Loading...
97-006RESOLUTION NO. 97R-6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF HEARING OFFICER ADDING NEW CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 104 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1765. WHEREAS, on March 16, 1961, Conditional Use Permit No. 104 was granted under Resolution No. 193 by the Anaheim City Planning Commission to permit the sale of beer in conjunction with a 1,298 square -foot restaurant at 1652 West Lincoln Avenue; and WHEREAS, on November 11, 1977, Conditional Use Permit No. 1765 was granted under Resolution No. PC 77 -250 by the Anaheim City Planning Commission to permit a 1,298 square -foot beer bar at 1652 West Lincoln Avenue.; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 1996, the Anaheim City Planning Commission held a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of the public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to consider a City initiated request to revoke or modify Conditional Use Permit No. 104 (for the sale of beer in conjunction with a restaurant) and Conditional Use Permit No. 1765 (to permit a 1,298 square foot beer bar) at 1652 West Lincoln Avenue; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 1996, by its Resolution No. PC- 96-98, the Planning Commission revoked Conditional Use Permit No. 104 (for the sale of beer in conjunction with a restaurant), and by its Resolution No. PC- 96 -99, the Planning Commission revoked Conditional Use Permit No. 1765 (to permit a 1,298 square foot beer bar); and WHEREAS, on October 17, 1996, Rick A. Blake, Esq., Rick Blake Associates, on behalf of the owner of El Ojo De Agua, filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to terminate Conditional Use Permit No. 104 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1765 on August 19, 1996; and WHEREAS, on October 22, 1996, by motion, the City Council appointed a Hearing Officer to conduct a hearing on the matter and make recommendations to the City council pursuant to A.M.C. §1.12.110; and WHEREAS, a Notice of the Public Hearing before a Hearing Officer regarding the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision was duly given by the City; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 1996, the Hearing Officer opened the public hearing relating to modification or termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 104 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1765 and received oral and written testimony; and WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim appeared and was represented by Bruce Freeman, Code Enforcement Supervisor and Mark S. Gordon, Deputy City Attorney. Appellant Juan Carbajal, owner of El Ojo De Agua, appeared and was represented by Rick A. Blake, Esq., Rick Blake Associates; and WHEREAS, both sides were provided the opportunity to present evidence. Seventeen exhibits offered by the City of Anaheim were received into evidence. At the conclusion of the hearing on December 4, 1996, the Hearing Officer closed the evidentiary portion of the hearing and continued the public hearing until such time as the transcript could be completed by the certified shorthand reporter and requested each side to submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations. The Hearing Officer indicated that there would be no further testimony at the continued public hearing; and WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to these recitals, findings and recommendations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Hearing Officer has, in accordance with Section 1.12.110 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, prepared, or caused to be prepared, the administrative record of the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Hearing Officer, having considered the exhibits received at the hearing, arguments and proposed findings of fact and recommendations of counsel, has prepared Findings of Fact and Recommendations of Hearing Officer to Anaheim City Council pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 1.12.110 (the "Findings of Fact and WHEREAS, on January 7, 1997, the City received the administrative record and the proposed Findings of Fact submitted by the Hearing Officer; and WHEREAS, on January 14, 1997, the City Council did consider the administrative record and the written recommendations of the Hearing Officer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that the City Council hereby adopts those certain findings of fact and recommendations of the hearing officer attached hereto, marked Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based on the foregoing Findings and evidence, that the City Council reverse the decision of the Anaheim City Planning Commission to terminate Conditional Use Permit No. 104 (for the sale of beer in conjunction with a restaurant), and to terminate Conditional Use Permit No. 1765 (to permit a 1,298 square foot beer bar), by the addition of the following new conditions thereto. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No. 104, as approved by Resolution 193, and Conditional Use Permit No. 1765, as approved by Resolution PC 77 -250, are hereby amended, to read as follows: 1. That the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises shall be prohibited. 2. That there shall be no live entertainment, amplified music, or dancing permitted on the premises at any time, with the exception that a juke box may be utilized. 3. That the activities occurring in conjunction with the operation of the establishment shall not cause noise disturbance to surrounding properties. 4. That the interior entry doors serving the establishment shall be kept closed and unlocked at all times during hours of operation, except for ingress and egress, deliveries, and in the event of an emergency. 5. That uniformed and licensed (by the State Bureau of Consumer Affairs) security guard or guards shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department to deter unlawful conduct on the part of employees or patrons, and to promote the safe and orderly assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and to prevent disturbance to the surrounding neighborhoods from excessive noise created by persons entering or leaving the premises. 6. That the parking lot serving the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons on or about the parking lot. 7. That there shall be no pool tables or coin operated games maintained within the subject establishment without issuance of proper permits as required by the Anaheim Municipal Code. 8. That the business operator shall comply with Section 24200.5 of the Business and Professions and shall not employ or permit any person to solicit or encourage others, directly or indirectly, to buy them drinks in the licensed 3 premises under any commission, percentage, salary, or other profit- sharing plan or scheme, or conspiracy. 9. That there shall be no coin operated telephones located inside the business premises and under the control of the business owner. 10. That there shall be no coin operated telephones located outside the business premises and under the control of the business owner. 11. That the floor area of the subject premises shall not exceed approximately 1,298 square -feet in area as indicated in the diagram marked as Exhibit No. 17 and received into evidence at the Public Hearing held on December 4, 1996, concerning C.U.P. 104 and C.U.P. 1765. 12. That the premises shall be operated as a beer bar. 13. That the operator of the subject business shall pay for the cost of any Code Enforcement Inspection in which a violation is determined to exist. 14. That Conditional Use Permit No. 104 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1765, under the conditions stated above, shall expire six (6) months from the date of approval by the Anaheim City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the time within which rehearings must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section 1.12.100 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and the time within which judicial review of final decisions must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Anaheim City Council Resolution No. 79R -524. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this 14th day of January, 1997. ATTES MAYOR OF THE CITY 4 ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97R -6 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim City Council held on the 14th day of January, 1997, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: MAYOR /COUNCIL MEMBERS: McCracken, Tait, Zemel, Lopez, Daly NOES: MAYOR /COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: MAYOR /COUNCIL MEMBERS: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution No. 97R -6 on the 14th day of January, 1997. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 14th day of January, 1997. (SEAL) ..r�r�n .at -tot CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 97R -6 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim on January 14th, 1997. -2( CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM