Loading...
56R-3502 - .~ r ,: RESOLUTION NO. 3502 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 615. WHEREAS, the City Planning CommIssion of the City. of Anaheim did receive a petition from the owner andlor agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: A portion of the Ni of the NEt of the Nwt of Section 22, T4S, R10W, S.B.B. & M. Said property is located on the west side of Manchester Avenue, approximately 300 feet southerly of Ball Road. AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on September 4, 1956, notices of which said public hearing were duly given, as required by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its be~lf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports ofrered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 46, Series 1956-57, recommending that Variance No. 615 be granted for the term therein set forth; and WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from the date of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council did elect, upon its own motion, to review the action taken by the City Planning Commission in granting said variance and did set a public hearing thereon to be held on the 9th day of October, 1956, at 7:00 O'Clock P. M. in the City Hall in the City of Anaheim, and notice of suoh public hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalr, and arter due consideration of all the evidence and reports offered at said hearings, the City Council does find that: r 1. There is no substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied the subject property. 2. It appears that the subject property can be adequately developed and used under the present zone. -1- - .- ,;""" NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commission granting Variance No. 615 requesting permission to erect one "V" type double faced outdoor advertising structure on the property hereinabove described, be and the same is hereby, disapproved, and that Variance No. 615 be, and the same is hereby, denied. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this 9th day of October, 1956. ~ . :.--e~ MA OR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM --- A'I'TEST: ~~~~~~~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SSe CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 9th day of October, 1956, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser None NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILM~ COUNCILMEN: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed and approved said resolution on the 9th day of October, 1956. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 9th day of October, 1956. / . ~- ~) ~;-.. , City Clerk ~ e Crr:-;t~eim r -2-