57R-4194
;-"'
RESOLUTION NO. 4194
A RESOLUTION OF THEOITY OOUICIL OF THE OITY
or ANAHEIM DENYIIG VARIANCE NO! 846.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Co.-18sion ot the City ot
Anaheim did reoeive a petition trom the owner ot certa1n real
property Ii tuated in the Oi ty ot Anaheim, County ot OraJige, State
ot Oalitornia, described as tollows:
T.e :lut 75 teet ot the Horth 240 teet ot the
Northeut quarter ot the lortbwest quarter ot
the lortheast ,.arter ot Seotion 22, Township
4 South, Elange 10 West, San Bernardin~ Base
dd Meridian.
(Said property is looated at 222 West Ball Road,
Anabei., Oal1tornia.)
AID WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissi.n did h.old a
pUbl1c hearing at the Oi ty Ball ift the City ot .!nahe1ll Oft Ootober "(,
1951, notioes ot whioh said public hearing were duly give., as
re,uired ~y law and the provisions ot Section 92GO.17 ot the
Aa&heim K\U1ioipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Coamission, atter clue ln-
speotion, investigation and studie. ..ae by itselt and in its
behalt, &ad atter due consideration ot all evidenoe aad reports
ottered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 80 -- Serles
1957"58, reoolllllending that Varidce No. 846 be deaied; 8.Rd
WHEBEAB, thereafter, within twenty (20) days troll the
date ot the adoptio. ot said resolution a wri'tten a,ppeal was tiled
with the City Council of the Oity ot Anaheim protesting the action
of the Oity PlanniRg CO_is8ion 4eaylng said variance, and said
appeal was. set for public hearing on the 5th day ot Nove.ber, 1957,
at "(:00 o'olock P.M., in the Oity Hall in the Oity of Anabei., and
notioe of suoh public hearing vas duly given as required by law and
the provisiQns ot Secticn 9200.17 ot the AnaBelm Municipal Cede; and
WllEBEAS, at the time and place fixed tor said pub110
hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such pub11c
hearing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity
to be heard; and
WHEREAS, atter due investigation and studies lllade 8Y
itself and 1n its behalt, and atter due oonsideration ot all the
evidence and reports oftered at said hearing, the City Council does
tind that:
."-"
1. There is no substantial property right
posselsed by other property in the saae
vicinity and zone and denied the subjeot
property.
2. It appears that the subject property CaR
be adequately developed and used under
the present zOlle.
-1.-
-
HOY, THERErORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City COWlel1 of
the Clty of Anahelm that the ~ctlon ot the Clty Plannlng Oo..lssloft
denylng Varlance lIo. 846 reCluestlng permission te convert a portlon
ot the exlstlng house on the property Mre1nabove a._scrlDed to an
offlce for the practloe of Publlc Aocountanoy be, and the same ls
hereby sustained, and that Varlance No. 8~ be, and the 88JIUII ls
hereby. denled.
THE rOREGOIHG RESOLUTIOH 18 approved and 81glll.ed by..
this 5th 4a1 of Rove.ber, 1'51.
~~
R 'OF THE. OI'!'Y OF AI.Am:IX -,
ATTEST:
~~?1F ~~~6~F~AWiIx
ft.ATE OF O.ALIFORllIA. )
CCUI!Y or ORANGE ) 88.
01 TY OF AlABi:IX )
I, DERE K. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the Clty of Anaheim,
do hereby certlfy that,th. feregoing r.solutlolll. Was lntroduo.d and
adoptecl at all adJournecl regular. ..etlng provlclecl iy law of the
Clty Clondl of tile Clty of ARal!leill, lleld on the 5tl'l ~ tlf
Hov..ber, 1957, by the followlng vote:
.AYES: OOUHCILKEN: Pearsoll, OOORS, Fry, Sohutte 8Jld
Wlsser.
NOES: OOUlICILMElf: lone.
.AlSEI'f: COUICiLMEN: ITone.
AID I rtlRTllER CERTIn that the Hayor of the CUy of
Anaa.iIl approved and slgned said resolutlon on the 5th da1 of
loneer, 19.57.
II WI'1'RESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set .., l'Iaacl ....
affixed the offlclal ..al of the C1 ty of Anahd. this 5th day of
ITovellber, 19.57.
L ~)n. 2)::---- -~
OIn ClLERX OF '1'HE~ or DAHEIK
( SE.AL)
/"--""
-2-