1975-410
RESOLUTION HO. 75R-4.
A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP"THE CITY
OP ANABEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL OSE PERMIT
NO. 1545
.........
WIIBREAS, t.he Cit.y Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive an applica~ion for a condi~ioftal u.. peEmi~
fram Robert E. Grosse and Sanford H. Anze1, owners of the
following described property:
Beginning at a point in the Southeasterly line of
'the 60-foot road known as Santa Ana Canyon Road,
as described in the deed to the County of Orange
dated May 8, 1928 and recorded in book 171, page 144
of Official Records in the office of the County
Hecorder of said Orange County, which point is 30
feet South 450 59' 30" East from a bolt marking the
Eastern end of a curve in the center line of said
road, described in said deed as being concave to
the North, having a radius of 450 feet and a central
angle of 370 02' 45" and running thence from said
point of beginning Southwesterly along the Southeast-
erly line of said road on the arc of a curve concave
to the Northwest, having a radius of 480 feet, through
a central angle of 230 05' 24", a distance of 193.4
feet; thence South 290 14' 15" East 770.58 feet to the
Northerly line of the land conveyed to Edwin Emil
Kettler and wife by deed dated October 7, 1947 and
recorded Novernber 8, 1947 in book 1591, page 142 of
Official Records in the office of the County Recorder
of said Orange County; thence North 800 40' 25" East
along said Northerly line 150.76 feet; thence North
260 24' 45" West 164.48 feet; thence North 200 57' 30"
\-lest 159.78 feet; thence North 90 24' 15" West 98.91
feet; thence North 490 21' 40" East 133.74 feet to the
most Southerly corner of the land described in the
deed to Louis Brody, dated June 26, 1947 and recorded
July 22, 1947 in book 1526, page 361 of Official
Records; thence North 420 59' 30" West along the South-
westerly line of the land described in said deed to
Brody, 423.32 feet to said Southeasterly line of Santa.
Ana Canyon Road; thence South 440 00' 30" West along
said Southeasterly line 47.56 feet to the point of
beginning.
AND WHEREAS, ~e Ci~y Planning Commi..ion did hold a
public hearing at the City Ball in the City of Anabeim upon
said application on . June 23 , 19~, notices of which
.aid public h..ring. were" duly qiven .s reijiiI"red by 1.". and the
provisions of Tit.le 18, Chap:l:er 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code; and
WHBREAS, s.ld COIIIIi..ion, after due ln8pect::Loft, iftv..-
~iga~ion and .~udl.. made by itself and in ita behalf and after
~ue ~on.ld.rat~on of al~ evidence and report. offered a1: .ald
.-.
WHEREAS, thereafter, within ~enty-ewo .(22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, tbe City Council
did elect, upon its own motion, to review the action of the
City Planning Commission ln~~t1ni said conditional use
permit and did thereupon fix the ~th day of Al:Y5..ust ,
19-15-.-, as the time and the Councl Chamber in the CIty Hall
of"tli"i!City of Anaheim as the place for a public hearing upon
said conditional use permit, and notices 'of such public hearing
were duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title .
18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim MUnicipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such hear-
ing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity
to be heard and did receive evidence and reports; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after careful cODside-
ration of the recolllllendatioDs of the City Planning Commission
and all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, that:
1. The proposed" use is properly one for which a
conditional use permit is autborized by the
Anaheim MUnicip.l C~de.
2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses" and the growth and development
of the area in which it 1s proposed to'be located.
3. The size and shape of the site propos~d .for tbe
use is adequate to allow the full develQpment.of
the proposed use in a' manner not detrlmental" to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety
and general welfare.
4. The traffic generated by t~e proposed,ule.will not
imp'ose an undue burden upon the streets,' and high-
ways designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
s. The granting of tbe conditional use peradt under
the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to
the peace, heal th, safety and general we.lfare of
the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council "of
the C1ty of Anaheim that th"e action of the ~ity Planning Com-
mission --s;ranti~ said conditional use permit be, and
the same1s here y sustained , and that Conditional U.e
Permit No.. 15L~5 be, and the same 1s hereby, granted
permitting a veterinary hospital on RS-A-43,OOO zoning
property with waivers of the following sections of the
Anaheim Municipal Code:
SECTION l8.44.068.0l0 - Reauired block wall.
