56R-3464
-
RESOLUTION NO. 3464
.~.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VAR!ANCE NO. 569
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim did receive a petition f~om the owner of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, des cribed as follows:
A portion of the Northeast corner of Brooldlurst
St. arn La Palma Avenue, more particulary describ-
ed as, approximately four acres, beginning at a
point 294 feet North of the center line of La Palma
Avenue; thence North along Brookhurst Street, 362
feet; thence East aoproximately 500 feet; thence
South 362 feet; thence West to the point of beginning.
(Located at the Northeast corner of Brookhurst Street
and La Palma Avenue)
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
oublic hea.ring at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
August 6, 1956, notices of which said public hearing were duly
given, as required by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17
of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
.1 HERE AS , said City Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in
its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 12-
Series 1956-57, recommendin~ that Variance No. 569 be denied
for the reasons hherein set forth; and
~iHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from
the date of the adoption of said. re solution, the City Council
di<i elect, upon its own motion, to review the action taken by
the City Planning Commission in denying said var1an~e and did
set a public hearing thereon to be held on the 11th day of
September, 1956, at 7:00 O'clock P. M., in the City Hall in
the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing vlas
dUl,y given as reqUired by law and the provisions of Section
9200.1'1 of the Anaheim IvIunicipal Code; and
WHBREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City
Council does find that:
1. There is no substantial property right
possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone and denied subject
property.
~.
2. It appears that the subject property can
be adequately developed and used under the
present zone.
-1-
~
NOW, TH~R1FORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
01 the Cit:r of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning
Commission denying Variance No. 569, requesting permiss~on
to construct and operate a 40 lane bowling alley, billiard
hall, restaurant, and cocktail lounge with on-sale liquor
license, anci the sale of' such merchandise and services as
are customary in a complete bowling center, be approved,
ana t.l;lat Variance No. 569 be, anci the same is hereby, denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is ai)proved and signed by me
this 11th d.ay of September, 1956. . C'
.. ~
-) ./,-'.. 0.- / ./
,;/ / " /-'J
'y~~~~",
A'l'TEST:
L~}f. -~)- . .
CITY CLdi OF' THE~lM
STATt; OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) S8.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution
was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by
law 01 the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the
11th ciay of September, 1956, by the following vote:
NOES:
COUNCIU1EN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte
and Wisser
COUNCIL~1EN: None.
AYES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN: None.
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of
Anaheim signed and approved said resolution on the 11th day
of September, 1956.
IN 'o'TITNESS \'~HER.EOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 11th day
of September, 1956.
~/i ~ ~)-' .
i )<J1~ W-<--~
ty Clerk:~-the City of Anaheim.
i"'-'"
-2-