Loading...
10/26/2021ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL REGULAR AND REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING OF OCTOBER 26, 2021 The regular meeting of October 26, 2021 was called to order at 3:00 P.M. and adjourned for lack of a quorum. The regular adjourned meeting was called to order at 3:34 P.M. in the chamber of Anaheim City Hall, located at 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard. The meeting notice, agenda, and related materials were duly posted on October 21, 2021. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Harry Sidhu and Council Members Stephen Faessel, Jose Diaz, Gloria Ma'ae, Avelino Valencia, and Trevor O'Neil. Council Member Jose F. Moreno joined the meeting during Closed Session. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Jim Vanderpool, City Attorney Robert Fabela, and City Clerk Theresa Bass ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION: None PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: No in -person speakers. City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that 11 public comments were received electronically prior to 3:30 P.M. related to the Closed Session agenda [A final total of 11 public comments were received electronically, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official record]. — See Appendix. CLOSED SESSION: At 3:34 P.M., Mayor Sidhu recessed to closed session for consideration of the following: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (d)(1) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code) Name of Case: Santiago Geologic Hazard Abatement District v. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021 01203933 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Subdivision (a) of Section 54957.6 of the California Government Code) Agency Designated Representative: Linda Andal, Human Resources Director Name of Employee Organizations: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (General Management, Professional/Technical, and Confidential Units) At 5:25 P.M., Mayor Sidhu reconvened the Anaheim City Council. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Sidhu and Council Members Faessel, Diaz, Ma'ae, Moreno, Valencia, and O'Neil INVOCATION: Rabbi Joel Berman, Temple Beth Emet FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Jose F. Moreno City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 2 of 32 Acceptance of Other Recognitions (To be presented at a later date): Recognizing October 24 — 30, 2021, as Lead Poisoning Prevention Week Recognizing November 1, 2021, as Extra Mile Day At 5:29 P.M., Mayor Sidhu called to order the Anaheim Housing Authority (in joint session with the City Council). ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDAS: None PUBLIC COMMENTS (all agenda items, except public hearin City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that 13 public comments were received electronically prior to 1:30 P.M. related to City Council agenda items and matters within the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Council. [A final total of 19 public comments were received electronically, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official record]. — See Appendix. Prior to receipt of public comments, an outline of rules for public comments and a brief decorum statement was provided by Ms. Bass. Council Member Moreno requested Ms. Bass further clarify the public hearing and public comment process. He also requested Mayor Sidhu advance Item No. 23 towards the beginning of the agenda so members of the public could be heard sooner. Mayor Sidhu advised the Consent Calendars would be heard first, then the public hearing, then any items that might be pulled by Council Members. Paul Hyek expressed concern regarding an unnamed homeless shelter and noted it looked and operated like a mini prison. David Klawe expressed support for Item No. 04. He noted Esther Wallace's efforts for west Anaheim and advised Anaheim Beautiful recently placed a tree in her honor near her husband's tree in Maxwell Park. He provided a brief history of her contributions to Anaheim. Mark Richard Daniels expressed concern that the City could not support the designation of Little Arabia. He believed the City Council has animosity against the Muslim people of Anaheim. Larry Larsen thanked all the women and men in blue, including the Anaheim Fire & Rescue. He reported he has been involved with the Independent Learning Center at Anaheim High School, which is an alternative education program for students. He advised Police Chief Cisneros spoke with the students and thanked him for his time. He noted he has made a tremendous impact on the students. He reported he attended the District 6 meeting and thanked Ms. Bass and her staff for attending. Mike Robbins expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and noted many Anaheim residents support the ethnic restaurants in the area. He believed the City Council should support this as part of the support for the small business community in the Brookhurst Corridor. Jeanine Robbins expressed support of the designation of Little Arabia and noted recognition of the diverse area is long overdue. She advised Mayor Sidhu and Council Member Ma'ae do not support the designation and noted Council Member Ma'ae has referred to the Brookhurst Corridor as in need of repair and as a gem, which she believed was contradictory. She reported Little Arabia has become a bustling vibrant area that should be celebrated and acknowledged by the City and it was time to City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 3 of 32 celebrate the unique areas of Anaheim, not just Disneyland. She encouraged the City Council to support to agendizing the issue and encouraged members of Anaheim's Arab community to stop contributing to campaign funds of the City Council and to vote for those who support them. Victoria Michaels advised she does not understand some of the dais' reluctance to agendize the designation of Little Arabia and encouraged the City Council to at least agendize the item for discussion. R. Joshua Collins called for a public forum to discuss the shooting of Brandon Lopez. He reported Santa Ana's Mayor stated the altercation should have ended in arrest but should not have ended in murder. He advised it seems the City Council is resisting a mandate for affordable housing units and noted it is the largest city in Orange County without an affordable housing policy despite calls to create one. He expressed concern there was no emergency plan to shelter the homeless during the recent storms. Vern Nelson expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and noted many residents of Orange County frequent the area for ethnic cuisine. He noted many of the City Council ran campaigns that promised the designation. He noted Westminster has Little Saigon, Garden Grove has Koreatown, and if Anaheim has Little Arabia, people would visit the area and spend money. He advised Council Member Ma'ae and Mayor Sidhu spent $3,000,000 of the taxpayers' money fighting against district elections. He reported the Police Review Board would meet on October 28, 2021 at &00 P.M. and would be the first meeting since the Brandon Lopez shooting. He encouraged the City Council to close the meeting in honor of Sandie Schwaiger. Cecil Jordan Corkern reported Halloween Time at the Disneyland Report takes place from September 3 through October 31. He advised he is preparing an ultimate guide for Disney. He expressed concern that the pandemic would extend into 2022 and encouraged residents to take care of themselves. Diego Anguiano reported the Asociacion de Emprendedores gives members the tools to start their own business, offers guidance, and provides support. He encouraged the City Council to continue support for the program. Monica Robles, President and Founder of Asociacion de Emprendedores, reported the group was started in 2018 due to the dire need in the Hispanic community. She advised this program teaches participants about the importance of empowerment, leadership, and business so they can believe in themselves and go on to start their own businesses. She reported the program has been taught to Anaheim residents since 2019 with very good results and noted 73 participants in Anaheim have completed the program. She requested the City Council continue to support the program and connect it with the County Board of Supervisors because the State has provided $15,000,000 in a grant that only counties can apply for and disperse to microbusinesses subject to guidelines. She encouraged the City Council to further explorer the program. Mazatl Tecpatl Tepehyolotzin thanked the City Council for voting for Indigenous Peoples' Day. He reported he has obtained 6,000 signatures on a petition to change the name of Anaheim High School's "Colonist" mascot and the school name. He thanked the City Council, especially Council Member Moreno, for making Indigenous Peoples' Day a reality. He expressed solidarity with the Arab Muslim community and encouraged City Council to approve the designation of Little Arabia. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 4 of 32 Jonathan Daniel expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and encouraged City Council to support the diverse communities in Anaheim. He noted the community does not need the City's approval to recognize Little Arabia. Mario Castillo reported he came to the United States six years ago with a degree in Business Administration and a master's degree in Finance but did not know anything about the economic system in this country. He advised the Emprendedores has helped him build his skills and now he has a business consulting company along with being a mentor for Emprendedores Wes Jones reported voters passed Measure L four years ago and he believed it was time the City enforced the measure. He encouraged City Council to recognize Little Arabia with a designation not only for tourists but for the residents of Anaheim. David Lieberman expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia. He would like to see the area flourish by becoming a destination much like the Little India area in his hometown in New Jersey once they received their designation. He noted the designation also helps local businesses. He advised the area has been a model for inclusivity and the Arab community has responded in kind. He encouraged City Council to agendize the item for discussion. Ashleigh Aitken congratulated Council Member Ma'ae for her appointment. She thanked City Council for recognizing Esther Wallace for her service to Anaheim. She encouraged City Council to adopt a resolution to officially recognize the Little Arabia district and noted it could do much good for the community. She advised people come from all over the region to enjoy its food, shops, and markets and while they are visiting, they also visit other areas of Anaheim. She explained that officially recognizing Little Arabia as a district would speed up the economic recovery of the district, resulting in economic benefit to the City. She advised the designation would also send a strong message to the Arab American community that it is valued and welcomed. She reported this community works hard to assist new immigrants with employment and services that streamline their entry into the local economy. She noted promoting Little Arabia's economic district would help Anaheim's economic recovery, help local small businesses, and promote kinship and pride amongst the local Arab American community. Bob Donelson expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and he did not understand why anyone would see it as divisive. He thanked Council Member Valencia for attending the districtwide meeting. He expressed concern regarding the bathrooms at Brookhurst Park and noted the port -a - potty is cleaner than the restrooms. Council Member Valencia requested Public Works staff investigate the restroom concerns noted by Mr. Donelson. David Duran expressed concern about how Mayor Sidhu exercised his power and privilege when a resident provided public comment earlier. He alleged many Council Members feel privileged and empowered because of their position and noted they make decisions, spend taxpayer money, and sell stadiums without sufficient public involvement. He noted they also remain silent when travesty against the public is brought to their attention and many of their actions have been to give millions of dollars to businesses. He encouraged City Council to make the designation for Little Arabia. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 5 of 32 Joe Pak, Orange County Korean War Memorial Committee Secretary -General, reported they have been working on a Korean War Memorial at Hillcrest Park since 2009. He invited the public and City Council to attend the official dedication on Veterans Day at 1:00 P.M. at Hillcrest Park. He noted the memorial would be inscribed with the names of the approximately 36,591 American soldiers who were killed in the war, with 2,612 being from California and 58 being from Orange County, Liliana Bataz (translation: Spanish) advised she graduated from the Emprendedores program in April 2019 and noted the program has allowed her to open her own business. She advised the program allowed her to work with entrepreneurs of different businesses. She was also able to work with women who were victims of domestic violence. She advised she is teaching mothers in the My Safe Harbor program and working with a program to stop human trafficking. She thanked the City of Anaheim for their support for the Emprendedores program. Javier Bataz (translation: Spanish) reported he belongs to the first generation of graduates from the Emprendedores program. He advised he arrived in the United States 10 years ago and was unable to develop professionally until 2019 when he started the Emprendedores program. He advised the program has helped him to start his own business. He thanked the City of Anaheim and requested City Council continue to support the program and the Hispanic community. He thanked Mayor Sidhu for telling his story of immigrating to the United States, noting it was very impactful for him. Elizabeth Gonzalez expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and noted, as a daughter of a small business owner, it is important small business owners in Anaheim receive the support they need. She advised Anaheim is more than Disneyland and the diversity in the community needs to be celebrated. She reported she is a resort worker and noted the pay and conditions are deplorable. She advised she is a member of SEIU-USWW and advised negotiating with Disney has been difficult. She advised she spent the entire summer knocking on doors in support of Measure L and noted it needs to be respected. Tom Orbison reported residents moved to Anaheim because of the quality of homes and owners take pride in ownership. He advised the Pearson Park and the Colony area are just some of the pride areas in Anaheim. He encouraged City Council to deny Item No. 23 and noted businesses should not be allowed in neighborhoods. He reported there is an unauthorized Airbnb at 620 North Janss Way and requested the City investigate. Sirina Nabhan expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and encouraged City Council to agendize the item for discussion. She believed the designation would drive more business to the area. Rebecca Kouac-Stein echoed the previous comments by Ms. Aitken and expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia. Jenny Matti expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and was disappointed the conversation was still ongoing. She advised Little Arabia is diverse and vibrant and noted it is because of the people and communities that live there. She expressed concern that the request to designate the area is continually denied. She explained City Council is ignoring its constituents who are asking for cultural recognition, is not defending the unity of the City, and contributes to its division. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 6 of 32 Ryan Clark advised he is a resident of District 2 and noted his family moved from Belmont Shores to be closer to Little Arabia. He noted it is time for the designation of Little Arabia that would help grow commerce and tourism in light of the recent setbacks from the pandemic. He advised the designation could also bring long-lasting changes to many small businesses. He encouraged City Council to agendize the item for discussion. Jackie Cordova expressed concerns about the working conditions at Disneyland. She advised the community has been standing up in protest for years against the cronyism between Disneyland and the City Council. She reported most households in and around the resort area cannot attend the park due to the exorbitant fees and noted McDonald's pays its workers more than Disneyland employees. She believed City Council helped create homelessness and hunger in Orange County. She expressed concern for low pay and poor working conditions for front-line workers at the West Anaheim Medical Center. She encouraged City Council to support the designation to Little Arabia. She addressed the killing of Brandon Lopez by the Anaheim Police Department. She advised Irvine would be expanding its jail capacity by 2,000 beds in Orange County and advised additional information could be found at https://www.stopthemusick.net/ Fred Sigala Jr. advised the Arab American community in Anaheim has been lied to, double-crossed, ignored by its elected officials, and excluded as a distinct culture. He advised the Little Arabia community continues to help others with essential services such as health coverage, jobs, food, financial support, and English classes through their non-profit foundation Access California Services. He noted that even with how diverse the City Council appears to be, they could make themselves appear to be xenophobic or discriminatory against Arab and Arab Americans. He advised the Arab American Civic Council has reached out to Stater Brothers and Cortina's Italian Market who have expressed support for the designation. He believed the City could gain by supporting the businesses in the area and urged Council Member Ma'ae to make the formal request to agendize the item. Fatima D. Bagi expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and encouraged City Council to agendize the item for discussion. She advised the argument against the designation is of terrible faith and noted there would also be non -Arab businesses in the area. She believed an official designation of Little Arabia would bring a boom in business. She expressed concern regarding the FBI spying on the Arab community and encouraged interested parties to research FBI vs. Fagaza. Carmen Philip expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia. She advised she is an immigrant from Iraq and noted she lives in the heart of the community. She noted she has family members who will travel hours to the area to shop and eat and for those family members who do not speak English well to feel comfort and understood. Adam Overton reported he is a faith -rooted organizer with Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice (CLUE) whose mission it is to educate, organize, and mobilize the faith community to accompany workers and their families in the struggle for good jobs, dignity, and justice. He advised there are many ethnic enclaves in the region and it is time for the City to officially designate Little Arabia. He noted he is Jewish and has always felt welcome in Little Arabia. He reported Little Arabia is home to hundreds of Arab American businesses that have become a cultural destination for countless American families all over California. He advised many businesses in the area have closed due to the pandemic. He expressed concern about the alleged divisiveness of this issue and noted this is about diversity and not division. Afaf Annan expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and she would like to see all Anaheim residents explore Little Arabia. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 7 of 32 Tom Fielder expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and noted all the relevant arguments have already been made by previous speakers. He does not understand why there is any pushback against the designation and encouraged the City Council to do the right thing. Fayaz Nawabi reported he is the Policy and Advocacy Manager for the Council on American -Islamic Relations (CAIR) and is a resident of Anaheim. He expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia. He advised the Arab community is an integral part of the Anaheim community and noted there are over 100 businesses in Little Arabia serving the residents of Anaheim. Nizar Bilbas congratulated Council Member Ma'ae on her appointment in District 2. He expressed disappointment regarding her comments on Little Arabia and noted it only fuels the myth that Arabs are trying to take over. He believed this was an opportunity for people to get to know the Arab community and noted this would be the first Little Arabia designation in the nation. He reported the Arab community has helped develop the most run-down area in Anaheim and continues to do so. He advised both Arab and non -Arab businesses in the community support the designation. He recommended Council Member Ma'ae personally ask the businesses such as Stater Brothers and Cortina's if they want the designation. He advised the majority of Anaheim voters support the designation. He recommended she meet with the Arab American Civic Council to see the petitions that have been signed by the non -Arab businesses in support of the designation. Aneesah Muhammed reported she works in District 2 and encouraged City Council to support the designation of Little Arabia. She advised it is a welcoming cultural and business area that attracts people from different ethnic backgrounds, such as ethnic markets, restaurants, cafes, religious centers, clothing stores, hair salons, and much more. She advised, growing up, her family was racially profiled, discriminated against, and they would drive to Little Arabia to eat the food and feel safe. She noted in supporting the Little Arabia designation, City Council would empower the Arab American and immigrant -owned small businesses, hundreds of their employees, and their families. She expressed disappointment the item has not been agendized and encouraged City Council to place it on the agenda. Amin Nash expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and encouraged City Council to agendize the item for discussion at the next City Council meeting. He advised there is Arab and non - Arab community support for the designation. He reported many Arabs come to Little Arabia from locations as far away as Las Vegas and Arizona to obtain their Halal meats at the Altayebat Market. He encouraged City Council to think about the community and the prospects of what may emerge if Little Arabia receives its designation. He noted that this designation would be the first in the nation and people would recognize that Anaheim did the right thing by supporting the designation. Amir reported he is a student at Cal State Fullerton and regularly commutes there from Rancho Cucamonga. He advised Little Arabia has always been a part of the Arab community within Cal State Fullerton and noted fellow students of Arab background come to enjoy the food, hang out, and enjoy the culture. He expressed support for the designation along with his fellow Arab students at Cal State Fullerton. Rashad AI-Dabbagh, Executive Director of the Arab American Civic Council, expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia and encouraged City Council to agendize the item for discussion at the next City Council meeting. He noted more than 100 businesses in Little Arabia contribute to the City of Anaheim's culture and business. He encouraged City Council to experience the food and culture in Little Arabia. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 8 of 32 Kenneth Batiste encouraged the City Council to listen to its constituents. He alleged money means more to Council than residents. He expressed support for the designation of Little Arabia that should be an attraction for people to know all around the world. Manuel Hernandez reported on July 22, 2012, Officer Kelly Phillips shot Joey Acevedo in the back of the head while handcuffed. He advised Officer Phillips is still patrolling Anaheim, encouraged City Council to compensate the mother of Mr. Acevedo, and advised a legal response would happen if she was not compensated. He reported he was placed in the Los Angeles County jail as a political prisoner for three months for exposing the murder of Jason Rodriguez by the Montebello Police Department. He reported he was tortured in jail and took two years to recover. He advised people in the streets talking to themselves and hitting themselves are victims of mind control attacks by government agencies. He advised City Council and the Police Chief are not immune from these mind control attacks, it is known as Havana Syndrome, and encouraged them to pay attention. CITY MANAGER'S UPDATE: City Manager Jim Vanderpool announced the Dia de los Muertos event would be hosted by the Community Services Department and Project SAY from October 29 through November 1, and would include community altar showcases at seven locations throughout the City. He advised more information can be found in the press release at www.anaheim.net and on the City's social media. At 7:25 P.M., Mayor Sidhu recessed the Anaheim City Council to address the Anaheim Housing Authority agenda and reconvened at 7:43 P.M. CONSENT CALENDAR: At 7:43 P.M., the consent calendar was considered with Council Member Ma'ae pulling Item No. 04, Council Member Valencia pulling Item No. 20, and Council Member Moreno pulling Item Nos. 06, 14, and 18 and requesting Public Hearing Item No. 23 be advanced for earlier consideration. MOTION: Council Member O'Neil moved to waive reading of all ordinances and resolutions and adopt the balance of the consent calendar, in accordance with reports, certifications, and recommendations furnished each City Council Member and as listed on the consent calendar, seconded by Council Member Valencia. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Sidhu and Council Members Faessel, Diaz, Ma'ae, Moreno, Valencia, O'Neil); NOES — 0. Motion carried. B105 3. Receive and file minutes of the Library Board meeting of September 13, 2021. B105 5. Appoint six new members and reappoint four members to the Anaheim Workforce Development Board to serve terms through June 30, 2024 and June 30, 2025: [New Appointments - Katie Marquez (June 30, 2025), Jenevive Sandoval (June 30, 2025), and Paul Sanford (June 30, 2024), representing business; Adrian Esparza (June 30, 2025) and Andrew Gonzales (June 30, 2024), representing labor; and Sergio Ramirez (June 30, 2025), representing economic development] [Reappointments - Joseph Paquette (June 30, 2025), representing business; Robert Nelson (June 30, 2025) representing labor; Rhonda Wooten- Savino (June 30, 2025), representing the California Employment Development Department; and Trung Le (June 30, 2024), representing the California Department of Rehabilitation]. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 9 of 32 AGR-13169 8. Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Crosstown Electrical and Data, Inc., in the amount of $356,855, which includes a not -to -exceed construction allowance in the amount of $25,000 for contingencies, for the Wayfinding Signs Project; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and related documents, and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the contract; determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301(b) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions; and increase the Community and Economic Development FY 2021-2022 budget by $256,855. AGR-13170 9. Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Asplundh Construction LLC, in the amount of $7,294,265.83, for the Direct Buried Cable Replacement Project FY 2021-22; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and related documents, and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the contract; determine that the project is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301(b), 15302(c), 15302(d), and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions. AGR-13171 10. Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Cedro Construction Inc., in the amount of $2,657,949.40, for the La Palma Avenue and Tustin Avenue Water Main Replacements at Orange County Transportation Authority Railway Crossing Project; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and related documents, and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the contract; determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301(b), 15302(c) and 15303(d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions. AGR-13172 11. Approve the agreement with the Orange County Superintendent of Schools, operating as Inside the Outdoors, for Energy and Water Sustainability Education Programs and Services, for a term of three years with up to two one-year extensions, in an annual amount not to exceed $125,000 with a 10% contingency for extra services if needed; authorize the Public Utilities General Manager, or designee, to execute the agreement and any related documents, and take the necessary, required, or advisable actions to implement, fund, and administer the agreement. D175 12. Authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to accept and manage the two awarded Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 10 grants totaling $1,918,200, for traffic signal modifications at a total of seven intersections and accept the additional Highway Safety Improvement Program Local Road Safety Plan grant funding $90,000, with a $10,000 local match; determine that two Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program grant projects are categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Class 2, Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, [Traffic Signal Improvements at Three Intersections Project and Traffic Signal Improvements at Four Intersections Project]; and increase the Department of Public Works Fiscal Year 2021/22 revenue and expenditure budget by $2,008,200. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 10 of 32 AGR-13174 13. Approve the Professional Services Agreements with six consultants, in the not to exceed AGR-13175 amount of $400,000 per Work Order Package and with a total not to exceed contract amount of $1,000,000 per contract year per consultant, for on -call materials testing, deputy inspection AGR 13176 and environmental engineering and science services to support the Construction Services AGR-13177 Division of the Public Works Department each for a term ending April 27, 2022 with one two- AGR-13178 year optional renewal and extension of the term for such time as necessary for completion of AGR-13179 outstanding work order packages in progress (not to exceed six additional months); authorize de minimis changes that do not substantially change the term and conditions of the agreements, as long as such changes are determined to be de minimis by the City Attorney; and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute the agreements and to take the necessary or advisable actions to implement and administer the agreements, any optional renewals, and extensions (MTGL, Inc.; Geocon West, Inc.; Twining, Inc.; Smith — Emery Laboratories, Inc.; Geo-Advantec, Inc.; and LaBelle Marvin, Inc.). D175 15. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM certifying that Anaheim has the resources to fund the projects submitted for inclusion in the FY 2022/23 - 2027/28 Transportation Improvement Program and affirming its commitment to implement all of the projects submitted in the program. C350 16. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-096 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 2021-002 for Groundwater Treatment Plants Phase B and Groundwater Supply Wells Nos. 60 and 61 supported by those findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act. T107 17. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-097 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM forming Underground District No. 70 (Wildfire Mitigation Undergrounding in Fire Threat Zones) and determining said action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301(b), 15302(c), 15302(d) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. D154 19. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM for the purpose of creating, deleting and/or modifying certain classifications designated as Management Unrepresented Full -Time. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Resolution No. 2014-093 for the purpose of creating, deleting and/or modifying certain classifications designated as Administrative Management. D114 21. Approve minutes of the City Council meeting of February 16, 2021. At 7:45 P.M., Mayor Sidhu took the agenda out of order and considered Public Hearing Item No. 23 prior to addressing items pulled from the Consent Calendar and End of Consent Calendar agenda items. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 11 of 32 PUBLIC HEARING: C220 23. CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, CLASS 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06106 (DEV2021-00122) OWNER: Roberto Esquivel, 1540 El Travisia Drive, La Habra, CA 90631 APPLICANT: Grandma's House of Hope, Je'net Kreitner, 1505 E. 17th Street, Santa Ana, CA 92705 PROJECT LOCATION: The project site is located at 626 North West Street and 945 West Pioneer Drive, at the northeast corner of West Street and Pioneer Drive. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit to permit a transitional housing facility for 20 residents plus one house lead resident within a single family residence. [Applicant has submitted a revised request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to permit a transitional housing facility for 16 residents inclusive of one house lead resident within a single family residence.] ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Denied Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06106 (PC2021-030). VOTE: 6-0 (Chairperson Meeks and Commissioners Keys, Kring, Perez, Vadodaria, and White voted yes.) (Planning Commission meeting of August 30, 2021) Appealed by: Je'net Kreitner, Grandma's House of Hope. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM denying Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06106, and making certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2021-00122) (626 North West Street & 945 West Pioneer Drive). Approved, as amended to include additional findings. Or RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06106, and making certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2021-00122) (626 North West Street & 945 West Pioneer Drive). Planning and Building Director Ted White reported the item is a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a transitional housing facility located within an existing single-family residence at 626 North West Street. He advised the request was denied by the Planning Commission and appealed by the applicant. He reported the site is located on two-thirds of an acre located in the "RS-1" Single - Family Residential Zone and is developed with a single-family residence and an attached three -car garage. Mr. White reported the applicant proposes a transitional housing project in the existing residence and noted transitional housing is considered a residential use pursuant to state law. He advised state law defines transitional housing as rental housing that is operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and recirculating of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at a predetermined future time that shall be no less than six months from the beginning of City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 12 of 32 the assistance. He advised the Anaheim Municipal Code requires a CUP for transitional housing projects that are greater than six (6) residents. Mr. White reported the applicant proposes a transitional housing facility for up to 16 residents with one participant serving as a Community Leader where 21 was previously proposed. He advised this change was proposed following the Planning Commission meeting as part of a revised letter of operation. He reported the transitional housing facility would provide housing and support services for women over 18 years of age with the majority being over the age of 40 that have not been able to obtain permanent housing and are experiencing homelessness with mental health disabilities. Mr. White reported participants in the program gain skills needed to live independently within 12 to 18 months after arriving in the program. He advised participants living at the facility would be provided with various resources, including individual case management, health service referrals, counseling, and assistance with placement in permanent housing. He explained all participants would be chosen through a pre-screening process through the Orange County Health Care Agency and would maintain a sober living environment. He advised participants would be required to follow a program schedule and would not be allowed to have visitors without express consent from the Program Manager as specified in the Program Agreement, which is generally limited to child reunification scenarios. Mr. White reported the existing 5,300 square foot home consists of eight bedrooms, ten bathrooms, a kitchen, living room, dining room, game room, and three -car garage with laundry room. He advised one garage space would be used as a gym or recreation area. He advised the staff work area would be located in the existing pool house. He explained there are no specific occupancy limits in the building or fire codes for transitional housing and noted no specific changes are being proposed for the property. Mr. White advised the proposed facility would be staffed by a Program Manager who is on -site approximately 25 hours per week along with a Case Manager, Housing Navigator, Service Coordinator, Intake Specialist, and Therapist, although there would be a maximum of three staff on - site at any time. He explained nighttime supervision would be provided by the participant serving as the Community Leader who would be required to complete a leadership program and be identified by staff as having the maturity, skills, and trustworthiness to effectively supervise the facility during the evening hours. He advised the revised letter of operation clarifies that the Community Leader would have a vehicle on -site and would call 911 if an emergency occurs overnight. He noted professional staff would be on -call 24 hours a day and would be available to assist the Community Leader when needed. Mr. White reported the applicant conducted a community outreach meeting on July 7, 2021 to inform neighbors of the proposed transitional housing facility. The applicant stated that approximately eight (8) neighbors attended the online meeting who had general questions relating to the facility operations and guest policies, with no one expressing opposition to the project. He reported the Planning Commission meeting was held on August 30, 2021 where 50 public pieces of correspondence were received in opposition to the project. He advised thirty six (36) members of the public spoke in opposition of the project at the meeting with six (6) speaking in favor of the project. He reported the basis for opposition includes concerns regarding the change to the character of the neighborhood and over -concentration of these types of uses, impact on property values, potential impact on traffic and noise, and the size and scale of the proposal. He advised the Planning Commission denied the project finding that its operation would cause adverse impacts due to its size and scale. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 13 of 32 Mr. White reported the project applicant submitted a timely letter of appeal. He advised the basis of the appeal was that the Planning Commission's denial discriminated against individuals with disabilities and violated federal and state law including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Housing Accountability Act (HAA) and that there is no substantial evidence to support its actions or findings. Mr. White advised staff does not believe the action of the Planning Commission denying the project was discriminatory nor that the action was inconsistent with federal or state law, rather that the Planning Commission based their decisions on findings related to the location of the proposed project, the size and scale of the operation within a single-family zone, and potential impacts to the health and safety of Anaheim residents. He reported a community forum hosted by Council Member Moreno was held on October 21, 2021 to discuss the proposal, with over 100 in attendance. He advised City staff provided an overview of the project and the applicant provided an overview of the organization and operation followed by a question and answer period. He noted concerns raised by the public were similar to those expressed at the Planning Commission meeting with particular emphasis on the number of facilities in the Westmont -Colony neighborhood. He advised a draft City Council resolution upholding the decision of the Planning Commission and denying the project is attached to the staff report along with a draft City Council resolution approving the project including conditions of approval limiting the number of participants in the program to 16. DISCUSSION: Council Member Moreno requested Mr. White provide an overview of the other facilities located in the Westmont -Colony Neighborhood. Mr. White reported other "quasi -residential" land uses in the neighborhood include one (1) traditional housing with CUP, that is another Grandma's House of Hope facility that serves 32 residents, one (1) verified unlicensed Community Care Facility that serves six (6) residents, and eight (8) potentially unlicensed Sober Living Homes (SLH), Group Homes (GH), or Short-term Rentals (STRs) that serve six (6) residents, and three (3) confirmed STRs whose occupancy number is unknown. He advised the remainder of the State Licensed and Unlicensed facilities serve a maximum of six (6) residents. He noted those that are not running in conformance with State law may have more than six (6) residents but would be running illegally. