Loading...
57R-3644 -- ~ RESOLUTION NO. 3~44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO.653. I*'" WHEREAS, the City Planning CO~ission of' the City of' Anaheim did receive a petition f'rom the owner of' certain real property situated in the City of' Anaheim, County of' Orange, State of' Galif'ornia, described as f'ollows: Lot 41 of' Tract No. 14. Said p'roperty is located at 833 South Philade;I.phia Street. AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did~hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of' Anaheim on Nov- ember 19, 19:>6, notices of' which said Pllbl1c,hearing were duly given, as required by law and the provisions of' Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Mtulielp~l Code; and WHEREAS, said City Planning. Qommission, af'ter due in- spection, investigation and studies made by itself' and in its behal!', and af'ter due considerationo!'all:evidence and reports off'ered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 94, Series 1956-57, recommending that Variance No. 653 be granted; and . WHEREAS, thereaf'ter, within twenty (20) d~ys f'rom the date of' the adoption of' said resolution, the City Council did elect, upon its own motion, to r~view the action taken by the City Planning Commission in granting said variance and did set a public h,earing thereon to be held on the 8th day of' January, 1957, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the City Hall in the City of' Ana- heim, and notice of' such public hearing was duly given as re- quired by law and the provisions of' Section 9200.17 of' the Ana- heim Municpal Code; and WHEREAS, af'ter due investigation and studies made by itself' and in its behalf', and after due consideration of all the evidence and reports off'ered at said hearings, the City Council does find that: 1. There "is no substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied the sub- ject property. 2. It appears that the subject property can be adequately developed and used under the present zone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of' the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commis- sion granting Variance No. 653 requesting that the property here- inabove described be reclassif'ied as R-3, Multiple-Family Resi- dential Zone, to permit the erection of' a duplex dwelling thereon, be, and the same is hereby disapproved, and that Variance No. 653 be, and the same is hereby, denied. ,"-' THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this 8th day or January, 1957. ~_ J::i.m 'l'li CITY 0 ANAHEIM ATTEST: ~~ ~- . LERK OF ~ 61ff~NXHEIM II. ,- - STATE OF CAJ.IFQRNIA ) COOI'I'Y or OJalcn ) 8S . crrr OF JJlJSI'M I, DEllE M. WILI..IA)8, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution wa. lIiuly pllssed and adopted at a reguiar meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held the 8th day of January, 1957, by the following vote of them.eDlber~ thereofl AYlB: COUNCILMEN:' Pean:on, <<loons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser llCiB: COUNCIIJ!EN: None AlJllUT: COIDICILMD: None AJtD I FUR'l'HIR CEJll'IFY that the Mayor of the City. of ~aheim approved and signed said Resolution on the 8th ciay of January, 1957. IN WITnBI WBIRIOF, I han hereunto set my hand anq affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 8th day of January, 1957. 1 , ' ~~~~~~ (SEAL) . .....;,; ~ ,~ 1 1-