development
First Services Division;
City Aitorney's
Office
3.3-4 Prior to Final Building and The property owner/developer shall jcin and financially participate in a Public
Zoning Inspection; and, clean fuel shuttle program, if established; and, shail aarlicipate in the Worics/Engineering
Ongoing During Project Anaheim Transportation Network/Transportation Management Department, Traffic
Operation Association. and Transaortation
Division; City
Attorney's Office
3.3-5 Prior to Issuance of Grading The property owner/developer shall coordinate rideshare services for Public
Permit construction employees with the Anaheim Transportatio~ Nelwork Works/Engineering
(ATN), and shall implem~nt ATN recommendalions to the extent Department, Traffic
feasible. and TranspoRation
Division
3.3-7 Ongoing During Construction If the Hnaheim Police Departmenl or Anaheim Traffic Managemenl Police Department
Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic (for Police
control services, the property owneddeveloper shall reimburse the Department
City, on a fairshare basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated Personnel); Public
with s~!ch services. Works/Engineering
Department, Traffic
and Transportation
Division ( for
Anaheim TMC
personnel)
3.3-8 Prior lo Finsl Building and The property owner/developer will implement and administer a Public
Zoning Inspection; and, comprehensive Transportation Demand Managemenl (TDM) program Works/Enginee~ring ~
Ongoing During Projecl for all e~nployees. Objeclives of tlie TDM program shall be: Department, Traffic
Operation Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transpoAation modes and Transportation
by guests. Division
Provi~~'e a menu of commute alternatives for employees tu reduce
project-generated trips.
nunp010N dor
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. OlOo
Pro;ect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resnrr Rner.ifir. Plan N~ 9~_2 ~t i ~S_i i4~ r~~a ~~~.,,~A e.,A.,,~a~
tJlftigatfon
Measure
Number Timing Me2sure Responsible for
Monitoring Completion
3.3-8 A menu of TDM program stratepies and elements for bath existing and
con't future employee commute options include, but are not limited !o, the
following:
Onsite Service. Onsite services, such as the food, retail, and
other services be provided.
itidesharing. A computer listing of all employee members be
developed for the purpose of providing a"matching" of employees
with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and
who could rid~share.
Vanpooling. A computer listir.g of all employees for the purpose
of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic
proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool.
Transit Pass. Southem Califomia Rapid Transit District and
Orange County Transportation AUlhority (including commuter rail)
passes be promoted through financial assistance and onsile sales
to encourage employees to use the various transit and bus
services from thro~ghout the region.
Commuter Bus. As commuter "express" bus service expands
throughout the region, passes for use on these lines may be
provided for employees who choose to use this service. Financial
incentives be provided.
Shuttle Service. A computer listing of a~l employees living in
proximity to the project be ganerated, and a local shuttle program
offered to encourage employees lo travel to work by means other
than ihe automobile.
Bicycling. A Bicycling Proc~ram be developed to offer a bicycling
alternative to employees. Secure bicycie racks, lockers, and
showers be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle
routes throughout the area be provided to inform potential
bicyclists of these options.
Rental Car Fieet. A"fleet vehicle" prugram be developed to
provide employees who travel to work by means other than an
automobile with access to automobiles in case of emergency,
medical appointments, etc. This service would help employees
use altemative modes of transportation by ensuring that they
would bs able ta ha~~e personal transportation in the event of
specfal c(rcumstances. I
I
~ro i ox.a~
Anaheim Resort M:ti~ation Monitu:ir;~ pmgrnrxi No. 0108
Proiect~ 1:'~:.:*idment?~'t~. 3 to Anaheim Res~.~t Snec;fir. Plar, N~ 9~_7 (1175_1193 (`aca f:ra.,~la e.,a.,~~a~
Mitigation
Measure
Number ._.__.._.~, ~.,,.
Timing
~ __.~ - - - - - -
Measure
R~sponsible for
~Aonitoring
Compietion
3.3-8 Guaranteed Fcide Home Program. A program to provide
con't employees who rideshare, or use transit or olher means of
commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental
car, shultle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during
the work shiK.
Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. An incentives
program for ridesh2rirg and other altemative transpo~lation
modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee
commute trips.
Stagc~er shifts.
Develop a"compressed work week" program, which provides for
fewer work days bul longer daiiy shifts as an option for
employees.
Explore the possibility of a"teiecommuting" program that would
link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer wifh
modem),
Oevelop a parking management program lhat provides incentives
to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single-
occupant auto to travel ;o work.
Access. Preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and
shuttles may be provided
Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit.
(Currently, Federal law provides tax-free status for up to $60 per
month per employee contributiQns to employees who vanpool or
use pubiic transit including commuter rail and/or express bus
pools)
Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Employees offered financial
incentives for bicycling to work.
Sper,ial "Prsmium" for the PaAicipation and Promotion of Trip
Reductiun. TickeUpasses to speciai events, vacations, etc. be
offered !o employees wiio recruit other employees for vanpool,
carpool, or other trip reduction programs.
Actively recruit prospective employees residing within a 30-minute
commute shed.
Design incentive orograrns for carpooling and other altemative
transpartation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of
longest commute trips.
i
~-.
Anaheim Resart Mitigation Menitorinb Program No. 0108
Project: Amendmert No. 3 to Anaheim Resort Speci6c Plan No. 92-2 (1175-1193 Casa Grande
~ MBlgation ~ Tfming I Measure I Responsible far I Completion ~
IVumber f Manitoring p
AIR QUAL ITY
3.4-1 Ongoing During Project The prcperty owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce Public
Operation emissions to the extent practical, schedule goods movements for off- Works/Engineering
pea{c traffic hours, and use clean fuel for vehicles and other Department, Traffic
equipment, as praclicable. and Transportation
Division
3.4-2 Prior to Issuance of Eacl~ The propeny owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission Planning
Buildinp Permit; and, paints and coatings are ulilized in the design of buildings, in Department,
Ongoing During Construction compliance with SCAQMD regulations. This information shall be Buiiding Division
denoted on the project plans and specifications. The property
owneddeveloper shall also implement the following to limit emissions
from architectural coatings and asphalt usage:
a. Use nonsolvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever
appropriate.
b. Use solvent-based coatinc~s, where they are necessary, in ways
that minimize solvent emissions.
c. Encourage use of high-solid or water-based coatings.