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Faessel's inquiries, Mr. White reported the map presented was what was circulating amongst the community and is not to scale. He advised there are additional facilities on Pearl Street that are not shown on the map, a care facility on Wilshire Avenue, and potentially others in surrounding areas. He advised staff has attempted to map out the entire City but does not yet have it available. He noted some areas have more facilities than others but also noted they are unevenly dispersed throughout the City. Mayor Sidhu and Council Member Ma'ae reported ex-parte communication with Grandma's House of Hope. Mayor Pro Tem Faessel and Council Member Valencia reported several conversations with the applicant and neighbors. Council Member Diaz reported having a Zoom meeting with the applicant. Council Member Moreno reported conversations with the applicant and hundreds of neighbors at the community forum. Council Member O'Neil reported his staff met with the applicant and he was briefed. Mayor Sidhu opened the public hearing. Je'net Kreitner, applicant, thanked City Council for the time each Council Member gave her regarding the project. She advised Grandma's House of Hope has worked very hard to earn the respect and trust it has with the City in the combined goal of addressing the homeless crisis. She advised they run clean effective programs including an after -school program called HopeWorks, which is located at City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 14 of 32 Lincoln Avenue and Dale Avenue and serves 45 families. She noted they also run a program called Nana's Kidz that serves hunger issues for children in Anaheim who rely on school cafeterias for their primary source of food. She reported Grandma's House of Hope was acknowledged as the non-profit of the year in 2017. Ms. Kreitner reported she was abandoned 28 years ago with her six -year -old son and noted Anaheim helped her get back on her feet, which is why she wants to serve the City. She advised the program being proposed for this location is their premier program that they were asked to design by the Orange County Health Care Agency (HCA) after they had worked with Grandma's House of Hope on several different contracts. She advised they were subsequently awarded 80% of a $6,000,000 contract, which only has increased because their outcomes are so significant. She reported they have a 65% success rate in moving residents to permanent housing within nine (9) to 18 months. She noted they are one of the leaders in Orange County with that kind of success rate and is noted in the letters received by the Orange County Community Foundation, United Way, the Sisters of Saint Joseph, and the Dayle McIntosh Center. Ms. Kreitner reported this service is provided at no cost to the City and they chose to deploy the program in the City due to its homeless problem. She noted the homeless crisis is not going away and is only increasing. She advised in 2019, 6,800 people experiencing homelessness were unsheltered and sheltered in Orange County. She noted Anaheim had 1,202 homeless individuals residing in the City in 2019 and the second highest behind Santa Ana. She advised there was a 43.1 % increase in the previous point -in -time (PIT) count in 2017. She advised it is important to note that when the possible saturation of this location is discussed, it includes the fact that the City has an increased number of residents experiencing homelessness. Ms. Kreitner reported the Planning Department's staff report recommended approval for this project and she hoped the City Council would overturn the decision of the rare 6-0 vote of the Planning Commission from August 30, 2021. She advised Grandma's House of Hope was not allowed to mitigate any circumstances that the Planning Commission was concerned about. She noted there were no specific findings or new facts that were entered into evidence for consideration. She advised the items cited in the resolution for denial are unsubstantiated and noted they were never offered the opportunity to clarify misstatements or facts, or suggest a mitigating response. Ms. Kreitner advised Grandma's House of Hope prides itself on its willingness to work with the Planning Commission, the City Council, and all the good people of Anaheim. She looks forward to continuing the difficult work of serving a hurting community of displaced individuals and assisting the City in caring for its most vulnerable. She referenced the contract they have with the Orange County Health Care Agency, noted they are supervised and audited by HCA, and stated they follow the contract by the letter. She referenced their Good Neighbor Policy that shows what they have promised HCA with its relationship with its neighbors. Ms. Kreitner advised the first reason for denial states the proposed project would adversely affect the neighborhood due to the magnitude of the proposed project, which includes 21 participants and its proximity to high pedestrian and traffic uses including a public high school, two elementary schools, and being less than half a mile from two public parks. She advised occupancy has been reduced from 21 residents to 16 residents and advised they would be willing to plan deliveries to twice a month to avoid high traffic times. She advised it is a high vehicular traffic area and she did not believe that two (2) additional vehicles and 16 residents would make a huge impact. She advised only two (2) participant vehicles are approved in the program and they must have a documented disability. She noted only one (1) resident is in treatment for chemotherapy, is on a special diet, and receives her City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 15 of 32 meals via Meal on Wheels daily. She estimates using two (2) to three (3) Ubers per week and would be keeping in alignment with any family of eight or more that moved into that property. Ms. Kreitner advised the second reason for denial is that granting the CUP would be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the proposed project would adversely affect the existing infrastructure related to the public sewer and water facilities. She advised this has been mitigated by reducing the number of participants from 21 to 16. She advised it is now comparable to their other approved CUPs and noted none of those facilities have ever had a plumbing issue that has ever adversely impacted the neighbors. Ms. Kreitner advised the third reason for denial is that granting the CUP under the conditions imposed would be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because participants would be without care or supervision during the overnight hours. She clarified there are seven (7) staff attached to the project and no more than three (3) would ever be on the property at the same time. She advised there are currently two (2) participants who have approved vehicles on site. She explained the Community Leader is not a participant in the program and provides overnight supervision with on -call managers. She reported this particular Community Leader has been with the program for eight (8) years and has always handled emergencies with great responsiveness and the appropriate level of response. She explained during an emergency the Community Leader would contact emergency services immediately and then contact the staff. She clarified the 20 minutes referred to in the last meeting would be the time it would take for a staff member to leave their home and arrive at the property. Ms. Kreitner advised homelessness is not a nuisance, it is a tragedy. She advised the only solution is to provide readily available shelter and housing for every single person. She reported Grandma's House of Hope is providing a service at no cost to the City and is being funded by Orange County Health Care Agency. She advised 74% of program participants have been identified as homeless in Anaheim and noted three (3) assessments are done before they are accepted into the program. She clarified they do not require their participants to take medications as part of their stay but do have an expectation that participants want help and are willing to follow their doctor's advice. Ms. Kreitner advised they feel the Planning Commission's denial discriminates against individuals with disabilities and violates state and federal law including the ADA, Housing Accountability Act, California Code of Regulations, and Government Code §8899.5. She noted there is no substantial evidence in the record to support the actions taken and the findings made in the resolution. She advised there is substantial evidence and other facts that negate the findings made in this resolution were valid; they refute the findings that there is no feasible way to avoid the adverse impact to the public health and safety based on the proposal and terms of which they propose to run the project. Ms. Kreitner presented a video of a resident of the program and noted she is now in permanent housing. She reported Grandma's House of Hope holds three (3) CUPs in this district. She advised the property on Harbor Boulevard would be eliminated in March, so the number of beds in the district is not being increased but simply being replaced. City Clerk Theresa Bass reported there are a total of 61 public speakers with 15 in the noticed area and 46 outside the noticed area. Mayor Sidhu welcomed all public speakers and asked them to be concise in their statements in the spirit of time. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 16 of 32 City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that 58 public comments were received electronically prior to 7:45 P.M. related to Public Hearing Item No. 23. [A final total of 58 public comments were received electronically, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official record]. — See Appendix. Debra Trabattoni expressed support for the legitimate concerns that would be heard tonight from her neighbors. She advised her main issue is the oversaturation of her community with businesses that change the nature of the neighborhoods. She advised over 25 homes within a half -mile of this site have been turned into similar businesses. She explained a non-profit is a business that has been granted tax exemption by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and noted this CUP is a business model. Ms. Trabattoni reported the applicant operates 10 homes in central Anaheim neighborhoods. She advised six (6) of those homes have CUPs with over six (6) residents including one around the corner from the proposed site that has 36 residents. She noted the applicant's 2019 Financial Statements show they generated over $4,000,000 in revenue with $2,000,000 from taxpayers along with salary and benefits totaling $1,500,000. She advised Grandma's House of Hope's revenue has grown substantially over the last two (2) years and they recently received a $6,000,000 grant. She reported Ms. Kreitner has stated that the program has not entered Anaheim Hills because it is too far for her employees to travel between sites during the day. She believed this means the homes need to be near each other for the business model to work. Ms. Trabattoni reported Ms. Kreitner often talks about her partnership with the City to help the homeless. She advised it is clear the business model is to buy or lease as many homes in the neighborhood as possible to run the business and they are concerned with the enabling of the business model at residents' expense. She noted compared to nearby cities, Anaheim has done more than its share to help the County's homeless. She advised Ms. Kreitner obtains many of her residents from the Orange County Health Care Agency. Ms. Trabattoni advised the City has struggled to manage the six (6) and under unlicensed homes. She reported this situation is different in that the City Council has full discretion over approval or denial of the permit. She noted the impact of this home is far greater due to its sheer size and existing oversaturation of the neighborhood. She advised the Planning Commission was well aware of its options when it unanimously denied the CUP. She acknowledged the adjustments that Ms. Kreitner has made in the name of the facility and the number of residents but believed the Planning Commission's findings are still appropriate. She urged City Council to deny the permit and adopt the findings in the resolution approved by the Planning Commission. She presented a map of facilities that are within a half -mile of the proposed facility. Mary Dragieff reported her property abuts the proposed facility. She presented a petition with over 300 signatures in opposition to the project. She advised she has lived on her property for over 42 years and her neighbors are all elderly. She expressed opposition to the project due to the oversaturation of group homes in the immediate area and noted there are over 25 licensed and unlicensed group homes in the area. She described the variety of facilities in the immediate area to highlight the saturation. Ms. Dragieff acknowledged that Grandma's House of Hope provides service to the City and that Ms. Kreitner reported having contracts with the City but was unable to confirm those facts. She advised many of the answers Ms. Kreitner gave at the meeting on Thursday were vague. She understands a denial by the Planning Commission is very rare. She explained Ms. Kreitner's recount of the number of homes her organization manages has varied. She expressed concern that nothing is stopping Ms. Kreitner from increasing the number of residents in the home to 32 like some of the other facilities. She explained this type of business is very lucrative and there are many benefits for a non-profit and is profitable for the homeowner. She acknowledged that it helps the homeless but it negatively affects homeowners' health and safety. Ms. Dragieff expressed concerns about the 15 residents and the Community Leader overseeing at night. She believed that is a large group of people for one person. She advised they were told the Community Leader position is an entry-level position that would be covering the overnight shift and is now being told it is someone with eight (8) years of experience. She reported the information given by Ms. Kreitner keeps City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 17 of 32 changing. She advised when there are too many group homes in one area it chips away at the family dynamic of the neighborhood. She noted as these programs grow and obtain additional funding from the State, it helps further their mission and promotes expansion. She expressed opposition to the project and believed it affects not only the safety and the health of the program's residents but also the neighborhood. She encouraged City Council to deny the CUP and follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Paul Dragieff reported he has lived in his home for 42 years in what he feels is an extraordinary neighborhood. He advised there is an overabundance of group homes in the neighborhood and feels enough is enough. He encouraged City Council and staff to come to the location and view it from their point of view. He thanked Council Members Moreno and Valencia and Mr. White for taking the time to come talk to residents and visit the location. He expressed disappointment that the remainder of the dais did not visit with residents but did meet with Grandma's House of Hope. Carolina Garcia thanked Grandma's House of Hope staff for the hard work they do for the program. She expressed concern regarding the saturation of group homes in Anaheim. She advised if this were approved, her property would be adjacent to two (2) group homes. She noted the greatest concern is the oversaturation of businesses in the community when it is supposed to be a neighborhood. Shelly Nichols thanked City Council for listening to residents' concerns regarding the proposed project. She advised they have lived in the neighborhood for 32 years and noted residents feel unseen and unheard. She expressed support for the great work of Grandma's House of Hope. She recalled the story of how she was able to purchase the home and the sense of community in the neighborhood. She noted she was offended by the accusations she heard at the Planning Commission that the group in opposition is a dog -whistling community and advised they are not a discriminatory community. She referenced a flyer she received today that lists positive things to say about Grandma's House of Hope for tonight's meeting. She advised that in the flyer there is an acronym for BANANA, which stands for Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything. She noted the community is being represented as something they are not and she encouraged City Council to deny the CUP and follow the recommendation from the Planning Commission. Mike Nichols noted that this comes down to residents' fears about the residents who would be residing in the proposed facility. He advised there was initially not enough information and communication regarding the project. He believed much of the miscommunication could have been alleviated with direct communication from Grandma's House of Hope to the neighbors. He expressed concern that the City does not know how many facilities are operating in the City. He advised the City needs to develop more low-income housing to address affordability and help address the City's homeless issues. Joanne Kellogg reported she resides less than 200 feet from the proposed project and moved in in 1946. She noted the neighborhood has turned into a wonderful family -oriented community and believes it is one of the best in Anaheim. She thanked City Council for listening to residents' concerns. She commended the excellent report by the Planning Commission and City staff. She advised she is extremely opposed to the proposed project and believed it would affect the health and safety of the community. She noted the proposed facility is in a high -traffic area and close to two key intersections where hundreds of cars pass daily. She also believed being an older neighborhood, any high -density housing could impact the fragile infrastructure. She expressed concerns about having 15 residents supervised by one supervisor during overnight hours living so close to her home if those residents roamed the neighborhood at night in search of mental or physical support. She believed the lack of supervision would affect the safety of residents. She advised Anaheim is a lively community City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 18 of 32 that draws families looking for a safe City to raise their children and build their lives. She does not believe her neighborhood is an appropriate location for a group home. Estela Merkaske reported she moved to the neighborhood 20 years ago. She advised she has witnessed some misbehaviors by residents in older facilities in the area. She echoed the sentiments of her neighbors and encouraged City Council to deny the CUP. Roberto Esquivel reported he is the owner of the property and built the home in 2009 to raise his family. He advised he has completed $1,000,000 worth of improvements on the property. He reported he is a medical doctor from Mexico and saw many opportunities when he came to the United States in the 1980s. He advised he began to serve the underserved Hispanic communities of Orange County in the area of health care. He believes in values, respecting others, and being prosperous to pass on to his family and the community. He expressed support for the Little Arabia designation and noted all residents are different but their values are the same. He expressed support for Ms. Kreitner and the work that Grandma's House of Hope is doing and noted these are not the same people that are residing on Skid Row in Los Angeles. Mr. Esquivel reported the house was abandoned when he purchased it in 2009 and he has transformed it into a beautiful home for the neighborhood. He acknowledged he has had family parties at the property but was very respectful when the police showed up to ask that he keep it down. He advised he began his work in healthcare 20 years ago and has other programs that help serve the underserved in the County including those who do not have medical insurance. He noted the healthcare system in the United States is very complicated and bureaucratized and many people are taking advantage. He reported he has another property in Anaheim he has rented to Grandma's House of Hope and has not had any complaints in the last four (4) years for that property. He understands the concerns of residents but noted the residents are not drug addicts or gang members. He advise the program is focusing on assisting women and noted the other property has been successful. He reported he was approached by a corporation to purchase the property for use as a party location and he turned it down. He noted he has not seen any money from this proposed project. He advised he would respect the decision of the City Council and the will of the neighbors. Carlos Garcia recognized and acknowledged Council Members Moreno and Valencia and Mr. White for reaching out to the residents and listening to their concerns. He expressed concern the remainder of the dais did not reach out to residents but met with Grandma's House of Hope. He advised he supports the mission of Grandma's House of Hope but supports the concerns of the residents of the neighborhood. He reported his property is adjacent and surrounded by the property in question. He noted he often has his grandchildren playing in the back yard and his backdoor is 20 feet from the front door of the property. He noted this would have a direct impact on the lifestyle for his children and grandchildren. He advised the market is already saturated with group homes and hopes the City would have a strong conversation with residents on how to mitigate the saturation. He advised this topic would continue if not addressed. He advised once a group home license is approved for six (6) residents they often increase since they are not being monitored by the City or the State. He reported Grandma's House of Hope runs a very profitable business although they are labeled a non-profit. He expressed concern for the health and safety of residents given the number of group homes in the area. Mayor Sidhu clarified the City Clerk needs four (4) hours advance notice to display anything electronically from public speakers. Kyle Bonenberger expressed pride that Anaheim has been a leader in the community for providing tangible solutions for homelessness. He advised he is a pastor that has worked with many of the homeless population and has worked with Grandma's House of Hope. He does believe there is an City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 19 of 32 over -saturation of group homes in Anaheim and encouraged City Council to deny the CUP and uphold the findings of the Planning Commission. He felt there needs to be broader conversations about this issue in the City. He believed it was time for the rest of Orange County to bear the burden that Anaheim is already bearing. David L. Vandenberg advised when Ms. Kreitner was asked if she was going to construct another building on the property, she advised it was not her intention although she reported tonight she has unlimited funds. Mr. White reported any building would require a building permit but noted none of her requests for permits have ever been denied. He advised when the Planning Commission denied the CUP request she lowered the occupancy count to 16 but noted she could save $50,000 by not having to install fire sprinklers. He believed fire sprinklers are a safety concern and because it is not required in the building code, they would not be installed. He encouraged City Council to deny the CUP and follow the recommendation from the Planning Commission. David Ponce thanked City Council for listening to the residents and the Anaheim Police Department for protecting the community. He advised he moved to Anaheim seven (7) months ago to start his family and picked the community based on its character. He echoed the concern other public speakers mentioned about the saturation issue. He inquired for clarification if the CUP indicates that the property can only be used by women and inquired what resources residents have to solve potential problems with Grandma's House of Hope. He noted no one questions helping residents in need but advised he is concerned about the safety and the character of the neighborhood. He encouraged City Council to deny the CUP and follow the recommendation from the Planning Commission. Lorraine Anton advised she is a third -generation Anaheim resident. She noted this is not just a neighborhood but a family. She expressed support for helping the homeless in Anaheim but agreed that there is a saturation of group homes in the area. She noted that if Grandma's House of Hope is making so much money, they should build a facility. She advised there have been disturbances at some of the facilities in the area. She expressed concern regarding the health and safety of residents and that it creates an undue impact on the neighborhood. Joe Mohan thanked City Council for hearing the residents. He advised his home is 100 yards from the property in question and his family has been in Anaheim a long time. He reported the residents of these facilities are not just homeless; they are mentally imbalanced and have been in some form of medical care. He expressed concern that they would be in a house with someone who would be mothering them and does not feel there is appropriate personnel in the facility to assist when there is an occurrence. He reported three (3) weeks ago in Newport Beach there was a problem with a similar facility. He advised in his business there is one (1) supervisor for five (5) well -trained employees. He does not believe one (1) person can be responsible for 15 people in a group home. He advised these facilities are mental institutions being run in single-family homes and encouraged City Council to deny the CUP. Gena & Joey Vergel de Dios reported she and her family have lived in the neighborhood for over 20 years. She advised the neighborhood is clean and safe. She expressed concern regarding the CUP for the proposed facility and noted children in the neighborhood walk every day to and from school. She noted approval of this CUP would put the health and safety of the children in the area at risk. She believed an incident at one of these facilities could be fatal and would put the City in jeopardy. She encouraged the City Council to deny the CUP and noted the 500 residents in District 3 would remember the City Council's support. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 20 of 32 Mike Robbins noted the concerns of residents regarding this project are the same concerns residents had when the City Council voted for Short -Term Rentals (STRs). He advised none of the STRs save lives. He noted the Homeless People's Task Force is in support of the CUP. He advised 16 lives can be saved every year by the City Council providing approval of the CUP. He advised this is a small measure of help and encouraged the residents to not be afraid. Jeanine Robbins reported she and her husband are founders of the Homeless People's Task Force and Housing as a Human Right Orange County. She noted people battling for housing the homeless and people battling against housing for the homeless have become the new norm in Anaheim. She advised the dynamic of neighborhoods has already changed with STRs and noted there are 12 in her neighborhood. She noted the dynamic would further change with the passage of Senate Bill (SB) 9 and SB 10 and encouraged the neighborhood to embrace Grandma's House of Hope over what could happen under those laws. She noted neighborhoods simply do not want to support homeless women and this highly successful program. She advised these are the same people that complain about the homeless on West Street and at Pearson Park and noted the City has no affordable housing mandate or rent control so people live on the streets. She encouraged residents to be more concerned about Megan's Law in their neighborhoods. She encouraged City Council to approve the CUP to save lives. Victoria Michaels noted the constituents have been speaking and inquired if City Council was listening. She advised the CUP was denied by the Planning Commission, which was appealed by Ms. Kreitner. She noted the entire City Council was invited to meet with residents and only Council Members Moreno and Valencia met with them but the remainder of the dais met with Ms. Kreitner. She encouraged City Council to listen to residents. Dave Ramos advised his only investment is his home and expressed concern for the quality of his neighborhood. He reported a sober living home moved next to his home 10 years ago, and he's found needles in his front yard since then. He encouraged the City Council to stop the saturation of group homes in his neighborhood and deny the CUP. Johnny Ramos noted his father worked his entire life for his home. He believed this project is a housing experiment and advised these facilities keep moving into their neighborhood. He expressed concern for all the children who do not have a voice in this argument. He noted a child molester moved next door in the halfway house, a neighbor had their catalytic convertor stolen, and one (1) neighbor had their vehicle stolen. He encouraged City Council to deny the CUP. Anthony T. (Tom) Caso, St. Boniface Catholic Church Deacon, reported he has worked with several homeless facilities. He recalled success stories from Grandma's House of Hope. He noted most residents do not want to see the homeless but want to see the homeless taken care of. He advised this program helps the homeless dream and realize their hopes. He noted Grandma's House of Hope is a good neighbor and doing God's work. Terri Garry reported she moved to Anaheim 19 years ago and met every neighbor in the neighborhood. She noted her community has become very united during the pandemic. She expressed appreciation for the City Council's time. She advised other cities and communities know that Anaheim will provide services for the homeless so churches and organizations will refer the homeless to the City. She encouraged City Council to make the right decision. Crystal Street reported she is a Case Manager at Grandma's House of Hope. She advised she is a former participant of this amazing program and noted her son also stayed with her while she was in the program. She advised he was a straight -A student and the captain of the baseball and basketball team while going through the program. She noted it created a character and passion in him that City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 21 of 32 taught him to be of service. She advised the participants have a greater chance of being impacted by the neighbors than vice versa. She encouraged residents to not pass judgment on the program participants. She believes in everything the program does for the community. Henry Taylor expressed support for Grandma's House of Hope and noted he is the first graduation from the men's program in 2017. He advised he had just completed one (1) year in a mental facility and was homeless and had the opportunity to participate in Grandpa's House of Hope. He explained he was there for six (6) months, participated in the program, and learned how to love people again. He noted he learned the skills to be a productive person in society. He reported he was also a Community Leader in the program. Jane Gibbons reported she is a retired registered nurse and understands the program's participants' needs. She advised the issue is where the homeless should be taken care of and believed this is the wrong location. She advised Ms. Kreitner made it clear in the original application that approval for less than 20 residents was not possible due to the Bridges contract. She advised they indicated installing fire sprinklers was not an issue with the homeowner and downplayed the impact of their staffing needs on traffic. She advised Ms. Kreitner submitted a new operations agreement meant to fix their issues but noted it is another attempt to downplay and minimize the impact by being more opaque and obtuse. She noted Ms. Kreitner was quoted in the Orange County Register as never having been denied a CUP and was shocked by the decision of the Planning Commission. She noted the difference between this application and the others was they were specific about the population being served. She advised the previous application described residents as having a severe and persistent mental illness and are described in the new application as a mental health disability. She explained that by dropping their staffing numbers and number of residents they are trying to win over City Council and get the CUP approved. She noted a volunteer therapist providing two (2) hours of services per week for 15 residents equates to eight (8) minutes of therapy time per individual per week. Ms. Gibbons reported that RS-1 single-family zones intend to provide an attractive, safe, and healthy environment for single-family dwelling units. She advised the sewer in the City has reached capacity in some areas and the sewer system is not capable of handling multiple homes of this type packed full of residents and staff causing a burden on the infrastructure. She advised the neighborhood is saturated with group homes both small and large. She explained the City Council has a responsibility to all residents and until all infrastructure issues are identified and corrected it is arguably irresponsible to approve CUPs that place a strain on an older and burdened system. Jackie Garibay thanked Council Members Moreno and Valencia for responding to her email today and for Mayor Pro Tern Faessel for responding to her emails in the past. She reported she has been a resident for 12 years and has lived in her home for 3.5 years. She advised she can hear all of the conversations going on at the adjacent halfway home and smells the cigarette smoke from her property. She expressed concern for the saturation of group homes in her area. She encouraged City Council to find Grandma's House of Hope a facility where there are plenty of stores, services, and public transportation. She encouraged the City Council to deny the CUP. Ken Vargha reported he has been a resident of Anaheim since 2011. He advised projects from non- profits such as Grandma's House of Hope are needed to help address the homelessness crisis facing the City and provide the hope and path forward needed. He reported he and his family have been trying to support those struggling with homelessness since they moved back to California in 2009 through volunteerism and financial support. He noted he has experienced the impact of mental health challenges within his family. He explained the twin challenges of mental health and homelessness are complex and those impacted benefit immensely by trained support and supportive housing being considered in the proposed project. He advised the proposed project encompasses the key aspects of providing a safe supportive environment for this vulnerable population struggling with Clty Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 22 of 32 homelessness and mental health challenges. He reported Grandma's House of Hope has a long positive track record in the community that should be acknowledged and rewarded accordingly. He advised Grandma's House of Hope has an excellent reputation shown by the trust given to it by multiple agencies for their successful quality model. He shared his recent experiences in working in San Francisco and his engagements with the homeless and noted they are human beings who deserve dignity and are worthy of the residents' love and care. He encouraged City Council to approve the CUP. Mark McKinley noted that one of the points in the appeal was that by denying the CUP the City was discriminating against Americans with Disabilities. He does not see how the City could be discriminating against Americans with Disabilities given how many facilities there are in the area. He expressed concern regarding the saturation of group homes in the area. Wes Jones reported he is a member of Anaheim's People's Homeless Task Force and noted he lives close to the proposed facility. He advised there is a tremendous need for more facilities to serve more homeless residents but acknowledged there is also saturation of group homes. He advised these types of facilities are generally well -run. He noted years ago when he was actively participating in feeding residents, Grandma's House of Hope did not have a good reputation and inquired about a monitoring program for non -profits. Taylor Montano, Director of Housing, Grandma's House of Hope, reported she has provided much detail about the program at the various community meetings and at the Planning Commission meeting. She hopes that those who have been willing to listen can see they are an excellent provider because they do run a program that works. She noted the efficacy of the program is not up for debate as it works and they have a proven track record. She advised the program has been working successfully for the last 17 years. She does not feel there would be an impact on the infrastructure given the decrease in participant size and advised they have comparable programs running in smaller homes without issue. She encouraged residents to not draw the line with a program that works and feels residents would be in opposition even if they were the only program on the block, which is discriminatory. She encouraged City Council to look at the root causes of why residents are opposed to this project. David Duran advised it sounds like a NIMBY (not in my backyard) convention frosted over with care. He called for a moment of silence for the voices of the women who may potentially be served in the program and do not have an opportunity to speak tonight. He encouraged City Council to have humanity or otherwise resign. He advised there would be recourse should Grandma's House of Hope fail. He reported most of the crime in the area does not come from these facilities but comes from those living in homes. He predicted City Council would deny the CUP. Steffani Maletta read a testimonial from one of the participants of Grandma's House of Hope and detailed her success story. Angela Garner, Program Manager, Grandma's House of Hope, advised she would be one of the Program Managers who would be working with the residents who would be moving into the proposed project. She noted the rude comments about the program participants are not needed. She advised the participant highlighted in the video is a lovely person and a successful graduate of the program. She noted these 16 ladies deserve to live a full and abundant life as everyone else does. She would like to see the CUP approved and understands the concerns of residents. She advised homelessness is a human race issue and one that must be solved together. