Loading...
56R-3553 - - RESOLlTrICIf NO. 3553 ,..-.' ~, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A CiWIT DEED'aJNVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CDTAIN RliAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASIIIENr FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES o WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim is desirous of purchasing the hereinafter descriped real property , for public purposes, to witl An easement for road and public ~;1l1tYPurposes I and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim finds that it is for the benefit and best interest of the City of Anaheim to accept said offer and purchase said real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that the offer of HUBER G. WILSO., a IIfIr"'ied m~, , to sell to the City of Anaheim the following described real prop- erty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of OeJ.ifornia, to be used for road and public utility :purposes , and more particularly described as followSI An easement for road and public utility purposes over, under and across the Northerly 40 feet and the Westerly 50 feet of that portion of land located in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: The Westerly 600 feet of the Northerly JJO feet of the NWt, Sit. NWt of Section 18, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, S.B.B.& M. /"' be, and the same is hereby, accepted by the city Council of the a. ty of Anaheim, and that the City of Anaheim accept a convey- ance of said property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Treasurer Qf the City of Anaheim be, and he is hereby, authorized to pay to the Ollmers of said real property, out of General Funds of the City of Anaheim, the sum of One and nO/lOO Dollars (Sl.OO). -1- ATTEST I ~ ~-~Li.~~ o.J-, f' r ,-. - RESOLUTION NO. 3552 A RESOLUTION OF ~~3 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEU'I DENYING 'l'HE APPLICATION OF FRED L. LIPP FOR A SPECIAL USE PEilliIT '1'0 ESTABLISH A TRiULER PAme. \~EREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim di d receive a request i'or a Special Use Permit f'rom the owner ot' certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Calit'ornia, described as follows: All of the East half' (Ei) of the East half (Ei) of the Northwest quarter CNWi) of the Southwest quarter (SWi) of' Section 7, Town- ship 4 South, Range 10 West, S.B.B.& M., in the Rancho Los Coyotes, EXOEPT the North 766 f'eet. AND \~EREAS the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said request on June 18th, 1956, notices of which said public hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, inves- tigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf' and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did adopt its Resolution No. 228-A, Series 1955-56, granting said Special Use Permit upon the conditions therein set forth; and WHEREAS, thereafter, '..Ii thin twenty days f'rom the date of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council did elect, upon its own motion, to review the action of the Oity Planning Commission in grantinz; said Special Use Permit and did thereupon fix the 17th day of July, 1956 as the time and the Council Cham- ber in the City Hall of the City of Anaheim as the place for a public hearing upon said Special Use Permit and notice of such public hearing ,-las duly given as required by law and the provi- sions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Hunicipal Code; and WHER~lS, at the time and place fixed for said public hearins, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such hearing and diQ give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard and did receive evidence and reports and did thereupon close said hearing and declare that the matter would be given f'urther consideration at a later date; and WP~R~~S, the City Council did find that there is no sub- stantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied the subject property; and that the subject property can be adequately developed and used under the present zone, and, therefore, denied said Special Use Permit with- out prejudice; and WHEREAS, 3- request was made by the O1mer of subject pro- perty ~or reconsideration by the City Council of said application for said Special Use Permit, and the City Council did hold a pub- lic hearing on October 23, 1956 to I'eview the proposed use of sub- .iect property and sa5"d application for a Special Use Permit; and -1- J'- .