Loading...
69R-126RESOLUTION NO. 69R -126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2044 WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from A. Hemmerling and Ben J. Rizzotts, owners of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County. of Orange, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1: The Southerly 4 acres of Lot 2 and that portion of Lot 1 in Block 23, of the "Golden State Tract as shown on a map, recorded in book 4, pages 66 and 67, Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California, lying Southerly of the Southerly line of the land described in Final Order of Condemnation by the State of California, recorded May 12, 1964 in book 7042, page 165 of Official Records. Parcel 2: The Northerly one quarter acre of the Southerly 4 -1/4 acres of Lot 2 in Block 23 of the "Golden State Tract as shown on a map recorded in book 4, pages 66 and 67, Miscellaneous Maps, records of. Orange County, California. Parcel 3: That portion of Lot 2, Block 23 of the "Golden State Tract," as shown on a Map recorded in book 4, pages 66 and 67 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 2; thence Westerly along the Northerly line of said Lot 2 a distance of 401.10 feet; thence Souther- ly parallel with the Easterly line of said Lot 2 a distance of 1244.68 feet; thence Easterly parallel with the Northerly line of said Lot 2 a distance of 401.10 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 2; thence Northerly along said Easterly line 1244.04 feet to the point of beginning. Except therefrom that portion thereof lying Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the land conveyed to the State of California, recorded in book 2790, page 430 of Official Records; thence along the Southerly prolongation of the Westerly line of said land, South 7° 19' 33" East 32.50 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 85 02' 44" East 401.43 feet to the Easterly line of said Lot 2. AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said petition on January 27, 1969, notice of which said public hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. PC 69 -10, recommending that Variance No. 2044 be granted for Phase I only, subject to certain conditions therein set forth; and WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty -two (22) days from the date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting the action of the City Planning Commission granting said variance, for Phase I only, and said appeal was set for public hearing on March 11, 1969 at 1 :30 o'clock P.M. at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the. Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council does find and determine that: 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circum- stances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. 2. That such a variance is necessary for the preser- vation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied to the property in question. 3. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. 4. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general zoning plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and the same is hereby granted permitting the establishment of a 694 -unit apartment complex (Phases I, II and III), on the property hereinbefore described, with waivers of the following Anaheim Municipal Code requirements or limitations, subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth: (a) Maximum height of any building located within 150 feet of any R -A or any single family residential zone (Section 18.28.050 (5-b)); (b Minimum depth of the landscaped building setback area from a secondary street (Section 18.28.050 (6 -a -1)) (c Minimum depth of the landscaped building setback area from a local street (Section 18.28.050 (6- a -4)); (d) Minimum depth of side yard (Section 18.2 (6- b -3)); (e Minimum distances between buildings (18.28.050 (7 -a)) (f) Minimum width of pedestrian accessways (Section 18.28.050 (7 -d)); (g) Maximum distance of living units from a standard street (18.28.050 (9 -b)); That said variance is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification Proceedings No. 68 -69 -13 now pending. 2. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department 3. That all streets within the development shall be constructed in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer, EXCEPT THAT the sidewalks may be located adjacent to the curbs, provided the sidewalks are offset to the rear of fire hydrants placed within the sidewalk area, and to the rear of any utility poles on Frontera Street. 4. That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim sha].1 be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of a 6 -foot masonry wall along all property lines where required by the Anaheim Municipal Code. 5. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent residential homes. 6. That Conditions Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5, above- mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City Council, or as amended with the approval of the City Council. The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke such variance permit for good cause or failure of said owners, their heirs, successors or assigns, to comply with the. Anaheim Municipal Code and Regulations and the Conditions herein. THE,TOREGQING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this llth day Of karch, 1969. ATTEST: CLE •F THE CITY OF AN IM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 69R -127 was in- troduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the llth day of March, 1969, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 69R -127 on the llth day of March, 1969. IN WITNESS WHEROF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this llth day of March, 1969. (SEAL) I, DENE hereby certify that 69R -127 duly passed 11, 1969. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on March City Clerk