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 23 of 32 Tobi Aclaro reported she lived in Anaheim for 20 years and advised she has been with Grandma's House of Hope for nine (9) years. She advised she has visited all of the homes and noted the caliber of the team, the work, and the need to address homelessness is critical. She acknowledged the concerns of residents regarding oversaturation but noted the needs of homelessness need to be addressed in some fashion. She cannot imagine this property being put to better use than the program being proposed here. She noted the participants would be between 40 and 70 years old and would not live a party lifestyle. She explained the role of Community Leader is one that is with the participants and noted they have deep training because it is the most important role in the program. She spoke on behalf of one of the partners that works with the residents who noted the caliber of Grandma's House of Hope and advised he has a brother who is mentally ill and hopes he is placed in the program. June Jackson reported she is a resident for five (5) years and submitted a letter of support for the proposed project. She noted the Planning Commission department's staff report initially recommended approving the project but later found out there was opposition, which resulted in the denial. She advised Grandma's House of Hope has done great work within the community and has resulted in several contracts. She noted their proven success record shows that 65% of their participants move on to permanent housing, which is the highest in the country. She reported there is a lot of misinformation and stigma surrounding mental illnesses although Grandma's House of Hope is quite experienced in dealing with this population and should be commended for the great work they are doing in the community. She advised the opposition stating they do not want "these people" in their neighborhoods amounts to housing discrimination. She noted the denial by the Planning Commission is a red flag and she believed something bigger was taking place. She encouraged City Council to approve the CUP. Rebecca Kouac-Stein, Orange County Poverty Alleviation Coalition, reported she has worked directly with the homeless and encouraged City Council to listen to staff and support the project. She reported Anaheim has a population of 395,000 and has funding for homeless services. She thanked Ms. Kreitner for dedicating her life to providing much -needed services and saving lives. She noted she hears a lot of Nimbyism in these meetings and encouraged residents to support the program. Lee Proimos thanked City Council for the chance to speak and reported he is a member of the Board of Grandma's House of Hope. He advised when he learned about the issue he toured the program's homes and spoke to program participants. He noted the homes are well managed and would be proud to have them as neighbors. He refuted that Grandma's House of Hope has unlimited funding or is a highly -profitable business and noted they operate within their limits. He pointed out financial forecasts can be positive or negative for any given year. He referenced a letter from a local law enforcement agency that stated it is far more dangerous for the homeless to remain homeless and or unhoused than to be housed. He read letters from United Way and the Orange County Community Foundation in support of the CUP and Grandma's House of Hope. Pat Pebley reported there have been a lot of encroachments on the City Council's ability to act in support of single-family homes including recent state laws. She noted this is a business and, while providing a good service, should not be operating in a residential area. She advised the City has spent millions of dollars supporting the homeless and providing shelters. She expressed opposition to the project because it is an apartment -sized business and noted it does not belong in this neighborhood. She believed this would affect the mental health of residents and noted taxpayers want the rights of the neighborhood supported. Cheryl Pebley reported she has lived in the neighborhood for 42 years and expressed opposition to the CUP. She advised the neighborhood is saturated with group homes and noted these businesses City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 24 of 32 have taken away the amount of single-family homes in the neighborhood. She encouraged City Council to put laws and amendments in place to limit these types of facilities in residential neighborhoods and noted it is important for the City to know how many of these facilities are in operation. She encouraged City Council to deny the CUP. Pat Kreitner reported he rescued Ms. Kreitner and her son off the street and since that time homeless outreach has become their priority. He advised it is a misnomer to say this is a highly profitable business and noted he gave up his home to shelter the homeless. He reported the homeless are also residents of Anaheim and should be afforded the same protections as those in the neighborhoods. He reported Grandma's House of Hope has run for years without incident and the residents' concerns are unfounded. He noted this program is for women 40 to 70 years old. He advised the City does not have a true idea of how many group homes are in operation so it cannot provide an accurate count of facilities and therefore cannot determine saturation. He inquired if those on the dais who did not speak with the residents outright refused to speak to them or simply did not reply. He noted this is about helping as many residents in the City as possible. Antonia Lipovac reported her home is one (1) block away from the proposed facility. She advised she has to walk by three (3) other facilities when she walks to her Grandmother's house a half -mile away and is acutely aware of their presence. She noted the individuals in favor of this project are from outside the Anaheim community. She noted the owner of the home views this as an opportunity to line his own pockets. She believed other areas of Anaheim need to take on the group home burden. She noted she had already witnessed people walking around her neighborhood yelling profanities. She believed an increase in these facilities would cause the community to crumble. She believed the traffic caused by this project has been grossly understated. She noted this problem already exists in Anaheim's backyard and is far from a NIMBY argument. She reminded City Council to think of the 45% of the participants this program does not work for and vote to deny the CUP. Sameer Khan expressed support for Grandma's House of Hope and encouraged City Council to approve the CUP. He expressed concern for those living with homelessness and mental health disabilities and believed the program would help the homeless problem experienced by the City. He advised these people want help and referenced an earlier speaker who was a successful product of the program. He expressed disbelief that the program was denied by the Planning Commission after being recommended by their staff report. He believed Grandma's House of Hope has made adjustments to mitigate the concerns of residents and the Planning Commission. He encouraged City Council to support their efforts. Cameron Dekens expressed support for Grandma's House of Hope and noted they are a well - established non-profit that has been providing transitional housing for those with diagnosed mental illness for 17 years. He advised he has listened to the concerns of the neighbors but believed they have mischaracterized Grandma's House of Hope as the very problem they are trying to solve. He explained this is a voluntary housing option for women who have already been diagnosed and have a treatment plan from the Orange County Health Care Agency. He noted unhoused conditions for these women are terrible and degrading and without housing, they cannot have the stability, safety, or peace of mind necessary for a mental health treatment plan. He advised Grandma's House of Hope has a proven track record of decreasing homelessness and he encouraged City Council and residents to support the project. James Horan expressed opposition to the project and encouraged City Council to deny the CUP. He advised the facility on Pearl Street that was approved now has increased drug usage, graffiti, homeless, homeless having sex in their cars, needles, condoms, and broken liquor bottles which are the exact things they were promised were not going to happen because it would be such a well- City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 25 of 32 maintained and supervised transitional living home. He advised residents in the area have done their share and noted the area is oversaturated with group homes. He reported it is long past time that these programs stop being placed in the Westmont neighborhood. He encouraged City Council to stop the madness and allow the neighborhood to live in peace. Al Jabbar, Trustee for Anaheim -Union High School District, noted that Grandma's House of Hope does great work but believed this was coming down to the straw that broke the camel's back and advised the community has seen the brunt of the group homes in the neighborhood. He expressed the same concerns as his neighbors but also believed there needed to be balance by preserving the integrity of the neighborhoods. He advised residents may not be able to obtain their return on their home investment if they live close to one of these facilities. He noted that as a Trustee he is concerned that the homes would not be available for families and children to live in them and go to a local school. He noted this denies the local school district attendance and asked that it be taken into consideration. He encouraged City Council to deny the CUP. Linda Martinez expressed opposition to the project and encouraged City Council to deny the CUP. She was in favor of helping residents in need but expressed concern about the safety of her children in the area and does not allow her children to ride their bikes on Pearl Street. She expressed concern regarding the saturation of group homes in her neighborhood and encouraged City Council to find different locations for these facilities. Kenneth Batiste advised the issue is maintaining the status of a neighborhood. He did not believe the community was as concerned with the 16 women living in the facility as they were about losing their neighborhood. He believed this should be about balance and encouraged City Council to continue the item so it could review how many actual group homes are in Anaheim and where they are located across the whole city. He believed the entire City should share the burden of homelessness and noted he did not want an Orange County Skid Row. He encouraged City Council to join the Santa Ana City Council in suing the Orange County Board of Supervisors for not dealing with the homeless situation. Steve Savran, Program Manager, Grandma's House of Hope, reported he has lived in Anaheim for 17 years. He read a testimonial from one of the program's participants. He reported he works for the men's program and referenced an earlier speaker who is a success story of the program. He noted he enjoys seeing participants going from homelessness to self-sufficiency. Ruth reported she is an Anaheim resident and works with individuals with mental health disabilities and in crisis for over seven years. She expressed concern about how this population in question has been vilified and stigmatized. She expressed disbelief that residents can both oppose the program and have concerns about the community. She noted programs such as Grandma's House of Hope repair the community and make the streets and communities safer. She advised the program has the backing of Orange County Health Care Agency and prioritizes Anaheim residents. She believed Anaheim was on its way to becoming Orange County's Skid Row and that trajectory would continue if the City Council continues to oppose these programs. She encouraged everyone to think about Anaheim's future. Mitch Cherness reported he has been in the field of substance abuse and mental health for almost 50 years. He advised he is the architect of the programs that Grandma's House of Hope is following and noted he was an administrator for Orange County working in housing, mental health, and substance abuse. He expressed support for the program and noted 78% of the people who have gone through the program are linked to Anaheim in some way. He expressed concern regarding the misinformation that is circulating and believed many people signed the petition based on this misinformation. He City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 26 of 32 advised the program tries to accommodate the needs of the community and the needs of the program and noted they are trying to create a home, not a business. Arturo Contreras reported he has worked in healthcare for the last 29 years and is a 19 year resident of Anaheim. He reported he works in a lot of these homes and noted he has worked on Skid Row and various facilities to help the homeless. He advised residents of these programs have the right to not take their medication and that unfortunately leads to health care workers not being able to control them. He encouraged City Council to deny the CUP and encouraged City Council to look at other programs that offer similar services to residents that are not at full capacity. He noted this neighborhood is for single-family homes and not for group homes. Cory Street reported he is an Anaheim resident and thanked Ms. Kreitner for her work. He advised he would be on the streets or dead if it were not for a program like Grandma's House of Hope. He noted he has heard both sides of the argument but explained that the California Legislature has declared that the opportunity to seek, obtain, and hold housing without unlawful discrimination is a civil right. He also advised it is unlawful to discriminate against those with disabilities and noted addiction is a mental disease defined by the psychiatric community as a mental illness. He noted those in opposition are discriminating against those with mental illness. He advised Ms. Kreitner is giving help to those in need, unlike the residents who are opposed to the project. He noted these people have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Danny Allen expressed opposition to the CUP, noted he is a 26-year Anaheim resident, and noted his backyard is one house away from this property. He advised the City has insufficient CUP notification requirements and they need to be addressed. He recommended certified mail, a wider notification area, and full-time monitoring of CUPs. He reported Grandma's House of Hope has a property on 928 West North Street with 36 placement spots with 32 current placements. He advised no one from the City checks or knows if Grandma's House of Hope complies with its other CUPs. He noted the organization is not based in Anaheim nor does the CEO live in Anaheim. He inquired what would stop this facility from being converted into a men's home in the future. He reported a friend of his wife was physically assaulted by a man in Whitter four (4) to five (5) days after his placement in a transitional living home and has since moved out of state. He noted six (6) residents with one (1) supervisor seems more appropriate than what is being proposed. He believed a business such as this belongs in a business community. He encouraged the City to place a moratorium on CUPs until there is a plan to manage them properly and to band together with other cities to legally stand up for residents' property rights. He noted his area is so saturated with group homes he would not purchase his home again under these conditions. He urged City Council to deny the CUP. Paul Kott expressed opposition to the CUP and noted this is the right mission in the wrong location. He advised of Orange County's 34 cities, Anaheim has done the most for the homeless population. He applauded Grandma's House of Hope for their mission but in this process, it has become abundantly clear that this mission is a business whose headquarters are in Santa Ana, whose owners live in Garden Grove, and whose customers come from all over California. He recalled being called a NIMBY by Mr. Kreitner who stated this is a normal reaction for residents who are not used to having this type of use in their neighborhoods. He advised there is an over -saturation of group homes in their neighborhood and noted Grandma's House of Hope only wants to work with the community if they get their way. He advised he was told by the Planning Commission there is nothing the City can do if the group homes are regulated by the State and the resident count is six (6) or under. He encouraged City Council to deny the CUP and support the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Ms. Kreitner expressed concern that their non-profit is making a profit when the definition of a non- profit is not to profit. She reported the $690,000 in excess is an asset and not cash and does not go City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 27 of 32 into any investor's pocket. She advised they fight every year for every dollar they receive for the program. She noted the people who spoke in favor of the program are staff members who are not being paid to speak tonight and here because they care. Ms. Kreitner advised when the hours she works are taken into consideration with the hours that are taken away from her family to run the organization she makes under $40 per hour and noted she is not getting rich from this program. She advised the purpose of the program is to serve people in need and noted Anaheim needs their help. She reported they are endorsed by the Orange County United Way, the Orange County Community Foundation, the Sisters of Saint Joseph Foundation, and Dayle McIntosh Center. She noted organizations do not get there if they are running a bad program or doing things on the sly. She advised she is helping Anaheim like it helped her and people who were in a similar position that she was in years ago. She noted that many people do not have a family to help pick them back up when they fall on bad times. Ms. Kreitner advised Grandma's House of Hope is here to help Anaheim address the issue of homelessness and noted there is a large community of homeless in the City. She noted they have grown their programs to try and help the City and expressed sadness to be losing one of its properties in March 2022. She advised she has had no indication that property values of homes have been impacted by being next to one of their programs. She reported she does not see this as a business but sees it as a retreat and noted the name of this property would be called Clara's Retreat. She noted there are no code enforcement issues because they do not have issues on their properties. She advised the 15 calls for police were at their administrative offices in Santa Ana with 20 other non -profits and not a location where people are served. She believed the facts are being twisted to make it seem that they are an unsafe environment for the neighbors. She noted Grandma's House of Hope is holding the fabric of the community together and noted they are passionate about it. Ms. Kreitner advised she was happy to see Mayor Sidhu involved in the Buena Esperanza program She read a press release from its opening where Mayor Sidhu stated that Anaheim and its partners are leading the way in addressing homelessness with a groundbreaking response to the homeless crisis. She encouraged Mayor Sidhu to not stop now and noted this is what Grandma's House of Hope does well. She thanked City Council for listening. Mayor Sidhu closed the public hearing. DISCUSSION: City Attorney Robert Fabela restated some of the legal matters in the proceedings. He advised the matter before the City Council is an application for a transitional housing facility and under state law is required to consider the proposed use to be residential use. He advised some of the comments heard suggested City Council should base their decision on the individuals residing at the facility and their disabilities. He advised City Council could not base a decision to deny this application on the class of individuals residing at the facility or their disabilities. However, he advised if City Council believes there are severe adverse impacts to the public health and safety based on objective written standards and these impacts cannot be mitigated immediately, then City Council could adopt written findings denying the project. Mayor Sidhu thanked Grandma's House of Hope for their partnership with the City. He noted they helped lead the City out of homelessness and support others as they work to improve their lives. He thanked the residents for their involvement in this issue and noted it is an important part of the local democracy. He advised the City needs stable and supportive housing for residents facing personal challenges and has a responsibility to neighborhoods to make sure decisions are responsible and balanced. He reported Anaheim has stepped up more than any city with more than 100 community City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 28 of 32 care facilities in the City. He advised there are many examples of Grandma's House of Hope being a good neighbor while helping those in need. He noted the issue is concentration and neighborhood balance. He advised concern was expressed from many who spoke this evening and if this were the first, second, or third facility in the neighborhood they may not even be having this discussion. He reported there are 15 group homes in this neighborhood and noted it is not unreasonable to pause on the group home process. He reported he is inclined to uphold the Planning Commission's decision. He advised this is an evolving landscape and the State is playing a larger role in how housing is regulated in cities. He believed upholding the Planning Commission's decision was reasonable. MOTION: Mayor Sidhu moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2021-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM denying Conditional Use Permit No. 2021- 06106, and making certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2021-00122) (626 North West Street & 945 West Pioneer Drive), seconded by Council Member O'Neil. DISCUSSION: Council Member Valencia thanked Ms. Kreitner for her presentation. In response to Council Member Valencia's inquiry, Ms. Kreitner reported addresses that were within 500 feet of the property were noticed. She advised they provided a letter inviting them to a Zoom neighborhood meeting with the first one at the end of June and noted there were approximately eight (8) people in attendance. She advised the meeting was non -confrontational. She reported letters were sent out to the noticed area again after the appeal and the community meeting was held two (2) days before Council Member Moreno's community forum and she advised four (4) people attended. She advised she attended Council Member Moreno's community forum and answered residents' questions. She explained they used their letterhead and envelopes when they mailed the notices so it came from Grandma's House of Hope. She recommended the City provide guidance for the official mailing and for what should be placed on the outside of the envelope to inform residents that it is official business. In response to Council Member Valencia's inquiries, Ms. Kreitner reported Grandma's House of Hope operates in Anaheim and Garden Grove and currently holds six (6) CUPs. She reported there are 11 facilities in Anaheim and one in Garden Grove. She reported their staffing model is built around keeping the facilities in one general area. She advised 72% of the program participants are coming from Anaheim. Council Member Valencia thanked residents for coming out and expressing their perspectives on the proposed project. He advised a land -use decision by the City was his first exposure to civic engagement and impacted the quality of life for his family and his neighbors. He believed City Council is charged with safeguarding and improving the quality of life for its neighborhoods. Council Member Valencia presented the Quasi -Residential Land Uses map and noted the City has been a County leader in providing supportive services to those in need. He did not believe that residential neighborhoods should be where businesses set up shop and believed there needed to be an equitable distribution of these facilities throughout the City and County. He advised that the majority of these facilities that the City is aware of are located west of the 57 Freeway. He noted due to the disclosures that are in place, this is what the City is aware of in Anaheim. He explained it is concerning to see a high concentration of Quasi -Residential properties in this neighborhood and across Anaheim's flatlands. He believed the oversaturation needs balance and expressed support for the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny the CUP. Council Member O'Neil advised residents live in a state where local control of land -use decisions is steadily eroding through acts of the State Legislature and Governor. He reported SB 9 allows for lot City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 29 of 32 splits of existing single-family parcels and construction by right of up to six (6) housing units where there is now only one (1) and noted the City has narrow ability to deny those types of projects. He advised the City submitted its Draft Housing Element to the Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) where the City was required to zone for approximately 17,450 new housing units. He reported every city in California was mandated to rezone for additional housing units and noted Orange County received a disproportionately large share of Southern California's required units which is why he led the effort of the Orange County Council of Governments to push back against the state and take legal action against HCD. He advised that action is pending its first hearing in November. He explained the State allows the Quasi -Residential uses that the City has little control over. He noted the City is tasked with balancing State mandates versus what is right for the community. He advised the City has discretion with this CUP. He noted there is no question that Grandma's House of Hope does great work and has been an excellent community partner but he could not ignore the overconcentration of other non-residential business uses already in the neighborhood and must agree with the Planning Commission's findings. Council Member O'Neil reported back in April, Grandma's House of Hope came before the City Council with another property on Olmstead Way where there was also a large concentration of group homes but noted the CUP was approved. He advised following the approval he asked for a future agenda item to address the issue of concentration and saturation where the City had the authority to do so. He explained in the interim, HCD issued the City a warning that components of its existing sober living ordinance may already be violating State law so work was paused. He advised there has been a favorable court ruling recently in another city involving their sober living ordinance that may open the door again for discussion. He believed this needs to be revisited and urged staff to continue the work to bring the item back to City Council to address the issue. Council Member Moreno requested Ms. Nichols make additional comments and explained public hearings allow for residents in the noticed area to make additional comments when requested. Ms. Nichols apologized for commenting out of order earlier and appearing disrespectful and noted she intended to clarify. She explained that she did not receive any outreach information and many of the neighbors did not receive the notifications from Grandma's House of Hope. She advised one (1) person on a street behind her received the notification. She reported after the appeal, residents reached out to Council Member Moreno and included Grandma's House of Hope because they had heard from their senior citizen community that they were not being included and wanted to be informed. She noted there were only four (4) people at the second Zoom meeting because residents were not informed not because residents were not interested. Council Member Moreno advised there is a consistent theme from residents that they are not noticed about important civic action and noted it puts the City Council in an awkward position because they cannot immerse themselves in an application of this nature while it is being considered by the Planning Commission because residents can then challenge a City Council decision and ask the Council Member to recuse themselves if they get involved too early. He requested staff review how the City can be assured that residents in the noticed area are receiving notifications. Council Member Moreno advised he has supported Grandma's House of Hope's mission and their work and believed it was important that residents recognize that this is a problem that is building. He advised the State has mandated additional housing units be built and noted the area around Westmont has overcrowded apartment units and overcrowded multi -generational homes because the City does not have an affordable housing policy. He reported the City has produced three times the amount of above -moderate housing units that the City needs when the City needs more low-income housing units. He advised three (3) out of four (4) people in homelessness are due to economic City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 30 of 32 matters and not to mental health issues. He encouraged residents to get the State to hold the City accountable for low-income housing. Council Member Moreno reported he visited the property last fall and he urged her to have community meetings first to obtain the tenor of the community. He advised he loves the mission, is concerned at Ms. Kreitner's surprise at the resistance, and noted the residents are feeling overrun by these types of facilities. Ms. Kreitner inquired why the City was not dealing with the bad actors in the neighborhoods instead of denying this CUP. Council Member Moreno explained the City does not budget enough Code Enforcement to respond in a timely fashion to complaints and they have to catch the bad actors in the act. He advised the other reason is that there is oversaturation and not enough Code Enforcement to deal with the issues. He believed that perhaps the neighborhood would be more open once Code Enforcement could engage the bad actors so its group homes and neighborhoods can be balanced again. Council Member Moreno addressed the residents in attendance and noted they were interrupting and not giving speakers the attention they deserved and came off as rude. He advised that was not neighborly. He encouraged neighbors to notify City staff of group homes that are operating illegally. He advised he could not support the CUP this evening as presented and would support the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Council Member Ma'ae clarified she was in contact with some of the community members and did have an appointment set up to come to the property next door and was unable to attend due to a family emergency. She reported she would be voting to support the recommendation of the Planning Commission and deny the CUP. Mayor Pro Tern Faessel reported he met with one (1) community leader and one (1) neighborhood leader and noted he knows the neighborhood very well. He thanked Ms. Kreitner for her work and noted she is the best the City has. He advised Ms. Kreitner has worked with several communities to quell residents' fears and the projects were approved and successful. He noted Grandma's House of Hope is the gold standard and has been endorsed by many well -respected organizations. He believed in this case, there are other providers, including one of Grandma's House of Hope, in the immediate vicinity. He hoped she would continue to provide services in Anaheim and bring more good projects to the City. Mayor Pro Tern Faessel explained the City does not have a full map of the facilities because the State of California does not inform the City and the City cannot ask for a list of facilities with six (6) or fewer residents. He noted the City is typically notified by the neighbors or Code Enforcement. He advised City Council tried to create an ordinance to manage these facilities and it turns out it might not be allowed by the State. He advised he cannot support the project based on the intensity, size, and scale. He encouraged Ms. Kreitner to rethink this project. He reported there are a few real estate agents in the room and encouraged them to work together to find facilities in the City that would be more appropriate. Council Member Diaz advised he would be supporting the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny the CUP. He expressed sadness because he was hoping to find a way to support the project. He noted these residents are not NIMBYs and want to be heard. He expressed support for the work of Grandma's House of Hope. City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 31 of 32 Council Member Moreno thanked Mr. Garcia for the map he provided but noted that his passion may have gone over the top. He hoped residents would take the time to speak to Ms. Kreitner to better understand the work of Grandma's House of Hope and its mission. Mr. Fabela clarified the motion on the table is to adopt the resolution denying the Conditional Use Permit based on another finding of overconcentration and noted the final resolution would be approved as is, but would also include another finding that would be reflective of the administrative record on that issue. MOTION: Mayor Sidhu moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2021-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM denying Conditional Use Permit No. 2021- 06106, and making certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2021-00122) (626 North West Street & 945 West Pioneer Drive), seconded by Council Member O'Neil. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Sidhu and Council Members Faessel, Diaz, Ma'ae, Moreno, Valencia, O'Neil); NOES — 0. Motion carried. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR: City Manager Jim Vanderpool advised he conferred with relevant department heads who agreed the five items pulled from the Consent Calendar could be continued to the next meeting of the City Council. D116 4. Authorize an honorary sign near Maxwell Park to honor Anaheim resident, Esther Wallace (in the drive alley on Orange Street on the east side of the driveway into Maxwell Park). AGR-12085 6. Determine, on the basis of the evidence submitted by KNT I Enterprises, LLC that the property owner has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 for the 2021 review period for the 1600 West Lincoln Avenue mixed -use project (Mills Ford Site). AGR-13190 14. Approve the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement with AG Essential Housing CA 3, L.P. for Tract No. 19017 located at 1621-1699 Lincoln Avenue, to establish a one lot subdivision for condominium purposes to construct 115 attached, single family condominium units. AGR-13191 18. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE AGR- CITY OF ANAHEIM approving an Owner Participation Agreement, substantially in the form 9579.1.1 attached, by and between the City of Anaheim and Lab Holding, LLC; authorizing the City Manager to finalize such Owner Participation Agreement; authorizing the City Manager to implement such Owner Participation Agreement; and making certain other findings in connection therewith [development of property located at 275 and 375 Santa Ana Street, Project Site No. 2, The Lumberyard]. Approve a First Amendment to Disposition and Development Agreement with LAB Holding, LLC; authorize the City Manager to execute and administer the First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement and make certain other findings in connection therewith. C280 20. ORDINANCE NO. (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the Zoning Map referred to in Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to Zoning (Reclassification No. 2020-00331) (DEV2019-00013) (removing the Mobile City Council Minutes of October 26, 2021 Page 32 of 32 Home Park (MHP) Overlay Zone from the project site) (156 unit single-family residential project located at 200 West Midway Drive). Determine that a streamlined review pursuant to Section 15183.3 (Streamlining for Infill Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines is the appropriate environmental review for this request under CEQA; and, that the proposed Reclassification No. 2020-00331 would not have any significant effects on the environment that either have not already been analyzed in prior environmental impact reports or that are more significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate. At 12:46 A.M. on October 27, 2021, without objection, Mayor Sidhu continued consideration of Consent Calendar Item Nos. 04, 06, 14, 18, and 20 to November 2, 2021. B105 22. District 2 appointment of an unscheduled vacancy on the Planning Commission to serve a term ending December 31, 2022. Planning Commission District 2 appointments: Phillip Wolfgramm (term ending December 31, 2022) (unscheduled vacancy, Rosa Mulleady) NOMINATION: Council Member Ma'ae nominated Phillip Wolfgramm. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Sidhu and Council Members Faessel, Diaz, Ma'ae, Moreno, Valencia, and O'Neil); NOES — 0. Nomination approved. REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS: None PUBLIC COMMENTS (non -agenda items): None COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS/AGENDA REQUESTS: Mayor Pro Tern Faessel requested the meeting adjourn in memory of Marian Francis, his policy aide's mother-in-law; Sandie Schwaiger, proprietor of the Jagerhaus, which she ran for over 20 years; Al Mariam, Anaheim's automotive fleet manager from 1966-1987; and Tim Kraft, Anaheim Hills resident, and local architect. ADJOURNMENT: At 12:51 A.M. on October 27, 2021, Mayor Sidhu adjourned the City Council meeting in memory of Marian Francis, Sandie Schwaiger, Al Mariam, and Tim Kraft. Terea y submitted, d, ss,CMC City Citylerk JenniferL. Hall From:Mark Adams Sent:Wednesday, October 20, 2021 8:42 AM To:Public Comment Subject:Please Consider the AFSCME Proposal Iwould just like to respectfully request that you give the AFSCME Proposal the respect itdeserves. Twelve years without consideration for any group is ridiculous; itistime thatsomething bedone. Acontinuation ofthesame will have the same results you have been experiencing lately, which issimply good people moving ontoother agencies andAnaheim being left behind. Thank You, Mark Adams 1 JenniferL. Hall From:Elaine Thienprasiddhi Sent:Thursday, October 21, 2021 3:11 PM To:Public Comment Subject:AFSCME/MAC-MOU Dear Mayor and Councilmembers, Itismy understanding thatthe AFSCME/MAC will bepresenting our MOU proposal during closed session onOctober 26. AsaCityemployees of14years, Iimplore youtosupport the proposal for salary increases. We arelosing highly qualified staff with years upon years ofinstitutional knowledge because ourCity isnolonger competitive with other jurisdictions. We are asked todomore with less, we work for alarge and complex city, with complex projects and resident concerns. I, personally, am doing the work that would have been assigned toleast four orfive planners when Ifirst started working for the City. Irecently sat oninterview panels and can attest that the City isnolonger abletoattract the talented pool ofapplicants that weused to. Additionally, once we hire onentry level staff, we provide them with excellent training and experience, but they only stay with usfor about two years before leaving for better opportunities elsewhere. This isnot theway it was when Istarted here. Staff grew with the City and found opportunities within inorder togrow professionally. Please support your staff. Thank you for your consideration. Elaine Thienprasiddhi, AICP Senior Planner Anaheim Planning and Building Department E-mail ethien@anaheim.net Phone (714) 765-4568 1 Jennifer L. Hall From: Moses Johnson Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 7:42 AM To: Public Comment; Theresa Bass; Jim Vanderpool; Linda Andal; Gretchen R. Beatty; Nora Verceles Subject: Item 2 Closed Session Agenda Oct. 26th Dear City Clerk, Please distribute to the City Council and confirm that you received this email. Dear Mayor and City Council, I have previously written and spoken to you several times over the past few years. One of the major items AFSCME is requesting in our MOU proposal is a raise. Why? Because the City offered us a 10% package back in March of 2020 but because the MOU was caught up in the COVID-19 pandemic it was not finalized. We have not had a fully funded range adjustment since June of 2009, over 12 years ago. With inflation (currently over 5%) during the last 12 years we are making less in real dollars today than before the Great Recession. During the City budget update last December City Full -Time Staffing was down from 1,946 employees, to 1,724, a loss of 222 full-time employees (11.4%). Over 20 City employees in our group have left in the last 6 months for better paying jobs in other cities. The City has given MOUs to other management groups and we only ask to be treated fairly. The City asked us again to "do more with less" during COVID-19 and City employees stepped up to fill the gap and provide local services to City residents. The Federal Govt. adopted a Stimulus Package with billions in local aid. The City of Anaheim has/will receive over $100 million to make up for its tax revenue losses. Further, our City began to return to normal in mid-June and the City's tax revenues have been rebounding ever since. City workers have been on the front lines throughout this COVID crisis working tirelessly to protect and serve the City's residents with essential city services. The City should support its workers that provide those services. City workers are essential, both to our safety and to our recovery. City workers are the engine of our City, and the final recovery from the COVID-19 starts with them. The City should reward its workers for stepping up during the COVID crisis. Providing raises for City workers is not optional — it is a necessity if the City wants vibrant City services. The time is now to come to a final MOU for AFSCME! Moses Johnson, Acting President AFSCME/MAC Jennifer L. Hall From: Terry Alford < Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 8:04 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Closed Session Item #2; 25 -Oct -2021 CC Meeting Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Greetings: I am writing in support of the AFSCME most recent offer for our contract. As a represented manager who is falling further and further behind because inflation has outpaced the miniscule 2% annual raises, I believe something needs to be done to make things right. In addition, the loss of key staff to other CIties due to wages is criminal; I have lost 4 (out of 7!) staff members recently that have left for lateral positions that are substantially higher paying. Please do something to stop the bleeding! Regards, Terry Alford Jennifer L. Hall From: Naomi Gruenthal Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 10:07 AM To: Public Comment Subject: Closed session AFSCME Dear City Clerk, Please distribute to the City Council and confirm that you received this email. Dear Mayor and City Council, I have previously attended and supported AFSME every time our MOU has been presented to you over the past few years. One of the major items AFSCME is requesting in our MOU proposal is a raise. Why? Because the City offered us a 10% package back in March of 2020 but because the MOU was caught up in the COVID-19 pandemic it was not finalized. We have not had a fully funded range adjustment since June of 2009, over 12 years ago. With inflation (currently over 5%) during the last 12 years we are making less in real dollars today than before the Great Recession. During the City budget update last December City Full -Time Staffing was down from 1,946 employees, to 1,724, a loss of 222 full-time employees (11.4%). Over 20 City employees in our group have left in the last 6 months for better paying jobs in other cities. The City has given MOUs to other management groups and we only ask to be treated fairly. The City asked us again to "do more with less" during COVID-19 and City employees stepped up to fill the gap and provide local services to City residents. The Federal Govt. adopted a Stimulus Package with billions in local aid. The City of Anaheim has/will receive over $100 million to make up for its tax revenue losses. Further, our City began to return to normal in mid-June and the City's tax revenues have been rebounding ever since. City workers have been on the front lines throughout this COVID crisis working tirelessly to protect and serve the City's residents with essential city services. The City should support its workers that provide those services. City workers are essential, both to our safety and to our recovery. City workers are the engine of our City, and the final recovery from the COVID-19 starts with them. The City should reward its workers for stepping up during the COVID crisis. Providing raises for City workers is not optional — it is a necessity if the City wants vibrant City services. Further, since our salaries are stagnant, we are not able to afford to live in Anaheim. Housing prices are out of our reach. A couple of developers in town have "reduced" their prices for City Workers. It is very sad that these developers think we can afford a Townhouse for $784,000. We cannot. We cannot qualify for a loan of that much. Most of the managers and clerical group cannot hope to live in the city we serve. The time is now to come to a final MOU for AFSCME! Naomi Gruenthal, Board Member and Negotiation Team Member, AFSCME/MAC Thank you, Naon&. cirvevuthuiL Associate Project Planner Community Services Department City of Anaheim zoo S. Anaheim Boulevard Suite 433 Anaheim, CA 92805 T. 714.765.4465 F. 714.765.4454 E. ngruenthalwpanaheim.net A"Please consider the environment before printing this email." N Jennifer L. Hall From: Ana Straabe Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 12:44 PM To: Public Comment Subject: Agenda item #2 - public comment Dear honorable Council Members, I am writing in support of the closed session agenda item #2 regarding the latest AFSCME MOU proposal. The MOU negotiations have been ongoing since 2018 and we are all eager to have the agreement finalized. Please consider approving the MOU, as proposed. We have not had a fully funded range adjustment in over 12 years. We are severely understaffed and employees in our group continue to leave for better paying jobs in other cities. We have stepped up to fill the gap and do more for less so that City residents could continue to have essential services. Meanwhile, the City has agreed to MOUs with other management groups. We are only asking to be treated fairly. We currently feel overworked and underappreciated. Sincerely, Ana Straabe Associate Project Planner Community Services Department I Parks Division 200 South Anaheim Boulevard I Suite 433 Anaheim, CA 92805 Office (714) 765-4901 PARKS DIVISION MISSION STATEMENT: To enrich the quality of life of individuals, families, and the community by providing excellent parks, trails, and recreational facilities through outstanding customer service, sustainable environmental practices, and strong employee development and commitment. Jennifer L. Hall From: Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 4: 55 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Approval of AFSCME Management MOU Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Honorable Mayor and City Council, As a fifteen year management employee of the City, I urge you to do the right thing and approved the AFSCME Management Unit MOU. We have had no salary range adjustment since 2009, and were promised a raise right before the pandemic devastated the world. I and my team were here on the job, providing excellent library service at a time when it was needed more than ever before. Yet, each year for the past several years, I received at maximum a 2% merit increase. The inflation rate and the cost of living, as you know, are well above that rate. Many of my colleagues took early retirement or recently left for positions in other cities with higher salary rates. The City of Anaheim cannot afford to lose the collective wisdom and work ethic of this dedicated group which you entrust to run our departments which are held in high esteem by other municipalities. The Anaheim Public Library was honored to receive the LJ/Gale Library of the Year Award for our efforts during the pandemic and I have to say it felt really good to be recognized and celebrated for what we do every day. Now, you have the opportunity to do what is fair and equitable and recognize the managers just as you have done for many years with other bargaining units' MOUs. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Cynthia Hicks East Region Supervising Librarian Jennifer L. Hall From: Concerned Employee < Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 10: 23 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Concerned Employee Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anaheim City Council. I have been employed at the City of Anaheim since 2016. 