4374ORDINANCE NO. 4374
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RE-
PEALING SECTION 6.44.070 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION
6.44.070, IN PLACE THEREOF PERTAINING TO
NUISANCES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
That Section 6.44.070 be, and the same is hereby,
repealed.
SECTION 2.
Section 6.44.070 is hereby added to the Anaheim
Municipal Code to read as follows:
6.44.070 EFFECT OF FAILURE TO ABATE.
If the nuisance is not abated within the period given
in the notice, the Council may determine to proceed with the
abatement. When it determines to proceed, the Council shall
give a second notice in the same manner set forth in Section
6.44.040 and 6.44050. The second notice shall direct the persons
to appear before the Council or such other person as the Council
specifies in the notice at a stated time and place and show cause
why the nuisance should not be abated. The notice shall be headed
"NOTICE OF HEARING TO DETERMINE EXISTENCE OF PUBLIC NUISANCE AND
TO ABATE IN WHOLE OR PART" in letters of not less than 1" in
height and shall be substantially in the following form:
NOTICE OF HEARING
TO DETERMINE EXISTENCE OF
PUBLIC NUISANCE AND TO ABATE
IN WHOLE OR PART
Notice is hereby given that on the day
of , 19 the City Counci1--of—the
City of Anaheim passed a resolution declaring its
intent to ascertain whether certain premises situated
in the City of Anaheim, State of California, known and
designated as in
said City, and more particularly described as Lot
No. , Tract No. constitute a public
nuisance subject to abatement by the rehabilitation of
buildings or structures situated thereon. If said
premises, in whole or part, are found to constitute a
public nuisance as defined by Section 6.44.010 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code and if the same are not
promptly abated by the owner, such nuisances may
be abated by municipal authorities, in which case
the cost of such rehabilitation, repair, or demo-
lition will be assessed upon such premises and
such cost will constitute a lien upon such land
until paid.
Said alleged violations consist of the
following:
Dated._.
City Council of the
City. of Anaheim
By
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY
The City Council of the City of Anaheim hereby declares
that should any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this
chapter of the Code hereby adopted be declared for any reason to
be invalid, it the intent of the Council that it would have
passed all other portions of this chapter independent of the
elimination herefrom of any such portion as may be declared
invalid.
SECTION 4. SAVINGS CLAUSE
Neither the adoption of this ordinance nor the repeal
hereby of any other ordinance of this City shall in any manner
affect the prosecution for violations of ordinances, which
violations were committed prior to the effective date hereof,
nor be construed as a waiver of any license or penalty or the
penal provisions applicable to any violation thereof. The
provisions of this ordinance, insofar as they are substantially
the same as ordinance provisions previously adopted by the City
relating to the same subject matter, shall be construed as
restatements and continuations, and not as.new enactments.
SECTION 5.
The City Clerk shall .certify to the passage of this
ordinance and shall cause the same to be printed once within
fifteen (15) days after its adoption in the Anaheim Bulletin,
a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and
circulated in said City, and thirty (30) days from and after
its final passage, it shall take effect and be in full force.
-2-
the City
November
ATTEST:
THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE is approved and adopted by
Council of the City of Anaheim this 9th day of
. 1982.
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
FAL: sg
-3-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LINDA D. ROBERTS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 4374 was introduced at a regular meeting of the ...,
City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 2nd day of November, 1982,
and that the same was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said
City Council held on the 9th day of November, 1982, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Ordinance No. 4374 on the 9th day of November, 1982.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal
of the City of Anaheim this 9th day of November, 1982.
r
CITY CLEIK OF THE CITY OF AITAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LINDA D. ROBERTS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original Ordinance No. 4374 and was published once in the
Anaheim Bulletin on the 19th day of November, 1982.
CITY CLERK