57R-4075
RESOLUTION NO. 4075
~.
A RESOLU'rION OF ':rRE CITY COUNCIL OF 'l'RE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, VARI-
ANCE 1\10. 799.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition from the owners of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, described as follows:
The South 355 feet of Lot 23 of the Anaheim
Investment Company's 'I'ract, as shown on a map
thereof recorded in Book 7, Pages 33 and 34,
Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County,
California.
Excepting therefrom the South 200.00 feet of
the West 200.00 feet (measured from the center
lines of streets adjoining on the South and
We s t ) .
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on the
5th day of August, 1957, notices of which said public hearing
were duly given, as required by law and the provisions of Sec-
tion 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Plannin; Commission, after due in-
spection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 29 - Series
1957-58, recommending that Variance No. 799 be granted upon the
conditions therein set forth; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from the
date of the adoption of said l'esolution, written appeals were
filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting
the action of the City Planning Commission granting said vari-
ance, and said appeals were set for public hearing on the 3rd
day of September, 1957, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., in the City Hall
in the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was
duly givsn as required by law and the provisions of' Section
9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, arter due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City
Council does find that:
1. There is no substantial property right possessed
by other property in the same vicinity and zone
and denied the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property can be ade-
quately developed and used under the present zone.
-
NO\1/, THEREFOHE, BE IT HESULVED by the Ci ty Council of
the City of Anaheim that the action of' the City Planning Commis-
sion granting Variance No. 799, requesting permission to develop
a recreation center consistins of a 40-lane bowling alley,
billiard room, cocktail lounee, restaurant and coffee shop on
the property herein above described, be, and the same is hereby,
-1-
disapproved, and that Variance No. 799 be, and the same is
hereby, denied without prejudice.
,,-....
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by
me this 3rd day of September, 1957.
. /' ..)
/. .//~7/
(_ A ..tZf{~.,~/ vP-~.
MAYOR OF fHE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
~~p~oin~mIM
STATE O? CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Ana-
heim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was
introduced and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting, pro-
vided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held
on the 3rd day of September, 1957, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIU1EN: Pearson, Coons, Fry and Wisser.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCIU1EN: Schutte.
And I further certify that the Mayor of the City of
Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on the 3rd day of
September, 1957.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 3rd day
of September, 1957.
c~?&f~mY~l~
(SEAL)
,-.
-2-