1 have worked in the public sector for over 10 years including working for two neighboring cities. Additionally, I have a large network of colleagues, friends and family members that have worked for neighboring agencies including Irvine, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Cypress, Fullerton and several more. To say that I understand how public agencies run and how different they treat their employees is an understatement. I remember my delight when I was hired in 2016 to join "The Great City of Anaheim." I was ecstatic and proud to be part of an agency that was known to be one of the best agencies in Orange County. I saw myself growing professionally, giving back to the community, and even imagined retiring from Anaheim after a long career here. However, the past few years, many of us, including myself, are seeing Anaheim in a different way. Conditions for employees have been consistently declining. Management and Confidential employees have not had a COLA (cost of living allowance) since 2009, yet the price of everyday living expenses have increased drastically, especially within the past two years. Furthermore, our health premiums have gone up which have made the situation even more difficult for many of us. The salary and benefits I need to maintain my family are no longer provided at this agency. To make matters worse, we have taken on more responsibilities without increase in pay. It is because of all this that we, the employees of Anaheim, have asked for wage increases several times. Still, nothing has happened. Prior to COVID we were in the midst of negotiating a 10% pay increase. That fell apart as the pandemic began. Time and time again we have asked the council to look into our situation and help us justify our working conditions, yet we have been ignored. Many employees from neighboring agencies are advised against applying for any City of Anaheim jobs, specifically noting poor pay rates. We have lost all the splendor that we once had, and many have already left Anaheim knowing they will be working for an agency that will provide competitive wages and overall be taken better care of. I, myself can no longer imagine retiring here. That is why I'm asking the council to increase the pay rates to a competitive price. Please help us retain the extremely talented, knowledgeable and hard working employees we have left. Anaheim can still be one of the best agencies to work for, if only council will consider the value of the city's employees. Thank you. Sincerely, Concerned Employee Jennifer L. Hall From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dear City Council Members, Erika Murphy Tuesday, October 26, 2021 10:45 AM Public Comment Moses Johnson MOU Proposal Comment I support the MOU Proposal for AFSCME on behalf of all of the employees who choose not to speak out due to fear of retaliation or fear of being seen. This is to no fault of their own, as this is a very sensitive and confrontational matter in which many employees do not feel comfortable discussing in a public forum. I don't blame them, as the reality may equate to less promotions, less opportunities for advancement, etc.. There are enough glass ceilings which exist in this world and many employees that work in administrative roles are women, so go figure. Yet today I stand for all the employees who choose not to speak, to shed light that many of us are in favor of this proposal. It is true when they say We have been doing much more with less people as I've witnessed. I've seen the hustle all around me and I'm extremely proud of all of my fellow counterparts ... every single department at the Convention Center is down several employees and STILL we have made sure to "show up and shine" for our City. Despite this, I have personally witnessed several employees walk away for "higher pay and respect" due to the demands required through their roles and their lack of enthusiasm with their paychecks. The energy being transferred for the work being performed and the pay being received, is unequal. During these times, employees are faced with an increased cost of living as goods and services surge, with almost everything going up. Many restaurants have secretly increased menu prices, apartments continue to soar, and even the tickets to Disneyland have increased. A movie ticket to the Regal in Irvine is $17 person! That's an entire hours' worth of work for someone. And forget about living in a nice neighborhood or owning a home without a 2nd 3rd 4th or 5th income in California. According to Zillow, the median price of a home in Orange County is almost $800,000. Also, while we are here, we should consider the large elephant standing in the room... student loans .... and the audacity of any city or company to ask for Masters' Degree as a requirement for a part-time job. I have seen it and it's not right. Many millennials (a large amount of the workforce here) are faced with that mountain of student loan debt that affects their home purchasing power. For so long owning a home was something you could hope to achieve by working for the City, or any other government job, right? That's the cornerstone of retiring ... a paid off home. And it's nearly impossible for many to get a real foot in the door as they just don't income qualify for something decent in the OC. Also, as of recent, the wage gap between working at fast food and as a working "professional" have started to merge. Panda Express will pay up to $18 per hour for a non -management role. This increase in pay is forcing more businesses to raise their prices, meanwhile the City remains stagnant in compensating their employees accordingly so they may thrive in his or her environment. This is a hard pill to swallow knowing that we have done more with less, and that many of our peers are jumping ship or changing roles just to survive. Working for the City of Anaheim for many has been regarded as a prestigious honor, as where we work is a thriving and growing City, but a real issue has emerged and it needs to be addressed. The solution is simple: treat others the way you want to be treated and compensate accordingly. We support one of the largest conglomerates in the entire world and still that isn't enough magic to keep people around, let alone happy. This is the reality of today. What will you do to stand for us? Respectfully, Erika Murphy, CTA I Executive Secretary Anaheim Convention Center Boo W. Katella Ave. Anaheim, CA 92802 Direct: 714.765.896o I Fax: 714.765.8986 Take a Virtual Tour! AHI Jennifer L. Hall From: Laura Alcala Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 11:14 AM To: Public Comment Subject: Support for MOU/AFSCME Honorable Mayor and City Council Members; My name is Laura Alcala, a 30+ year City employee. I have dedicated my professional career to fulfilling my life's goal, a simple yet fulfilling one: improving the lives of others. I have been fortunate and grateful thus far for being able to participate in some life changing projects that have positively impacted the lives of residents and visitors to Anaheim. My commitment has been so deep, that when asked if I live in Anaheim, I respond "Yes ... but I sleep in another city". While I have not devoted my life to being a public servant to get rich, I certainly did not choose this vocation to be treated unfairly and disrespected as it pertains to compensation and benefits. The rationale and statistics for the AFSCME request have already been presented to you by my colleagues on the negotiating team, but I would also like to stress the need to change the administration of the Retirement Health Savings (RHS) program. Unlike other bargaining units, the classification to which I belong only allows us to utilize the funds for insurance premiums. Co -payments and other medical expenses CANNOT be paid from funds that we earned. While I understand that participation is mandatory, I would hope each retiree could use their funds in a manner suitable to their needs. On the surface my plea for your support may appear petty, and perhaps even self-serving; however, I am speaking up not only on my own behalf, but that of several colleagues whom I have mentored. The City used to actively encourage employees to participate in leadership training intending to "build the bench" aka successor planning. In the past I not only encouraged fellow employees to participate but stress the importance of their participation and role in the organization. Today, as I experience the number of employees exiting to work for cities with better pay rate structures, I can no longer in good conscience continue to encourage the younger generation to be patient and wait for change. Please consider the talent we as a City stand to lose if there are no raises. Respectfully, Laura Alcala Community Investment Manager City of Anaheim Economic Development Department 1 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Seventh Floor Anaheim, CA 92805 714) 765-4317- Direct Number www.anaheim.net www.centercitvanaheim.net Jennifer L. Hall From: Heather Fuller Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 1:08 PM To: Public Comment Subject: Comment on October 26th closed session item The work that Management and Confidential staff do directly impacts the residents and business owners of Anaheim. By refusing to treat us fairly with, among other things, regular cost of living raises, you eventually impact the quality of services your constituents receive. When I first started working directly with residents in 2007 1 was surprised by how grateful people were when we responded promptly to their needs. On several occasions the resident or property manager told me that other cities were rarely as efficient or friendly. It made me proud to be part of such a fantastic and caring group of people. Even when the recession came and staff levels were reduced and our pay was cut, everyone made an effort to maintain the high quality of our service. People didn't leave, they struggled on. My co-workers are still working hard to maintain services, but that is becoming increasingly difficult. And many of them are choosing to leave, not to retire, but to work at other agencies who demonstrate that they value the work that staff do by paying them adequately. We have been trying to get an MOU since September 2018 and in that time our workload has only increased and the money we do earn is less and less able to cover the daily cost of living. You all consistently and repeatedly say how much you appreciate city staff and the work we do, but then you refuse to give Management and Confidential staff any cost of living raises, even when you give them to every other working group in the city. Actions speak louder than words, you are demonstrating how you really feel about the people who do the work to make the city run every time you refuse our MOU requests. Heather Fuller Confidential representative on the AFSCME negotiating team Jennifer L. Hall From: Cesar C <cesarc@kennedycommission.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 7:02 PM To: City Clerk Subject: [EXTERNAL] Item 1: Declaration of Surplus Land at Beach/Lincoln Site Attachments: Anaheim SLA Agency Land Beach10.26.21.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Please see The Kennedy Commission's comment letter on declaration of Surplus of the Housing Authority's Beach/Lincoln Site. Cesar Covarrubias Executive Director October 26, 2021 Mayor Harry Sidhu Councilmembers Housing Authority City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 Xennedy • M M I S S 1 • www.km edyco mion.org t7701 Cowan Ave_ Suite 200 Levine. CA 92614 (949)250-0%9 Re: Item 1. ADOPT A RESOLUTION DECLARING CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BEACH AND LINCOLN SURPLUS LAND Dear Mayor Harry Sidhu and Councilmembers: The Kennedy Commission (the Commission) is a broad coalition of residents and community organizations that advocates for the production of homes affordable for families eaming less than $27,000 annually in Orange County. Formed in 2001, the Commission has been successful in partnering and working with jurisdictions in Orange County to create effective policies that have led to the production of new homes affordable to low income working families. We submit public comments to support the Anaheim Housing Authority and the City of Anaheim in declaring the Southeast comer of Beach and Lincoln (Agency owned property) as surplus land and dispose of the land in a manner that complies with the California Surplus Land Act by prioritizing it to increase affordable housing in Anaheim. In adopting the Surplus Land Act, the California Legislature declared, "housing is of vital statewide importance to the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of this state and ... provision of a decent home and a suitable living environment for every Californian is a priority of the highest order," and thus "surplus government land, prior to disposition, should be made available for that purpose." Cal. Gov. Code, § 54220(a). The agency and city need to prioritize publicly owned land to create much needed affordable housing. As highlighted in the City of Anaheim's latest Housing Element Annual Progress Report that was submitted to the California Housing and Community Development, the city has a deficit of affordable housing production. The report points out that the city has approved and permitted over 8,162 housing units during the current Housing Element period and only 468 (remaining RHNA for lower income is 1,695) have been in the affordability level of low and very low households. The vast majority of the housing units, 7,694 have been approve at moderate and above moderate -income levels (RHNA in above moderate has been exceeded by over 300%). With only a few months left in the planning period and with the City lacking site capacity for affordable housing sites it is imperative that the City of Anaheim prioritize affordable housing on this public land. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to further conversations regarding the use of agency owned to increase affordable housing opportunities for the lower income families in Anaheim. nVery truly yours, Cesar Covarubias Executive Director CC: California Department of Housing and Community Development, Division of Housing Policy Development City of Anaheim, Housing Element Annual Progress Report, April 2021 Jennifer L. Hall From: Pat D < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 1:55 PM To: Public Comment; Jose Diaz Cc: Jose Moreno Subject: EXTERNAL] And item 20 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Reading through documents - is there anything affordable in this development, especially since MH designations were intended for alternative housing. Thank you Pat Davis Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and typos. On Tue, Oct 26, 2021, 1:43 PM Pat D <wrote: Dear Council members I am again submitting my comments in writing as unable to attend in person meetings. COVID and other responsibilities at home have limited my abilities to attend in person. I faithfully tune in to watch but that is as far as I can reach. Again I ask that you open your meetings to a hybrid style of delivery so more can participate live". Comments tucked away in a file are not as impactful nor allow for real time incorporation of what else is going on in chambers. I have not gotten a response from my council member for months. So much for two way communication. Do you not want to hear from your community and impacted persons? Item 23 - Grandma's House of Hope I am writing in support of the program offered by Grandma's House of Hope. As always I would expect oversight and management to be top notch with residents interests and needs always at the fore front! The narrative being run by dissenters includes inaccurate and misleading information AGAIN. The hurtful nature is very telling. The location is perfect. The plans complete and the resources are there. If only you had been so diligent in prior applications. This one will change and save lives. Likely familiar to all here against but unwilling to face the reality of the needs for help in our community and likely their families. Please approve this application. Now for you to address other affordable housing needs. Public Comment Little Arabia distinction" The idea that this Council is unable to even agendize a conversation about the Little Arabia is so telling and disgusting! What world do each of you live in that you are unable to recognize the value of this community? What don't you understand about inclusion and diversity so rich here in Anaheim? The comment about Stater Brothers future and other dog whistles are even below what I have come to expect of folx on this body. Your leadership in this city is damaging in so many ways. Quite painful to watch. The economic prosperity in this area is key to the district. I find the area most welcoming and businesses are good neighbors to each other. Now you must move forward in Designating the area Little Arabia with the respect it deserves. Pat Davis District 1 Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and typos. JenniferL. Hall From:Michael Lopez < Sent:Friday, October 8, 2021 9:18 AM To:Public Comment Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] RE: Suggestion for Homelessness Approach Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Good Morning Council Members, I hope you are all safe and well. As the weather begins to shift once again in Southern California, my heart and mind rest with those in need of the greatest support on our community. This, of course, includes those without stable housing. Upon my morning run today I saw something I hadn't seen in my local park in my short time as a home owner these past two years: a tent. Normally folx might see that and think a myriad of things, including, I can't believe this is in my neighborhood, or how could this happen in my own backyard. Yet again, some folx may go a step further and call law enforcement to "clean up the mess" rather than seeking out humane resources for their fellow neighbor. I say all this to say, first, that I appreciate that Anaheim has a Community Care Response Team. Homelessness is absolutely not a criminal act, therefore law enforcement has no direct reason to respond to homelessness in and of itself, and so I applaud our city's efforts to take this out of the hands of law enforcement as the immediate responders. That being said, I have a couple of asks today. One, I would ask that we update the language on the CCR Team webpage to something that does not appear to criminalize homelessness at worst, or stigmatize it at best. Currently it reads, "...If you have a complaint regarding homelessness..." which implies it is something for folx to complain about rather than respond to with humanity. (https://www.anaheim.net/5808/Community-Care-Response-Team) Second, with any seasonal shift in weather extremes, now compounded with the ongoing effects of the pandemic, we must protect those without stable housing who are at risk to the elements. I kindly request the council make it a priority to ensure the community is aware of our CCR Team and encourages folx to use them as a first response instead of law enforcement. Our neighbors deserve the same level of dignity that any of us would want to be afforded with, and so the first step is empowering our community to use the resources best suited for our overall community health. I hope this is taken to heart and that you stand with me in protecting all of our neighbors. Thanks for your time and work. Michael A. Lopez, ASW 1 JenniferL. Hall From:International Educators' Hall ofFame < Sent:Friday, October 8, 2021 5:56 PM To:Public Comment Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] Call for Nominations--2021 International Educators' Hall of Fame Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Preserving Legacies , Honoring Excellence, Uniting Generations P.O. Box 5983, Garden Grove, Ca 92806 October 8, 2021 Call for 2021 IEHOF Nominations On Sunday, Dec. 26, 2021, Youth on the Move International Educators’ Hall of Fame will hold its 2nd Virtual Induction and Youth Awards Ceremony. The event is open to the world. The International Educators’ Hall of Fame (IEHOF) honors the often “unsung hero” and/or humanitarian teachers /educators who went or go beyond the call of duty to serve, while often confronting many challenges (such as educating during the Coronavirus Pandemic). They deserve to be-honored publicly,” says their nominators and Dr. Patricia Adelekan, the founder. Youth are also recognized and awarded. 1 The IEHOF event started in 1993, in Sacramento, CA. USA, and since then, diverse educators worldwide have been honored. The public is encouraged to nominate outstanding retired or veteran educators (of 20+ years--living or deceased) and youths who have gone “beyond the call of duty.” And whose legacies deserve to be preserved. A nomination form (with guidelines) is hereby attached. Please read it closely and nominate a deserving educator. Further, visit our website and view the 2020 Virtual Ceremony www.educatorshalloffame.org to have an idea of what we will be doing. You may email your nomination form to us at: iehof2015@gmail.com; or mail it to our P.O, Box listed at the top of this announcement. Sincerely yours, Patricia Adelekan, Ph.D., FounderandCoordinator International educators' hall of fame first virtual celebration 2020 2 Caption Caption Learn About Our Programs Watch Video Contact Us Youth on the Move International Educators Hall of Fame Youth on The Move Dr. Patricia Adelekan, Retired Educator, Founder, CEO; 714-628-9844; Donate Now Email:iehof2015@gmail.com International Educators' Hall of Fame International Educators' Hall ofFame | 1850 E. 17th Street, Room 103, Santa Ana, CA 92705 Unsubscribe publiccomment@anaheim.net Update Profile | About Constant Contact Sent by 3 JenniferL. Hall From:International Educators' Hall ofFame < Sent:Thursday, October 14, 2021 5:37 PM To:Public Comment Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] Call for Nominations--2021 International Educators' Hall of Fame Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Preserving Legacies , Honoring Excellence, Uniting Generations P.O. Box 5983, Garden Grove, Ca 92806 October 8, 2021 Call for 2021 IEHOF Nominations Deadline to submit NOMINATIONS for your EDUCATOR is October 30, 2021 On Sunday, Dec. 26, 2021, Youth on the Move International Educators’ Hall of Fame will hold its 2nd Virtual Induction and Youth Awards Ceremony. The event is open to the world. The International Educators’ Hall of Fame (IEHOF) honors the often “unsung hero” and/or humanitarian teachers /educators who went or go beyond the call of duty to serve, while often confronting many challenges (such as educating during the Coronavirus Pandemic). 1 They deserve to be-honored publicly,” says their nominators and Dr. Patricia Adelekan, the founder. Youth are also recognized and awarded. The IEHOF event started in 1993, in Sacramento, CA. USA, and since then, diverse educators worldwide have been honored. The public is encouraged to nominate outstanding retired or veteran educators (of 20+ years--living or deceased) and youths who have gone “beyond the call of duty.” And whose legacies deserve to be preserved. A nomination form (with guidelines) is hereby attached. Please read it closely and nominate a deserving educator. Further, visit our website and view the 2020 Virtual Ceremony www.educatorshalloffame.org to have an idea of what we will be doing. You may email your nomination form to us at: iehof2015@gmail.com; or mail it to our P.O, Box listed at the top of this announcement. Sincerely yours, Patricia Adelekan, Ph.D., Founder and Coordinator International educators' hall of fame first virtual celebration 2020 2 CaptionCaption Watch VideoLearnAboutOurPrograms Contact Us Youth on the Move International Educators Hall of Fame Youth on TheMove Dr. Patricia Adelekan, Retired Educator, Founder, CEO; 714-628-9844; Donate Now Email:iehof2015@gmail.com International Educators' Hall of Fame International Educators' Hall ofFame | 1850E. 17thStreet, Room103, SantaAna, CA 92705 Unsubscribepubliccomment@anaheim.net UpdateProfile | AboutConstantContact Sentby 3 JenniferL. Hall From:International Educators' Hall ofFame < Sent:Sunday, October 17, 2021 5:31PM To:Public Comment Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] Reminder: DEADLINE FOR NOMINATIONS IS OCTOBER 30, 2021 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Preserving Legacies , Honoring Excellence, Uniting Generations P.O. Box 5983, Garden Grove, Ca 92806 October 8, 2021 Call for 2021 IEHOF Nominations Deadline to submit NOMINATIONS for your EDUCATOR is October 30, 2021 On Sunday, Dec. 26, 2021, Youth on the Move International Educators’ Hall of Fame will hold its 2nd Virtual Induction and Youth Awards Ceremony. The event is open to the world. The International Educators’ Hall of Fame (IEHOF) honors the often “unsung hero” and/or humanitarian teachers /educators who went or go beyond the call of duty to serve, while often confronting many challenges (such as educating during the Coronavirus Pandemic). 1 They deserve to be-honored publicly,” says their nominators and Dr. Patricia Adelekan, the founder. Youth are also recognized and awarded. The IEHOF event started in 1993, in Sacramento, CA. USA, and since then, diverse educators worldwide have been honored. The public is encouraged to nominate outstanding retired or veteran educators (of 20+ years--living or deceased) and youths who have gone “beyond the call of duty.” And whose legacies deserve to be preserved. A nomination form (with guidelines) is hereby attached. Please read it closely and nominate a deserving educator. Further, visit our website and view the 2020 Virtual Ceremony www.educatorshalloffame.org to have an idea of what we will be doing. You may email your nomination form to us at: iehof2015@gmail.com; or mail it to our P.O, Box listed at the top of this announcement. Sincerely yours, Patricia Adelekan, Ph.D., Founder and Coordinator International educators' hall of fame first virtual celebration 2020 2 CaptionCaption Watch VideoLearnAboutOurPrograms Contact Us Youth on the Move International Educators Hall of Fame Youth on TheMove Dr. Patricia Adelekan, Retired Educator, Founder, CEO; 714-628-9844; Donate Now Email:iehof2015@gmail.com International Educators' Hall of Fame International Educators' Hall ofFame | 1850E. 17thStreet, Room103, SantaAna, CA 92705 Unsubscribepubliccomment@anaheim.net UpdateProfile | AboutConstantContact Sentby 3 JenniferL. Hall From:Seoul < Sent:Monday, October 18, 2021 7:27AM To:Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; dbarnes@anaheim.net; jbrandman@anaheim.net; Jose Moreno; lkring@anaheim.net; Trevor O'Neil Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] Police Budget Warning: This email originated from outside the CityofAnaheim. Do not clicklinks oropen attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To the Anaheim City Council: Iam writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift inour concept ofpolicing and community health must take place atthe local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come toanend. The United States does not have anational healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some of the most well-funded and militarized police departments inthe world. Anaheim isnodifferent: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8million tolaw enforcement andonly $1million tocommunity development. Anaheim isthe9th most violent police department inthe U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people during the process ofarrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate ofarrest-related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds thatofLAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is74% higher than theaverage for police in California. Idemand that the city council not approve “Resolution 19” that would spend $700,000 dollars oftaxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti-police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic. Iam calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community. Thank you, Nika 1 Jennifer L. Hall From: Theresa Bass Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 11:48 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Too much screen time can change your brain chemistry can directly impact your hormones, it can affect your brain as well too long can have serious side effects on your physical and mental well-being. From: Craig A Durfey < Sent: Saturday, October 23, 20218:07 PM To: TGOODBRAND@CITYOFIRVINE.ORG; police@garden-grove.org; Police Chief <policechief@anaheim.net>; info@ggea.org; info@ocsheriff.gov; info@capta.org; info@namica.org; sbe@cde.ca.gov; COB_Response response@ocgov.com>; editor at oc-breeze.com <editor@oc-breeze.com>; ocbe@ocde.us; OCMentalHealthBoard@ochca.com; Lawrenz, Mark <MLawrenz@ochca.com>; Pulido, Mark Mark.Pulido@mail. house.gov>; Walter Muneton <walter.muneton@ggusd.us>; Teresa Pomeroy <teresap@ggcity.org>; Teri Rocco <teri.rocco@ggusd.us>; Public Records Request <cityclerk@ggcity.org>; anan@ggcity.org; Nick Dibs Dina Nguyen <dina.nguyen@ggusd.us>; Early, Dawnte@MHSOAC Dawnte.Early@mhsoac.ca.gov>; Maureen Blackmun <Maria Stipe <marias@ci.garden- grove.ca.us>; Malibu Blue <DIANA.LARA@sen.ca.gov; Lan Nguyen <Ian.nguyen@ggusd.us>; Bob Harden <bob.harden@ggusd.us>; board@orangeusd.org; Gabriela Mafi <gmafi@ggusd.us>; Kelly McAmis kmcamis@ggusd.us>; PIO Department <pio_department@ggusd.us>; stevej <stevej@garden-grove. org>; stephaniek@garden-grove.org; George Brietigam <georgeb@ggcity.org>; thuhan@ggcity.org; KIMN@ggcity.org; joneill@garden-grove.org; Phat Bui <phatb@ggcity.org>; superintendent@capousd.org; Supervisor Andrew Do Andrew.Do@ocgov.com>; Supervisor Doug Chaffee <Fourth.District@ocgov.info>; JBenitezl@lbschools.net; MMKerr@Ibschools.net; DCraighead@lbschools.net; EMiller@lbschools.net; DOtto@lbschools.net; JBaker@Ibschools.net; JSuarez@Ibschools.net; Julie Crook <JCrook@Ibschools.net>; LRodriguez@lbschools.net; TM Brown@Ibschools.net; Jennifer Postma <JPostma@lbschools.net>; Lucy Salazar <LSalazar@Ibschools.net>; Kristi Kahl KKahl@Ibschools.net>; Angonzalez@lbschools.net; CSBrown@Ibschools.net; I: <district5@longbeach.gov>; Councilmember Rex Richardson <district9@longbeach.gov>; district2@longbeach.gov; district3@longbeach.gov; district4@longbeach.gov; Districtl@longbeach.gov; Dlstrict5@longbeach.com; district6@longbeach.gov; district8@longbeach.gov; Mayor Robert Garcia <Mayor@longbeach.gov>; cityclerk@longbeach.gov; Theresa Bass TBass@anaheim.net>; City Manager <Citymanager@anaheim.net>; Annie Mezzacappa <AMezzacappa@anaheim.net>; Harry Sidhu (Mayor) <HSidhu@anaheim.net>; Stephen Faessel <SFaessel@anaheim.net>; Nam Bartash NBartash@anaheim.net>; Jose Diaz <JoDiaz@anaheim.net>; Sarah Bartczak <SBartczak@anaheim.net>; Gloria S. Ma'ae GMaae@anaheim.net>; Diana Moreno <DiMoreno@anaheim.net>; Jose Moreno <JMoreno@anaheim.net>; Karen Romero Estrada <KRomeroEstrada@anaheim.net>; Rudy Acevedo-Gurrola <RAcevedo-Gurrola@anaheim.net>; MMatsuda <matsuda_m@auhsd.us>; brian.harris@sausd.us; brian.chesmore@sausd.us; robert.toyer@sausd.us; felix.rivera@sausd.us; john.hill@sausd.us; jerry.almendarez@sausd.us; karina.quiroz@sausd.us; Rigo.Rodriguez@sausd.us; Carolyn.Torres@sausd.us; Alfonso.Alvarez@sausd.us; Valerie Amezcua wearesausd20l7@yahoo.vsarmiento@santa-ana.org; TPhan@santa-ana.org; dpenaloza@santa-ana.org; JessieLopez@santa-ana.org; pbacerra@santa-ana.org; JRyanHernandez@santa-ana.org; nmendoza@santa-ana.org; farrahkhan@cityofirvine.org; tammykim@cityofirvine.org; Iarryagran@cityofirvine.org; mikecarroll@cityofirvine.org; anthonykuo@cityofirvine.org; clerk@cityofirvine.org; cm@cityofirvine.org; mhamel@cityofirvine.org; mkent@cityofirvine.org; terrywalker@iusd.org; Diane DIXON ddixon@newportbeachca.gov>; bavery@newportbeachca.gov; dduffield@newportbeachca.gov; kmuldoon@newportbeachca.gov; nblom@newportbeachca.gov; jbrenner@newportbeachca.gov; woneill@newportbeachca.gov; cityclerk@newportbeachca.gov; Ibrown@newportbeachca.gov; krieff@newportbeachca.gov; jlewis@nbpd.org; kyelsey@nmusd.us; cmetoyer@nmusd.us; kweigand@nmusd.us; aanderson@nmusd.us; superintendent@orangeusd.org; superintendent@nmusd.us; senator.hertzberg@senate.ca.gov; Cc: <SENATOR.BATES@senate.ca.gov>; SENATOR.WIENER@SENATE.CA.GOV; Senator Umberg Senator.Umberg@outreach.senate.ca.gov>; SENATOR.GONZALEZ@senate.ca.gov; SENATOR.GROVE@SENATE.CA.GOV; Senator.Galgiani@senate.ca.gov; SENATOR.PORTANTINO@SENATE.CA.GOV; SENATOR. PAN@SENATE.CA.GOV; RANDYBLACK@OCFA.ORG; Jim Tortolano <orangecountytribune@gmail.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Too much screen time can change your brain chemistry can directly impact your hormones, it can affect your brain as well too long can have serious side effects on your physical and mental well-being. Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Forwarded message --------- From: Craig A Durfey < Date: Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 4:51 PM Subject: Too much screen time can change your brain chemistry can directly impact your hormones, it can affect your brain as well too long can have serious side effects on your physical and mental well-being. To: <CADURFEY( 10-23-2021 P.R. D.D.C.) PARENTS FOR THE RIGHTS OF DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN CRAIG A. DURFEY FOUNDER OF P.R.D.D.C. GARDEN GROVE, CA 92842 CELL SOCIALEMOTIONALPAWS.COM FACEBOOK: CRAIG DURFEY U.S. HOUSE OF CONGRESS H2404 - HONORING CRAIG DURFEY FOR HIS FIGHT AGAINST AUTISM Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. https://www.govinfo.govlcontent/pkq/CREC-2003-03-27/pdf/CREC-2003-03-27.pdf new website socialemotionalaaws.o To who it may concern Just as too much screen time can directly impact your hormones, it can affect your brain as well. According to Psychology Today, studies show that screen addiction can lead to gray matter atrophy and damage to the area known as the insula, which is responsible for our ability to cultivate empathy and compassion. Furthermore, the white matter in the brain also becomes compromised underneath the glare of the screen. This can lead to loss of communication throughout different parts of the brain or cause "short circuits." The bottom line is that screens should not take up as much time as they do for many of us. Simple ways to help offset the damaging effects include limiting your exposure to the blue light. Consider getting a pair of blue -light blocking glasses to use while you work at your computer and turn on the night-time mode on your phone, which filters blue light from your screen. This is particularly important at night; for example, a study found that people who spent four hours hovered over their a -books before bed produced 55 percent less melatonin than those who read print books (via WebMD). But, the best solution is to cut down screen time and get outside, away from all technology as much as possible. Take breaks every hour to help your system reset and stretch to alleviate neck and back strain. If you ask anyone these days to name one thing they can't live without, their cell phone would probably top the list. If you're anything like me, the sheer act of reaching around a giant purse without immediately grabbing ahold of your precious smartphone is the easiest way to go straight into panic mode. That's because, thanks to good of technology, most of us have become completely 3 addicted to our phones, relying on them for everything from ordering take-out to staying in touch of with our BFFs. If you ask anyone these days to name one thing they can't live without, their cell phone would probably top the list. If you're anything like me, the sheer act of reaching around a giant purse without immediately grabbing ahold of your precious smartphone is the easiest way to go straight into panic mode. That's because, thanks to good of technology, most of us have become completely addicted to our phones, relying on them for everything from ordering take-out to staying in touch of with our BFFs. Between our TVs and computers, many of us spend hours upon hours every day staring at screens. Throw a smartphone into the mix and it won't be long before your eyes have simply had too much. In fact, I'll be the first to admit that I've tired out my own eyes plenty of times just scrolling through my Instagram feed. Extended use of digital devices and exposure to screens can cause digital eye strain," Dr. Howard Purcell, an optometrist, Fellow of the American Academy of Optometry, and the Senior Vice President of Customer Development at at Essilor, told me. "Symptoms can include blurry vision, trouble focusing on one thing, red, tired, or dry eyes, as well as headaches." This is because our devices emit low levels of harmful blue light, which Dr. Purcell says that studies suggest can change the way our pupils react to light, causing light sensitivity and strain around and behind the eyes. "Think of the eyes like any muscle. You have six muscles that move each eye, and one muscle that focuses it," he said. "Overuse can certainly cause your eye to fatigue." If you're going to be concentrating on any screen for a long time, Dr. Purcell suggests trying the 20/20/20 rule. "The goal is to take a break every 20 minutes, for 20 seconds, and look at something that's at least 20 feet away." 4 Whether we're catching up with friends via group text or laughing along to an adorable cat video on YouTube, using our cell phones usually results in us being hunched over, which can wreak havoc on our neck and shoulders. Using your phone too much results in what doctors call 'overuse injuries'," Dr. Jennifer Stagg, naturopathic physician and author of Unzip Your Genes, told me. One of the main problems she sees in her practice, she says, is neck strain. From leaning forward or holding your head in awkward positions for extended periods of time," she said. Cell phone -related neck strain is so common, doctors have even given it it's own name—text neck. "Research shows that for every inch you drop your head forward, you double the load on those muscles," said Dr. Robert Bolash in an article for Cleveland Clinic, where he is a pain specialist. "Looking down at your smartphone, with your chin to your chest, can put about 60 pounds of force on your neck." Besides neck and shoulder pain, slouching over to look at your phone can cause other health concerns, including lowered oxygen to your brain. According to Cleveland Clinic, sitting in a slumped position hinders your lungs' ability to expand, thus impairing your lung capacity. Inhaling less oxygen means your heart needs to work harder to send more oxygen -carrying blood throughout your body, including to your brain. If texting is your favorite means of communication, you might want to err on the side of caution the next time your phone dings with a new notification. Dr. Stagg told me that carpal tunnel and wrist sprains in her patients are often a result of cell phone overuse. "From holding the phone for extended periods of time, compressing the carpal tunnel and also causing inflammation of the tendon attachments," she said. 5 If a sprained wrist isn't enough to put your phone on "Do Not Disturb" mode, Kimberly Hershenson, LMSW, a New York -based therapist whose practice includes treating individuals with social media and technology addiction, told me that "text thumb" is another common injury seen in patients who spend too much time on their phones. Pain, discomfort, or numbness in the thumb can occur from overuse due to constant texting and typing," she told me. Ever decide to check Facebook before bed only to find yourself still scrolling your feed at 2 a.m.? While staying up past your bed time is probably okay every once in a blue moon, habitually using your cell phone before bed can have several adverse effects. Constantly looking at your phone not only keeps your brain up but actually affects and suppresses your melatonin levels," Erica Hornthal, founder of Chicago Dance Therapy and licensed dance therapist, told me. Hershenson agreed, saying, "The glare from the phone light, as well as engaging on your phone, keeps the brain active not allowing you to wind down and calm the body for bed." In addition to negatively affecting our bodies, constantly looking at our phones can impact our mental health, too. "I coined a term called 'acquired anxiety disorder' because of the massive amounts of people I treat in recent years who have major anxiety issues," Kersting said. "This is from spending so much time in the cyber world and not enough time in the real world." How Too Much Screen Time Really Affects You Shutterstock BY PAIGE MCBRIDE/SEPT. 23, 2020 11:18 AM EDT While you may be spending more time looking at a screen right now, it's important to remember to take a step back as frequently as possible. Whether you're working from home or back in the office, looking at a screen (be it your phone or computer) for too long can have serious side effects on your physical and mental well-being. The average American adult spends more than seven hours a day staring at a screen with nearly 58 percent of people who work at computers suffering from Computer Vision Syndrome (via Business Insider). The ailment causes eyestrain, blurred vision, neck pain, and more. But perhaps the most notable consequence of too much screen time is the disruption of your body's circadian rhythms. Since screens emit a variety of colors including blue light, absorbing these rays can damage your body's ability to regulate your hormones (via WebMD). An extremely important hormone, melatonin, tells your body when it's time to wake up, rest, eat, and function properly. When you're exposed to too much blue light from your screens, it can adversely affect your natural cycles — leading to insomnia and other issues, especially if you're on your phone before bed. Ketel One Family Made Vodka SPONSORED BY KETEL ONE Ketel One Vodka is carefully crafted using exclusively 100% non-GMO European wheat for smoothness and neutrality. SEE MORE Too much screen time can change your brain chemistry Shutterstock Just as too much screen time can directly impact your hormones, it can affect your brain as well. According to Psychology Today, studies show that screen addiction can lead to gray matter atrophy and damage to the area known as the insula, which is responsible for our ability to cultivate empathy and compassion. Furthermore, the white matter in the brain also becomes compromised underneath the glare of the screen. This can lead to loss of communication throughout different parts of the brain or cause "short circuits." The bottom line is that screens should not take up as much time as they do for many of us. Simple ways to help offset the damaging effects include limiting your exposure to the blue light. Consider getting a pair of blue -light blocking glasses to use while you work at your computer and turn on the night-time mode on your phone, which filters blue light from your screen. This is particularly important at night; for example, a study found that people who spent four hours hovered over their a -books before bed produced 55 percent less melatonin than those who read print books (via WebMD). But, the best solution is to cut down screen time and get outside, away from all technology as much as possible. Take breaks every hour to help your system reset and stretch to alleviate neck and back strain. What Really Happens When You Stare At Your Phone All Da rj BY ADRIA VALDES GREENHAUFF/JUNE 28, 2017 10:17 AM EDT/UPDATED: FEB. 14, 2020 3:53 PM EDT If you ask anyone these days to name one thing they can't live without, their cell phone would probably top the list. If you're anything like me, the sheer act of reaching around a giant purse without immediately grabbing ahold of your precious smartphone is the easiest way to go straight into panic mode. That's because, thanks to good of technology, most of us have become completely addicted to our phones, relying on them for everything from ordering take-out to staying in touch of with our BFFs. 3 So many people are addicted to their phones because they provide us with instant feedback and instant gratification," Tom Kersting, psychotherapist and author of the book Disconnected: How to Reconnect Our Digitally Distracted Kids, told me in an interview. "Want to know the weather forecast? Okay. Need to know the name of that actor from that movie? No problem. Want to talk to your uncle in California? Okay, no problem. Because we rely on them for just about everything, when we don't have them we go into withdrawal." But besides making us majorly needy, smartphone separation anxiety can actually have a slew of other negative side effects, according to the experts I spoke to. Here are ten things that happen when you stare at your phone all day. Eye strain Between our TVs and computers, many of us spend hours upon hours every day staring at screens. Throw a smartphone into the mix and it won't be long before your eyes have simply had too much. In fact, I'll be the first to admit that I've tired out my own eyes plenty of times just scrolling through my Instagram feed. Extended use of digital devices and exposure to screens can cause digital eye strain," Dr. Howard Purcell, an optometrist, Fellow of the American Academy of Optometry, and the Senior Vice President of Customer Development at at Essilor, told me. "Symptoms can include blurry vision, trouble focusing on one thing, red, tired, or dry eyes, as well as headaches." This is because our devices emit low levels of harmful blue light, which Dr. Purcell says that studies suggest can change the way our pupils react to light, causing light sensitivity and strain around and behind the eyes. "Think of the eyes like any muscle. You have six muscles that move each eye, and one muscle that focuses it," he said. "Overuse can certainly cause your eye to fatigue." 