1960-5781RESOLUTION NO. 5781
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1186.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim
did receive a petition for zoning variance from BROADWAY VIL OF
ANAHEIM owner, of certain real property
situated in the ty of Anaheim, County of. Orange, State of California,
described as follows°
The East 150.00 feet of the South 150.00 feet
of the Northeast quarter of Section 8, Township
L South, Range 10 West, partly in the Rancho
Los Coyotes and partly in the Rancho San Juan
Cajon de Santa Ana, in the city of Anaheim,
county of Orange, state of California, as said
Section is indicated on a map filed in Book 40,
page 6 of Record of Surveys, in the office of
the County Recorder of said county.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on Jan1F ry 1�
1960 notices of which said public hearing were duly given as re-
quired by law and the pr visions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due inspection,
investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after
due consideration of all evidence ar and reports offered at said hearing,
did adopt Resolution No. 146 Series 1959-60 denying
Variance No 1186 and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from the date of
the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal was filed with the
City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting the action of the City
Planning Commission denying said variance, and said appeal was
set for public hearing on January 26 1960 at 700
o'clock P.M. at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim, and notice of
such public hearing was duly given as required by law and the provi-
sions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, the City Council does find and de-
termine that
1. There is no substantial property right possessed by
other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied
the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property can be adequately
developed and used under the present zones
-1-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commission
denying the application of BROADWAY VILLAGE OF ANAHEIM, 801 North
Loara Street, Anaheim., California, for a zoning variance to permit
on -sale liquor in the coffee shop restaurant proposed to be erected
on the property hereinabove described, be and the same is hereby
sustained, and that Variance No. 1186 be, and the same is hereby
denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this
2(1th day of January 19 (,0
AT ST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
at a
regular meeting of the City Council held on the
26th day of January 1960 by the following vote of the
members thereof:
(SEAL)
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
a
MAYOR OF
EC ITY OF ANAHEIM.
Fry, Pearson, Thompson
Coons.
None.
and Schutte.
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim
approved and signed said resolution on the 26th day of January
1960
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the seal of the City of Anaheim this 26th day of .Tsanusary
1960
CI CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
—2—