3.4-3
Ongoing Durin~ Construction I The property owner/developer shail implement measures to reduce
construction-related air quality fmpacts. These measures shall inciude,
but are not limited to:
a. Normal welling procedures (at Ieast lwice daily) or other dust
palliative measures shall be ioliowed during earlh-moving
operations lo minimize fugitive dusl emissions, in compliance with
ihe City of Anaheim Municipal Code including appiication ot
chemical soit stabilizers to exposed soils after grading is
completed and replacing graund cover in dislurbed areas as
quickly as practicabie.
b. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved
soil binders, accordinfl to manufacturers specification, to exposed
stock piles.
c. Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and cleared of
any spilled export malerials at les~t twice a day to assist in
minimizing (ugitive dust; and, haul routes shall be cteared as
needed (f spilis of materials exported from the project site occur.
South Coast Air
Quality
Management
District; Planning
Depa~~~ent,
Building Division
(verification ot notes
on pians); Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Devetopment
Services Division
(for annual review)
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Proiect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Recnn Snec~fi~ p~a,: N„ p~_~ n i~s_i ioz r~~~ n~~.,,~a e.,o...,o~
Mitlgatlon
Measure
Number i T(min8 Measure Responsible for
Monitoring Compietion
3.4-3 d. bJhere practicable, heavy duty conslruction equipment shall be
con't kept onsite when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions
associated with vehicles repetitiously en'ering and exiting the
project site.
e. Trucks importing or expo~ting soil material and/or debris shall be
covered prior to entering public streets.
f. Taking preventive measures to ensur~ that trucks do not carry dirt
on tires onto public streets, includ~ng treating onsite roads and
staging areas.
g. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minu!es ~
h. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water
and mainlain the vegetation as soon as pianting is .:ompleted.
i. Reduce traf(ic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miies
per hour or less.
j. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as
instantaneous gust) exceed 25 miles per hour and during first and
second stage smog alerts.
k. Comply with the SCAQMD Ruie 402, which states that no dust
imQacts offsite are sufflcient to be cailed a nuisance, and
SCAQ~dD Rule 403, wliich restricls visible emissions from
constrz;ct;r.n.
I. Use I~w emiss!un mobile construclion equiprnent (e.g., tractors,
scrape~, dozeis, etc.) where praclicable.
m. Utilize existing powsr sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel
generators rather lhan temporary power generator~, where
practicable.
n. Maintain construclion equipmenl engines by keeping them
properly tuned.
o. Use low sulfur fuel for eq~ipmenl, lo the sxtent practicable.
3.4-4 Prior to Approval of Each The property owner/deveio~er shall submil Demolilion and Public
Grading Plan (for ImporUExpori Plans, i( determined to be necessary by the Public Works/Engi~~eering
ImpoNExpo~l Plan) and Prior Works/Engineering Departmen!, 3-ra/fii~E~ginser+~-Btivisic~-and/oF Oepartment, Field
to Issuance o( Demolition AAair~teraaace~epartsaer~E. The plans shall include idenlification of En5',neerinc~
Permit ((or Demolilion Plan) of(site localions for materials expurt from the project ~nd options ~~r
disposal ot excess material. These options may include recycliny of
~
materials onsite, sale lo a soil broker or contractor, safe to a project in '
the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with
attempts made to move it within Orange County. The pmperty i
II
owner',feveloper shall oifer recyciable buildin~ materials, such as j
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Ddonitoring Program No. 0108
Proiect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort Snecific Plan No. 92-2 (1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenuel
Mftlgatton Timing Measure% Responsible for Completion
Measure
'
'
' Monitoring
Number ;
>.:,,
;
, _
3.4-4 agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be
con't reused on project site.
3.4-5 Prior io Issuance of Each The prope~ly owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset South Coast Air
Building Permit regulations and implementation of Best Available Control Technology Quality
(BAC'~ and Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARC~ for Management
ar.y new or modified stationary source. Copies of perm~ts shall be District (for permit
' given to the Pianning Department. issuance); Planning
Depatiment,
Planning Division
(for verification of
permii application
and receipt)
3.4-6 Prior to Issuance of Each The properly owr~r/developer shail implement, and demonstrate to the Public Utilities
Building Permit City, measures that are being taken to reduce operation-related air I Department,
quality impaets. These measures may include, but are not limited to, Electric Services
the following: Administration,
Resou-ce Efficiency
1. Improve thermai integrity of siructures and reduced thermal load
through use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors.
2. Incorporate ~f5cient heating and other appliances.
3. Incorporate energy consenration measures in site orientalion and
in building design, such as appropriate passive solar design.
4. Use drought-resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce
energy used in pumping and transporting water.
S-Ra#isip2Ee-i
8-~NASt6-IA~#iAlf
bst~~NsFbusl~esses:
6. To lhe extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for
employees or participate in a J~int development daycare center.
mmrotos.a~
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Protect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort Soecific Plan No. 92-2 (1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenuel
Mitlgation Timing Measure Responsible for Completion
Measure Monitoring
Number
NOISE
3.5-1 Qngoing During Demotition, Noise generated by construction activity shall be limited by the Planning
Grading and Construction property owneddeveloper to 60 dBA along the property boundaries, Department,
before 7:OU a.m. and after 7:00 p.m., as governed by Chapter 6.7, Code Enforcement
Sound Pressure Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal ~ode. Division; Building
. Divis~on (verification
' of notes on plans)
3.5-2 i'rior to Issuance of Each An 8-foot-high perimeter or portable consiruction barrier shali be Planning
Building Permit provids~l by the properiy owner/developer along boundaries of Depart~nent,
construction areas which have noise-sensitive land uses adjacent to Building Oivision
them to minimize noise impacts.
3.5-3 Ongoing During Project The property owneddeveloper shall ensure that all internal cambustion Planning
Constraction . engines on const:vction equipment and trucks are fitted with properly Department,
maintairied mufflers. Building Division
3.5-4 Prior to Submittal of Each The property owner/developer shall submit a noise study prepared by a Planninc~
Final Site Pia~~; to :,e ce~tified acoustical engineer lo ihe satisfaction of the Building Division Department,
Implement2d Prior to Final Manager identifying whether noise altenuation is required and defining Building Division
Building and Zoni~g the attQnuation measures and specific performance requirements, if
inspections warranted, to comply with the Uniform Building Code and Sound
Pressure Levels Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements,
if any, shall depend on the final iocation of such buildings and noise-
sensitive uses inside and surroundinc~ the buildings. AttEnuation
measures shall be irnplemented by the property owneNdeveloper prior
to final building and zoniny inspections.
3.5-5 Prior lo Issuance of Each For structures that are adjacenl to noise-sensitive uses such as Planning
Building Permil residences, the property owner/developer shall ensure that ali Department,
mechanical ventilation units are shown on plans and insialled in Building Division
compliance wilh the Sound Pressure Levels Orclinancs.
