Loading...
Resolution-PC 99-31RESO! UTION NO. PC99-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CiIY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4098 BE GRANTED WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Counry of Orange, State of California, described as: THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 IN BLQCK 17 Ui= A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTH HHLF OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, S.B.B.&M, BEING A PART OF THE FAIRVIEW COLONY TRACT, IN THE HE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNN OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOINN ON AMP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 33 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF 7HE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THE WEST HALF OF THE FOLLOWING PARCEL OF LAND: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT Y, DISTANT SOUTH 89 DEGREES 51' 10: EAST 460.40 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER 7HEREOF. SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO ROBERT H. HUDSON AND WIFE BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1950 IN BOOK 2094, PAGE 16, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THE CE NORTH 0 DEGREES 33' 1G" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO ROBERT H. HUDSON AND WIFE, 668.87 FEEI' TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 43' 50" EAST ALONG THE NOR7H LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 8 IN BLOCK 17 OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 303 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 33' 10" WEST 668.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 8'; THENCE NORTH ti9 DEGREES 51' 10" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID L.OTS 7 AND 8, 202 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNIiJG. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHERLY 300.00 FEE7 THEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civia Center in the City of Anaheim on February 17, 1999 at 1:30 p.m., notice of sa?d public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions uf the Anaheim Municipal Gode, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evid~~::~ for and against said p~oposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. Thal the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sections 18.44.050.130 and 18.44.050.140 to convert an existing vacant one- story residence (formerly used as offices) to a church in lhe CL (Commerciai, Limited) Zone, with the following waivers: (a) Sections 18.04.042.02d and 18.44.063 (b) Section 18.44.035.630 Minimum setback of institutionai uses adiacent to a residential zone bound2rv. 15 feet requ(red; 5 feet proposed from RM-2400 zoning to the west) Reauired location of parkina soaees. (Vehicle parking required to the rear of ihe residential structure; parking n fron proposed) CR3561 MS.DOC -1- PC98-31 2. That the proposed church will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and dev~lopment of the area in which it is proposed to be located but, instead, witl enhance the aesthetics of the building and the property. 3. That the size and shape of the site for the proposed use is adequate to allow full development of the proposal in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare but, rather, the church operation will eliminate lhe burden of the blighted and unsafe conditions of the underling property. 4. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the tra~c in the area due to the low intensity and minor tra~c generation of the use. 5. That granting of this conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and generai welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim but will further balance and buffer the transition of the CL "Commercial, Limited" zone to the adjacent residential zoning to the north and help to eliminate problems associated with a deteriorating, unsupervised and vacant property. 6. That only 14°/a (42 feet) of lhe total west side yard setback is a deviation from Code; that this property is three times deeper (308 feet) than it is wide (101 feet); that strict application of the Zoning Code requires a significant amount of Iandscaped setback area for this propertY; that the intent of the Code is achieved not through structural compliance but through the fact that the property has an increased depth that allows 86% of the entire west prcperty line (adjacent to residential zoning) to meet the Code requirement of a 15-foot structural setback; and that lhis waiver is necessary due to the location of the existing structure and that a hardship would be imposed if a significant part of this building were demolished in order to comply with Code. 7. That front yard parking was utilized for the previous office use for over three decades; that the adjacent property to the east (Dutch Club) also utilizes front yard parking in a manner similar to th2 proposal; that this prop~ra~ is located in a transitional area that includes not only residential but also general commercial ~r :, iat the property has a large front vard area capable of supporting the proposed parking; ii,~t land•ar..;,i;ig ti~e ent~re hon! yard would dimir,ish lhe practical usahility of this sike as a commerc~:" :.~d pro,~erty; ar~ t~iai a~ly a portion o~ the parking spaces are lor.ated fn fron! of the structure arJ, therefore, a cietenn'nation of special circumstances is applicable to this property because an unnececsary hardship ;v~uid result from strict enforcement of the Zoning Code lhat would deprive this property of a privilege afford,:~+ to similar properties ~. ~!his vicinity in lhe same CL zone. 8. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property such as shape, location and surroundings, which do not apply to other identically zoned properties in the vicinity. 9. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition; that one concerned person spoke; and that no correspondence was received in ~pposition. CALIFORNiA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposai to convert an existing vacant one-story residence (formerly used as o~ces) to a church in the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone with waivers of minimum setback of institutional uses adjacent to a residential zone boundary and required location of parking spaces on a rectangularly-shaped 0.11-acre property having a frontage of 101 feet on the north side of Katella Avenue, a maximum depth of 308 feet and being located 286 ieet west of ihe centerline of Bayless Street (1565 West Katella Avenue); and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no suostantial evidence that the project will have a sipnificant effect on the environment. -2- PC99-31 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditionai Use Permit, upon the foliowing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order fo preserve th~ safety and general weifare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That the applicant shall revise the landscape plan and work with staff to develop an appropriate landscape pallet. A landscaping plan for the entire site shall be submitted to the Zoning Division of the Planning Department specifying type, size and location of existing and proposed refurbished landscaping and irrigation for review and approval by the Planning Commission as a"Reports and Recommendations" item. Following approval, the landscaping shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the plan. 2. That the existing wall in the front of the property (south) shaii b~ removed. If a thirty six (36) inch high wall is proposed to be located within the front setback area, it shall be located to the rear of the setback area and so-specified on the final landscaping plan which shall be submitted to the Zoning Division for the review and approval. This information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 3. That prior to installation of Iandscaping and irrigation facilities, professional rodent eradication shall be undertaken for the entire property. 