Loading...
1975-379 RESOLUTION NO. 75R-379 A RESOLUTION OF TilE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAIIEI?1 FINDING AND DETERMINING TnAT TITLE 18 OF TIlE ANAHElr"l MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AL"1ENDED AND THAT THE BOUND- ARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. mIEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did hold a public hearing in ~classification Pro- ceedings No. 74-7~-34 to consider an amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to zoning, and to consider a change in the boundaries of the zone or zones hereinafter mentioned and described, and at said hearing did receive evidence and reports from persons interested therein and from its staff: . and m-IEREAS, within a period of forty days following said hearing, the Planning Commission did duly adopt a resolution containing a report of its findings, a summary of the evidence presented at said hearing, and a recommendation that the proposed amendment be adopted by the City Council and that a certain zone or zones be changed as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of said resolution, summary of evidence, report of findings and recommendation of the City Planning Commission the City Council did fix the 22nd day of July , 19.15.-, and continued to the day of , 19 , as the time, and the City Counc11 Chambers in the City Ha~f the City of Anaheim as the place for a pUblic hearing upon said proposed amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and the exclusion of said property, hereinafter described, fron the zone or zones in which it is now situated and the incor- poration thereof in the zone or zones hereinafter set forth, and did give notice thereof in the manner and form provided in said Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code: and l~IEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public hearing the City Council did hold and conduct such public hearing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard, and did receive evidence and reports, and did thl~reupon consider the summary of evidence presented at said public hearing before the Planning Commission, its report of findings and recommendation; and t~EREAS, the City Council does find and detennine that the amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code should be adopted and that the property hereinafter described should be excluded from the zone or zones in which it is now situated and incorporated in the zone or zones as hereinafter se"t forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Title 18 of the Anaheim r.iunicipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended and that the follow:Lng described property, situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, to wit: .' ........... That portion of Lot 1 of Tract No. 6646, as shown on a Map recorded in book 249, pages' 38 and 39 of Miscellaneous Maps, records 'of Orange County J California, describe"d as 'follows: Parcell, as shown on a map filed in book 27, page 32 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said Orange County. be. excluded from the "RM-1200" RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY ZONE, and incorporated in the "CL" COMMERCIAL, LIMITED ZONE,' subj'ect to the fOllowing cond1 tions : 1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along State College Boulevard for street lighting purposes. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That appropriate water asses'sment fees as determined by the Director of Public Utilities' shall be paid to the City' of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. That only one driveway shall be allowed to State College Boulevard for the subject property; said driveway to be aligned with Almont Avenue on the east. side of St'ate College Boulevard, as approved by the City Engineer. 5. That subject property shall be 'served by under- ground utilities. 6. That a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west property line; prOVided, however, 1t such a wall presently exists along said property line on the 'adjacent property, an additional wall shall not be requIred. 7. That drainage of SUbject property shall be disposed o~ in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 8. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly sh'1elded from view and th'e sound buffered fttom adj a'cent properties. 9. That 5ubj.ect property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and speclflcat10ns on file with the 'City of Anaheim marked Exhibits Nos. 1 and 2. 10. Prior to the introduction ot an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition No.1, ab.ove-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by th1s resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said condition 1s complied with within one (1) year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City' Council may grant. 11. That Conditions Nos. 2, 4, 5,6,7,8 and 9, .above- ........__... ~ __ _ A ,.,1.0....." '" _ _ ___, ~ _ A ...~....."" __~ __ ......... .p~ _...., 1.0. ..~ , ...:... _ _ __..3 ....... .,..-..-. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Attorney be, .and he is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and submit 'to the City Council an ordinance amending Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code to accomplish the objects herein found and determined to be necessary and proper. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and s~'gned by me this 22nd day of July, 1975. _./' ATTEST: CI~o7~~~N~HEIM .- --..... STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUN'l'Y OF ORANGE SSe CITY OF ANAHEIM I, ALONA M. BOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 75R-379 was intro- duced- and adop~ed a:t.a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 22nd day of July, 1975, by the fOllowing vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS," . None COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas COUNCIL MEMBERS: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 75R-379 on the 22nd day of July, 1975. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 22nd day of ..July, 1975. (~>n.~~ CITY CLERK OF THE CIil OF ANAHEIM ( SEAL) I, ALONA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 75R-379 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on July 22, 1975. ~. ~ /~ Yn. -,~ City Clerk --.....