3.5-6 Ongoing During Project Engine noise from sweeping equipment used in any paricing facilities PIanR~ng
Operations located adjacent to residential areas shail be mu+fled. Department,
Code Enforcement
Division
mmp01 oB.doc 10
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Proiect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort Snecific Plan No. 92-2 (1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenuel
Mfligation Timing `Measure Responsible for Comptetion
Measure Monitoring
Number
3.5-7 Prior to Issuance of Each The propeRy owner/developer shail ensure that noise from parking Planning
Building Permit for a Parking structures adjacent to residential areas wiil be reduced by the provision Department,
Structure of convenienl access to parking facilities, sound attenuation devices Building Division
(i.e., louvers and walls), the use of textured deck surfaces to reduce
tire squealing, and tiering to provide greater distance to the receptor.
EARTH RESOURCFS - GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY
3.6-1 Prior to Approval of Each The property owner/developer shall submit to the City Engineer for Public
Grading Plan review and approval, a soils and geological report for the area to be Works/Engineering
graded, based on proposed r~rading and prepared by an engineering Deparlmenl,
geologfst and geotechnical engineer. All grading shall be in Development
conformance with Title 17 oi the Anaheim Municipal Code. Services Division
3.6-2 Prior to Issuance ot Each The prope~ty owneddeveloper shall submit for review and approval, Planning
Buildin~ Permit detailed foundation design information for the subject building(s), Department,
prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a Building Division
geotechnical engineer.
~.6-3 Prior lo Issuance of Each The property owneddeveloper shall submit a repart prepared by a Planning
Foundation P.ermit geotechnical engineer fo~ review and approval which shall invesligate Departmenl,
the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft layers are Building Division
present immediately beneath lhe footing site and to ensure that
compressibility does noi underlie the footing.
3.6-4 Prior to Issuance of Each The propeRy owner/developer shall submit plans showing that the Planning
Building Permit proposed structure has been analyzed for earthquake loading and Department,
designed according to the most recent seismic standards in the Building Division
Uniform Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim.
3.6-5 Prior to Final Building and The propeRy owneddeveloper shall submit an eaRhquake e~nergency Fire Department
Zoning Inspection for a response plan for review and approval. The plan shall require p~:,ted
Hotel/Motel notices in all hotel rooms on ea~thquake safety prooedures and
fncorporate ongoing eanhquake training for hofel staff.
~„~o i ox.aa
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Proiect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort Soecific Plan No. 92-2 (1175-1193 Casa C~rande Avem~el
M(tigation Timing Measure Responsible for Completion
Measure : Monitoring
Number
3.6-6 Ongoing During Grading The properiy owner/developer shall implement standa~d practices for Pubiic
Activlties all applicable codes and ordinances to prevent erosion. WorkslEngineering
Deportment,
Development
Services Division
GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE HYDROLOGY ~
3 ~_~ Prior ta Approval of First The property owneddeveloper shall submit a Master Drainage and Public
Grading Plan or Issuance of Runoff Management Fian (MDRMP) for review and approval by the Works/Engineering
First Building Permit, Public WorkslEngineering Oepartment, Development Services Depariment,
Whichever Occurs First Divis(on and Orange Counly Environmental Management Agency. Development
The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following Setiices Divisien
ilems: (plan review);
Orange Couniy
a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting Environmenlal
hydrology and hydraulic calcufalions for storms up lo and Management
including the 100-year storm; and, Agency (authorized
b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control activities)
of project-generated drainage and n:noff.
3.7-2 Prior to Approval of a The property owneNdeveloper shail submit for review and approval of Publ~c
Grading Pian the City Engineer, a Water Quality Management Plan (4VQMP) Works/Engineering
spec(fically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be Department,
used onsite to control Fredictable pollutant run-off. This WQMP shall Development
identify the stnictural and non-structural measures specified in Services Division
Appendix 7 of the Countywide Drainage Area Management Plan de-
tailing impiementation of BMPs whenever they are applicable lo the
project (when the project has a betow grade loading dock, for
example); the assignment of lang-tenn maintenance responsibilities
(specifying the developer, parcel ownzr, maintenance association,
lessee, etc.); and, shall reference the locatfon(s) of structural BMPs.
3.7-3 Prior to Approval of Grading The property owneddeveloper shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Public
Plan or Issuance ot Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Constn~clion Wo~ks/Engineering
Demolition Permit; and, Activities from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence of Department,
During Clearing attainment shall be submitled to the City Engineer. Development
Services Divisfon
~,ro i os.a~~ ~ ~
Anaheim ResoR Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Pro'ect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort S ecific Plan No. 92-2 1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenue
Mitigat(on Timing Measure _ Responsible for Completion
Measure Monitoring
Number
3.7-4 Ongoing During Project The property owneddeveloper shall provide for the following: cleaning Public
Operations of all paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim on a monthly Works/Engineering
basis, including, but not limited to, private streets and parking lots. DepaRment, Streets
The us3 of water to ctean streets, paved areas, parking lots, and other and Sanitation
areas and flushing the debris and sediment down the storm drains shall Division)
be prohibited.
3.7-5 Prior to Each Final Buiiding The property owner/developer shall submit a letter from a licensed Planning
and Zoning Inspection landscape architect to the City ce~tifying that the landscape installation Departmenl,
and irrigation systems have been instalted as specified in the approved Planning Division
landscaping and irrigation plans.
3.7-6 Prior to Final Building and The property owner/developer shall inslall piping onsile with project Public Utilities
Zoning Inspection waier mains so that reclaimed water may be used tor landscape Department,
irrigat(on, if and vr•hen it becomes available from the County Sanitation Electric Services
District of Orange County. Administration,
Resource Efficiency
PUBLIC S ERVICES AND UTILITIES - FIRE
3.9.1-1 Prior to Commencement of Onsite fire hydrants shall be instalted anc! charged by the propeny Fire Department
Structural Framing on Each owner/developer as required and approved by the Fire Department.
Parcel or Lot
3.9.1-2 Prior to Approval of Each The property owner/developer shall submit an emergency fire access Fire Department
Grading Plan plan to the Fire DepaRment for review and approval to ensure that
service to lhe site is in accordance wilh Fire DepaAment service
requiremenls.
3.9.1-3 Prior to Issuance of Each Plans shall fndicate that all buildings, exclusive of parking struclures, Fire Department
Building Permit to be shall have sprinklers installed by the properiy owneNdeveloper in
Implemented Prior to Final accorciance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be
Building and Zoning instalied prior te each final building and zoning inspection.
Inspeclion
3.9.1-4 Prior to issuance of Each Plans shall be submitted to ensure that development is in accordance Fire Department
Building Permit with the City of Anaheim Fire Department Standards, including:
a. Ove~head clearance shall not be less than 14 feet for the full
width of access roads.
rmip0108.duc ~ ~
Anaheim P.esort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Proiect: Amendment No. 3 rn AnahP~~„ uP~~~ C.,o~7F... nl..., i.t,. m ~ i~ i~e ,,n~ ~.___ ..
