59R-5671
RESOLUTION NOo 5671
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANMIEIM GRANTING A VARIANCE (NO. 1170).
"*
WHEREAS. the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from the prop-
erty owner and/or purchaser of certain real prop-
erty situated in the City of Anaheim. County of Orange, State of
California. described as follows:
Lots 4 to 8, both inc1usiv~. of Block G of the New
Subdivision of Vineyard Lot D-5. in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as
shown on a map filed in Book 17, Page 72 of Misce1-
1 aneous Records of Los Ange 1 e s County, Ca1 !forn ia.
AND WHEREAS. the City Planning Commission did hold a pub-
lic hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said peti-
tion on November 16. 19'59 , notices of which said public
hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of
Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS. said Commission. after due inspection. investiga-
tion and studies made by itself and in its behalf and after due
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
did adopt its Resolution Noo 112 . recommending to the City Coun-
cil of the City of Anaheim that Variance No. -1170 be granted upon
t'c1e conditions stated in said resolution; and
WHEREAS. the City Council does find that:
10 There are exceptional or extraordinary circum-
stances or conditions applicable to the property
involved or to the intended use of the property
that do not apply generally to the property or
class of use in the same vicinity and zoneo
2. That such a variance is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone and denied to the property in
questIon.
3. That t'c1e granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
4. That the granting of such variance will not ad-
versely affect the comprehensive general zoning
plan 0
NOW TFffiREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and the
same is hereby granted to THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY
112S Ninth Avenue, San Diego 1, California, to construct an additionai
building west of U:e existing central office building at 217 North
Lemon Street, with off-street parl{ing as required by the Anaheim
-1-
--~"----'~'",-----, ----.".,,~ '""-"-"'"--~~----"-,"""...,-"....,."._",..,...,~~
IVlur.icipal Code, on the property hereinabove described, subject
tc the followinr condltions:
1. Tr'at the sidewalks along Clementine and Chartres Streets
be replaced as required by the City of Anaheim and in
accordance with standard specifications of the City.
(2. That the owner of subject property pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum 0:' $2.00 per front foot for street light-
ing purposes.
3. That a wall of a maximum height of 42 inches, except for
a stepdO\,y;l adjacent to dr iveways and other open ings, be
erectc'l alone; the west prDperty I ine, commencing at the
south side of t,e proposed alley along the north properly
I in:::, 2nd continuinc, except for driveways, to the west
I ine of the parJdnq entrance on the south property 1 ine,
apprJxi~ately 2J feet from the southwest corner of sub-
ject pr'opert.'l,
4. That the final building and landscaping plans be sub-
mitted to and approved by the City Council before any
building permit is issued.
5. That the proposed development of subject property shall
cnmmence within two years from date hereof.
6. That the stipulations with reference to parking set forth
in a letter from The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph
Company to the Honorable City Council, City of Anaheim,
dated December 3, 19S9, which lett~r and attachments
mentioned tlJ,~r8in are on file with the City of Anaheim,
be inc~rporat8d her2in and made a part hereof, by refer-
ence, the same as if set forth in full herein, and that
all voluntary agreements to be performed by the appli-
cant as contained therein are hereby made conditions to
the ~1ranting of this variance to be performed in con-
nection herewith.
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revol{e
s1.1ch var'iance permit for good cause or failure of said owner, its
success)!'s or assigns, to comply with the Anaheim JVJunicipal Code
and regulations and the conditions herein. Said variance is
granlRd for the t'?rm prescribed by the Anaheim Municipal Code
unless otherwise speci~ied herein.
THE PUHEr10ING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this /jth day of December, 19S9.
..\J-'~
JVIAk~ OF. t CI~ OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
~ -/d --./ ;T~.
~.R_ //'(.~..... .e
1 CLERK OF TH~ C1 0 pJlPJ-i"E~M
-.::::-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim; do
hereby certify that the foregoirrg resolution was introduced and
adopted at a regular meeting provided by law of the City Council
of the City of Anaheim, held on the 8th day of December, 1959,
by the following vote;
AYES:
NBJES;
COUNCILMEN: 6ry~sPearson, Thompson and Schutte.
COUNCILMEN; None.
ABSENT; COUNCTLMEN; Coons.
AND I FURTHER CERTIFYd that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim
approved and signed said resolution on the 8th day of Decemb~r, 1959.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, r have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 8th day of December,
1959.
L /x~ a~~~~.~
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
( SEAL)
~.-,... .,."~,---."-".--'_..---- .- ""'_..-'-' ","-.-..--........, ._~.._...~~.-...-.-.,-...~,,~. -_.,,_...,,~.--