Loading...
59R-5436 RESOLUTION NO. 5436 A RESOLUTION OF' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1126. .- WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from Juanita Mills. owner of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: Let 26 of Tract No. 2373, as showTI on a map recorded in Beok 68, Pages 17 and 18 of 11iscellaneous Haps, records of Orange County, California. AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission hearing at the City Hall In the City of Anaheim on 19 59 , notices of which said public hearing were quired by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17 Municipal Code, and did hold a public July 11 , duly given as re= of the Anaheim WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf. and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 8 Series 19 ~9-60 , granting Variance No. 1126 Upor~ the conditions set forth therein , and WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from the date of the adoption of said resolution. a written appeal was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting the action of the City Planning Commission grantin~~ said variance. and said appeal was set for pub 1 ic hear ing on August 16 , 19 C;g , at 7 ~oo o'clock P.Mo at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was duly given as required by law and the prOVi- sions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code~ and WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council does find and de~ termlne tha t: /,-,,- 1. There is no substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied the subject property. 20 It appears that the subject property can be adequately developed and used under the present zone. ~ l'~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commission grantlng VariancE; No. 1126 to Ju&rSta Hills, 1068 Lomita Street, Anaheim, CalLfornia, to permit the operation of' a beauty shop in tL') home located on the propert:l hereinabove described, and the "r!~ction or a 2' x':' lawn sign on sa.id property, be and the same ,::: LersGJ dL;aplirov8d, fin(}. that Var18LCc Ne. 1126 be and the same is hereby denjed. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this 18th day of A.u~ust , 19 :~q . MAYOa J'e 1)1 J~ ;:; C . ... LERa TH~~~m~ STATE OF CAL I FORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ) sSG ) I, DENE M. WILLIAMS. City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted a~ an adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on the loth day of ~Ugust 9 19~9 , by the following vote of the members thereo ~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ BOP-DEN, COONS, FRY, PEARSON AND SCHUTTE NOES ~ COUNCILMEN ~ NONE ABSENT ~ COUNC ILMEN ~ HONS AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on the 12th day of August 19 59 . , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I the seal of the City of Anaheim 19 59 . have hereunto set my hand and affixed this 18th day of August , ....-- LA- :N. ~~:,_____ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. ( SEAL ) =2=