Miligation
Measure
Number -
Timing ---- - -- - , . , ~-. . ~~ ~,a~a .~, a«uc r~venue
Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
3.9.1.q b. Bridges and underground stnictures to be used for Fire
cony Department access shall be designed to support Fire Department
vehicles we(ghing 75,000 pounds.
c. All underground tunnels shall have sprinklers. Water supplies are
required al all entrances. Standpipes snall also be provlded when
determined to be necessary by lhe Fire DepaRment.
d. Adequate off-site public fire hydrants contiguous to the Specific
Plan area and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the
propeRy owner/developer. The precise number, types, and
locations of the hydrants shall be delennined during building
permlt review. Hydrants are to be a maximum of 400 feet apaA.
e. A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain in the
water system. Flow rates for public parking facilities shall be set
at 1 OOO l0 1,500 m.
3.9.1-5 Prior to Issuance of First
8uilding Permit The propeAy owneddeveloper shall enter into an agreement recorded
againsl the property wilh the City of Anaheim lo pay or cause to be
Fire Department;
paid lhe(r falr share of the fundfnp to accommodate the following ~~~y Aitomey's
~
,
which will serve the Anaheim Resort Specffic Plan area: Office
• One additional fire truck company.
• One additional paramedic company.
• Modiftcat(ons to existing 8re stations to accommodate the additional
fire units, addilional manpower, equipment and faciNties.
• A vehicle equipped with specialty tools and equipment to enable the
Fire Department to prov(de heavy search and rescue response
capabflity.
• A medical triage vehicle/lrailer, equipped wilh sufficient lrauma
dress(ngs, medical supplfes, stretchers, etc., to handle 1,000 injured
persons, and an appropriate storage facfAty.
The detenninatfon of the allocable share of costs altributable to the
property owneNdeveloper shall be based on an apport;onment ot the
casts o( such equfpmenUfacilities among propeAy owners/developers
in the Holel Cfrcle Specific Plan Area, the Disneyland Resort Specific
Plan brea and lhe r~naheim ResoR Spec(flc Plan Area or the otherwise
defined service area, as appticable, depending on the area served.
(Note: To (mplemenl lhis mitfgation measure, the City has adopted ihe
Fire Protection FaGI(des and Paramedic Services Irt~pact Fee
Program. Compliance wilh lhis Program by the property
owneNdeveloper (per Ordinance No. 5498 and ResoluUon No. 95R-73
14
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Proiect: Amendm~nt No. 3 to Anaheim RP~~n c.,P~;F,- ni~., T.T., o~_~ ii i ~c i i n~ r~,,,.., n_
Mitiga4ion
Tfming - -----' - l1Yl~lI~lG
Measur
Measure e
. Responsible for Comptetion
hiumber
, .,.
_ .. ., _ , . , Monitoring
3.9.1-5 dated May 16, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation
con't Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financinc~
arrangements.)
3.9.1-6 Prior to Each Final Building The property owner/developer shall place emergency telephone Fire Department
and Zoning Inspeclion service numbers in prominent locations as approved by the Fire
Deparlment.
3.9.1-7 Prior to Issuance of Each
Building Permit The propen; owner/developer shali submii a Constniction Fire
P
t
i Fire Department
ro
ect
on Pian to the Fire Department for review and approval
detailing accessibility of emergency fire equipment, fire hydrant
location, and any other construction features required by the Fire
Marshal. The property owneddeveloper shall be responsible for
securing facilities acceptable to the Fire Department and hydrants shall
be operational with required fire flow.
3.9.1-8 Prior lo Approval of Water The water supply system shall be designed by the property Fire DepaRment
Improvement Plans owneNdeveloper to provide sufficient fire flow prsssure and storage for
the proposed land use and fire proteclion in accordance with Fire
Department requirements.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILlTIES - POLICE
3.9.2-1 Prior to Approval of Each The property owneddeveioper shall submit plans to the Police Police Department
Final Site Plan and Issuance Department for review and approvai for the purpose of incorporating
of Each Building Permit. safety measures in the project design including the concept of crime
prevention through environmental design (e.g„ building design,
circulation, site pianning, and lighling of parking structures and parking
areas),
3.9.2-2 Prior to Issuance o( Each The property owneddeveloper shall submit plans to the Police Police Department
Building Permil for a Parking Department for review and approvai indicating the provision of closed
Structure circuit television monitoring and recording or oiher substEtute security
measures as may be approved by the Police Department. Said
measures shall be implemented prior to final building and zoning
inspecUons.
3.9.2-3 Ongoing During Project The property owneNdeveloper shali provide private security on the Police Department
Operation premises t~ maintain adequate security for the entire project subject to
review and approval of lhe PoUce Department. The use of security
patrols and electronfc security devices (i.e., video monitors) should be
considered to reduce the potential far crimfnal activity fn the area.
m,~,ro i os.a~x
~ 1S
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Pro'ect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort S ecific Plan No. 92-2 1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenue
Mftigation Timing
Measure Measure Responsible for Completion
Number
_ _. ,.. Monitoring
3
9
2
4 P
.
.
-
rior to Issuance of Each
Building Permil The project design shall include parking lots and parking structures
i Police Department
w
th controlled access points to limit ingress and egress if determined
to be necessary by the Police ~leoartment, and shall be subject to the
review and approval of the Polir.~ ;.~epartment.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES - SOLID WASTE 4
3
9
3
1 ' The
ro
ert
dd
.
.
- Prior to Issuance of Each p
p
y owne
eveloper shall submit project plans to the
Building Permit; to be Maintenance Department for review and approval to ensure that the Public
Implemented Prior to Final Plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989
as Works/Engineering
Building and Zoning ,
administered by thP City of Anaheim and the County of Orange and Department, Streets
Inspection City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans. Prior to final and Sanitation
building and zoning inspection, implementation of said plan shall Division
commence and shal! remafn in full effect. Waste management
mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid waste
generalion include, but are not limited to:
a. Detailing the locat(ons and design of on-site recycling facilities.
b. Providing on-site recycling receptacles to encourage recycling.
c. Complying with all Federal, State and City regulations far
hazardous material disposal.
d. Participating in the City of Anaheim's "Recycte Anaheim" program
or other substitute program as ma.y be developed by the City.
In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of
1989 (AB 939), the property owner/developer shall impiement
numerous solid waste reduction programs, as required by the
Maintenance Department, including, but not limited to:
Facilitating paper recycling by providing chutes or convenient
locations for sorting and recycling bins.
Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by
provlding adequate space and centralized locations for collection
and bailing.
Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by
providina adequate space for sorting and staring.
Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials whenever
feasible to reduce the total votume of solid waste and the number
of trips required for collection.
Prohibiting curbside pick-up.
(Note: The DepaRment of Maintenance reference in the miligation
measure has been changed to Public Works/Engineering Department
,
Streets and Sanitation Division inasmuch as Cit AAafntenance
~ro i oa.a~
16
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Proiect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resnrr S~P~~F~ p~-~., T.T~ 4~_~ n i~c_i ioz r.,~~ n.,.,ae n
Mftiga(ion
Measure Timing Measure Responsible for Completion
Number
. . , ,- :: Monitoring
3,g,3_~ functions are now overseen by the Public Works Department.)
con't
3.9.3-2 Ongoing During Project The following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the Public
Operalion property ownerideveloper: Works/Engineering
Usage Qf recycled paper produc!s for stationery, letterhead, and Department, Streets
, packaging, and Sanitation
Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboarcl. Division
Collection of office paper fc~ recycling.
Collection ef polystyrene (ioam) cups for recycling.
Coileclion of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, la:,er printer toner
cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or
recovery.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILI7IES - SCHOOLS
3.9.5-1 Prior to Issuance ot Each The prapeRy owner/developer shall provide proof of compliance with Planning
8uilding Permit Government Code Section 53080 (Schools). Departn~ent,
Building [3ivision;
ACSD;AUHSD
PUBLIC S ERVICES AND UTILITIES - WATER
3.9.6-1 Prior to Issuance of Each The property owneddeveloper shall submit plans to the Utilities Public Utilities
Building Permit; to be Department for review and approval which shall ensure that water Department,
Implemented Prior to Final conservation measures are incorporated. The water conservation Eieclric Services
Building and Zoning measures to be shown on the plans and implemented by the property Administration,
Inspection; ai~d, Ongoing owneddeveloper, to the extent applicable, include, but are not limiled Resource Efficiency
During Project Operation to, the following: (for water
Us~ of low•flov; sprinkler heads in irrigation systems, conservation
Use of waterway cecirculation systems. measures/annual
Use of low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including iow review); Planning
flush toilets and urinals. Depa~iment,
Use of self-closing valves on drinking fountains. Building Division
Use of effcienl iRigation systems such as drip irrigation and (for verification of
automatic systems which use maisture sensors. inclusion on building
Use of low-flow shower heads in hotels. plans.)
Use of water efficient ice-machines, dishwashers, clothes washers
and other water-us(ng appliances.
Use of (mgation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates
are lowest.
~'rovide information to the ublic in cons icuous laces re ardin
nu~qiu;~a.uuc , /
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Pro'ect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort S ecific Plan No. 92-2 1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenue
Mftlgatian
Measure Timing Measu~e
~ Responsible for Completion
Number
, _ ,:. . _., . . Monitoring
3
9
6
1 water co
t
.
.
- nserva
ion.
con't Use of water-conserving landscape piant materials wherever
feaslble.
3
9
6-2 Pri
.
. or to Approval of First
S~~bdivision Map or Issuance The property owneddeveloper shalt enter into an agreement recorded
against the property with the City of Anaheim
to the satisfactio
f th Public Utilities
D
of First Grading Permit or ,
n o
e
Utilities Depanment and City Attomey's Office, to guarantee the epartment, Waler
Services
Building Permit, V~hichever •
Occurs First property owner/developers participation in water system Administration; City
improvements necessitated by the project. 7he agreement ~hall
contain provisions requiring the property owner/develo
er to Attomey's Offic~
p
pay or
cause to be paid its fair share funding for said improvements and/or
construcl said improvements, if determined to be necessary by the
Utilit3es DepaAment, with reimburs~ment by other beneficiaries in
accordance with the Ut(lity's Rates, Rules, and Regulatians. Costs
shall include the payment for consultant/contractor services for the
preliminary engineering, soils analysis, right-of-way acquisition,
demolition, construction and inspection, and any other related
expenses. Further, the property owneNdevelopershall submit an
engineering report and phasing plan for review and approval by the
Utilities Department selting forth the extent and timfng of the water
system improvements necessitated by the project for use in
implemeniing the agreement. The propeRy owneddeveloper shall at
all times periorm its obligations as sel forih in said agreement. Water
system improvements identifted (n the environmental documentation
for buildout of the Anaheim Resort, which the property
owner/developer may be required to participate in, include:
• The existing 8-inch diameter pipe in Clementine Street from Katella
Avenue to Freedman Way shall be replaced by a 20-inch diameter
pipe.
• The existing 10-inch diameter pipe in Freedman Way from
Clement(ne Street to Harbor Boulevard shall be replaced by a 20-
inch diameter p(pe.
~ The exfsUng 10-inch dlameter pipe in Harbar Boulevard from
Convention Way lo Freedman Way shall be replaced by a 20•inch
diameter pipe.
• The 12-tnch pipe in 6Catella Avenue from Harbor Boulevard to
Clementfne Street shall be replaced by a 20-inch diameter pipe.
• The existing 10-inch diameter plpe in Harbor Boulevard from
Freedman Way to Harbor Boulevarcl north of Manchester Avenue
shall be re laced b a 16-inch diameter i e.
mmp01 U8.doc
~A
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
PiOleCt: Amendment Na 3 tn AnahP~m RP~~~ CnnniF~ Di.,.. Af.. O7 'f /t ~^l[ i tn~ n___ ~___~
- - ---- - --' - - a vaauuc rlvclluc
Mitigation
Measure Timing Measure Responsible for Comptetion
Number Moniroring
3.9.6-2 • An additional water welt shall be constructed near the intersection
conY of Clementine Street and Freedman Way.
• The existing 14-inch and 12-inch diameter pipes in West Street
from Katella Avenue to Ball Road shall be replaced by a 20-inch
diameter pipe.
' (Note: To implement this mitigalion measure, the City has adopted the
Anaheim Resof. Water Facilities Fee Program (Rule 15E of the Water
Rates, Rules and Regulations). Compliance with this Fee Program by
the property owneddeveloper (per Resolution No. 95R-140
effective
,
September 1, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation
Measure, or the City may enter into altemative financing
arrangements).
