56R-3176
,.....-
RESuLUTION NO. 3176
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 497.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City
or Anaheim did receive a petition rrom the owner of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State or California, described as rollows:
The southerly 58.50 feet or Lot 9 or the
Orchard Park Tract, as shown on a map thereof
recorded in Book 7, Page 6 of Miscellaneous
Maps, Records or Orange County;
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the easterly 660.00 feet,
the northerly line or West Vermont Avenue 66.00
reet in width being the southerly line of Lot
9 for the purpose of this description.
Said property is located at the Northeast oor-
ner of South Palm Street and West Vermont Avenue,
and designated as 898 South Palm Street.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold
a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
February 20, 1956, notices of which said public hearing were
duly given, as required by law and the proviSions of Section
9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in
its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports orfered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No.
129 -- Series 1955-56 denying Varianoe No. 497; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from
the da te of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal
was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim pro-
testing the action of the City Planning Commission denying
said variance, and said appeal was set for public hearing on
the 13th day of March, 1956, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim, and notice of suoh publiC hear-
ing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of
Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalr, and arter due consideration of all
the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City
Council does find and determine that:
1. There is no substantial property right
possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone and denied the subject
prop erty.
.-
2. It appears that the subject property can
be adequately developed and used under
the present zone.
-1-
,-.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counoil
of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning
Commission denying said Variance No. 497, re~lesting permis-
sion to operate an insurance office in the existing residence
on subject property, hereinabove described, and to build an
addition to the front of said residence, be, and the same is
hereby, sustained, and that Variance No. 497 be, and the same
is hereby, denied.
THE FOfiliGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by
me this 13th day of March, 1956.
/~j
-kyo ~6~~~~
STATE OF CALI1~RNIA )
COU:N'"TY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law
of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the
13th day of March, 1956, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIU1EN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte, Wisser
and Van Wagoner.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None.
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City
of Anaheim signed and approved said resolution on the l3th
day of March, 1956.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this
13th day of March, 1956.
c~CiiM'/o1 TH'~~.
(SEAL)
r
-2-