0 If you're going to be concentrating on any screen for a long time, Dr. Purcell suggests trying the 20/20/20 rule. "The goal is to take a break every 20 minutes, for 20 seconds, and look at something that's at least 20 feet away." Shutterstock Whether we're catching up with friends via group text or laughing along to an adorable cat video on YouTube, using our cell phones usually results in us being hunched over, which can wreak havoc on our neck and shoulders. Using your phone too much results in what doctors call 'overuse injuries'," Dr. Jennifer Stagg, naturopathic physician and author of Unzip Your Genes, told me. One of the main problems she sees in her practice, she says, is neck strain. From leaning forward or holding your head in awkward positions for extended periods of time," she said. Cell phone -related neck strain is so common, doctors have even given it it's own name—text neck. "Research shows that for every inch you drop your head forward, you double the load on those muscles," said Dr. Robert Bolash in an article for Cleveland Clinic, where he is a pain specialist. "Looking down at your smartphone, with your chin to your chest, can put about 60 pounds of force on your neck." Lower oxygen levels Besides neck and shoulder pain, slouching over to look at your phone can cause other health concerns, including lowered oxygen to your brain. According to Cleveland Clinic, sitting in a slumped position hinders your lungs' ability to 10 expand, thus impairing your lung capacity. Inhaling less oxygen means your heart needs to work harder to send more oxygen -carrying blood throughout your body, including to your brain. And let's just say that lower oxygen levels aren't exactly a walk in the park, especially over time. Wrist sprains If texting is your favorite means of communication, you might want to err on the side of caution the next time your phone dings with a new notification. Dr. Stagg told me that carpal tunnel and wrist sprains in her patients are often a result of cell phone overuse. "From holding the phone for extended periods of time, compressing the carpal tunnel and also causing inflammation of the tendon attachments," she said. If a sprained wrist isn't enough to put your phone on "Do Not Disturb" mode, Kimberly Hershenson, LMSW, a New York -based therapist whose practice includes treating individuals with social media and technology addiction, told me that "text thumb" is another common injury seen in patients who spend too much time on their phones. Pain, discomfort, or numbness in the thumb can occur from overuse due to constant texting and typing," she told me. Impaired sleep 11 Ever decide to check Facebook before bed only to find yourself still scrolling your feed at 2 a.m.? While staying up past your bed time is probably okay every once in a blue moon, habitually using your cell phone before bed can have several adverse affects. Constantly looking at your phone not only keeps your brain up but actually affects and suppresses your melatonin levels," Erica Hornthal, founder of Chicago Dance Therapy and licensed dance therapist, told me. Hershenson agreed, saying, "The glare from the phone light, as well as engaging on your phone, keeps the brain active not allowing you to wind down and calm the body for bed." Anxiety In addition to negatively affecting our bodies, constantly looking at our phones can impact our mental health, too. "I coined a term called 'acquired anxiety disorder' because of the massive amounts of people I treat in recent years who have major anxiety issues," Kersting said. "This is from spending so much time in the cyber world and not enough time in the real world." As we constantly pump our minds with scary news and content from the self - glorified worlds of our peers, Kersting said, the more insecure we become. Remember, we are doing this for nine hours per day on average, 365 days a year. Our minds need silence, not a constant bombardment." In addition to making us anxious and paranoid, constantly checking our phones— especially when that involves a lot of time on social media—can end up making 12 us feel sad and excluded. "What we don't realize that we are doing is attempting to fill our self-esteem with likes and affirmations—constantly," Kersting explained. "Yet, the first word in 'self-esteem' is 'self', not 'others'." Hallucinations Hershenson also thinks that phone addiction can have a negative impact on self- esteem. "It allows us is to hide behind screens and present the lives we want others to think we have," she told me. "We often see pictures about vacations, fun activities, and photoshopped bodies." She explained that this leads to comparisons, making it easy to start thinking, Why are they so happy when I'm struggling? "The truth is, we don't know what is truly going on with people's lives." If you've ever sworn you felt your cell phone vibrate in your back pocket only to check it and find zero missed calls and no new notifications, don't worry, you aren't crazy. You may, however, be totally addicted to your phone. "Recent studies with college students found that smartphones are making the majority of them hallucinate," Kersting told me. "It is called 'phantom vibration syndrome'." According to one study, the majority of students surveyed have experienced a phantom vibration" of buzzing in their pockets, even when their cell phone wasn't vibrating. If you're feeling phantom vibrations on the regular, you may want to give your cell phone a little space. Acquired ADHD 13 Being addicted to our cell phones is causing us all to become majorly distracted, too. "Since the average person spends nine hours per day, seven days per week staring into highly stimulating devices, their brains get messed up," Kersting explained. Countless teenagers, for example, are now being diagnosed with ADHD, even though most of them don't even have the neurological condition. Instead, because their brains are so used to being stimulated, the brain loses its ability to concentrate, focus ,and be organized when it needs to be in certain situations." Make time to disconnect If you've recently found yourself a little too dependent on your smartphone, it may be a sign that it's time to create some distance. "We have to train ourselves to be in control of our phone instead of it being in control of us," Kersting said. To do this, he suggests leaving your phone in the car when you go to dinner, work, or the mall. "It will be very uncomfortable at first as you will feel that you are missing a part of yourself, but eventually you'll get used to it. "Forget about what everyone else is doing today, this is superficial nonsense. Detox from social media for a month and you will see what I mean." If totally disconnecting from technology sounds like too big of a challenge, Hershenson suggests turning off all notifications so you aren't getting alerts when new items are posted, and instead, schedule times when you check technology. She also says it's important to recognize your triggers for turning to technology. Is it when you're lonely or bored? If you are struggling with depression, stress, or anxiety, technology may be a way to self -soothe moods." Instead, she suggests finding healthier ways of managing your moods, such as practicing relaxation techniques like deep breathing or meditation. You can also find alternative ways 14 of connecting to others such as going out with friends (without taking selfies) instead of texting and hanging out on social media. https://www.thelist.com/72539/really-happens-stare-phone-day/ 15 Jennifer L. Hall From: Theresa Bass Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 2:22 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] FW: SEEKING A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR MY LETTER TO GGUSD NOTED BELOW WITH LEGISTION TO ADDRESS CONCERN BELOW AS WELL AS PUBLIC COMMENT TO GOVERNT BODIES FOR MENTAL WELLNESS,SCREENTIME,TOBACCO ADDICTION,SCR 73 BLUE LIGHT 2019. From: Craig A Durfey < Sent: Monday, October 25, 20212:18 PM To: Theresa Bass <TBass@anaheim.net>; CADURFEY@GMAIL. Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: SEEKING A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR MY LETTER TO GGUSD NOTED BELOW WITH LEGISTION TO ADDRESS CONCERN BELOW AS WELL AS PUBLIC COMMENT TO GOVERNT BODIES FOR MENTAL WELLNESS,SCREENTIME,TOBACCO ADDICTION,SCR 73 BLUE LIGHT 2019. Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Craig A Durfey < Sent: Sunday, October 24, 20213:42 PM To: CADURFEY@GMAIL.norma.kurtz@asm.ca.gov;'Public Records Request' <cityclerk@ggcity.org>; Assemblymember.Nguyen@assembly.ca.gov; Emily.Humpal@asm.ca.gov; Brian.Sala@mhsoac.ca.gov; DIANA. LARA@sen.ca.gov Cc: preston.romero@asm.ca.gov; assemblymember.rendon@assembly.ca.gov; Brian.Sala@mhsoac.ca.gov; Norma. Pate@m hsoac.ca.gov;'stevej' <stevei@garden-grove.org>; joneill@garden-grove.org; OCMentalHealthBoard@ochca.com; 'COB_Response'<response@ocgov.com>; SBE@cde.ca.gov; senator.atkins@senate.ca.gov; Media@DA.oc.gov.; info@ocsheriff.gov;'Maria Stipe' <marias@ci.garden-grove.ca.us>; anan@ggcity.org; SENATOR. BATES@senate.ca.gov; "'SENATOR. PAN @SENATE.CA.GOV- SENATOR.PAN@senate.ca.gov>; sSENATOR.GONZALEZ@senate.ca.gov; "'SENATOR.PORTANTINO@SENATE.CA.GOV"' SENATOR.PORTANTINO@senate.ca.gov>; senator.hertzberg@senate.ca.gov;"'SENATOR.WIENER@SENATE.CA.GOV"' SENATOR.WIENER@senate.ca.gov>;'Joyce" <Joyce. Rivero@ocgov.com>Supervisor Andrew Do Andrew.Do@ocgov.com>guirk-siIva @assembly.ca.gov' <Christopher.Aguilera @asm.ca.gov> Subject: SEEKING A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR MY LETTER TO GGUSD NOTED BELOW WITH LEGISTION TO ADDRESS CONCERN BELOW AS WELL AS PUBLIC COMMENT TO GOVERNT BODIES FOR MENTAL WELLNESS,SCREENTIME,TOBACCO ADDICTION,SCR 73 BLUE LIGHT 2019. 10-24-2021 P.R. D.D.C.) PARENTS FOR THE RIGHTS OF DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN CRAIG A. DURFEY FOUNDER OF P.R.D.D.C. GARDEN GROVE, CA 92842 CELL SOCIALEMOTIONALPAWS.COM FACEBOOK: CRAIG DURFEY U.S. HOUSE OF CONGRESS H2404 - HONORING CRAIG DURFEY FOR HIS FIGHT AGAINST AUTISM Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. socialemotionalpaws.org https:llwww.govinfo.gov/content/pkq/CREC-2003-03- 27IpdfICREC-2003-03-27.pdf cc. Todd Spitzer Orange County District DA Main Office 300 North Flower St. Santa Ana, CA 92703 714-834-3600 cc. MHSOAC Commissioners { Public Comment) 1325 J Street, Suite 1700 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 445-8696 Fax: (916) 445-4927 Email: MHSOAC@mhsoac.ca.gov cc. Sheriff -Coroner Don Barns 550 N. Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92703 United States cc. Behavioral Health Advisory Board Members ( Public comment ) Address: 405 W. 5th St. Santa Ana, CA 92701 cc. Orange County Board of Supervisor 333 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Santa Ana, CA 92701 714) 834-3100 cc. Mayor Steve Jones (Public comment) City of Garden Grove 11222 Acacia Parkway Garden Grove CA cc. Anthony Rendon Assembly Speaker, District 63 State Capitol Room 219 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: (916) 319-2063 Fax: (916) 319-2163 Senator Toni G. Atkins Senate President Pro Tempore Capitol Office State Capitol, Room 205 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 651-4039 Fax: (916) 651-4939 To whom it may Concern. To all Cities. Tony Thurmond, State Superintendent California Department of Education 1430 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814-5901 Orange County Board of Education Board 200 Kalmus Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: 714-966-4012 { Public Comment) Fax: 714- 432-1916 E-mail: ocbe@ocde.us Al Mijares, Ph.D. County Superintendent of Schools Mayor Harry Sidhu Theresa Bass, CMC { Public Comment) Office of the City Clerk 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard 2nd Floor, Room 217 Anaheim, CA 92805 tbass@anaheim.net <tbass@anaheim.net>; Phone: (714) 765-5166 Fax: (714) 765-4105 3 State Senator Tom Umberg District Office 1000 E. Santa Ana Blvd., Ste. 220B Santa Ana, CA 92701 Phone: (714) 558-3785 Senator.Umberg@outreach.senate.ca.gov Assemblywoman Janet Nguyen District Office 17011 Beach Blvd Suite 1120 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 714-843-4966 Assemblymember.Nguyen@assembly.ca.gov Dear State, Representees, Senator Umberg. Assemblywomen Nguyen. As my two State district Representative seeking support to address my letter to GGUSD that was submitted on Oct, 19.2021 at 2:50 pm at that day the GGUSD meeting held at 7.pm meeting where public comment were held without including my written comments since I have medical issues that prevent me attending. Please read my letter which is posted for the socialemotionpaws.org blog where the entire WWW internet can view of those who want to read it, asking for letters of support. We all want Wellness, therefore we ought to support the issues of concern calling for Digital Wellness, Citizenship, and Safe education, human trafficking, screen time ,tobacco addictions ,blue light SCR 73 year 2019,Blue Light Summit.com, ect. https://socialemotionaIpaws.org/blog-post/f/open-Ietter- calling-for-digital-wellness-citizenship-and-safe-t. The changes they at GGUSD from prior where you could call in as well as written communication by 3 pm on the day of the of Board meeting I was not informed if any changes when I had spoken with GGUSD Public Information Office Jane that day at 3.51 pm. Both offices were Co-sponsors of SB -224 Pupil instruction: mental health education.(2021-2022) This bill would require each school district, county office of education, state special school, and charter school that offers one or more courses in health education to pupils in middle school or high school to include in those courses instruction in mental health that meets the requirements of the bill, as specified. The bill would require that instruction to include, among other things, reasonably designed instruction on the overarching themes and core principles of mental health. The bill would require that instruction and related materials to, among other things, be appropriate for use with pupils of all races, 4 genders, sexual orientations, and ethnic and cultural backgrounds, pupils with disabilities, and English learners. The bill would require the State Department of Education to develop a plan to expand mental health instruction in California public schools on or before January 1, 2024.. Since AB 361 2021 passed to address AB -361 Open meetings: state and local agencies: teleconferences.(2021-2022) This bill, until January 1, 2024, would authorize a local agency to use teleconferencing without complying with the teleconferencing requirements imposed by the Ralph M. Brown Act when a legislative body of a local agency holds a meeting during a declared state of emergency, as that term is defined, when state or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, during a proclaimed state of emergency held for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees, and during a proclaimed state of emergency when the legislative body has determined that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees, as provided. 1. Implementing a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the ADA and resolving any doubt whatsoever in favor of accessibility; this procedure must be advertised each time notice is given of the means by which members of the public may observe the meeting and offer public comment. 2. - In any instance where there is a change in the means of public observation or 3. comment, or when the meeting was initially noticed prior to the implementation 4. date of the bill, a state body may satisfy the requirement to provide the means of 5. public access by advertising it using the most rapid means of communication 6. available at the time, which may include posting the information on the state 7. body's website. 8. 3. State bodies wishing to hold teleconferenced meetings under these conditions may do so only if they comply with the following requirements, in addition to the 5 remainder of the Bagley -Keene Act: • Providing an electronic means for members of the public to observe and address the meeting, consistent with the notice and accessibility requirements listed below. • Implementing a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the ADA and resolving any doubt whatsoever in favor of accessibility; this procedure must be advertised each time notice is given of the means by which members of the public may observe the meeting and offer public comment. • Giving advance notice of the time of, and posting the agenda for, each public meeting as required under the Bagley -Keene Act. • Providing, at each instance notice of the meeting is provided or the agenda is posted, the means by which members of the public may observe the meeting and offer public comment. • In any instance where there is a change in the means of public observation or comment, or when the meeting was initially noticed prior to the implementation date of the bill, a state body may satisfy the requirement to provide the means of public access by advertising it using the most rapid means of communication available at the time, which may include posting the information on the state body's website. 4. SAFE, SECURE AND EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS: PREVENTING VIOLENCE AND BUILDING A POSITIVE SCHOOL CULTURE June 18 and 19, 2020 Mark your calendars! CSROA and partnering agencies will hold a 1.5 day conference in the beautiful Temecula Valley. School administrators, deans of students, school resource officers, school police officers, probation officers, school counselors/social workers, intervention specialists and campus safety personnel will benefit from this vital conference. The focus of the conference is on reducing school discipline, arrests, negative behaviors and school violence. A variety of prevention and intervention supports will be covered from practitioners in the field. Sound strategies for reducing bullying, other forms of violence and building a positive school culture and climate will be discussed in detail. Topics include: Mentoring, Human Trafficking, Depression, Suicide, Bullying, Narcotics, Active Assailant, Gangs, Effective Interventions and Diversions, Implementing Effective MTSS/PBIS approaches at the site level. https://csroa.org/ CALIFORNIA SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 31938 TEMECULA PARKWAY, SUITE A-368 TEMECULA, CA 92592(951) 219-3456 EMAIL: WSAKAMOTO@CSROA.ORG 5. "The relationship between school resource officers and school staff is significant," said Irvine Unified spokeswoman Annie Brown "They are seen as a resource and partner rather than a disciplinarian or traditional law enforcement officers who provide criminal consequences. They are a part of the fabric of the school community and participate in restorative justice to ensure reconciliation and correcting inappropriate or illegal behavior." 6. Mission of SROs School resource officers perform three main roles — law enforcer, mentor/counselor, and educator, according to the National Police Foundation. These individuals are highly trained and usually go through basic, intermediate and advanced school resource officer classes," said Wayne Sakamoto, executive director of the California School Resource Officers Association in Temecula. Despite outcries, armed officers maintain presence at Southern California schools - Orange County Register (ocregister.com) 7. AB -1419 Local educational agencies: meetings: online public participation.(2021-2022) This bill would require, in addition to the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act, the governing board of a school district, a county board of education, and the governing body of a charter school to make any public meeting of the board or body accessible electronically online to all members of the public seeking to attend and ensure the opportunity for the members of the public participating electronically to comment on agenda items in the same manner as a person attending a meeting in person. By imposing additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state -mandated local program. HTTPS://LEGINFO.LEGISLATURE.CA.GOV/FACES/BILLTEXTCLIENT.XHTML?BILL I D=202120220AB1419 . Fil41CSV111if_\1,11hd:IFW1=F_lX61110:Yi-3=1-3 Z•111x]:Yi-7_1o3a71hd:',Eva kid4 0 OUTLINE MANY REASON. AB 361 (Robert Rivas) file:///C:/Users/SHAWN/Down loads/202120220AB361 Senate%20Judiciary.pdf This Committee considered the bill's Brown Act provisions at its July 13, 2021, hearing. The analysis for that version of the bill is incorporated herein by reference. In brief, the Brown Act portion of the bill will allow local legislative bodies subject to the Brown Act to implement, on their own, the teleconferencing provisions of the Governor's executive orders during a declared state of emergency, subject to the bill's conditions. Specifically, the bill allows local legislative bodies to implement the teleconference measures during a declared state emergency and when (1) state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; 2) the legislative body is meeting to determine whether an in-person meeting would present imminent health or safety risks as a result of the declared emergency; or (3) the legislative body has already determined that such health or safety risks exist as a result of the declared emergency. When the stated conditions are met, a local legislative body may hold meetings entirely via teleconference without providing a public location for the meeting, having a quorum of members present in the jurisdiction, or posting the locations of all participating members, subject to requirements for providing notice of the meeting and the means for accessing the teleconference lines, and for providing Page 15 of 21 State bodies wishing to hold teleconferenced meetings under these conditions may do so only if they comply with the following requirements, in addition to the remainder of the Bagley -Keene Act: Providing an electronic means for members of the public to observe and address the meeting, consistent with the notice and accessibility requirements listed 3 below. Implementing a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the ADA and resolving any doubt whatsoever in favor of accessibility; this procedure must be advertised each time notice is given of the means by which members of the public may observe the meeting and offer public comment. Giving advance notice of the time of, and posting the agenda for, each public meeting as required under the Bagley -Keene Act. Providing, at each instance notice of the meeting is provided or the agenda is posted, the means by which members of the public may observe the meeting and offer public comment. In any instance where there is a change in the means of public observation or comment, or when the meeting was initially noticed prior to the implementation date of the bill, a state body may satisfy the requirement to provide the means of public access by advertising it using the most rapid means of communication available at the time, which may include posting the information on the state body's website. The bill also extends the above permissions and requirements to elected student bodies within the California State University (CSU) system subject to the public meeting requirements of the Gloria Romero Act.9 The Gloria Romero Act is modeled after the Bagley -Keene Act and contains the same requirements and limitations on teleconferenced meetings.10 The Governor's COVID-19 executive orders authorizing modified teleconferencing procedures under the Bagley -Keene Act and the Brown Act did not, however, extend that authorization to student bodies covered by the Gloria Romero Act. This bill will, therefore, allow for the first time CSU student legislative bodies to hold fully remote teleconferenced meetings. Over 23 years as Founder of P.R.D.C. creating to websites from scratch upon this very issue in the last five years of researching supporting financially the evidence is now over wheelmaking to address what we have now before us is medically proof the outcome from too much consumption screen time, Tobacco Addictions, Time, no real education prevention from Human Trafficking, SCR 73 Blue Light 2019,eye safety, schools being each a separate body of government don't mesh together as one on these very crucial issues to open meetings for access who are unable to attend for medical reason, transportations issues, 0 Covid 19, students under AB Civic education year 2017, easy access from snapchat to obtaining U.S. Senate hearing with Technology impacts children's wellness with two hearings the question came by a Senator to the expert the real long tern impact she replied that we my end up in losing a generation. https://socialemotionalpaws.org/bioq-post/f/knowingly-allow-its-products4o- harm-childrena-tobacco-addicti https://socialemotional paws.org/bioq-post/f/4-key-poi nts-facebook- whistleblowers-testimony-on-capitol-hil I https://socialemotionalpaws.org/bioq-post/f/live-facebook-whistleblower-frances- haugen-testifies-to-us-sen Please excuse me for software issues very large fonts was not intended to shout I had cut and pasted the information. https://socialemotionalpaws.org/biog-post/f/protectinq-kids-onIine-facebook- i nstag ram -an d -mental -health -ha https://www.washinqtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/30/facebook-instagram- teens- health/?fbclid=lwAR3yyBD8Uzgx1 R3hYN9U4mXLYlikEBc2dFThIHLKGlgy11708 MYXEc WT8o https://www.cbsnews.com/news/facebook-whistleblower-frances-haugen- misinformation-public-60-minutes-2021-10-03 https://www. wsm. com/articles/the-facebook-files-a-podcast-series- 11631744702?fbclid=lwAR3XsLQiTN nGQV9vG3ykD-FTgZklrgCWxi4s- b9mzKPB71ha5OxlA91VIg0 https://www. wsm. com/articles/facebook-knows-instagram-is-toxic-for-teen-girls- company-documents-show- 11631620739?st=wgh47z9synva6dc&reflink=desktopwebshare facebook&fbclid 1wAR1 p6KglLbJ7QTxwtzU3wYrdr24DFDruF6EVkOzLDm3MX4xnATODtcegcCs Below are more documentation the toxic effects with children. https://socialemotionalpaws.org/blog-post/f/%E2%80%98one-pill-can- kill%E2%80%99-dea-snapchat-parents-confront-deadly-fenta 10 https://www.reuters.com/technology/state-ags-urge-facebook-cancel-instagram- younger-kids-2021-05-10/?fbclid=lwAROBdtFpQh- 2UpuPKiKDZGieoHkBOnnPH3XDZGIHeNKOuF7CJ12SGUDBZgQ https://socialemotionalpaws.org/blog-post/f/long-beach-republican-women- federated-dr-brenda-flores-on-human https://socialemotionalpaws.org/blog-post/f/among-the-46-harmful-effects-of- social-media-were-found-to-be-anx For sake of pupils' pupils, China to ban homework on apps (apnews.com) https://medialiteracynow.org/new-law-utah-creates-school-digital- wellness-and-citizenshiD- panel/?fbclid=lwAR3yyBD8Uzgx1 R3hYN9U4mXLYIjkEBc2dFThIHLKGIq y11708MYXEc_WT8o https://www.ocregister.com/2018/10/14/digital-predators-teen-victims- one-q irl-shares-ordeal-to-warn- others/?fbclid=lwAROXRIWtJOtVSWL1 fPLtxD4f7aiM5nM- AFPSflcekd18mTXCw1 tUXbajWWk https://www.ocregister.com/2018/10/14/digital-predators-teen-victims- one-q irl-shares-ordeal-to-warn- others/?fbclid=lwAROSOYBdRgZm1WSxUd1112H Olz7rSMGMYmEQz1pY 8rD19kL3s117yn2Ct4 httas://www.ocregister.com/2018/03/19/this-16-vear-olds-suicide- letters-are-a-cry-for-help-and-a-national-call-for- change/?fbclid=lwAR1 p6KglLbJ7QTxwtzU3wYrdr24DFDruF6EVkOzLD m3MX4xnATODtcegcCs https://www.ocregister.com/2018/03/19/this-16-year-olds-suicide- letters-are-a-cry-for-help-and-a-national-call-for- change/?fbclid=lwAR1 p6KglLbJ7QTxwtzU3wYrdr24DFDruF6EVkOzLD m3MX4xnATODtcegcCs 11 httas://www.ocregister.com/2018/03/21 /teen-suicide-can-be-reduced-if- parents-educators-change-social-media- culture/?fbclid=lwAR2BPm7FWdr7_fCTYcPm1 Eb6nDdCwHnBsgRwlZvk AtWnTyvFLWXnhDjxPzs https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mental- wealth/201612/autism-and-screen-time-special-brains-special- risks?fbclid=lwAR3LOnef6aJ6eAyMOH52f1 kR- Df3gMHQv4kTC1XOxWiM1 RUTADaLhhtJNNo Screenagers Student -Parent-Teacher Panel Discussion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfPMBNBm2zO https://abc7.com/neurologics-brain-mapping-neuroscience-southern- california/11100558/ httas://www.dailvbuiletin.com/2019/10/01 /new-health-resort-for- california-shows-34-increase-in-teen-suicide-and-29-rise-in-childcare- costs-in-past-3- years/?fbcIid=lwAROTgTLy1 Rctxna9vtE_jtKlhm2pCjb dZ3mJSCcC191 8CFPT3yN2XAvZY TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN THIS IS A TEENAGER'S BRAIN ON INSTAGRAM PLEASE WATCH VERY SHORT VITAL INFORMATION.!!!! FACEBOOK WHISTLEBLOWER FRANCES HAUGEN SAYS INSTAGRAM CAN LEAD YOUNG PEOPLE DOWN A NEGATIVE SPIRAL -- ONE THEY ARE ILL-EQUIPPED TO GET OUT OF. EXPERTS SAY THAT'S BECAUSE THE ADOLESCENT BRAIN IS STILL DEVELOPING AND THE EXCESSIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USE COULD HAVE LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES. CNN'S CLARE SEBASTIAN REPORTS. HTTPS://WWW.CNN.COM/VIDEOS/TECH/2021/10/07/INSTAGRAM-TEENAGE- BRAIN-IMPACT-SEBASTIAN-INTL-PKG-VPX.CNN AND SCREENAGERS OFFICIAL TRAILER) HTTPS://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/WATCH?V=LQX2XOBXGZG 12 AND HTTPS://WWW.SCREENAG ERSMOVIE.COM/HOST-A- SCREENING?GCLID=CJWKCAJWH5QLBHALEIWAIOODSYGBLLJUWDSDBQQT SDYSR9FXNCELLMXOH7NKSTAPSVCSYHMI3FRRPROC-8GQAVD BWE Request support to address above documentation to address a lack of awareness professionally ,parents, students education in order to truly identify the root cause illness from technology vs a broad term mental illness as we have clear evidence what segment of the children's population have miss understood from a lack of awareness with those who hold back for political ideology. A quote from former U.S. "President John F. Kennedy said technology `has no conscience of its own. Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man.' Yet swayed by digital -age myths, we are providing our children with remarkably little guidance on their use of technology." It was Albert Einstein who famously said that once you stop learning, you start dying. It was Bill Gates who said that he would want the ability to read faster Happy Veterans Day! Thank you to all who have served our country. As we express our gratitude, we must never forget that the highest appreciation is not to utter words, but to live by them." President John F. Kennedy Thank you Craig A. Durfey Founder of P.R.D.D.C. 13 Jennifer L. Hall From: Theresa Bass Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 9:35 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] "algorithms help foster political dissent, contribute to mental health and emotional problems among teenagers and can lead to real-world violence in volatile regions." From: Craig A Durfey < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20219:33 AM To: Media@DA.oc.gov.; info@ocsheriff.gov; info@capta.org; INFO@NAMIOC.ORG;'PIO Department' pio_department@ggusd.us>; CADURFEY@GMAIL.COM;'Nick Dibs' <Teresa Pomeroy' teresap@ggcity.org>;'Public Records Request' <cityclerk@ggcity.org>; Brian.Sala@mhsoac.ca.gov; OCMentalHealthBoard@ochca.com; 'COB_Response' <response@ocgov.com>; ocbe@ocde.us; Theresa Bass TBass@anaheim.net>; norma.kurtz@asm.ca.gov; preston.romero@asm.ca.gov; Assemblymember.Nguyen@assembly.ca.gov; assemblymember.rendon@assembly.ca.gov; assemblymember.fong@assembly.ca.gov; Norma.Pate@mhsoac.ca.gov; Andy.Perez@dot.ca.gov Cc: 'Senator Umberg' <Senator.Umberg@outreach.senate.ca.gov>; SENATOR. BATES@senate.ca.gov; SENATOR.GROVE@SENATE.CA.GOV"' <SENATOR.GROVE@senate.ca.gov>; "'SENATOR. PAN@SENATE.CA.GOV"' SENATOR.PAN @senate.ca.gov>; senator.hertzberg@senate.ca.gov;"'SENATOR.WIENER@SENATE.CA.GOV"' SENATOR.WIENER@senate.ca.gov>; "'SENATOR.GROVE@SENATE.CA.GOV"' <SENATOR.GROVE@senate.ca.gov>; Senator.Galgiani@senate.ca.gov; police@garden-grove.org; Police Chief <policechief@anaheim.net>; cm@cityofirvine.org; Theresa Bass <TBass@anaheim.net>; communications@cde.ca.gov; SBE@cde.ca.gov; TGOODBRAND@CITYOFIRVINE.ORG; cityclerk@newportbeachca.gov; Ibrown@newportbeachca.gov; gleung@newportbeachca.gov; ddixon@newportbeachca.gov; bavery@newportbeachca.gov; dduffield@newportbeachca.gov; kmuldoon@newportbeachca.gov; nblom@newportbeachca.gov; jbrenner@newportbeachca.gov; woneill@newportbeachca.gov; irvinecitycouncil@cityofirvine.org; ps@cityofirvine.org; farrahkhan@cityofirvine.org; tammykim@cityofirvine.org; Iarryagran@cityofirvine.org; mikecarroll@cityofirvine.org; anthonykuo@cityofirvine.org;'stevej' <stevej @garde n -g rove. o rg>; 'Joyce" <Joyce.Rivero@ocgov.com>Supervisor Andrew Do <Andrew.Do@ocgov.com>quirk-silva@assembly.ca.gov'<Christopher.Aguilera@asm.ca.gov>; 'George Brietigam' <georgeb@ggcity.org>; KIMN@ggcity.org; joneill@garden-grove.org; 'Maria Stipe' <marias@ci.garden- grove.ca.us>; anan@ggcity.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] "algorithms help foster political dissent, contribute to mental health and emotional problems among teenagers and can lead to real-world violence in volatile regions." Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. 10-26-2021 P.R. D.D.C.) PARENTS FOR THE RIGHTS OF DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN CRAIG A. DURFEY FOUNDER OF P.R.D.D.C. GARDEN GROVE, CA 92842 SOCIALEMOTIONALPAWS.COM FACEBOOK: CRAIG DURFEY U.S. HOUSE OF CONGRESS H2404 - HONORING CRAIG DURFEY FOR HIS FIGHT AGAINST AUTISM Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkq/CREC-2003-03-27/pdf/CREC-2003-03-27.pdf new website socialemotionalpaws.org To whom it may concern A Zucker born every minute: Facebook stock RISES as company reports quarterly profits soared 17% to $9.2BILLION despite slew of devastating whistleblower claims" Zuckerberg's remarks followed Haugen's testimony in British Parliament on Monday, in which the former Facebook employee said the tech firm's algorithms help foster political dissent, contribute to mental health and emotional problems among teenagers and can lead to real-world violence in volatile regions." Haugen told the committee of United Kingdom lawmakers that Facebook Groups amplifies online hate, saying algorithms that prioritize engagement take people with mainstream interests and push them to the extremes". https://www.dailvmaii.co.uk/news/article-10127661 /Whistleblower-Hauqen-testi UK-scrutinizes-Facebook.html Thank You Craig A. Durfey Jennifer L. Hall From: Theresa Bass Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 10:58 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] For the City council's consideration -Little Arabia From: Melody Marler < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 202110:11 AM To: Theresa Bass <TBass@anaheim.net> Cc: Jose Moreno <JMoreno@anaheim.net> Subject: [EXTERNAL] For the City council's consideration -Little Arabia Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. It's unfortunate that since I moved here I started learning the history of racism in the city of Anaheim just by reading the papers and looking into the history of my own little Bungalow Court. I fully support designating Little Arabia as its own little community because it'll stop the history that I'm reading today in the future. They like many others came here from many different countries to escape political and religious persecution just like my ancestors did. (I personally think William Bradford was a cult leader but that's just me cuz I'm related to him directly) the City of Anaheim needs to be looking at how it treats its citizens directly and not focusing so much on the Angels or Disney than what they're doing to help the City even though it's significant. Our citizens are diverse. Do we celebrate that diversity by designating this little area of town is Little Arabia? I say absolutely. Believing the propaganda of political parties about terrorism is a mistake that a lot of the country has made since 9/11 and the pull out of troops from Afghanistan. Where else are people going to run if there's not a safe place for them to live in Anaheim let alone the United States? They're here. Let's celebrate it instead of marginalize it and making them possible radicals to convert in the future. And let's bring sales tax dollars in by doing so. People come from miles around to buy goods and services from people in Little Arabia because of their ethnic diversity. If we celebrate it instead of fear it everyone will be better off. Thank you for your time and consideration. Melody Marler Jennifer L. Hall From: michele volz < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 11:44 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Little Arabia Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear city council, The food in this community is unbelievable and more should know about it. Please consider giving a Little Arabia sign to this wonderful contribution to diversity in O.C. It would draw in more visitors and be beneficial to your city. Sincerely, Michele Volz Sent from my iPad Jennifer L. Hall From: Lyndsey lefebvre < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 12: 13 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello Anaheim City Council Members, My name is Lyndsey Lefebvre, I am from Anaheim. My family has lived in Anaheim since Orange Groves and started going to the schools that were built in early 1960s. Many of my family still resides in Anaheim, one of which is my Mother in Law, whose tract is up against Brookhurst. In my lifetime, the community around Brookhurst, Ball Rd., Cerritos Ave, has been the center of a blossoming immigrant community. While I may not be a homeowner in Anaheim, I certainly make the drive to Superking for produce, to Sahara Falafel for a great Shawarma, and take my visiting folks to the side of Anaheim that is the best part: Little Arabia. See, I have been referring to it for years, despite the city not recognizing it. But shouldn't you? This community is vital to Anaheim - it is as essential and as important as the Matterhorn is. It should get the same respect as the now "revitalized" Packing District. It should get the same respect as the "resort district". The west side of Anaheim has been a long ignored corridor between two major Southern California theme parks. Acknowledging this community of people and what they have brought and revitalized this community into is something the city of Anaheim should be proud of. I am proud of Little Arabia. I am proud to tell people that when I was growing up - that it wasn't always there - but now it is - I want it to stay - Please designate "Little Arabia". Lyndsey Lefebvre 92804 Before 90631 Now Jennifer L. Hall From: Rayna Hamre < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 12:37 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] In Support of Little Arabia 10.26 CC Meeting Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. publiccommenta-anaheim.net Dear City Council Members, As 65 year resident of Orange County, a property owner in Garden Grove, and a local minister, I am making a statement of support in favor of creating a Little Arabia community designation in Anaheim. I also stand in support of small businesses, including our local Arabian -American community. With so many other ethnic designations for areas of Southern California, why would we exclude our Arabian community? Anaheim has an important opportunity to take a stand for inclusivity in Orange County, and assist small business owners. In Solidarity, Rev. Rayna Hamre she, her Affiliated Community Minister Tapestry Unitarian Universalist Congregation 23676 Birtcher Drive Lake Forest, CA 92630-1769 jiD p e - t ry AA L.... n Canpn. p.an Jennifer L. Hall From: Jordan P < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 1:10 PM To: Public Comment Subject: EXTERNAL] 10/26 Council meeting - Public Comment Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I am in full support of the City of Anaheim officially recognizing Little Arabia. I don't think it creates division in the city. To me, it celebrates diversity. I am non -Arab and have enjoyed visiting businesses in this section of town. Just like many cities have a Chinatown, I think it makes sense to award this designation to the folks requesting it. Thank you. Jordan Prell Jennifer L. Hall From: Ibrahim Shakhtour < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:36 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Designation of Little Arabia Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Councilmembers, My name is Ibrahim Shakhtour, I have resided in Anaheim in the past and am a frequent visitor of Little Arabia for over 15 years. I am writing to you today in favor of the designation Little Arabia because of the importance that Little Arabia has served to the city of Anaheim as well as the residents of Anaheim. Little Arabia has been a space where Arabs in the community can come together and can express their culture. I believe that designating Little Arabia would be extremely positive for the Arab community in Anaheim and would bring people interested in Arab culture to Anaheim. Sincerely, Ibrahim Shakhtour Jennifer L. Hall From: Yusuf AI-Bazian < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 4: 10 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Little Arabia Designation Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Councilmembers, My name is Yusuf Albazian and I frequently visit Little Arabia for the rich community and cultural resources it provides. I respectfully ask the council to put the Designation of Little Arabia on their agenda, because public recognition and representation is essential to the health and cohesion of our community. There are many "Little Italy's" and "French Quarters" around the country, and considering the cultural contribution Little Arabia represents, and the profound positive impact and environment it fosters; a Designation is a holistic way to value and nurture Anaheim's Arab constituents. Yusuf Al-Bazian University of California, Berkeley BA Rhetoric & French 510) 918-2076 Jennifer