56R-3606
HESOLUTIOi,J I\)O. 3606
,.
A PJ.;SCLUTluN OF TH:,: CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AHAHEIH FINDING AND DETl!;RHINING
THA'2: A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE
GR.AJ.\!TED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY
HEPl:INAFTEH DESCRL:5ED.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim has heretofore duly passed and adopted a resolution
recommending denial of a chance in the boundaries of the zone
or zones hereinafter mentioned and described, after having
fixed 8. time and Dlace for the holding of a public hearing
thereon in the manner and as prescribed in Article IX, Chapter
2 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and. after having duly held
and conducted such')ublic hee.ring to consider said proposed
change of zone or zones, and after having received evidence
and re:.)orts from persons interested therein; and
WHEhEAS, within a period of forty (40) days follow-
ing the hearin~ thereon, the Planning Commission did duly
announce by formal ~esolution No. 82--Series 1956-57, its
findings of facts and declare its opinions and reasons for
recommending a denial of said proposed change in the bounda-
ries of the zone hereinafter mentioned and described; and
'~{HF;::.EAS, upon receipt of the re:>ort and recommenda-
tion of tne City Planning Commission, the City Council did
thereupon fix the 27th day of November, 1956 as the time and
the Council.ChambeJ" in the City Hall of the City of Anaheim
as the place for a)ublic nearinG upon said proposed, change
of zone ancl did, give notice theJ'eof in the manner anri as pro-
vided in said Article IX, Chapter 2 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code; and
;rHE3EAS, at tne time and place fixed for said
public hearin~:, the City Council did duly hold, and conduct
such nublie hearing anct did give all :persons interested there.in
an opportuni t~ to be heard and cUd, rece i ve evid,ence and reports,
and did thereupon consider the recommend.ations of the City
Planning Commission, and did continue 8a,ia hearing until a
later date; and
VrHE3:^;AS, the Oi ty Council does find and determine
that the 9roperty and area proposed to be changed from the
zone in vrhich it is nOF situated to a different zone as
hereinafter set forth is more suitable for the zone in which
it is no\'! incol'porated and thf,t a change of zone should not
be granted.
NO\'l, THEfu:FORJ:<;, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Anaheim that all of the property and area
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, state of
California, described as follows, to wit:
Lots 1 to 64 of Tract 2624, as shown on a Map
recorded January 26, 1956 in Book 84, Pages 31
and 32 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange
County, California. (Located on the North side
of Romneya Drive between West Street and Euclid
Avenue and abuttln. the proposed Houston street
Freeway on the North.)
-1-
r- 5. - :J'.;1./
""-----~.""""'._.. ""--..,.".....
remain in the R-l, SINGLE-FAIvfILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE in which it
is no', incOl'uora ted, and that the urouosed reclassification
to R-j, MlJLTI:eLE-FAlHLY RESIDENTIAL ZONE, be denied, as
recommended by the City Planning Commission.
THE FOREGOINO, RESOLUTION is signed and approved by
me this 11th day of December, 1956.
"/
I ' " /~
.,~-,~>~,~~
'MAYOROF THE CITY OF ANA M ~.
ATTEST:
rt~? .. .... . ,-.
1-, L"..2L h /~'//.---"" ' -
, Y dL'tPJ( OF T-HE CiTY OF AN~
STATL:; OF CALIFORInA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s s.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution
was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the 11th day of December, 1956, by the
followins vote of the members thereof:
AY'.2S:
COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser
NOES:
COUNCILlvJEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL~lliN: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City
of Anahe im signed anc'L ap;)l'oved. said resolution on the 11th
day of December, 1956.
IN 'HITNESS \111EREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and affixed the seal of the Oity of Anaheim this 11th day
of December, 1956.
II .", "', -. "',--c .
ti~iCLER~F Tfr(~ of ANAHEIM
( SEAL )
-2-