3.9.6-3 Prior to Issuance of Each All water supply planning for the project wili be closely coordinated Public Utilities
Building Permit with, and be subject to the review and final approval of, the Utilities Department, Water
Department, Water Engineering Division and Fire Deparment. Serv(ces
Administralion; Fire
Department
3.9.6-4 Prior to Issuance of Each Water pressure greater than 80 pounds per square inch (psi) shall be Planning
Building Permit reduced to 80 psi or less by means of pressure reducfng valves Department,
installed at the propeAy owneddeveloper's service. Building Division
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES - SEWER
3.9.7-1 Prior to Approval of a Final The property owner/developer shall participate in the City's Master Public
Subdivision Map or Issuance Plan of Sewers and related Infrastructure Improvements (Fee) Works/Engineering
of a Grading or Building Program to assist in mitigating existing and future sewer system Departmenl, Dasign
Permit, Whichever Occurs deficiencies as follows: [~ivision
F~~~ The property owner/devetoper shall submit a repai for review and
approval by lhe Cily Engineer to assfst with detertnini~g the fallowing:
a. If the developmenUredevelopment (1) does not di,;charge into a
sewer sqstem that is currenlly deficient or will becor~e deficient
because of that discharge and/or (2) does not increase Ilows or
change points of discharge, then the properly owner's/developers
responsibility shall be Ifmited to pa~ticipation in the Infrastructure
Improvement (Fee) Program.
~ro i os.ao~
19
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitorin~ Program No, 0108
Pro'ect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort S ecific Plan No. 92-2 1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenue
MltigaUon Timing Measure Responslbie for Comptetion
Measure
Number Monit:.ring
3•9•~'~ b. If the developmenUredevelopmenl {1) discharges into a sewer
conY system that is curcently deficient or will become deficient because
of lhat discharge, and/or (2) increases flows or changes points of
discharge, then the property owneddeveloper shall be required lo
guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
City Attorney's Office of the impacl prlor to approval of a final
subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit,
whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements Identifred in
lhe Soulh Cenlral Area Sewer Deftcfency Study. The property
ownerldevelo er shall be re uired to tnstall the sanita sewer
facililies, as recommended by tlie South Central Area Sewer
Deficiency Study, prior to acceptance for malntenance of public
Improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspection
lor the building/stn~cture, whichever occurs ftrst. Additionally, the
propeRy owner/developer shall participate in the Infrast~ucture
Improvement (Fee) Program, as determined by the City Engineer,
which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, or a
combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of
impacts for the sanitary sewe~ system, the propeAy
owners/develuper shall submit a sanftary sewer syslem
improvement phasing plan for the project to the City Engineer for
revfew and approval which shall contain, at a minfmum, (1) a
layout of the complete system; (2) all facility sizes, inGuding
support catculations; (3) construction phasing; and, (4)
construct(on estimates. The study shall determine the impact of
the project sewer flows for total buildout of lhe project and identify
local deficiencies for each project component (i.e„ each hotel).
(Note: To implement this mitigat(on measure, the C(ty has
adopted the Sewer Impacl and Impravement Fee Program for the
South Centrai C(ly Area. Compliance with this Fee Program by
the property ov~neddeveloper (per Ordinance No. 5490 and
Resolution No. 95R-80 dated Apri118, 1995) shall satisty the
requfrements of this m(tigaUon measure).
mmp0 t Otl.da
2U
Ar-aheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Pro'ect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort S ecific Plan No. 92-2 1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenue
Mitiga4ion Timing Measu~e Responsible for Completion
Measufe
Number . Monitoring
PUBLIC S ERVICES AND UTILITIES - STORM DRAINS
3.9.8-1 Prior to Appreval of a Final The property owner/developer shall pariicipate in the City's Master Public
Subdivision Map, or Issuance Plan of Storm Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Woiics/Engineering
of a Grading or Building Program to assist in mitigating existing and future storm drainage Department
Design
Permit, Whichever Occurs
~ system~deficiencies as follows: ,
Division
First The property owneddeveloper shall submit a repoR for review and
approvzl by the City Engineer to assist with determining the following:
a. If the specific developmenUredevelopment does not increase or
redirect current or historic storm water quantities/flov:s, then the
property owner's/ developers responsibility shall be limited to
participation in the Infra~tructure Improvement (Fee) Program to
provide storm drainage fa~ilities in 10- and 25-year storm
frequencies and to protect propertiesJstructures for a 100-year
storm frequency.
b. If the specific developmentiredevelopment increases or redirects
the current or historic storm water quantity/flow, then the property
own+. ~'•veloper shall be required to guaranQee mitigation to the
satisfa; ;; :n of the City Engineer and City Attorney's ~ffice of the
impact N; ;~r lo approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of ~~
a grading or buiiding permit, whichever occurs first, pursuant to ,
'
the improvements identified in the Master Plan of Drairage for the
South Central Area. The property owneddeveloper shall be
required to instal! the storm drainage facilities as recommended
by the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area to
provide storm drainage facilities for 10- and 25-year storm
frequencies and to protect propeAies/structures for a 100-year
storm frequency prior to acceptance for maintenance of public
improvements by the City ar final building and zoninc~ inspection
(or the building/structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the
property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure
Improvement (Foe) Pragram as sietermined by the City Engineer
which could include fees, credils, reimbursements, or a
combination thereof. As part of guarantePing the mitigatifln of
ir~pacts on the storm drainage system, a storm drainage system
improvemeMphasing plan for the project shall be submitted by
the property owneddeveloper to the City Engineer for re4lew and
a roval and shall contain, at a minimum 1 a la oul of the
'
nunp0108.doc ~
. . ~
2~
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Project: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No 92-2 (1175_1193 Casa Grande Avenue
Mitigation
Measure Tlming Measu~e
` Responsible for Completion
Number ,
, _
;:: ,. , , _
> . ,::,;: , , , . .
. Monitoring
3.9.8-1
CO~~ ,
.,. _
complete system; (2) all facility sizes in~luding suppoR
calculat(ons; (3) construction phasing; and, (4) construction
estimates.
(Note: The Gity has adopted the Storm Drain Impact and
Improvement Fee Program for the South Central City Area.
Compliance with this Fee Program by the propeRy
owner/developer (per Ordinance No. 5491 and Resolution No
.
95R-81 dated April 18, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this
mitigation measure).
PUBLIC S ERVICES AND UTILITIES - ELECTRICAL
3.9.9-1 Prior to Issuance of Each The property owneNdeveloper shall submit plans showing that each Public Utilities
Building Permit; to be structure will comply with the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Departmenl I
ImplemenQed Prior to Each
Final Building and Zoning Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Code of
Regulations); and, will consull with the City of Anaheim Utiliti ,
Electric Services !
Inspection es
Department, Resource Efficiency Division in order to review above Administration,
Resource Efficiency
Title 24 measures to incorporate into the project design inciuding
energy e~cient designs.
3.9.9-2 Prior to Fi~al Building and The praperiy owneddeveloper shall implement energy-saving practices Public Utilities
Zoning Inspection in compliance with Title 24, which may include the following: Department
Use of high-efficiency air conditioning systems controlled by a ,
Electric Services
computerized managem~nt system including teatures such as a Administration
variable air volume system, a 100-percent outdoor air economizer ,
Resource Efficiency
cycle, sequential operation of air conditioning equip;nent in
accordance with building demands, isolalion of air conditioning to
any selected floor or floors.