L. Hall From: Ali Shokeh < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 4:20 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Designation of Little Arabia Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council members, I am writing today in favor of designating little Arabia because little Arabia is the home of countless Arab American citizens, families and business which has served as a hub of tourism and a cultural destination to people all over souther California. I encourage the city of Anaheim to officially designate little Arabia. Thank you, Ali Shokeh Jennifer L. Hall From: Pat D < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 1:43 PM To: Public Comment; Jose Diaz Cc: Jose Moreno Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment and Item 23 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council members I am again submitting my comments in writing as unable to attend in person meetings. COVID and other responsibilities at home have limited my abilities to attend in person. I faithfully tune in to watch but that is as far as I can reach. Again I ask that you open your meetings to a hybrid style of delivery so more can participate live". Comments tucked away in a file are not as impactful nor allow for real time incorporation of what else is going on in chambers. I have not gotten a response from my council member for months. So much for two way communication. Do you not want to hear from your community and impacted persons? Item 23 - Grandma's House of Hope I am writing in support of the program offered by Grandma's House of Hope. As always I would expect oversight and management to be top notch with residents interests and needs always at the fore front! The narrative being run by dissenters includes inaccurate and misleading information AGAIN. The hurtful nature is very telling. The location is perfect. The plans complete and the resources are there. If only you had been so diligent in prior applications. This one will change and save lives. Likely familiar to all here against but unwilling to face the reality of the needs for help in our community and likely their families. Please approve this application. Now for you to address other affordable housing needs. Public Comment Little Arabia distinction" The idea that this Council is unable to even agendize a conversation about the Little Arabia is so telling and disgusting! What world do each of you live in that you are unable to recognize the value of this community? What don't you understand about inclusion and diversity so rich here in Anaheim? The comment about Stater Brothers future and other dog whistles are even below what I have come to expect of folx on this body. Your leadership in this city is damaging in so many ways. Quite painful to watch. The economic prosperity in this area is key to the district. I find the area most welcoming and businesses are good neighbors to each other. Now you must move forward in Designating the area Little Arabia with the respect it deserves. Pat Davis District 1 Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and typos. JenniferL. Hall From:Aprovemjb91 < Sent:Tuesday, October 19, 2021 12:30 PM To:Public Comment Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] Conditional Use Permite No. 2021-06106 626 North West Street and 945 West Pioneer Drive Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Subject: CUP2021-06106 Site: 626North WestStreet and945 West Pioneer Drive Dear City Clerk, Iamwriting toyoutoday torequest that youvote noontherequest fortheConditional Use Permit No. 2021-0616. The request tousethisproperty asafacility tohouse 21people isnotinthespirit ofourneighborhood andinthepreservation ofThe Colony. The neighborhoods ofWestmont andThe Colony have done their fareshare intaking onfacilities inourneighborhoods. The surrounding neighborhoods arenow over saturated andtheconcentration oflicensed andunlicensed facilities arenow overwhelming ourcommunity. They arelocated near ourHigh School andtwoofourelementary schools andour public parks. One unlicensed facility sides Founders Park andistwo houses away from the Anaheim High School field. Grandma'sHouse ofHope isoperating atleast fourother facilities rightin thisareaandIbelieve that thissitewas chosen fortheconvenience forthe CEO tooperate herbusiness. She hasa32person facility operating rightaround thecorner at928 West North Street. Myopposition to thegranting of theCUPis notofdiscrimination for people with mental illness orhomelessness itis strictly onthebasis ofwhat will bethedetrimental impact onthehealth, safety andandgeneral welfare ofthecitizens of theCity ofAnaheim. The impact onourexisting infrastructure, theadded traffic and tothe land use. Lowering theparticipants to16from 21still does notnegate the fact ofthesaturation offacilities inourneighborhood. Iamrespectfully requesting thattheCity ofAnaheim City Council Members step upandvotenoon theConditional Use Permit No. 2021-06106 to protect thecitizens andtaxpayers ofAnaheim. Enough isenough. Best Regards, Maryjane Brooks Anaheim, CA92805 1 JenniferL. Hall From:Lorraine Anton < Sent:Tuesday, October 19, 2021 5:27 PM To:Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Jose Diaz; Jose Moreno; Avelino Valencia; Stephen Faessel; Trevor O'Neil; nitaylor@anaheim.net; Public Comment Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] opposed to * CUP 2021-06106 at 626 N. West St, Anaheim, Ca 92805 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Iamdefinitely opposed toanother OVERSATURATED HOUSING likethisGrandmas House ofHope; andohsovery many similar ones near byinAnaheim ! This isabsolutely hurting thousands ofourHEALTH nottomention our SAFETY, too ! ( Common sense shows ustoomany problems of people with mental problems hurting ourhealth & safety... even , killing people, allover thenews ! ) Example : justlastmonth inNewport Bch, Caaman hadapsychotic episode & brokeinto ahome , theowner warned him togetout , buthewouldn`t, was shot & died ! Also, Ihave adearfriend inanear bycity, beautiful homes, Electric Gates, too, & 4 times broke intoherroommates car, stole money, jewelry ! Sotraumatizing !!! Another time, more recently, , broke into theother roommates car, but shecame home latefrom Co. & herlights fromhercarmust ofscared himto take offleaving thecardoor open, whew ! There areoften lotsofloud & disturbing noises & littering , too !!! Ithastraumatized their neighborhood/! Thepolice are having toconstantly patrol herneighborhood !!! Soscary, traumatic tothousands ofusadults, children andtheelderly !!! Wehadamuch more safer neighborhood, before somuch high Saturation ofthese very questionable homes & oddlaws !!! Wehave lotsofresidence who routinely take walks, runs etc., & now lotsofusare scared !!! Also note wehave grade schools, high schools inour neighborhoods ! Enough isenough !!! Police arenow burden withmore with thisridicules increasing ofway toomany questionable homes likethese inquestion ! Note, atlastmeeting wehadapolice talking against thispermit atour lastCityCouncil meeting of inAug too ! Igot infofrom Police ofover 15Police Disturbance ofjustover a oneofGrandmas /House Administrations, alone !!! oh my, cant imagine how many more !!! ? Doesn`tmatter ifitisonly 3, or4, or33 people opposing tohurting Hundreds, Thousands ofourLives !!! ? Plain oldnot fair ! Surely they could more safely, wisely, legally TRY toREHAB these people inaSNIFF type ofenvironment !? Itcan have ALL THEIR NEEDS met in aMUCH MORE SAFER & COST EFFECTIVE WAY !!! ( more of acommercial like environment likeSniff places ) ForALL of ourHealth & safety tosee IF, yes, IFSOME ofTHEM, caneven actually BE REHABED & SAFELY FUNCTION ina Regular Neighborhood !? NOT ALL willever beable to beREHABED, too !!! This other way they aredoing itis * " putting the cart before thehorse ! " Icouldn`twalkforayrtomarkets inmyneighborhood forayr ) & since they arenotallowed todrive acar, yettheyare expected towalk around foronetotwoyrs toget groceries. with high possibilities tocause problems isabsurd !!! ? One would think after all theyrsofdoing thisthere would beamuch Better ,Healthier, Safer Legal WAY FOR THE BETTERMENT OFALL OFUS, RIGHT !? ??? Also these people haveno attachments to ourcommunity sincethey cancome fromanycity, state !!! Weare tooheavily burden withway toomanyofthese odd, unhealthy & unsafe living arrangements = NOTFOR THE BETTERMENT OF ALL OUR RESIDENTS !!???!!!! Wethe people, bythepeople, right !? Nomore Grandmas Houses & orOthers, PLEASE andTHANK YOU foryour time and efforts tobeFAIR to THOUSANDS ofUSwho have WORKED VERY HARD tohave aSafe & Healthy "Sanctuary " called HOME !!! GOD help ALL ofus ! 1 Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 12:54 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: Cup Dev2021-06106 Attachments: (DEV2021-06016).pdf From: Cynthia Macias <cynthia@grandmashouseofhope.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 202112:27 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net>; Lissette Mungia <lissette@grandmashouseofhope.org> Cc: Je'net Kreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Cup Dev2021-06106 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Good afternoon, I have attached the letter of support for Grandma's House of Hope. Respectfully, Cynthia Macias (she/her/hers) Housing Navigator 1505 17th street suite 218 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Direct: 909.258.5617 Fax number: 17142421340 cynthia@q rand mashouseofhope. orq www.grandmashouseofhope.com 1 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Infolmabon contamedhi the s message and any at tachments is hitt ndedonlyfol tic eaddlessee(), If,otjl)elre,eflint ,otiliar ,ele(.er,edtlirsr)7essageriiellolplea seiiotrf,tlieseiideI 7)7ed atel,I),lettjliiele(tloii()7a laiidpleasedeletetlieol g iialw tliotitftiltlielle,e N,d s(lostile,oI cupplig, To whom it may concern-, Date: October 20, 2021 I - Fse o • nas-rnaW is retain passion-VTFIror Init it) Yrt7YrF-"M7-I=,, we found this organization, we were losing passion for working and helping individuals who needed support, We knew why we had started; however, we did not know where we were going Here at GHH, we regained our passion. Our CEO carries compassion and empathy not only for our participants but for her staff. The empathy that she bestows to many of us we bestow to our participants. Our participants come here willingly- The house on 626 N West St, Anaheim, CA, 92801, for which we are advocating, would help us house many more individuals. While these individuals are in our care, we work on individualized plans that assist them with obtaining the necessary skills and support needed' to maintain permanent housing successfully and be reintegrated into the community helping end the stigma on individuals facing homelessness. These individuals that we serve are our neighbors, friends, aunts, uncles, brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, sons, and daughters. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Sincedey, 01 nq)t, Housing Navigator, Cynthia Macias Case Manager, Lissette Munguia Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 1:50 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] CUP Dev2021-06106 Attachments: HOUSE OF HOPE.pdf From: Pia Castaneda <pia@grandmashouseofhope.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 20211:28 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: Mnet Kreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] CUP Dev2021-06106 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Pia Castaneda Service Coordinator 1505 17th street suite 218 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Direct: 909.258.5617 Fax number: 17142421340 pia@q rand mashouseofhope.orci www.grandmashouseofhope.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTTCE Ircfoc..mabon c.octtamed hi the m message and any attachments r m rrctended only fol the addl m me (), If you beher ,e that you hay ,e c c.ewed this mem ag hi ellol, please rco ffy the endeel.. c opymg 1 To %vhoni it tuay concern: Date: October 20, 021 Years ago, I got sick, lost my home and became homeless. Grandma's House of was the only program for me. They gave me a place to live that I could call home, with food, shelter, acid support. I fie pr()gram is structured, to include saving, budgeting and life skills classes to all. They were able to find me a place of my own, f now live in Irvinc and have a beautiful apartment that I call home. GHVI had faith in inn and supported [lie, in my lime of'riced. Now, I am a productive citizen that pays rent and taxes. f behcVC SO much in GfIll that I am now ernploycd with them, giving back to the COMMUnity what they 9,"ve nae. The ) Wriet Krcitner not only took care of the business end ofGH11; she also took the time to meet & welcome every Client, There is truly no other prograrn like Grandma's House offlope. Please support us in helping even more people. Sincere'ly' Flou,sirq,r, Service Coordinator, Pia Castaneda JenniferL. Hall From:Nicholas J. Taylor Sent:Wednesday, October 20, 2021 1:50 PM To:Public Comment Subject:FW: \[EXTERNAL\] Re: Cup Dev2021-06106 Importance:High From: Elizabeth Matusak < Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 1:36 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] Re: Cup Dev2021-06106 Importance: High Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To the Anaheim City Council, Iam writing this letter in support of Grandma’sHouse of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. Ihave been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. Ibelieve that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma’sHouse of Hope (GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living onour streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, Iknow action must betaken to assist those in need and end the cycle ofhomelessness. Bydoing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of allpeople and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES inSacramento forVictims ofCrime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success inmoving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest inthe county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lotof stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and Iwould be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. Iunderstand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. 1 Neighbors saying, they “don’twant these people” intheir neighborhood isnot thestandard todeny aproject ordismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which isassembled thoughtfully and ingreat detail over a6–9-month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners toreject the recommendations ofthe staff report. Iam informed and believe that avote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. Itconcerns methat this decision was based ondiscriminatory comments from protesters atthe hearing. Istrongly ask that you support this project and beinstrumental inhelping our community. Elizabeth Matusak 2 Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 12: 19 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06106 (DEV2021-00122) Attachments: Letter to Anaheim City Council.pdf Importance: High From: Danielle Guerrero <dguerrero@ferruzzo.com> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 202110:08 AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim. net> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06106 (DEV2021-00122) Importance: High Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mr. Taylor: Please find attached to this email a letter of support regarding Conditional Use Permit No. 2021- 06106 (DEV2021-00122) which is set for hearing before the City Council meeting on October 26, 2021. 1 respectfully request that you direct this letter to the appropriate parties for consideration. Thank you, Ferruzzo & Ferruzzo, LLP 3737 Birch Street, Suite 400 Newport Beach, California 92660 T 949-608-6900 F 949-608-6994 dguerrero@ferruzzo.com www.Ferruzzo.com Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged, and is intended to be viewed only by the individual or ntity to who th-- addressed. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is gtrictly prohibited. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at (949) 608- i,900 and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving them in any tti t e r. 3737 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 400 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 TELEPHONE: 949-608-6900 October 21, 2021 To the Anaheim City Council: I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope ("GHH") and the proposed Conditional Use Permit ("CUP") (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. I understand a vocal minority opposed approving the CUP for a property in their neighborhood that, if approved, would help GHH continue to serve a population that is frequently ignored and discriminated against. You are already informed about the support shown to GHH by county and state -level agencies. These agencies have already put their money where their mouths are by continuing to fund the incredible work done by GHH. Instead of listing these monetary" votes of support again, I would like to address the impact of GHH on the local community. GHH has a developed a reputation as an organization that places a premium on serving those living on our streets. In addition to the financial hardships that lead to a loss of housing, this population often faces additional challenges, including undiagnosed mental health illness, addiction, and unique family dynamics. These challenges often serve as barriers to breaking the cycle of homelessness by compounding its effect on the individuals. Some people see these challenges and fear this population. They fear that homeless + mental illness/addiction/family dynamics will automatically endanger them, their families, and their financial security. The irony is that undiagnosed mental health illness, addiction, and unique family dynamics are not exclusive to the homeless population. We know that the neighborhoods with the prettiest lawns and best holiday decorations are home to community members with the same challenges. The fact of homelessness does not automatically make a person dangerous or justify excluding a population from the opportunity to join this community. An absence of community, however, can and sometimes does make a person living on the street afraid and desperate in a way that the vocal minority may never understand. GHH is here to provide that community and change lives, one house at a time. GHH offers safety and support in a program that not only addresses the immediate (and sometimes emergent) needs of the participants but further aids them in establishing stability and independence once they "graduate" from GHH. By doing so, GHH actually enhances the local community by transitioning many of the participants from a desperate and dangerous living situation to one of love, support, and, most of all, structure. Without GHH, these participants lose what might be their only avenue to recovery, freedom, and the opportunity to give back to the community. What more could the Anaheim residents want than to see that woman you always see on the comer or that man who sleeps behind the dumpster get clean, obtain housing, and find employment? Anaheim City Council October 21, 2021 Page 2 If you are interested in my opinion, the proper community response to an organization like GHH is to get behind the cause, not act as one more barrier. GHH takes it upon itself to rescue and restore" homeless individuals who are ignored by society. We should all rally behind Je'net Kreitner and her staff who are truly doing the Lord's work. All they ask is to not get shut down by the vocal minority who do nothing on their own to help this population and offer no solution other than "not in my backyard." I "rally" by serving on the GHH Board of Directors. My parents and siblings "rally" by donating monthly and for fundraising campaigns. My friends "rally" by donating Secret Santa gifts for program participants during the holidays and volunteering on site with their families. On Tuesday, I ask that the Anaheim City Council "rally" by looking beyond the vocal minority and joining with GHH in its cause by approving the CUP. Thank you, 1 U-401 1 am= =W5131m * Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 1:25 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Re: Cup Dev2021-06106 Attachments: 2021-10-21 12-49.pdf From: Rosa Conde <rosa@grandmashouseofhope.org> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 202112:53 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: Mnet Kreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Cup Dev2021-06106 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello, Please see attached a letter of support for Grandma's House of Hope. Thank you. IIRosa Cande Assistant. Program Manager Grandma's House ol. Hope 657)274 162 rosaa,grandmashouseofhobe.org 1505 E. 17th Street Suite H 6 Santa Ana CA 92705 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Information contained in this message and any attachments is intended only for the addressee(s). Ifyou believe that you have received this message in error, please notes the sender immediately by returning electronic mail and please delete the original without further review, disclosure, or copying. r arn,e and Address Lka—a 31&- 20l,s N-PkWgt&ve To the Anaheim City COLIndl, Date I am writing thus letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St,, Anaheim, CA 92801, 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report, recommended approval for the proposed project I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will o p erate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone, who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelossnes5, By doing so, we are enhancing ouir community by preserving the dignity of all': people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers, and; partners Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable, There is a lot of stigrna and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population, and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and! audits the program annually.. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in, great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report, I am informed and believe that a vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Signature Grandma's House of Hope is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity I Tax ID 4 26-0391438 206N State College Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806 I P: 714. 558.8600 I F: 7'14.S58.8613 S a I h- r arn,e and Address Lka—a 31&- 20l,s N-PkWgt&ve To the Anaheim City COLIndl, Date I am writing thus letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St,, Anaheim, CA 92801, 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report, recommended approval for the proposed project I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will o p erate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone, who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelossnes5, By doing so, we are enhancing ouir community by preserving the dignity of all': people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers, and; partners Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable, There is a lot of stigrna and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population, and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and! audits the program annually.. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in, great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report, I am informed and believe that a vote of 6- 0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Signature Grandma's House of Hope is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity I Tax ID 4 26-0391438 206N State College Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806 I P: 714.558.8600 I F: 7'14.S58.8613 Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 4:37 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] GHH letter of support Attachments: Dan Stevens - Letter of Support on Appeal.pdf From: Dan Stevens <dstevens@burnhamgibson.com> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 20214:31 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Subject: [EXTERNAL] GHH letter of support Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hi Nick, Please see attached — my letter of support for the GHH appeal. All my best, Dan Dan Stevens, ChFC@, CRPC@ Financial Advisor Burnham isoWealth visors, A BRIP Company 2050 Main Street, Suite 510 Irvine, CA 92614 Dir: (949) 833-5854 1 Fax: (949) 252-1308 Ih.ttp://www.buirnlhamc ibsoli.com/ BE T BurnhamGibson pLA ES Dan M. Stevens is an investment adviser representative (IAR) offering investment advisory services through Burnham Gibson Wealth Advisors, LLC. BGWA), a registered investment adviser, and indirect subsidiary of Baldwin Risk Partners, LLC and BRP Group, Inc. Dan M. Stevens is also, separately and apart from BGWA, a registered representative who offers securities products through Equitable Advisors, LLC (NY, NY (212) 314-4600), member FINRA, SIPC, (Equitable Financial Advisors in MI & TN), as well as an agent (CA insurance license #: 01-92115) who offers insurance and annuity products through Equitable Network, LLC, which conducts business in CA as Equitable Network Insurance Agency of California, LLC, in UT as Equitable Network Insurance Agency of Utah, LLC, and in PR as Equitable Network of Puerto Rico, Inc. Equitable Advisors and Equitable Network are affiliated companies and do not provide ERISA fiduciary, tax or legal advice. For more information about Equitable Advisors, LLC, you may visit https://eguitable.com/crs to review the firm's Relationship Summary for Retail Investors and General Conflicts of Interest Disclosure. Individuals may transact business and/or respond to inquiries only in state(s) in which they are properly qualified. Your receipt of this e-mail does not necessarily indicate that the sender is able to transact business in your state. BGWA, Baldwin Risk Partners, LLC and BRP Group, Inc. are not affiliated with Equitable Advisors or Equitable Network. 21 October 2021 Dan M. Stevens 2050 Main St. Ste 510, Irvine, CA, 92614 To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801.1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision- making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. Neighbors saying they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6- 9 month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report. Please don't cave to the loudest and most inflammatory among us; I would ask that logical and compassionate considerations be made when reviewing this matter. The positive impact on real people is too great and immediate to overlook. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 4:40 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] FW: Scanned image from MX -4101 N Attachments: Copier ContactBuffal_20211021_135635.pdf Dear Taylor, Please find my two letters of support which reference both my properties in the City of Anaheim. As you may know, my family also owns and operates additional rental properties in this wonderful city. I also own and operate several businesses in the city of Anaheim and Buena Park. As an actual housing provider who has direct involvement with GHH and your ability to provide services, maintain my property, monitor, and coexist (seamlessly) in a Historic District, I am in complete support of your growth in our fine city. I will be on vacation during the next scheduled City Council Meeting but please feel free to speak on my behalf and submit my letters of support. If I can lend additional support, please do not hesitate in contacting me, Sincerely, Frank Alvarez President Buffalo Maintenance, Inc. 6861 Stanton Ave. #G Buena Park, CA 90621 TEL: (714) 956- 8371 FAX: (714) 509-0626 Original Message ----- From: copier@contactbuffalo.com <copier@contactbuffalo.com> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 20213:59 PM To: Frankie Alvarez <Frankie@contactbuffalo.com> Subject: Scanned image from MX -4101N Reply to: Copier ContactBuffal <copier@contactbuffalo.com> Device Name: Not Set Device Model: MX -4050V Location: Not Set File Format: PDF MMR(G4) Resolution: 200dpi x 200dpi Attached file is scanned image in PDF format. Use Acrobat(R)Reader(R) or Adobe(R)Reader(R) of Adobe Systems Incorporated to view the document. Adobe(R)Reader(R) can be downloaded from the following URL: Adobe, the Adobe logo, Acrobat, the Adobe PDF logo, and Reader are registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States and other countries. https://gcc02.safeI i n ks. protection.outlook.com/?u rl=http%3A/ 2F % 2Fwww.adobe.com % 2F&a m p;data=04%7C01%7Cpu bl iccomment%40anahei m. net%7C6cb6b72da66a45a681e708d994ec233e%7C74c3739c502a49c68d212bbc30f56f22%7C 0%7C0%7C637704564192731592%7CU n known%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJ Wljoi MC4wLjAwM DAi LCJQljoiV21 u Mzl i LCJ BTi 161 k1 haWwi LCJXVC16Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=fWjlcbaPcxB%2BXyE7PM1V1QDy%2BTW3ByGfXH k4V3k2z8w%3D&amp; reserved=0 Letter of Support for Grandma's House of Hope Date 10121/2021 Name Frank Alvarez Address Anaheim CA, 92805 To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. I am a current landlord of another Grandma's House of Hope location in Anaheim and can attest to the fact that they are very good tenants. GHH operates its program peacefully and takes great care of the interior and exterior of the property. 1 am confident that their respectful management will maintain the property value. In fact, GHH has even increased the property value with renovations or additions made with my permission. I have not had any neighbor complaints regarding the upkeep of the property or the daily operation of their housing services. I have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. Our homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community, Signature Letter of Support for Grandma's House of Hope Date 10/21/2021 Name Frank Alvarez Address Anaheim CA, 92806 To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 am a current landlord of another Grandma's House of Hope location in Anaheim and can attest to the fact that they are very good tenants. GHH operates its program peacefully and takes great care of the interior and exterior of the property. I am confident that their respectful management will maintain the property value. In fact, GHH has even increased the property value with renovations or additions made with my permission. I have not had any neighbor complaints regarding the upkeep of the property or the daily operation of their housing services. I have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. Our homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community, Signature Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 4:48 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Message from "DownstairsCopier" Attachments: 20211021123305446.pdf Original Message ----- From: Je'net Kreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 20214:46 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: Je'net Kreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Message from "DownstairsCopier" Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Je'net Kreitner CEO/Founder Grandma's House of Hope 714-457-3187 Jenet@grandmashouseofhope.org Sent from my iPhone (pardon the typos ) Begin forwarded message: 1 October 21,2U22 John P.Hannon, III 737Birch Street, Suite 400 Newport Beach, CA92660 Re: Conditional Use Permit (CUP)/DEV2O21-06O1G)located at626N.West St,Anaheim, CAg2801 Tothe Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at626 N. West StAnaheim, CA 92801. | have beep informed that th a Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. | believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right tobefairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided forthe last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. It is an organization that I support as a cari ' fully designed way to improve the homelessness issue. K is an organization that improves the lives of the most vulnerable who (we should not forget) are also members of the community. My understanding is that GHH's success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. understand that the staff report for this project supportedapp |oftheCUP,andthatGHHi»quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. umconcerned and| question why the commissioners outrightrejected thereco mnend tions of the staff report, which was assembled over a 6 -to -9 -month time frame. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. John P. Hannon, U| JenniferL. Hall From:Joey Vergel De Dios < Sent:Thursday, October 21, 2021 8:12 PM To:Public Comment Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] FW: NO To The Conditional Permit for 626 West St. 20 Seriously and Severely Mentally Ill Residence Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Sirs/Madam, My name is Gena Vergel de Dios and my husband is Joey. We have two adult daughters and two granddaughters. One is already an adult and the youngest is still in high school. We have lived in West Pioneer Drive inAnaheim for over 20 years. It is a very quite and clean neighborhood where nothing happens even if we forget to close our garage door. On a regular basis, we, including our neighbors walk around our neighborhood for our exercise. We have not experienced any crime, disorderly conduct, people urinating or leaving thrash inthe street nor sidewalk, nor the lawn nor garden. We are very proud and happy that we are living in thisarea where our children and grandchildren can walk safely to and from their schools. Now we hear that a conditional permit has already been granted tothis facility that will house 15+1 residents whoare SERIOUSLY AND SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL. Out neighborhood is already saturated with too many transitional homes. Why is the city doing this to us. We elected our city officials to support us but instead we feel neglected and ignored. This is a single family neighborhood where children walk everyday either from Anaheim High School, Adelaide Price and Westmont Elementary School. We cannot put them atrisk from mentally disturbed much more seriously mentally ill people. We have heard news of medical workers being killed by patients who have temporarily lost their sanity. How much more from persons who are SERIOUSLY AND SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL. One incidence involving one of those seriously mentally ill person could beFATAL. The City could besued for damages ifthis unfortunate incident happens despite the opposition from its residents. We would not want that to ever happen. We are definitely OPPOSED to this facility housing seriously and severely mentally ill persons. Please do not ruin our quite and beautiful neighborhood. Vote NO to this conditional permit. Thank you and we will remember your help. Gena and Joey Vergel de Dios Anaheim, CA 92805 Sent from Mail for Windows 1 Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 9:38 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support Attachments: 2021-10-21 Letter of Support_tsd.PDF From: Sent: Friday, October 22, 20219:23 AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: 'Je'net Kreitner' <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Please see attached letter of support. Respectfully, Tim Danaher October 21, 2021 Timothy S. Danaher Corona del Mar, CA 92625 To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801.1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. Earlier this year I got involved with Grandma's House of Hope. Through'my involvement, I have seen firsthand the positive impact that the organization is making on fighting homelessness and improving the lives of those that enter the program. I believe that this project would continue the critical work that Grandma's House of Hope is doing and extend their mission of Empowering the Invisible Populations of Orange County. This project fits well within the scope of what the organization can handle from an infrastructure perspective and I believe that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. Our homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness. That being said, Grandma's House of Hope has an excellent reputation with their peers and partners, which has been built and nurtured over the last 17. Contracts include: 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to permanent housing within 12 months is 65%, which from my understanding is among the highest in the county. I kindly ask that you support this project. efiixfl- JenniferL. Hall From:Nicholas J. Taylor Sent:Friday, October 22, 2021 11:58 AM To:Public Comment Subject:FW: \[EXTERNAL\] Re: Cup Dev2021-06106 - Grandma'sHouse of Hope Attachments:Landlord Letter of Support on CUP Appeal - 1767 WM.pdf From: Alan Nguyen < Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 11:53AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: Je'netKreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org>; Taylor Montano <taylor@grandmashouseofhope.org>; alan nguyen < Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] Re: CupDev2021-06106 - Grandma'sHouse ofHope Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mr. Taylor, I am a landlord of one of the properties that Grandma's House of Hope Organization is operating. I understand that there is an issue with another property that they are trying to get a business license for from the City of Anaheim. I would like to express my support for them in this matter. Please see my attached letter. Best regards, Alan Nguyen Voice : ( 1 October 22, 2021 Alan Nguyen, Landlord Anaheim, CA 90804 To the Anaheim City Council, Use Permit (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. I am a current in Anaheim and can attest to the fact that they are very good tenants. GHH operates its program peacefully and takes great care of the interior and exterior of the property. I am confident that their respectful management will maintain the property value. In fact GHH has even increased the property value with renovations or additions made with my permission. I have not had any neighbor complaints regarding the upkeep of the property or the daily operation of their housing services. I have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need andend the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. Our homeless population is diverse, and , including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community, Best regards, Alan Nguyen JenniferL. Hall From:Michelle Derak < Sent:Friday, October 22, 2021 1:39 PM To:Public Comment Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] CUP for West St & Pioneer Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Anaheim City Council. I am a57 year resident of Anaheim and live within 1 block of the West St Pioneer home that Grandma'shouse of Hope is looking to secure for those with mental issues not allowed tobe disclosed to neighbors. Iwould like to urge you to uphold your original decision. If your original decision criteria has been rectified by GHOF, Iurge you to deny this application for CUP based on safety for the neighborhood. We are saturated in our area with like homes and we have seen an increase in crime over the last 15 years. Furthermore, with an admitted 400 police officers for ALL of Anaheim, it is an unfair burden to have allthese homes in one particular area of Anaheim. How can we adequately protect the elderly and children who live in this area. 1 block from a high school and 3 blocks from 2 elementary schools. We cannot take chances with the safety of our neighborhoods. We can find another solution but turning the large homes in our neighborhoods into homes for people who should be under constant medical and psychiatric care is not the answer. 1 The answer is asking these homes to be moved into commercial and industrial areas where there are not an overabundance of vulnerable neighbors. There is absolutely nothing that was presented on Thursday night to make us neighbors feel any more safe. 1 person on duty for 15 + 1 residents. Only time there will be more than 1 is during shift changes. The woman representing GHOH did NOT give clear and concise answers and had ZERO stats she could give us to make us feel any better about this. We the taxpayers are funding this and thus should have asay. I understand the state of California has replied to you and is trying to force you to have no say, but if we have to sue the State, then we need to do that. Anaheim is suffering all through this once great city. We need to use another neighborhood that is not already so saturated. Kids and elderly walk by these homes daily and are at risk whether anyone wants to admit it. I am aresident and a neighbor of this proposed CUP and I say NO. OR let'stalk more about it. Let's have more than 1 person there at all times! Not just shift changes. We are all a protected class in one way or another and we cannot just give one protected class all the rights, while denying our elderly, sick and disabled, children and other protected classes none. The owner of this home stands to make upward of 25k monthly and its our money that is being paid to him. 2 He will still turn a profit and GHOH needs to have more staff. If a patient, and thats what they are, decides to go off their meds, it could turn dangerous very quickly! It'ssad, but if in an area that isnot residential, they will not be adirect threat and any situation that arises can be handled without harm coming to a neighbor, child orelderly walking by. Thank you for your time and upholding your original decision to deny. This time based on safety and unknowns. Michelle E Derakhshanian Westmont Drive 92801 3 Jennifer L. Hall From: caroline Garcia < Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 1:41 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fw: Project at 626N. West Street Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. My name is Carolina Garcia, I live at N West st This property 626 wraps around to my back yard. The front door to this property is just a few feet from my back door. There already is a Care Home back here. (1st pic). If you approve this, My home will literally be surrounded by these type of business. My concern is the saturation in this area alone. Thank you for your time & consideration, Carolina Garcia Pic 1 senior care home 2 property 626 N. West st front of house 3 front door about 15ft away from my yard Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone 9 r tr APrh YY kd i- ON f 1' RX r 7 . w.4"1 t \ l i r.•, A '' i ( .,,aft r, i Y - . ti . i ' , t 1h e 1 f M4c4st4, 0 Mask f 4yy r r r rM ti Jennifer L. Hall From: loharc@juno. Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 5:35 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Grandma's House of Hope application 202106106 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello Anaheim Council, I send this email to inform you of my opposition to Grandma's House of Hope application for transitional housing 9 202106106 because; 1. it would discourage a prospective real estate buyer to know such a big transitional housing exist within the Anaheim Colony 2. GHH clients are allowed to go outside during daytime to do their errands (shopping to Walmart) and appointments while children and kids are walking to Westmont Elementary School 3. The Anaheim area within 1 mile radius of the proposed GHH housing is already oversaturated with licensed and unlicensed (city and state -approved) transitional housing, some of which have created law enforcement issues and loss of interest to respond due to frequent calls (this is according to neighbor's accounts during public hearing 10/21/22 I therefore I request the good Anaheim Council to deny the GHH's application. I also propose a city ordinance to track and set a limit on number of transitional housing allowed in the city, more so in family residential zones. Thank you for considering my opposition, Mr. Lohengrin Arcebal Anaheim CA 92801 Choose to be safer online. Opt -in to Cyber Safety with NortonLifeLock. Get Norton 360 with LifeLock starting at $9.95/month.