4. That twenty four (24) inch box trees shall be planted in the landscaping planters immediatety adjacent to Katella Avenue and in lhe west and north required setback areas in accordance with Anaheim Mu~icipal Code Sections 18.44.063.010. and 18.44.063.040. Said information shall be specificaily shown on plans submitted for Zoning Division review and approval. 5. That all landscaped planters shall be permanently maintained with live and healthy plant materials. 6. That the existing sign cabinet on the south side of the property shail be removed. All existing above-ground electrical equipment relative to this sign shal! also be removed. This information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for buildfng permits. 7. That plans shall be submitted to the Zoning Division specifying decorative, wrought iron ~gsi~z~ on tne east and west sides of the building in order to secure the rear of the property. 'Rle sxact fflw,atio~ pf lhe gate across the driveway shall be subject to review and approval by -'1ho ~~ty TYaf~E an¢ Transportation Manager. 8. That the block wall adjacent to the east property line shall be repaired and increased t9 a finax~niUin height of six (6) feet. This information shall be specifically shown on the plans sut~mi~tted for IhuPldlflg permits. 9. That the maximum occupancy for this building type is forty nine (49) persons an~, fhe~efpre, fha maximum number of congregates at any one time shali be limited to forty nine (49) ~ersv~rls, 10. That all church activities shall end before 8:30 p.m. and parked vehicles shall be remoVed by ~'~0 p.m., except on special church holidays (not exceeding ten (10) days per year). " 11. That the hours of operation for church services shail be limited as follows: Sundays: - 8:00 a.m. to 12;00 p.m. Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m. to 8:3U p.m. The Pastor's office hours: Sundays: - 7:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Wednesdays: - 6:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Thursdays through Fridays: - 9;00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. 12. That no exterior bells or chimes and no exterlor amplification devices shal~ 5e permitted. -3- PC99-31 13. That lighting for this facility shali be designed and positioned in a manner so as r,ot to unreasonably illuminate or cause glare onto adjacent or nearby properties. Said information shail be specificaily shown on plans submitted for Zoning Division approval. 14. 7hat no outdoor services shall be conducted. 15. That signage for the subject facility shall be limited to that which is shown on the exhibits submitted by the petitioner and approved by the Planning Commission. Any additional signage shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission as a"Reports and Recommendations" item. 16. That no school facilities shall be operated on lhis site, inclusive of pre-school operations. 17. That the entire structure shall be refurbished and/or constructed in a quality manner including addressing and resoiving all of the outstandir.g Code Enforcement issues, including: Repair all windows; Paint and re-stucco the building; Repair and replacement block walls; Landscape management and maintenance; Clean-up and remove all debris from the property; Clean-up and remove aIl debris from lhe building interior; and Provide property security. 18. That this conditional use permit is approved for a period of three (3) years to expire on February 17, 2002. 19. That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division, and in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Said storage areas shall be designed, located and screened so as not to be readily identifiable from adjacent streets or highways. The walls of the storage areas shall be protected from gra~ti opportunities by the use of plant materials such as minimum one (1) gallon, clinging vines pianted on maximum three (3) foot centers or tall shrubbery. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for Streets and Sanitation Division approval. 20. That a plan sheet for soiid waste storage and collection ancl a plan for recycling shall be submitted to lhe Streets and Sanitation Division for review and approval. 21. That an on-site trash truck turn-around area shzll be provided in accordance with Engineering Standard Detail No. 610 and maintained to lhe satisfaction of the Streets and Sanitation Division. Said turn-around area shall be specifically shown on plans submitted to the Streets and Sanitation Division for approval. 22. The Iegal property owner shall submit an application for a Subdivision Map Act Certificate of Compliance to lhe Public Works Department, Development Services Division. A Certificate of Compliance or Conditional Certificate of Compliance shall be approved by the City Engineer and recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder prior to (ssuance of building permits. 23. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petilioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3, as conditioned herein. 24. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, or prior to commencement of the activity authorized by this resolution, or within 1 year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 13, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 24, above mentioned, shall be compiied w;th. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. -4- PC99-31 25. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 3, 17 and 23, above mentioned, shall be complied with. 26. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent 9hat it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Za~ing Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal reguiations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinznce, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESULVED th~t the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressiy predicated upon applicant's complia+::e with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court o~ompetent jurisdiction, then this Resoiution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be~eemed null an void. 7H[ FOREGOING RESOLUTION as ado~tea at t I ning Commission meeting of February 17, 1999. t ~ . s/~,~.I ~~ CHAIRPERSpN, ANA~PIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: l ,L~Z~. '~' SECRETARY, ANAH M CITY PLP,NNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Maheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolutfon was passed and adoptsd at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commissfon held on February 17, 1999, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, ESPING, KOOS, NAPOLES NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WILLIAMS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~ day of ~~~_, 1999. ~,~1~~cc~'~..~:.~ SA-~R~.s~ SECRETARY, , AHEIM CI7Y PLANNING COMMISSION -5- PC99-31