Use of electric motors designed to conserve energy.
Use of special lighting fixtures such as motion sensing lightswitch
dev(ces and compact fluorescent fixtures in place of incandescent
lights.
Use of T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Metal hallide or high-
pressure sodium for outdoor lighting and parking lots.
3
9
.
.9-3 Prior to Issuance of Each The property owner/developer shall instail an underground electrical Puhlic Utilities
Building Permit for Any
Building Requiring a Change service from the Public Utilities Disiribution System. The Underground
Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules
R
t Department,
El
in Eteclrical Service ,
a
es,
Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underc~round Systems. ectric Services
Administration
Electrical Service Fees and other applicabie fees witl be assessed in
accorclance with the Electric Rules, Rates Re ulations and Electr(cal
mmp0108,Ja:
~2
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitorinb Program No. 0108
Proiect: Amendment No. 3 to AnahPir„ uP~~~ c„P,.~F,. ai~.,,.,,, o~ ~ ~„-,~ „~~ ..___ ,.___~_ .
hAt
i --- - --' -' ~ - ~..aJa V~a11uc AvcIIUG
t
gatfon 7fmi~g Measure
Measure Responsible for Completion
Number Monitoring
S
ecificati
f
U
d
_ p
ons
or
n
erground Systems.
3
.9.9-4 Prior to Installation o( Any The property owr.er/developer shall submit evidence that the Public Utilities
Transforrners transformers are PCB free. Department,
Electric Services
Administraiton
3
9
.
.10-1 Prior to Esch Final Building . The Southem California Gas Company has developed several Southem California
and Zoning Inspection programs which are intended to assist in the selection of the most Gas Company;
ener~;-efficient water heaters and fumaces. The property Planning
owneddeveloper shail implement a program, as required, to reduce the Departme~it
demand on natural gas supplies. ,
Building Division
PUBLIC SERVlCES AND UTILITIES - Ti/ RECEPTION
3.9.12-1 Within 6 Months After A study of area teievision reception shall be undertaken by the Planning
Completion of Building
EMeriors of New property awner/developer and submitted to the 6.i{y-€qgiaeeF Planning
Department for review and approval
If the City of Anaheim Department,
P
Deve(opments Gver 75 Feel .
determines that tlie proposed project creates a significant i^.~pacl on lanning ~ivision
in Height broadcast television reception al local residences and other existing
hotels/restaurants or other businesses, a signal boosler or retay system
shail be installed by the propeKy owner/developer immediately on the
roof o( the tallest project building to reslore television reception to its
original condition. In no event shall heights set forth in Sectior,
18.04.035 of the Anaheim Municipal Code entitled, "Structural Height
Limitations-Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area" be exceeded.
(Note: City Engineer changed to Plannino Depariment)
HAZARD
~ 1
0
,
S MATERIALS
1 Prior to Approval of First
3
10 The
ro
ert
o
Nd
l
.
-
G
di
Pl p
p
y
wne
eve
oper shai~ retain the services of a qualified Orange County
ra
ng
an or Issuance of
First Demolition Permit, environmental professional to conduct an investigation for known, or
the presence of, crypiic tanks
using geophysical methods Heallh Departmenl
Whichever Occ~rs First, in ,
. (authorized
Areas of Former Service
Soil sampling or a soil organic vapor survey may be required if soil activilies); Fire
Departmenl
Stalions, in Areas Known or
Thought to Have 9een
sampling results are not available, or indicate contamination is present
abore regulatory guidelines. if warranted
subsartace investi
ation ,
Environmental
P
t
Previously Occupied by ,
g
and sampting shall be undeAaken in these areas, and appropriate ro
ection Seclion
USTs, and in Areas Where remediation measures developed, ff necessary
befors demolition
Tank Removal Has Nol Been ,
,
excavation, or grading takes place in these areas
Verified Prior to Excavation .
or Grading
.,~,,,H,,,~.~,~ ~3
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. O108
Pro'ect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort S ecific Plan No. 92-2 1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenue
Mitigation
Measure Timin
8
Measure
,. ,
Responsible tor
Completian
Number " ; .. .. Monitoring
3
10-2 Pri
t
h
R
. or
o t
e
emoval of USTs The propeRy oNmer/developer shall obtain a pennit from the Oran e Count
Environmental Protectian Section of the Fire Depa-tment for the Health Department
remova! of such tanks. During tbe removal of USTs, a representative (authorized
from the Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department activities); Fire
shal( be onsite to direct soil sampling. Qepartment,
Environmental
Protection Section
3.10-3 Ongoing During Remediation All remediation activities of surtace or subsurtace contamination not Orange County
related to USTs, conducted on behalf of the property owner/developer,
shall be overseen by the Orange County Health Department Health DepaRment
.
Information on subsurface contamination from USTs shall be provided (authorized
activities retative to
to the Fire Department. (Note: Mitigation measure references "Fir~ surface
Jepartment." This has been ch ;nged to Public Utilities Departmenl, contamination);
Water Services Administration, E,ivlronmental Services inasmuch as Public Utilities
the Publtc U81itles Department, Water Services Administration, Department
Water
Environmental Services now overse~s UST and subsurface ,
Services
cnntaminfltion remediation.) Adminislration,
Environmental
• Services
3.10-4 Prior to Approval of First
Grad'
y Plan or Issuance of The property owneNdeveloper shall submit a plan for review and Orange County
.
Fiist Demolition Permit, approval ot the Fire Depa~tment which detaiis procedures that will be
taken [f previously unknown USTs
or other unknown hazardo Health Department
Whichever Occurs First ,
us
matedal orwaste, is discovered onsite. (authorized
activities relative to
surtace
contamination); Flre
Department,
Environmental
Protection Section
. (letter
submittal/UST
3
10-7
Qn
i
i permit issuance)
. go
ng Dur
ng Praject
Demolition and Construction In the event that hazardous wasle, including asbestos, fs d(scovered
during site preparalion or construction
the propeAy owneNdevelo Orange Counly
,
per
shall ensure that the identi(ied hazardous waste and/or hazardous Health DepaAment
(hazardous waste
material are handled and dtsposed of in the manner speci8ed by the and malerlal
State of Catifomia Hazardous Substances Control Law Health and d(s osal • Fire
~~oioa.da
24
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Pro'ect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort S ecific Plan No. 92-2 I 175-1193 Casa Grande Avenue
Mftigation Timin
Measure g
`Measure
Res o
p nsible for Completion
Number Monitoring
Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5), and according to the Department
3.10-7
requiremen;s of the Califomia Administrative Code, Title 3Q, Chapter
22 ,
Environmenfal
conY . Protection ~ection
(hazardous
materials/wastes
from UST's and
' annual review); Air
Lluality
Management
District (asbestos
-_ disposal permit)
VI~UAL RESOURCES AND AESTHETlCB
3 ~ ~_~ Prior to Issuance of Each
B The property own~ddeveloper shall submit plans which illustrate that Planning
uilding Permit all mechanical equipment and trash areas for the subject building(s) Department
wili be screened from ad~acent public streets and adjacent resfdential ,
Planning Division
areas. Screening shall be installed prior lo final building and zoning
inspection.