* NetZero.com/NortonLifeLock Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 12:54 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support for Grandma's House of Hope Attachments: Letter of Support for Grandma's House of Hope jpg From: FCCA Office < Sent: Monday, October 25, 202112:18 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org; Tobi Aclaro <Tobi@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support for Grandma's House of Hope Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear City of Anaheim, I strongly support the request from Grandma's House of Hope for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate a transitional housing program for vulnerable women experiencing homelessness with a mental health disability. I have attached a signed letter of support. My church partners with a ministry that reaches out to women and men in restoration and recovery. Through this partnership, I have personally worked with a couple of the current Grandma's House of Hope locations. Our church also includes an individual who has been housed by Grandma's House of Hope. The homes are wonderful places for individuals to heal and to move forward into a better future. They are thoughtful about their presence in the community, and they have wonderful staff that are present to each house. I have good experiences communicating with staff. I have witnessed Grandma's House of Hope to be an asset to vulnerable people in our community and to be filled with staff ready to be good neighbors to those around them. Thank you for your time and attention, Emily Miller -Todd Associate Pastor First Congregational Church 515 N. State College Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92806 714) 776-0960 www.fccanaheim.or Name and Address 6(v% \-4 IV) V-—T6d c{ 515 N S f&tt (d )LCA L lv F-M-Kow'."ZIR To the Anaheim City Council, F1C5+ ONO 0WOrCIA c iRr QV\ajw-X Date i®f I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report. I am informed and believe that a vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Signature Grandma's House of Hope is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity I Tax ID # 26-0391438 206 N State College Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806 I P:714.558.8600 I F:714.558.8613 awl T-eX's L Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 12:53 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Comments on Grandma's House of Hope request Attachments: Grandma's House letter to Anaheim.doc From: Warren Lortie < Sent: Monday, October 25, 202111:36 AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net>; jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Comments on Grandma's House of Hope request Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Letter attached Warren H. Lortie, President Warren Lortie Associates, Inc. Tool Dove Street Ste. 220 Newport Beach, CA 9266o tel (949)679-5707, fax 679-5730 arren Lortie Associates To the Anaheim City Council, 1001 Dove Street, Suite 220 Newport Beach, California 92660 tel (949) 679-5707 fax (949) 679-5730 I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. I have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report. I am informed and believe that a vote of 6- 0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Sincerely, Warren H. Lortie, President a real estate investment and asset development company Jennifer L. Hall From: Jimmy Adams < Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 1:20 PM To: Public Comment Cc: gadams2214@att.net Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Hearing Item #23 -For October 26, 2021 Agenda Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: The intent of this email is to respectfully request that you deny the Conditional Use Permit for 626 N. West Street and 945 West Pioneer Drive. My wife and I have lived in Anaheim for 46 years, currently residing in the We can speak from experience that transitional housing is the worst thing that can happen in a neighborhood. We have lived through and experienced transitional housing in our neighborhood for many years. We can tell you stories of making threatening comments to neighbors, as well as relieving themselves on public sidewalks and block walls. This kind of behavior is unacceptable and should not be a condition for living in our neighbors. Once again, we respectfully request that you deny the request for C.U.P. Thanking you in advance for you consideration. Sincerely, Jim Adams and Gail Adams Sent from my iPad Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 1:41 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Anaheim City Council From: Natasha Wilkinson < Sent: Monday, October 25, 20211:24 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Anaheim City Council Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. 10/25/2021 Natasha Wilkinson To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. I have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that Grandma's House of Hope has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project was in support of the CUP being approved, and that Grandma's House of Hope is quite experienced with this population and held in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss thePlanning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6-9 month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to not follow the recommendations of the staff report. A staff member in the Anaheim Planning Department shared with GHH that the Planning Commissionhands down a split decision only 10% of the time.. A vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community, Natasha Wilkinson Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 1:41 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support on Appeal From: Ashlee < Sent: Monday, October 25, 20211:31 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net>; jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support on Appeal Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. 25 October 2021 Ashlee Nichols To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (DEV2021- 06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that Grandma's House of Hope has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project was in support of the CUP being approved, and that Grandma's House of Hope is quite experienced with this population and held in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6- 9 month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to not follow the recommendations of the staff report. A staff member in the Anaheim Planning Department shared with GHH that the Planning Commission hands down a split decision only 10% of the time.. A vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community, Ashlee Nichols Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 2:30 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Support Letter Attachments: Letter+of+Support+on+Appeal_Revl00821.pdf From: alyssa.cusimano@nm. Sent: Monday, October 25, 20212:26 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net>; Je'net Kreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Support Letter Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hi All, Please see my support letter attached. ACyssa Cusimano Lead Advisor I Cusimano Financial 1500 Quail St, Ste 600, Newport Beach, CA 92660 P: (714) 478-1625 jimmycusimano.com Schedule a Meeting* For secure file uploads Our Team: Jimmy Cusimano Wealth Management Advisor I iimmy.cusimano@nm.com Alyssa Cusimano Lead Advisor I alyssa.cusimano@nm.com David Whitaker I Director of Planning and Investments I david.whitaker@nm.com Cathy Van Meter I Client Service Manager I cathy.vanmeter@nm.com Northwestern Mutual Wealth Managernent. Company CA LIC #OK19400 Northwestern Mutual is the marketing name for The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, Milwaukee, WI (NM) (life and disability insurance, annuities and life insurance with long-term care benefits) and its subsidiaries. Alyssa is an Associate Insurance Agent of NM and Northwestern Long Term Care Insurance Company, Milwaukee, WI (long-term care insurance), a subsidiary of NM. Registered Representative of Northwestern Mutual Investment Services, LLC (securities), a subsidiary of NM, broker-dealer, member FINRA and SIPC. There may be instances when this agent represents companies in addition to NM or its subsidiaries. While links to other websites are provided for convenience and information, please be advised that except for information related to Northwestern Mutual NM), the inclusion of, or linking to, other websites does not imply NM endorsement of, nor responsibility for, those websites. Please do not send orders for mutual funds or securities via email, as they cannot be processed. Your transmission of electronic mail to this address represents your consent to two-way communication by Internet email. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer on which it exists This is an advertisement for Northwestern Mutual. Northwestern Mutual, its subsidiaries and affiliates may review and retain incoming and outgoing electronic mail for this e-mail address for quality assurance and regulatory compliance purposes. Please be advised that communications with {SECURE MESSAGE} in the subject line have been sent using a secure messaging system. Communications that do not have this tag may not be secure and could be observed by a third party. Our commitment to privacy: At Northwestern Mutual, your privacy is important to us. For more information about our privacy practices, please review our privacy notices. If you prefer not to receive any educational or promotional emails for products and services from Northwestern Mutual and your Financial Representative, unsubscribe. Northwestern Mutual 720 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202-4797. ll) J HOUSE OF H®PE Date 10/ 25/2021 Name and Address Alyssa Cusimano Laguna Hills, CA To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report. I am informed and believe that a vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Signature C Grandma's House of Hope is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity I Tax ID # 26-0391438 206 N State College Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806 1 P: 714.558.8600 1 F: 714.558.8613 Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 3:54 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Support letter Attachments: Su pport- letter- BJackson.pdf From: Brock Jackson < Sent: Monday, October 25, 20213:21 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Support letter Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello, Supporting your efforts! Blessings! Brock ll) J HOUSE OF H®PE Date 10-25-2021 Name and Address FB—rock Jackson Llano, CA 93544 To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report. I am informed and believe that a vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Grandma's House of Hope is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity I Tax ID # 26-0391438 206 N State College Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806 1 P: 714.558.8600 1 F: 714.558.8613 Jennifer L. Hall From: Humberto Macias < Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 5:42 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Grandmas House permit application Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I want to express my strong opinion to the city council and ask them to vote NO on transitional home at 626 West St Resident at Humberto Macias Jennifer L. Hall From: Reon Howard < Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 5:47 PM To: Public Comment Subject: EXTERNAL] 626 N. West St., Anaheim Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To the Anaheim City Council, I am against the CUP for this address for many reasons: The area is already over populated with care facilities, halfway houses, and rehab homes. That is the ones that are known about, but necessarily permitted by the City. There is a facility at 928/930 N. West St. with 35 people that cause issues with parking, traffic and their coming and going. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to not grant the CUP. If this gets approved, which I am against then I would ask that there be additional conditions put into the CUP. Quarterly inspections by code enforcement without prior notification and also that the residents/staff have to allow code enforcement to enter the property. Thank you for reading my email, Reon Boydstun Howard DRE901446104 Boydstun Realty & Property Management, Inc. 714-778-4261 office cell 703 N. Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim CA 92805 Www.reonboydstun.com Sent from my iPad Jennifer L. Hall From: David Schmidt < Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 6:34 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] 626 West Street Proposal Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To the Honorable City Council Members, Please vote no. I have lived on Lancer Drive for five years. I walk around the block a few times a week past the home in question. My wife and I believe we have too many non-resident (group home) properties in our area. In my vicinity there is one home directly across the street, one three doors down and one directly behind our home. We have numerous complaints already that are not in the scope of this letter with the new neighbors. This is the first time I have written to the city counsel and plan to attend the upcoming Tuesday meeting at 5:00 PM. Thank you for considering my request, David Schmidt Jennifer L. Hall From: Keith Olesen < Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 7:53 AM To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Jennifer Diaz; Avelino Valencia; Gloria S. Ma'ae; Trevor O'Neil; Jose Moreno Cc: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Agenda Item 23 / Oct 26 2021 Meeting Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim Mayor and City Council October 24, 2021 I am contacting you today to voice my opposition to the application for a Conditional Use Permit for 626 N. West Street (Item 23 on your agenda) and in support of the Anaheim Planning Commission's unanimous decision to deny this request. While there are a number of related issues such as the inadequacy of the city's notification process for applications for CUPs, that should be addressed for this application and all future applications, I'll avoid confusion and distractions and get right to the point: The proposed facility is incompatible with the surrounding single family neighborhood and should be denied. This is a low density single family neighborhood. Even with the reduction in the number of residents from the original 20 to the 16 in the appeal proposal and the switch from residents having "severe and persistent mental health disabilities" to "female adults with a mental health disability" this facility as proposed is not compatible with the existing use and density, While I enthusiastically support providing facilities and support services for homeless, those with mental health disabilities, and other at risk groups and individuals the location for these services is of paramount importance. Inconsistent and incompatible uses can be found throughout the residential areas in the flatlands of Anaheim, and have been long time contributing factors to the decline in quality of life in our residential neighborhoods. I recognize that the services provided by the various non-profit groups operating in Anaheim are needed and welcome, however they cannot be allowed to be provided where they are detrimental to other Anaheim residents and at the cost of quality of life in our neighborhoods. As a 35+ year resident of the central Anaheim area I have seen the negative impacts incompatible land uses, zoning variances, and widely allowed Conditional Use Permits have had on our neighborhoods. This specific area is already home to a significant number of smaller homes" over which the city has little if any control. The addition of this very large facility in an already impacted area is just not acceptable and should be denied. I urge you to support the unanimous decision of the Planning Commission, respect the voices of neighbors and homeowners in the impacted area, and prioritize Anaheim's residents and neighborhoods above all else and deny this application. Thank you, Keith Olesen Anaheim, CA 92805 Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 11:10 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support -CUP Grandma's House of Hope Attachments: GHoH CUP Oct 25, 2021-Tierney.pdf From: Sent: Monday, October 25, 202111:08 AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitnGer@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support -CUP Grandma's House of Hope Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Thank you for receiving my letter of support to Grandma's House of Hope. Roger Tierney HOUSE OE HOPE Name and Address M_I k To the Anaheim City Council, Date nc--T- 2_s , 1 I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report. I am informed and believe that a vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Signature Grandma's House of Hope is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity I Tax ID # 26-0391438 206 N State College Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806 1 P: 714.558.8600 1 F: 714.558.8613 Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 11:29 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Please approve Granma's House of Hope project in Anaheim. From: Susan Drees Kadota < Sent: Monday, October 25, 202111:16 AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please approve Granma's House of Hope project in Anaheim. Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801.1 have a beloved family member in residence in one of Grandma's House of Hope homes. I am so thankful that she found this extraordinary organization. She has truly been transformed by their program and their care. I strongly urge your approval of this new home as the women who would be served by this home are truly in need of it. Please support this project as there are so many people here in Orange County that could benefit from the care and attention that Granma's House of Hope provides to their residents. I include the text of a letter supplied by Granma's House of Hope below: I have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report. I am informed and believe that a vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Best regards and Thank you for being a light to those in need, Susan Kadota nitaylorO-anaheim.net Please cc: jkreitner(a grandmashouseofhope.org Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 11:41 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] CUP for Grandma's House project (DEV2021-06016) Attachments: Letter of Support on Appeal.pdf From: Ben Strom < Sent: Monday, October 25, 202111:30 AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: Je'net Kreitner <jenet@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] CUP for Grandma's House project (DEV2021-06016) Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello. Please see letter for support for this project attached. Thank you. Ben Best, Ben Ben Strom M: 1 Letter of Support Template 10/25/21 Ben Strom Corona del Mar, CA 92625 To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that Grandma's House of Hope has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project was in support of the CUP being approved, and that Grandma's House of Hope is quite experienced with this population and held in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. We also understand that neighbors may be cautious but this does not constitute the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled over a 6-9 month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to not follow the recommendations of the staff report. A staff member in the Anaheim Planning Department shared with GHH that the Planning Commission hands down a split decision only 10% of the time. A vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. We hope this case can be reconsidered in a thoughtful and careful process. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community, Ben Strom Jennifer L. Hall From: Le Family < Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 12:51 PM To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Jose Diaz; Gloria S. Ma'ae; Jose Moreno; Avelino Valencia; Trevor O'Neil; Nicholas J. Taylor; Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Opposition to CUP 2020-06086 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Honorable Mayor Sidhu, Mayor Pro Tem Faessel, and Council Members: We hope this message finds you well. We are writing to you in regards to CUP 2021-06106, and our opposition to the increase in residents at the property. Earlier this year, the City approved a CUP for Grandmas House of Hope in our neighborhood. Around the same time, an unlicensed drug rehab center started to operate next door to the transitional home. Since then, there has been increased traffic and increased littering. Drivers, including rideshares for participants, often speed through our neighborhood. I almost got hit by a car right in front of my house. We will never know if these are participants of the drug rehab center or GHH as there is a revolving door of strangers between the two homes, which are side by side and at the end of our cul-de-sac. There is no denying that the homeless population has increased in the City of Anaheim. GHH has told us that less than 40% of participants thrive in the program. What about the other 60+%? Are they left in the streets of Anaheim? Where do the graduates go after they finish the program, since there's a shortage of affordable housing in Orange County? Are participants originally from the City of Anaheim, or are they brought in from other cities? How many other cities does GHH operate in? How many transitional homes does GHH have in Garden Grove (Ms. Kreitner's city), and how many are in Santa Ana (GHH's headquarters)? Is the City planning to revise their policies so that different types of facilities are not right next door to each other? I'm not sure if any of you will respond back to our questions, but I hope that you consider our questions during the appeals process. Respectfully, The Le Family Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 4:05 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support: Grandma's House of Hope From: Sandy Hernandez < Sent: Monday, October 25, 20214:02 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support: Grandma's House of Hope Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Sandra Pickrell-Hernandez Anaheim, CA 92804 To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter of support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit(CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. I have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. The US Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in the sale or rental of housing, including against individuals seeking housing assistance, or other housing -related activities. The Fair Housing Act prohibits this discrimination because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability. This law was enacted to help level the field, and not allow a few immoral individuals to discriminate against their neighbors. Denying GHH's conditional use permit because my neighbors don't want those people" living in their neighborhood goes against the soul of the Fair Housing Act and goes against our very own moral and ethical obligations to serve and help out our community. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Anaheim should be the standard for all of Orange County, and we must lead the way by our passionate compassion and willingness to help or allow others to help our neighbors. Best, Sandra Pickrell-Hernandez CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE- PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL This communication and any accompanying documents are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the addressee. Ifyou received this transmission in error, you are advised that any disclosure, copying distribution, or the taking of arty action in reliance upon this communication is strictly prohibited. Ifyou have received this communication in error, please contact me at the above internet e-mail address. Thank you. Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 9:03 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support Attachments: Letter of Support_Stephania.pdf From: Stephania Ines <stephania@grandmashouseofhope.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20218:35 AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: Je'net Kreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Please see my attached letter of support for Grandma's House of Hope's Conditional Use Permit. Thank you, Stephania Ines bookkeepers Grandma's House of Hope stebhanian,szrandmashouseofhobe.orsz ate 2LI- Name and Address c To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report. I am informed and believe that a vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. se of Hope is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity 1 Tax ID # 26-0391438 4Uo M JldlC t-utiege Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806 1 P: 714.558.8600 1 r:/14.558.8613 Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 9:03 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Comment on GHH Application (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) Attachments: GHH letter to Anaheim City Council.pdf From: Ken Vargha < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20218:49 AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Comment on GHH Application (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Please see attached. Best regards. Ken Vargha Ken Vargha Anaheim, CA 92807 October 26, 2021 Anaheim City Council, I am writing this email in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have read in the OC Register about this proposal and saw that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. The issue of homelessness is complex, and the needs are immense. I believe that projects like these from reputable organizations like Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) are needed to help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim. My family and I have been involved in trying to support those struggling with homelessness in Orange County since we moved back to California in 2009 through Halcyon House, Thomas House Family Shelter, and GHH. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. Our family is pleased to be a financial supporter of GHH and the services they provide. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report. I am informed and believe that a vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 10:08 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Grandma's House of Hope From: Marissa Chery < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20219:59 AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: Je'net Kreitner <Jenet@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Grandma's House of Hope Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To Whom it May Concern, I am writing in support of Grandma's House of Hope being awarded the conditional permit for the home in Anaheim in the 600 block of North West Street. Grandma's House of Hope is a wonderful organization that provides their clients with the opportunities for not only safe housing, but to become model citizens of the community. I have personal knowledge of the clients at GHH, because I worked for them as the Manager of Corporate Relations and have visited all of the homes operated by Je'net and GHH and met all of the residents. I have always been incredibly impressed by the women in these homes and their dedication and appreciation of the community. It is my belief that denying this permit would be a mistake and have far-reaching consequences in the lives of these women, as well as in the perception and optics of the City of Anaheim during a time where inclusion is under the microscope. Thank you, Marissa Chery Jennifer L. Hall From: Kyle Bonenberger < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 10:30 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Vote no on CUP 2021-06106 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Anaheim City Council, My name is Kyle Bonenberger and I live within 500 feet of the proposed "Grandma's House of Hope" transitional home at 626 North West Street. I am a compassionate person who cares for the least in our society. I often volunteer in several different organizations who serve this population. I have even personally volunteered for Grandma's House of Hope on many occasions as an individual and with the church where I pastor, City Church. I have no question about the goodness of Grandma's House's work and my comments are no reflection upon their fantastic organization. That being the case, I am strongly opposed to this project as a resident and I urge you to vote no on CUP 2021-06106 (upholding the Planning Commission's 6-0 denial). West street and its surrounding areas are already saturated with these types of facilities. Allowing yet another one in, especially at this scope and size is effectively a stamp of approval to open the floodgates for even more. On top of that, this will embolden currently existing, unlicensed ones. More will continue to come in unbeknownst to the city and to the detriment of our good residents. West and Central Anaheim are already bearing the burden of the homeless rehabilitation/transition within our city and within Orange County as a whole. This is unfair and it is high time for other parts of Anaheim and Orange County to step up to the plate to bear the burden we already are. Thank you for listening. Kyle Bonenberger Jennifer L. Hall From: LTORGERSON@roadrunner. Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 11:03 AM To: Avelino Valencia; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Jennifer Diaz; Jose Moreno; Public Comment; Stephen Faessel; Trevor O'Neil; Gloria S. Ma'ae Subject: [EXTERNAL] CUP 2021-06106 Shelter for 20 severely disabled people Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor Sidhu and City Council Members, My husband Larry and I would like to express our strong opposition to approving the above CUP at 626 N West St. Approving a shelter for 15 "severely and persistently mentally -ill" people in a single-family residential neighborhood is incompatable with the surrounding community and inconsistent with the vision of the Anaheim Colony Historic District. We have lived in the Colony for 44 years. During that time, we have seen this particular neighborhood be subjected to quite a number of smaller, unregulated group homes. In the immediate area, there are three - by immediate, I mean next door to this property and within one block south and one block west. Luckily, a group home of this size is required to request a CUP from the city, and you all are the last line of defense. The city actually attempted to pass an ordinance this past year to regulate the saturation of group homes in this exact area. You get the idea - there are already too many here! Just because someone asks for a CUP doesn't mean it needs to be granted. And once granted, our experience has been that it is very difficult to revoke. In this case, it is the wrong use in the wrong place. Please do the right thing and deny this request. Dinah Torgerson Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 11:18 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Re: Cup Dev2021-06106 Attachments: Letter of Support on Appeal.docx From: Jay Choi < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 202110:44 AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Cup Dev2021-06106 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello, I submit my letter of support for GHH's application for the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) below. Best, Jay Grandma's House of Hope - Letter of Support 10/26/21 Jay Choi Irvine, CA 92617 To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that Grandma's House of Hope has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Furthermore, GHH already holds several CUPS with this occupancy, and higher, and have never experienced any plumbing issues that have impacted any of our neighbors. This includes a property with 13 bedrooms, 11 bathrooms with an approved capacity of 36, and another property with 11 bedrooms and 6 bathrooms with an approved capacity of 22. There is no evidence to support the Planning Commission's assertion that there is no feasible way to avoid a detrimental and adverse impact to the health and safety of the Citizens of Anaheim as it relates to the sewer system. Orange County's homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project was in support of the CUP being approved, and that Grandma's House of Hope is quite experienced with this population and held in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. It is our hope that the City Council will overturn the decision of the Planning Commission on a rare 6-0 vote on August 30, 2021. There was no opportunity offered to GHH to mitigate any circumstances that the Planning Commission were concerned about. GHH prides itself on its willingness to work with the Planning Commission, The City Council, and the good people of Anaheim with whom it shares space. I look forward to see GHH continuing the difficult work of serving a hurting community of displaced individuals and assisting Anaheim in caring for their most vulnerable. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community, Jay Choi Jennifer L. Hall From: Madison Sarti Rawuka < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 12:35 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Opposition to CEQA Categorical Exemption, Class 1 Conditional Use Permit NO. 2021-06106 Attachments: Opposition to CEQA Categorical Exemption, Class 1 Conditional Use Permit NO. 2021-06106.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello, Please see my attached response in opposition to the Conditional Use Permit NO. 2021-06106 (DEV 2021- 00122). Best regards, Madison Rawuka Resident of Anaheim. Direct 1 Dear City Council Members, My name is Madison Rawuka and I reside at in Anaheim with my husband and two children. My son attends Anaheim High School and my daughter attends Adelaide Price Elementary. I am writing to you today as a concerned resident, wife, mother, and neighbor. We are new to the area, we moved from south orange county as of July 2021, and were unaware of the first petition made on behalf of the non profit corporation, Grandma's House of Hope. Now that my family and I are settled into the neighborhood and looking to be active members of the community, I must inform you of my opposition to this request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a transitional housing facility at 626 North West Street and 945 West Pioneer Drive. I am sensitive to the needs of those who suffer from mental health disabilities as I am no stranger to their effects on a person and family. I believe what Grandma's House of Hope is trying to achieve is admirable, but speaking from experience, this neighborhood is not a proper fit for such a facility. It has been brought to our attention directly from Grandma's House of Hope, that the residents of the transitional housing tend to their own activities of daily living (ADL). The Westmont -Colony Neighborhood is home to children who walk to school every morning, whether it be to Anaheim High school, Westmont Elementary, or Adelaide Price Elementary and most of these children will be impacted on their commute by this facility. These children have a right to safely get to school without an additional distraction. Let me be transparent with my thought, If there is a resident who enjoys their morning routine, outside, as most of us do, but has a disability that may alter their word of speech, their train of thought, their ability to assess risky behavior, Grandma's House of Hope then is putting children at risk of being physically hurt, emotionally hurt, or traumatized at the hands of a resident who is left to their own daily activities. The residents of Grandma's House of Hope deserve to be treated in a controlled environment, a tranquil setting, away from distractions of a highly impacted neighborhood with a busy street such as North West Street, sounds of the daily lives of working families, school aged athletes, children playing, so they may actively work on themselves without judgment or persecution from anyone who may not understand their mental capacities. Please consider all parties involved as I believe Ms. Kreitner has not done so and is only seeking to benefit Grandma's House of Hope. Best, Madison Rawuka Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 4:17 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Your scan (Scan to My Email) Attachments: scan_bsaak_2021-10-25-12-44-35.pdf From: barbara Saak < Sent: Monday, October 25, 20214:14 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Your scan (Scan to My Email) Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. please see attached. Begin forwarded message: From: barbara Saak < Date: October 25, 2021 at 4:12:59 PM PDT To: jkreitnerggrandmas gouseifhops.org Subject: Fwd: Your scan (Scan to My Email) Begin forwarded message: From: Barbara Saak < Date: October 25, 2021 at 1:24:34 PM PDT To: Subject: FW: Your scan (Scan to My Email) From: Sent: Monday, October 25, 202112:45 PM To: Barbara Saak < Subject: Your scan (Scan to My Email) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this electronic message may be protected under the Federal regulations governing Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records, 42 C.F.R. Part 2, and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"), 45 C.F.R. Pts. 160 & 164 and cannot be disclosed without written consent unless otherwise provided for in the regulations. The Federal rules restrict any use of this information to criminally investigate or prosecute any alcohol or drug abuse patient. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All information contained herein is to be considered confidential and proprietary to American Addiction Centers, Inc. and its affiliates. Any copying, forwarding, sharing or use of this information in any manner without written permission from an authorized representative is strictly prohibited. N SOUSE-u wO 5rouseofHse„` Date Name and Address 7 To To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report. I am informed and believe that a vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Grandma's House of Hope is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity I Tax ID # 26-0391438 206 N State College Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806 1 P:714.558.8600 I F:714.558.8613 Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 4:36 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Re: Cup Dev2021-06106 Attachments: OCCF_G H H LetterofSu pport_CU P_DEV2021-06016.pdf Original Message ----- From: Cathleen Otero < Sent: Monday, October 25, 20214:26 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: Je'net Kreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Cup Dev2021-06106 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Good afternoon, Attached please find a letter to the Members of the Anaheim City Council from the Orange County Community Foundation in support of Grandma's House of Hope's proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) at 626 N. West St., Anaheim. Please feel free to contact me for any questions. Regards, Cathleen Otero Cathleen Otero Orange County Community Foundation Vice President of Donor Relations and Programs 4041 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 510 Phone: 949.553.4202, ext. 240 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Fax: 949.553.4211 https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F/2Fwww.oc- cf.org % 2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cpu bl iccom ment%40a na hei m. net%7C90a720731d 1945b76c6808d9981028bd%7C74c 3739c502a49c68d212bbc30f56f22 % 7C0%7C0%7C637708017494471680%7CU n known%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJ W Ijoi MC4 wLjAwMDAiLCJQljoiV21uMzliLCJBTi161k1haWwiLCJXVC16Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=mvKEZ%2FP9cd7gMgaggvD9urr TK% 2B2KXw5BA6kK7k8Mt6l % 3 D&amp; reserved=0<https://gccO2.safeI i n ks. protection.outlook.com/?u rl=http % 3A% 2F 2 Fwww. oc- cf.org % 2F&a m p;data=04%7C01%7Cpu bl iccom ment%40a na hei m. net%7C90a720731d 1945b76c6808d9981028bd%7C74c 3739c502a49c68d212bbc30f56f22 % 7C0%7C0%7C637708017494471680%7CU n known%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJ W Ijoi MC4 wLjAwMDAiLCJQljoiV21uMzliLCJBTi161k1haWwiLCJXVC16Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=mvKEZ%2FP9cd7gMgaggvD9urr TK%2B2KXw5BA6kK7k8Mt6l%3D&am p; reserved=0> Ora ge County CommunityFoundationFoundation October 25, 2021 RE: Grandma's House of Hope's proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) at 626 N. West St., Anaheim Dear Members of the Anaheim City Council: The Orange County Community Foundation has been actively engaged in the Anaheim community through a long history of grantmaking and leadership of the ACT Anaheim initiative founded by Disneyland Resort, Angels Baseball and the Anaheim Ducks. We remain deeply committed to strengthening the safety net that allows all Anaheim residents to thrive. I am writing in support of your Planning Department staff's recommendation for approval of the above -referenced project by Grandma's House of Hope to address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim. We believe that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has the expertise to operate this project in an effective, diligent and reputable manner. GHH's housing services, provided for the last 17 years, have earned GHH a stellar reputation with its peers and partners. Its work has resulted in four contracts with the OC Healthcare Agency (three to provide housing/services to those with a mental health diagnosis), two with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime, and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Success in moving participants to permanent housing within 12 months is 65%, among the highest in the county. The City's Planning Department staff report supported approval of the Conditional Use Permit sought by Grandma's House of Hope. The OC Healthcare Agency administers the contracts annually and holds GHH in high regard. The Orange County Community Foundation strongly encourages support of this project for the well-being of Anaheim and the broader Orange County community. Sincerely, 11 Shelley M. Hoss President & CEO 4041 MacArthur Blvd.. Suite 510 1 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Mu,% T 949-553-4202 E: infog oc-cf.org F: 949.5534211 www.oc-cf.org NNDAS` a Jennifer L. Hall From: natalie rubalcava < Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 9:19 PM To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Avelino Valencia; Jennifer Diaz; Gloria S. Ma'ae; Trevor O'Neil; Jose Moreno; Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] October 26, 2021 City Council Meeting: Agenda Item 23 Attachments: Agenda Item 23 -Oppose CUP 10-26-2021_Rubalcava.