(6~foot masonry wall re-
quired; none proposed)
...---.
-.
,-~
SECTION 18.84.062.014 - Minimum landscaoed setback.
(20 feet adjace~t to Santa
Ana Canyon Road required;
5 feet proposed)
SECTION 18.84.062.0142- Minimum landscaped setback.
(10 feet adjacent to residen-
tial zones required; none
proposed)
That said conditional use permit be granted subject to the
following conditions:
1. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted
subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 72-73-49,
no\q pending.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in
accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the
Director of Public Works.
3. That fire hydrants shall be installed and
charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief
of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structural
fralning.
4. That the petitioner shall apply for and receive
a license to encroach, for temporary access purposes, on City
fee-owned property kno\'ln as the Old Santa Ana Canyon Road and
the S.A.V.I. Company Canal, said property located adjacent to
sUbject property and Santa Ana Canyon Road. Said temporary
access shall be granted for a period of two years, subject to
renewal for one year periods; if alternate access to Fairmont
Boulevard or Rio Grand has not been provided for at the con-
clusion of such period, the petitioner will pay for all costs
of eminent domain action to acquire and improve access to either
Pairmont Boulevard or Rio Grand; provided that a reimbursement
agreement shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney.
5. That in the event that sUbject property 1s to be
divided for the purpose of sale, lease, or financing, a parcel
map to record the approved division of sUbject property shall
be subnlitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be
recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
6. That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory
to the City shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
installation of the required six (6) foot masonry wall adjacent
to the east, south, and west site boundaries, as shown on Exhibit
No.1, in the event said wall is required by the City at a future
date.
7. That the property owner(s) shall make an irre-
vocable offer to dedicate a pUblic street right-of-way for street
and public utility purposes through the subject property along
an alignment to be determined by the City Engineer at a future
date, not to exceed 64 feet in width, and that a bond in an amount
and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with
the City to guarantee the installation of all engineering require-
ments of the City of Anaheim along said right-or-way.
.-
.........
3. That sUbject property shall be developed
substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on
file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibits Nos. l, 2, 3
and 4.
9. That Conditions lias. l, 4, 5, 6 and 7, above-
mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the commencement
of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to
the time that the building permit is issued, or within a period
of one year from the date hereof, whichever occurs first, or
such further time as the Planning Commission and/or City Council
may grant.
lO. That Conditions Nos. 2 and 8, above-mentioned,
shall be complied with prior to final Quilding, and zoning
inspections.
11. That prior to termination of the licens.e for
temporary access tq Santa Ana Canyon Road, the petitioner shall
acquire and improve an easement for street and pUblic utility
purposes across adjacent properties to e1th~r Fairmont Boulevard
or Rio Grand, said easement to be satisfactory to the City
Engineer and subject to approval of the Cit~ Attorney.
The City Council hereby reserves the right to
revoke such Conditional Use Permit for good cause or failure
of said owners, their heirs, successors or assigns to comply
with the Anaheim Municipal Code and regulations and the
conditions herein.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by
me this 5t~ day of August, 1975.
ATTEST:
C.P~ m. ~t:VI~
CITY CLERK OF THE ITY OF ANAI-IEIIJI
FAL: j h
~.
~~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SSe
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, AIDNA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 75R-410 was intro-
duced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City
Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 5,th day of August, 1975,
by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pebley, S'neegas a'nd Seymour
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Raywood
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor Pro Tem of the City
of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 75R-410 on the
5th day of August, 1975.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the seal of the City of Anaheim this 5th day of~.A~8ust, 1975.
~ >no ~a1.,.b'
CITY CLERK OF THE TY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, ALONA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No.
75R-410 duly passed and adopted by the Anahe~ City Council on
August 5, 1975.
~ ffi. ~qt:Vl~
City Clerk'
............... ,