3
11
2
.
- Prior to Issuance of Each The property owner/developer shall submit a landsc~,pe ard irrigation Planning
Building Permit plan which shall be prepared and certified by a licensed landscape Department
architect. The landscape plan shall include a phasing plan for the
installation an~ maintenance of landscaping associated with th
t ,
Planning Division
a
building permit and shall be in conformance wilh the Water EfBciency (for specific plan
consistency); Qublic
Landscap. Ordinance. Utilities Department,
The irrigalion plan shall specify methods for monitoring the irrigation Eleclric Services
Administration
system. The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do not exceed ,
Resource Ef(iciency
the infiltration of local soils, that the applfcation of fertilizers and (water conservation
pesticides do nol exceed appropriale levels of frequencies, and that measures/
suriace runoff and overvvate~ing is minimized. Certificate of
The landscape and irrlgation plans shall include water-conserving Completion)
features such as low flow irrigation heads, automat(c irrigation
scheduling equipment, flow sensing controls, rain sensors
soil
,
molsture sensors, and other waler-conserv(ng equipment. In additfon
,
all irrigalion systems shall be designed so that theY will function
prope~ly with reclaimed water, once a system is ava(lable.
mmp0108.duc
2S
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Probram No. 0108
Pro'ect: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort S ecific Plan No. 92-2 1175-1193 Casa Grande Avenue
Mftigation Timi~g
Measure Measure kasponsible for Completion
Number Monitoring
3.11-3 Prior to Submittal of Each
Final Site Plan The property awneddeveloper shall submit a shade and shadow Planning
analysis to the Planning Department for review and approval Departme
nt
demonstrating that the proposed structure(s) would not create ,
,
Piannin~ Division
significant shade and shadow impacts on adjacent land uses. A
significant shade and shadow impact would occur when outdoor aclive
• areas (e.g., eating areas along Hafior Boulevard, hotel/motel
swimming pools, and res(dential front and back yards) or stn~ctures
that include sensitive uses (e.g., residences) have windows that
normally receive suniight are covered by shadows for more than 50
percent of the sunlight hours. I( lhe analysis identifies shade and/or
shadow impacts would occur and lhe building selback, architeclural
massing and landscape requirement provlsions set foAh in Sect(on 5
0
.
,
Design Plan of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, do not function as
feasible mitigalion measures, additional technical review of the
structure(s) will be required.
3.11-4 Priar to the Final Building
and Zoning Inspection or The property owneddeveloper shall participate (n an assessment
district tor landscape installation and maintenance If one is est
bli
h
d City Attomey's
O
Whenever Eslablished; and, a
s
e
for the Anaheim Resort. ffice
on an Ongoing Basis
3.11-5 Prior to Issuance of Each
B
ildi
P The propeny owner/developer shall submit plans which deta(I the Planning
u
ng
ermit lighting system tor any parking facililies adjacent to residential or light- Department
sensitive uses. The systems shall be designed and mainlafned in such ,
Planning Division
a manner as to conceal light sources to the extent teasible to minimize
light spiltage and glare to the adjacent uses. The plans shall be
prepared and signed by a Ifcensed eleclrical engineer, with a letler
from lhe engineer stating that, in the opinion of the engineer, lhis
requirement has been rnet.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
3.12-1 Prior to Approval of Each The property owneNdeveloper shall submit a letler identifying the Public
Grading Plan certffied archaeologist that has been hired to ensure ihat the following Worics/Engineering
actions are implemented: Department,
a. The archaeologist must be present at ltie pregrading conference Servfces Divisfon
in order lo establish procedures for temporarily halting or
redirecting work to permit lhe samp8ng, identi8calion, and
evaluation of artifacts if otentiall si niflcant ariifacts are
mmp010B.da
26
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Proiect: Amendment No_ 3 rn Anaheim RPCnrt c.,P~~f~ pi~., t~r,. o~_~ n i ~c ~ i n~ n,...., n____a.. .
Mitigatlon
Measure
Number
Tfming --- - -- r.rc~~uc
': Measu~e
,. ,
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be
significant, the archaeological observer shall determine
3•~2'~
' appropriate actions In cooperation with the property
con
t owneddeveloper for exploration and/or salvage.
b. Specimens that are collected priar to or during the grading
process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research
institution.
~ c. Any archarelogical work at the site shall be conducted ~nder the
direction of the certified archaeologist. If any aAifacts are
discovered during c~rading operations when the archaeological
monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area
until the monitor can survey tha area. '
d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the
specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon
completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City
as to when the final report will be submitted.
3.12-2 Prior to Approval of Each The property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying ihe Public
Grading Plan certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following Worlcs/Engineering
aclions are implemented: Department,
a. The paleontologist must be present at the pregrading conference Development
Services Division
in order to establish procedures to temporarily hait or redirecf
work to permit the sampiing, identification, and evaluation of
fossils if potentially signiCcant paleontological resources are
uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and found to be significant,
the paleontological observer shall detennine appropriate actions
in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration
and/or salvage.
b. Specimens that are collected prior 40 or during the grading
process wili be donated to an appropriate educational or researc~~
institution.
c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the
direction of the ce~tified paleontologist. If any fossiis are
discovered during grading operations when the paleontological
monitor is not, present, grading shall be diverted around the area
until the monitor can survey the area.
d. A final report detailing the flndings and disposftion of the
specimens shall be submitted. Upon compietion of the grading,
the aleontolo ist shall notif the Cit as to when the Bnal re oA
~ro~os.e~
27
Anaheim Resort Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108
Project: Amendment No. 3 to Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No 92-2 (1175-] 193 Casa Grande Avenue
1~'~~ R
Mitigatfon Timing Measu~e Responsib6e for Completion
. :
Measure '
. >.
': Number : . ; Mon(tori~ig
<.
.:. , .:..•. ,.. <::; ,
will be submitted.
ENERGY
3,13-1 Prior to Issuance of Each The property owneddeveloper shall demonstrate on plans that fuel- Planning
Building Permit etficient models of gas-powered building equipment have been Department,
incorporated into the project, to the extent feasible. Building Division
~ nm~p0108.J~ . . , . .
28