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor Sidhu and Anaheim City Council Members: I respectfully request that you accept the unanimous recommendation made by the Planning Commission and oppose the Conditional Use Permit for 626 N. West Street, agenda item 23. The proposed CUP is located in a residential neighborhood and should be denied because a 15 to 21 bed transitional housing facility is a business that changes the character of a community. During this process it has become apparent that District 3 is saturated with transitional housing facilities. As a matter of fact, city staff does not have an accurate count as to how many single-family residences are currently operating as transitional housing facilities in Anaheim. There are at least 10 in the general area of this proposed CUP. District 3 is a diverse population of predominately working-class citizens with the majority being members of the Hispanic community. Our community works hard and chooses to reside in a safe place where we can raise our families and live peaceful lives. I am extremely concerned that this type of business operation puts our community at risk and impacts the quality of life we work very hard to maintain. This single-family residence is located within 700 feet of a public high school, two elementary schools (less than 2,200 feet away) and two public parks (less than a half mile away). I absolutely support providing housing and supportive services for all vulnerable populations. However, District 3 has overwhelmingly become the community that carries an unfair burden of the responsibility for these populations. Furthermore, Grandma's House of Hope has utilized the downtown neighborhoods to grow a multi -million -dollar business, carrying the burden for all 34 cities in Orange County. Grandma's House of Hope receives large sums of taxpayer dollars from the County of Orange to provide services to the homeless population. In most cases Grandma's House of Hope clients are not residents of Anaheim. When clients fail the program, they may end up back on the streets, this time in Anaheim, which increases the number of homeless in our city. At a recent community meeting on Thursday, October 21, 2021, the CEO of Grandma's House of Hope confirmed that she chooses to have multiple business locations in District 3 so that she can use her staff at each location more efficiently, as oppose to identifying locations across the County of Orange that would be more conducive to serving the region at -large. As a 42 -year resident of the City of Anaheim I have experienced the negative impacts incompatible land uses, zoning variances, and widely allowed Conditional Use Permits have had on our community. The addition of this very large facility in an already impacted area is not good for the community. I urge you to support the unanimous decision of the Planning Commission, and prioritize Anaheim's residents and neighborhoods above all else and deny this application by Grandma's House of Hope. Thank you, Natalie Rubalcava Anaheim, CA 92805 Dear Mayor Sidhu and Anaheim City Council Members: I respectfully request that you accept the unanimous recommendation made by the Planning Commission and oppose the Conditional Use Permit for 626 N. West Street, agenda item 23. The proposed CUP is located in a residential neighborhood and should be denied because a 15 to 21 bed transitional housing facility is a business that changes the character of a community. During this process it has become apparent that District 3 is saturated with transitional housing facilities. As a matter of fact, city staff does not have an accurate count as to how many single-family residences are currently operating as transitional housing facilities in Anaheim. There are at least 10 in the general area of this proposed CUP. District 3 is a diverse population of predominately working-class citizens with the majority being members of the Hispanic community. Our community works hard and chooses to reside in a safe place where we can raise our families and live peaceful lives. I am extremely concerned that this type of business operation puts our community at risk and impacts the quality of life we work very hard to maintain. This single-family residence is located within 700 feet of a public high school, two elementary schools (less than 2,200 feet away) and two public parks (less than a half mile away). I absolutely support providing housing and supportive services for all vulnerable populations. However, District 3 has overwhelmingly become the community that carries an unfair burden of the responsibility for these populations. Furthermore, Grandma's House of Hope has utilized the downtown neighborhoods to grow a multi -million -dollar business, carrying the burden for all 34 cities in Orange County. Grandma's House of Hope receives large sums of taxpayer dollars from the County of Orange to provide services to the homeless population. In most cases Grandma's House of Hope clients are not residents of Anaheim. When clients fail the program, they may end up back on the streets, this time in Anaheim, which increases the number of homeless in our city. At a recent community meeting on Thursday, October 21, 2021, the CEO of Grandma's House of Hope confirmed that she chooses to have multiple business locations in District 3 so that she can use her staff at each location more efficiently, as oppose to identifying locations across the County of Orange that would be more conducive to serving the region at -large. As a 42 -year resident of the City of Anaheim I have experienced the negative impacts incompatible land uses, zoning variances, and widely allowed Conditional Use Permits have had on our community. The addition of this very large facility in an already impacted area is not good for the community. I urge you to support the unanimous decision of the Planning Commission, and prioritize Anaheim's residents and neighborhoods above all else and deny this application by Grandma's House of Hope. Thank you, Natalie Rubalcava Anaheim, CA 92805 Jennifer L. Hall From: Jane Gibbons < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 9:38 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] In opposition to Conditional Use Permit NO. 2021-06106 Attachments: CUP DEV2021-06016.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. For distribution to the City Council members and the Mayor. Please see attached letter in reference to the appeal of the denial of the CUP application. 10-25-21 To the Anaheim City Council My name is Jane Gibbons, I live 450 feet from the proposed location of this large transitional bridge program house, and I am writing this letter in continued opposition to the Conditional Use Permit application (DEV2021-06016) submitted by Grandma's House of Hope. The applicant, who has appealed the unanimous denial by the planning commission, has submitted a new operating agreement which is interesting in its operational changes as well as its explanations for the impact on the neighborhood. Although this revised operating agreement purports to be different in its approach and delivery, it is actually very much the same with the exception of the number of participants being 16 instead of 20 supposedly in order to bypass the need for sprinklers. This in and of itself is puzzling as the original application was firm in its statement that the number could not be reduced below 20 as the Bridge Housing Program is contracted for 20 people. Do we have any assurance that there will not be an expansion to 20+ people if the CUP is granted? It will house the same type of residents as were previously proposed, coming from the same Bridge Program location that Grandma's House of Hope wants to repurpose for an unrelated expansion, except this time they are describing the population in a more benign way by saying they have a mental health disability. This same population was described previously as having severe and persistent mental health disabilities such as depression, PTSD, Bi -polar, and Schizophrenia. This change of description seems disingenuous as the applicant seems to believe that it was her specificity as to the severity of the mental illness that was partly the reason for the denial of her CUP. She states in her submission that "the only difference in the CUP submission for this property and others, even 36 -bed program 700 feet away, is that we were specific about the population we would serve there. After providing that specificity, the Planning Commission implied that individuals with a mental health disability would have an undue and excessive need to utilize the sewer system, more than the participants that reside at our other properties." This a complete mischaracterization of the concerns expressed by the planning commission. What they were clearly expressing is a concern for the sewer capacity in the city, and that the addition of another large scale operation serving a large number of people adding a burden to the system when they wrote "the proposed project is in excess of the capacity estimated to be accommodated by the city's existing sewer infrastructure related to the public sewer and water." This is not specific to this project. I personally had to get clearance related to sewer capacity before I could start planning to build a guest house in my back yard. It's apparent that the City oversees all potential increase to the expected burden on the capacity of our sewer system and a household of 16+ people and all the ancillary staff is certainly a much higher burden in a single family home than what would be expected or planned for. The applicant attempted to minimize the impact of the proposed staffing plan on her original application and she doubles down on the minimization in the new operations agreement. The most obvious, and hard to believe statement is that these residents, with all their needs, will be served by one volunteer therapist who will be there 2-5 hours/WEEK. This very needy population will see a therapist for 20 min per week assuming the 5 hours; if the therapist is only there for 3 hours then that time is reduced to 12 minutes per week. If, as stated on the original application, the therapist will be doing group meetings as well as individual sessions then some will not have any interaction at all. This is just not believable. Stating that there should be no more than 2-3 staff members at any one time is also not believable based on the population being served. It seems to me that the applicant has retooled the description of her operation to describe a pared down operation in order to obtain approval. She has expressed her surprise at the result of the hearing in front of the planning commission, having stated that she has never been denied in the past. She has now essentially used the hearing in front of the planning commission as a trial balloon and has made the changes on paper that she sees as the road to approval of her appeal. I, for one, do not believe that these changes are meant for the long haul, but rather are just meant to get the approval before launching into an expansion of services as that has been her practice in the past and she will need to get to that 20 person contracted number for her Bridge Program contract at the very least. If the City Council decides that you believe these proposed changes to be true, and you vote to overturn a thoughtful and considered unanimous decision by the planning commission, then I strongly suggest that you prevent the predictable next steps by the applicant and condition the approval on no increases in residents served at this location, the random audit of actual staff size and impact to the neighborhood based on on-site staff at any given time, as well as a demand for an actual professional staff member on-site 24 hours rather than their cost-saving model of deputizing a program resident as responsible enough to oversee this population after hours. If the community leader is a long term resource- needing resident of one of GHH's programs then they are not prepared to make decisions related to a mentally ill population on their own. Although they defend this model of staffing it is ludicrous on its face and they, and all of us, are just lucky that there have been no reported adverse events. Respectfully, Jane Gibbons Anaheim, 92805 Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 7:53 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support for GHH (CUP) DEV2021-06016 Attachments: GHH Support Letter.docx From: Ms. Jackson < Sent: Monday, October 25, 20215:26 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support for GHH (CUP) DEV2021-06016 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello, Please see my attached letter of support for GHH. Thank you, Ms. Jackson June Jackson Anaheim, CA 92805 SUBJECT: Letter of Support for GHH-(CUP) Conditional Use Permit (DEV2021-06016) Dear City of Anaheim Commissioner's, I have been a resident of the City of Anaheim for 5 -years. As a concerned resident of the City of Anaheim, I am submitting this letter of support of (GHH) Grandmas House of Hope and the proposed (CUP) Conditional Use Permit (DEV2021-06016) for the property located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 understand initially, the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for this proposed project. However, later learned there is opposition from the neighbors regarding this project. GHH is doing a great work within our community They have provided housing services for the past 17 -years which has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work and dedication have resulted in four contracts with the Orange County HealthCare Agency (3 -of these provide housing and services to those with (mental health diagnosis) -2 with CALOES in Sacramento for victims of Crimes and CESH Funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their proving success record is 65% of their participants are later moved to permanent housing, which is the highest in the country. This speaks volumes. The homeless population is truly diverse and GHH services all individuals, including those with mental illness who are the most vulnerable; not to mention shunned. There are further stigmas and a lot of misinformation surrounding mental illness; although, GHH is quite experienced in dealing with this population. This is further held in highest regard by the OC Health Care Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the programs annually. GHH should be commended for the great work they are doing in the community. Lastly, the opposition from neighbor's blatant statements that "they don't want these people in their neighborhood" (verbatim.) These people meaning people with "mental illnesses" which amounts to housing discrimination. After the City of Anaheim staffs report (recommended approval) the commissioner's denied the approval by a 6-0 vote. This is clearly almost unheard of, is a red flag and one can extrapolate that something more is taking place regarding the commissioner's denial. While the neighbor's opposition is a bit more understandable due to them being uninformed yet unacceptable. I would hate to think the City of Anaheim Commissioners are supporting/condoning the neighbors' sentiment. I strongly support the stated proposed (CUP) Conditional Use Permit and strongly ask that you support this project which will show the City of Anaheim support and awareness of needed housing for the above- mentioned population. Thank you in advance for your support. Respectfully, Ms. Jackson Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 7:53 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] (Amended) Letter of Support for GHH-(CUP) (DEV2021-06016) Attachments: GHH Support Letter.docx From: Ms. Jackson < Sent: Monday, October 25, 20216:56 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] (Amended) Letter of Support for GHH-(CUP) (DEV2021-06016) Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Letter amended to include the date. Ms. Jackson June Jackson Anaheim, CA 92805 October 25, 2021 SUBJECT: (Amended) Letter of Support for GHH-(CUP) Conditional Use Permit (DEV2021-06016) Dear City of Anaheim Commissioner's, I have been a resident of the City of Anaheim for 5 -years. As a concerned resident of the City of Anaheim, I am submitting this letter of support of (GHH) Grandmas House of Hope and the proposed (CUP) Conditional Use Permit (DEV2021-06016) for the property located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 understand initially, the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for this proposed project. However, later learned there is opposition from the neighbors regarding this project. GHH is doing a great work within our community They have provided housing services for the past 17 -years which has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work and dedication have resulted in four contracts with the Orange County HealthCare Agency (3 -of these provide housing and services to those with (mental health diagnosis) -2 with CALOES in Sacramento for victims of Crimes and CESH Funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their proving success record is 65% of their participants are later moved to permanent housing, which is the highest in the country. This speaks volumes. The homeless population is truly diverse and GHH services all individuals, including those with mental illness who are the most vulnerable; not to mention shunned. There are further stigmas and a lot of misinformation surrounding mental illness; although, GHH is quite experienced in dealing with this population. This is further held in highest regard by the OC Health Care Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the programs annually. GHH should be commended for the great work they are doing in the community. Lastly, the opposition from neighbor's blatant statements that "they don't want these people in their neighborhood" (verbatim.) These people meaning people with "mental illnesses" which amounts to housing discrimination. After the City of Anaheim staffs report (recommended approval) the commissioner's denied the approval by a 6-0 vote. This is clearly almost unheard of, is a red flag and one can extrapolate that something more is taking place regarding the commissioner's denial. While the neighbor's opposition is a bit more understandable due to them being uninformed yet unacceptable. I would hate to think the City of Anaheim Commissioners are supporting/condoning the neighbors' sentiment. I strongly support the stated proposed (CUP) Conditional Use Permit and strongly ask that you support this project which will show the City of Anaheim support and awareness of needed housing for the above- mentioned population. Thank you in advance for your support. Respectfully, Ms. Jackson Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 7:53 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Support from OC Community Foundation Attachments: OCCF_Shelly Hoss CEO.pdf From: Je'net Kreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Sent: Monday, October 25, 20217:48 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net>; Ted White <TedWhite@anaheim.net> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Support from OC Community Foundation Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Blessings, Please make sure this letter gets to all the Council Members as soon as possible today. We will be reading this at the City Council meeting tomorrow JE'NET KREITNER Founder, Chief Executive Officer 1 GRANDMA'S HOUSE OF HOPE o) 714. 558.8600 ext. 100 1(c) I tenet@grandmashouseofhope.org Connect with us Linkedln I Twitter I YouTube I Instagram Website: www.grandmashouseofhope.org CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Information contained in this message and any attachments is intended only for the addressee(s). If you believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic mail and please delete the original without further review, disclosure, or copying. Ora ge County CommunityFoundationFoundation October 25, 2021 RE: Grandma's House of Hope's proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) at 626 N. West St., Anaheim Dear Members of the Anaheim City Council: The Orange County Community Foundation has been actively engaged in the Anaheim community through a long history of grantmaking and leadership of the ACT Anaheim initiative founded by Disneyland Resort, Angels Baseball and the Anaheim Ducks. We remain deeply committed to strengthening the safety net that allows all Anaheim residents to thrive. I am writing in support of your Planning Department staff's recommendation for approval of the above -referenced project by Grandma's House of Hope to address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim. We believe that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has the expertise to operate this project in an effective, diligent and reputable manner. GHH's housing services, provided for the last 17 years, have earned GHH a stellar reputation with its peers and partners. Its work has resulted in four contracts with the OC Healthcare Agency (three to provide housing/services to those with a mental health diagnosis), two with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime, and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Success in moving participants to permanent housing within 12 months is 65%, among the highest in the county. The City's Planning Department staff report supported approval of the Conditional Use Permit sought by Grandma's House of Hope. The OC Healthcare Agency administers the contracts annually and holds GHH in high regard. The Orange County Community Foundation strongly encourages support of this project for the well-being of Anaheim and the broader Orange County community. Sincerely, 11 Shelley M. Hoss President & CEO 4041 MacArthur Blvd.. Suite 510 1 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Mu,% T 949-553-4202 E: infog oc-cf.org F: 949.5534211 www.oc-cf.org NNDAS` a Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 7:53 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support on Appeal Attachments: Letter of Support on Appeal.docx From: Sent: Monday, October 25, 202111:54 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support on Appeal Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. I have attached my "Letter of Support on Appeal" to this email. Thank you! Kangdi Cheng UC Irvine, School of Law Letter of Support Date October 25, 2021 Name Kangdi Cheng Address Irvine, CA, 92617 To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. I am an international student at UC Irvine, but I am equally concerned as my Anaheim local peers for the plight of those living on the streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed. One of the very reasons I came to the US, especially to California, for my study is that I admire how this land tries to respect and protect the rights of the few, the weak, the discriminated, the disadvantaged and marginalized individuals, even at times when it might come in conflict with some of the majority's best interests. It is within this community's power and long-term interest to act to assist those in need. By supporting Grandma's House of Hope, the community could help preserve the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The world, including this community, have witnessed the 2008 financial crisis and the 2020 COVID-19's impacts on everyone. A middle-class family could easily become broke in such an unexpected crisis and joined the homeless on the streets. Helping them to have a transitional place is building a safety net for future crises for the community. More importantly, it is building trust and care among all people of the community. The housing services that Grandma's House of Hope has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. The homeless population here is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness, and it concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. Therefore, I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping the community, Signature Kangdi Cheng Jennifer L. Hall From: Michelle Murphy <MichelleM@UnitedWayOC.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 2:43 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor; Public Comment Cc: jkreitner@g rand mashouseofhope.org; Becks Heyhoe Subject: EXTERNAL] Support Cup Dev2021-06106 Attachments: GHH Support Ltr on Appeal 10.25.21.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Good Afternoon, Attached, please find Orange County United Way's letter of support for the Conditional Use Permit Dev2021-06106. Please let me know if you have any questions or require any follow-up. Thanks so much - Michelle Murphy, MSW Director, Public Affairs Orange County United Way 18012 Mitchell South, Irvine, CA 92614 Email: Michel leM @UnitedWavOC.ore Office: 949. 263.6110 Cell: Twitter @mawynneOCUW 1 Orange County United Way October 25, 2021 City of Anaheim City Council 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 7th Floor Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Conditional Use Permit (DEV2021-06016) Dear Anaheim City Council: 18012 Mitchell South 949.660.7600 Irvine, CA 92614 UnitedWayOC.org Orange County United Way is writing in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. We continue to support projects that would help address homelessness in Anaheim. Our homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most at -risk and need of support. There is a considerable amount of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness, and Grandma's House of Hope is quite experienced in working with this vulnerable population. It is our understanding that the CPU was originally supported by staff and Orange County United Way strongly supports staff's recommendations on this project as part of our County's systemic approach to ending homelessness for vulnerable communities. Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Michelle Murphy, MSW Director, Public Affairs WE FIGHT FOR THE EDUCATION, HEALTH, HOUSING AND FINANCIAL STABILITY OF EVERY PERSON IN ORANGE COUNTY. Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:22 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Help Grandma's House of Hope From: Je'net Kreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20213:15 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Help Grandma's House of Hope Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Forwarded message --------- From: Linda May < Date: Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:55 PM Subject: Help Grandma's House of Hope To: <councilganaheim.ne > Cc: <jkreitner(c grandmashouseofhope.org>, <admin(cr,voiceofoc.org> Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, I am writing to request that you support the efforts of Grandma's House of Hope. I am just now getting to know them and from what I see, it is a worthwhile, well run, fiscally responsible, caring program that will provide urgent services to homeless older women. You are facing a lot of opposition from people, some of whom are very powerful, who don't want this in "their neighborhood". That is a short sighted, uninformed, selfish stance. For all of you who claim to care about homelessness in Anaheim, now is the time to prove it. Support supportive housing for homeless older women. Support Grandma's House of Hope. Linda May Director of GrassRoots Organizers, member Lavender Democrats of Orange County, founder Orange County Equality Coalition, et al Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:23 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Please see attached Letter of Support Attachments: Document_2021-10-26_143918.pdf From: Jennifer Kreitner <jen@grandmashouseofhope.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20212:43 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please see attached Letter of Support Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Please read the attached Letter of Support for Grandma's House of Hope. All the best, Jennifer Kreitner Letter of Support 10/26/2021 Jennifer Gray Kreitner To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that Grandma's House of Hope has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project was in support of the CUP being approved, and that Grandma's House of Hope is quite experienced with this population and held in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6-9 month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to not follow the recommendations of the staff report. A staff member in the Anaheim Planning Department shared with GHH that the Planning Commission hands down a split decision only 10% of the time.. A vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community, Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:23 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter for Anaheim City Council Attachments: [U ntitled].pdf From: Swoboda, Jennifer@CDCR <Jennifer.Swoboda@cdcr.ca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20212:35 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter for Anaheim City Council Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hi, I know this was due by 2, hope it is not too late... Jennifer Swoboda, MS Parole Agent II Specialist, Adult Programs Unit South Coast District 18002 Sky Park Circle, Irvine, CA 92614 949) 863-1478 x333 From: DAPO-SR-Irvine-183139@cdcr.ca.gov <DAPO-SR-Irvine-183139@cdcr.ca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20213:24 PM To: Swoboda, Jennifer@CDCR <Jennifer.Swoboda@cdcr.ca.gov> Subject: 1 Parole Agent Specialist Jennifer Swoboda South Coast Parole District, Anaheim Office 2911 E. Coronado St., Anaheim CA 92806. October 26, 2021 Dear Anaheim City Council, I hope you take into consideration the.importance of public safety when considering allowing.a home in your area for homeless women. While many in the corn munitymay view this type of home as a risk, speaking from a law enforcement point of view, it is much more dangerous to have homeless people in the community remain homeless and/or unhoused. The parole.offices in Anaheim and Irvine have worked with staff and residents form other homes run by the Grandma's House of Hope organization and we know this: organization is very we11 run and responsible in their oversight of all their homes a.nd the people living there. I hope you consider allvwirng a. home in your area for homeless women and their children, as this is the most prudent thing to do for public safety and the most ethical thing to do as human beings.. Sincerely; 3 Jennifer Swoboda Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:24 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support for Grandma's House of Hope Attachments: Jacob Britton - Letter of Support on Appeal.docx From: Jacob Britton < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20211:58 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support for Grandma's House of Hope Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To whom it may concern, I am Jacob Britton, a law student at UC -Irvine, and I have attached my letter in support of the approval of Grandma's House of Hope. Thank you for your consideration. Best, Jacob Letter of Support October 26, 2021 Jacob Britton Irvine, CA 92617 To the Anaheim City Council, I am a first-year law student at the University of California -Irvine, and I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. As someone who himself lives with mental health issues, it is personally important to me that anyone with such issues can be housed in safety and dignity. The housing services that Grandma's House of Hope has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project was in support of the CUP being approved, and that Grandma's House of Hope is quite experienced with this population and held in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying that they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6-9 month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to not follow the recommendations of the staff report. A staff member in the Anaheim Planning Department shared with GHH that the Planning Commission hands down a split decision only 10% of the time. A vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Thank you for your attention. Jacob Britton Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:24 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support for Grandma's House of Hope Attachments: 1897_001.pdf From: Arnie Raiger < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20211:49 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support for Grandma's House of Hope Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello, Please see attached letter of support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit for Grandma's House of Hope. Best regards, Amie Raiger Arnie Raiger 949.375.4171 thebestofnewport. net DRE#01513604 PR0PFRTIF ' 1400 Newport Center Drive • Suite 100 • Newport Beach, CA 92660•DRE#01778230 Of 00n) (O 1 10/26/2021 Amie Raiger 1400 Newport Center Dr. Newport Beach, Ca To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that Grandma's House of Hope has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project was in support of the CUP being approved, and that Grandma's House of Hope is quite experienced with this population and held in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6-9 month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to not follow the recommendations of the staff report. A staff member in the Anaheim Planning Department shared with GHH that the Planning Commission hands down a split decision only 10% of the time.. A vote of 6- 0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community, Signature Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:24 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support Grandma's House of Hope Attachments: 20211026122249_001.pdf From: Efrain Lopez-Casarreal <efrain@grandmashouseofhope.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20211:41 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: Je'net Kreitner <jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support Grandma's House of Hope Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello Nick Taylor, Please see my letter of support for Grandma's House of Hope. Efrain Lopez Case Manager Grandma's House ofHope efrain .grandmashouseofhope.org Name and Address } i( l ` __- 't aab rl. 54. 1, Ule,,, 4,D CA clJOCI& To the Anaheim City Council, Date am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope (GHH) has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that GHH has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and GHH serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision-making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project supported approval of the CUP, and that GHH is quite experienced with this population and the County holds it in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying, they "don't want these people" in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6 -9 -month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to reject the recommendations of the staff report. I am informed and believe that a vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community. Si Lure Grandma's House of Hope is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity I Tax ID # 26-0391438 206 N State College Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806 1 P: 714.558.8600 I F: 714.558.8613 Jennifer L. Hall From: Je'net Kreitner <jkreitner@g rand mashouseofhope.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:37 PM To: Michelle Murphy Cc: Nicholas J. Taylor; Public Comment; Becks Heyhoe Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Support Cup Dev2021-06106 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Thank you so much Michelle I had received a different response from Becks so this is very very much appreciated. GHH values our relationship with United Way. You were very instrumental in our growth and success:) I will be handing this directly to the City Council and Mayor with our support letters from Sisters of St Joseph Regina Fox), OCCF (Shelly Hoss) , Dayle Macintosh Center (Ruth Cho) and about 50 other letters of Support. Keep a good thought for us tonight! JEINET KREITNER Founder, Chief Executive Officer 1 GRANDMA'S HOUSE OF HOPE o) 714. 558.8600 ext. 100 1(c) I tenet@grandmashouseofhope.org Connect with us Linkedln I Twitter I YouTube I Instagram Website: www.grandmashouseofhope.org CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Information contained in this message and any attachments is intended only for the addressee(s). If you believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic mail and please delete the original without further review, disclosure, or copying. On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:42 PM Michelle Murphy <MichelleM(cr,unitedwayoc.org> wrote: Good Afternoon, Attached, please find Orange County United Way's letter of support for the Conditional Use Permit Dev2021- 06106. Please let me know if you have any questions or require any follow-up. Thanks so much- Michelle Murphy, MSW Director, Public Affairs Orange County United Way 18012 Mitchell South, Irvine, CA 92614 Email: Miche11eNlgUnitedWay0C.org Office: 949.263.6110 Cell: Twitter @mawynneOCUW Jennifer L. Hall From: Alissa Fernandez < Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:43 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Grandma's House of Hope Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Honorable Mayor and City Council, I am a lifetime resident of Anaheim and currently earning my doctorate in Clinical Psychology who has spent extensive time working with those who are severely and persistently mentally ill. I urge you to allow for "Grandma's House of Hope" to be able to operate in the 600 block of North West Street so that we may be able to help some of the most vulnerable members of our community. As representatives of our community, I urge you not to allow for stigma and bias to influence your decision in the placement of the facility. The false narratives of danger and violence that are being perpetuated by other members of the community, as their reason for not wanting the facility near their home, is a clear sign that they are misinformed on the population that will be receiving treatment in that home. There has been substantial research done on the rate of violence perpetuated by those who are severely mentally ill, it is substantially lower than the rate of violence perpetrated by those with no mental illness. In fact, those who are mentally ill are almost 3x as likely to be a victim of a violent act than those who do not suffer with a mental illness (NIH, 2003). Please understand that those who would be living in the vicinity of the facility are significantly greater risk of being a victim of a violent act by someone with no mental illness at their local shopping mall, than they would be with this facility in their neighborhood. Without facilities such as this one in our own communities, we will never be able to solve the growing number of those experiencing homelessness. These are human beings with hearts and dreams and opinions. These are individuals with thoughts and a name, they have foods they like, they have activities they enjoy. These are not nameless shadows, we are talking about human lives and those who have been repeatedly marginalized by society. We have no room in our community for bias and stigma, or this type of hateful outcry over a treatment facility for those who need a community to rally on their behalf. I urge you to not perpetuate the cycle of hate, the opportunity is in your hands to begin breaking the cycle, or to continue it, please make the right choice and break the cycle. Sincerely, Alissa https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1525086/ violence by asking three questions: Are the mentally... Jennifer L. Hall From: Nicholas 1. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 5:55 PM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support on Appeal Attachments: Letter of Support on Appeal.docc From: Sameer Khan ' ----- Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 20215:53 PM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Cc: jkreitner@grandmashouseofhope.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of Support on Appeal Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. This email contains my support for the Grandma's House of Hope appeal. Thank you very much. Sameer Khan Letter of Support Template 1012612021 Sameer Khan Orange, CA To the Anaheim City Council, I am writing this letter in support of Grandma's House of Hope and the proposed Conditional Use Permit (DEV2021-06016) located at 626 N. West St., Anaheim, CA 92801. 1 have been informed that the Planning Department Staff Report recommended approval for the proposed project. I believe that this project would help address the homelessness crisis facing Anaheim, and that Grandma's House of Hope has and will operate this project in a reputable and considerate manner. As someone who is concerned for the plight of those living on our streets, many with mental health challenges that have never been diagnosed, I know action must be taken to assist those in need and end the cycle of homelessness. By doing so, we are enhancing our community by preserving the dignity of all people and their right to be fairly housed without discrimination. The housing services that Grandma's House of Hope has provided for the last 17 years has earned them an excellent reputation with their peers and partners. Their hard work has resulted in 4 contracts with the Orange County Healthcare Agency (3 of these to provide housing and services to those with a mental health diagnosis), 2 with CALOES in Sacramento for Victims of Crime and CESH funding to provide housing and services for victims of domestic violence. Their success in moving their participants to Permanent Housing within 12 months is 65%, which is among the highest in the county. Our homeless population is diverse, and Grandma's House of Hope serves all individuals, including those with mental illness, who are often the most vulnerable. There is a lot of stigma and misinformation surrounding mental illness; and I would be very discouraged to know that discrimination had any place in the decision -making process of the Anaheim City Council. I understand that the staff report for this project was in support of the CUP being approved, and that Grandma's House of Hope is quite experienced with this population and held in high regard with the OC Healthcare Agency, who administers the contract for these services and audits the program annually. Neighbors saying they "don't want these people' in their neighborhood is not the standard to deny a project or dismiss the Planning Department Staff Report, which is assembled thoughtfully and in great detail over a 6-9 month time frame. It is rare for the commissioners to not follow the recommendations of the staff report. A staff member in the Anaheim Planning Department shared with GHH that the Planning Commission hands down a split decision only 10% of the time.. A vote of 6-0 to deny is almost unheard of when the Staff Report has recommended approval. It concerns me that this decision was based on discriminatory comments from protesters at the hearing. I strongly ask that you support this project and be instrumental in helping our community, Sameer Khan