86R-042
RESOLUTION NO. 86R-42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 3524.
WHEREAS, after a request for variance by AHMED
JAHANPANAH, et al., 520 North Rexford Drive, Beverly Hills,
California 90210, owner, and MAGDY HANNA, 4000 MacArthur
Boulevard, #680, Newport Beach, California 92660, agent, was
received, a public hearing before the Planning Commission of the
City of Anaheim was held upon due and proper notice, a result of
which Variance No. 3524 was denied covering the following
described property:
A PORTION OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 17 OF A SUBDIVISION OF THE
SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 21, IN TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE
10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS BOLSAS, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER
MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51 PAGE 7 AND FOLLOWING
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, AND AS SHOWN ON A MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 1 PAGE 33 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7;
THENCE NORTH 00 49' 20" EAST 669.60 FEET ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 890 43' 50" EAST 339.00 FEET ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTH 00 33' 10" WEST
668.87 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE
NORTH 890 51' 10" WEST 340.40 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH
LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THE WEST 150.00 FEET THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 300.00 FEET THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED 4/5THS INTEREST IN
THE SOUTH 50.00 FEET OF THE EAST 12.5 FEET OF SAID
LAND; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party or the City Council, on its own motion, caused
the review of said Planning Commission action at a public hearing
noticed and held as prescribed by law and, as a result thereof,
the City Council does hereby make the following findings:
1. That there no special circumstances applicable to the
property which do not apply to other property in the same vicinity
and zone.
2. That strict application of the zoning code does not
deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in
the same vicinity and zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that said Variance be, and the same is hereby,
denied.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the time within which
rehearings must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section
1.12.100 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and the time within which
judicial review of final decisions must be sought is governed by
Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Anaheim City
Council Resolution No. 79R-524.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 28th day of January, 1986.
MAY~ tZ~M
ATTEST:
~&L 7(~
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
JWF : fm
4892M
-2-
CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SSe
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 86R-42 was introduced and adopted at a special
meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 28th day of January, 1986, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt and Pickler
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Bay and Roth
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 86R-42 on the 28th day of January, 1986.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 28th day of January, 1986.
~q~~
CITY CLERK F THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 86R-42 duly passed and adopted
by the Anaheim City Council on January 28, 1986.
~~?t~
CITY CLERK