Loading...
1954-2348RESOLUTION NO. 2348 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A PETITION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, DESIGNATING THE TERRITORY AS THE EAST RONNYA DRIVE ANNEXATION; DE:CRIBING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED. AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE DAY, HOUR AND PLACE WHERE AND WHEN ANY PERSON OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY 50 PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SUCH TERRITORY SHOULD NOT BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim did on the 9th day of February 19 54 receive a written petition asking that certain new territory described in said petition be annexed to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, before the filing of said petition, the pro posal for the annexation of the territory hereinafter described to the City of Anaheim was submitted to the Boundary Commission of the County of Orange, State of California, and reported upon by said Boundary Commission with respect to the definiteness and certainty of the proposed boundaries; and WHEREAS, said territory proposed to be annexed to said City of Anaheim is situated in the County of Orange, State of California, and is contiguous to the City of Anaheim and is un- inhabited territory, and said petition contained a description of said territory in words and figures as hereinafter in this Resolution described; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds from evidence and re- ports received that at the time of the filing and receipt of sail petition, it was and now is signed by owners of not less than one- fourth e) of the area and not less than one fourth (4) of the assessed valuation of the land in such territory proposed to be annexed, according to the last preceding equalized county assess- ment roll; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds from evidence and re- torts received and from said petition that at the time of the filing and presentation of said petition that said new territory proposed to be annexed to said City of Anaheim did not form a part of any municipal corporation and that said territory was un- inhabited and is contiguous to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds from said petition and evidence and reports received that the boundaries of the territory so proposed to be annexed to the City of Anaheim are as follows, to wit: A parcel of land being a portion of Lots 16 and 21 and all of Lot 17 of Golden State Tract No. 2 and recorded in Book 4, at Pa` °e 68 Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orai ge County, California and a portion of SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of Fractional Section 2, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the existing easterly Anaheim City Limits Line and the southerly right -of -way line of Romneya Drive, 40 feet wide, said point also being in the Southerly prolongation of the westerly line of Lot 17 of Golden State Tract No. 2 and recorded in Book 4 at Page 68, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County California; thence, 1. Easterly 680 feet, more or less, along the said southerly right -of -way line of Romneya Drive to the southeasterly right -of -way corner of said Romneya Drive and Baxter Street, 4 feet wide; thence, 2. Northerly 679 feet, more or less, along the easterly right -of -way line of said Baxter Street and its southerly pro longation to a point in the easterly prolongation of the northerly line of Lot 17 of said Golden State Tract No. 2; thence, 3. Westerly 680 feet, more or less, along the said northerly line of Lot 17 and its easterly prolongation to the most northwesterly corner of said Lot 17, said point also being in the existing easterly Anaheim City Limits line; thence, 4. Southerly 679 feet, more or less, along the westerly line of said Lot 17 and its southerly prolongation, and the said existing Anaheim City Limits line to the point of begin- ning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF ANAHEII: That such proposed annexation be designated as "EAST ROMNE'YA DRIVE;:ANITEXATIONI' and that notice of such pro- posed annexation be and the same is hereby given; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 12th day of March 19 54 at the hour of 100° o'clock A M. at the City Council Chamber in the City Hall of the City of Ana helm, be and the sane is hereby fixed as the day, hour and place when and where any person owning real property within said terri- tory so proposed to be annexed, and having any objections to the proposed annexation, may appear before the City Council of the City of Anaheim and show cause why such territory should not be so annexed; that all persons having any objections to such pro- posed annexation are hereby notified to appear on said day at said hour and place to show cause, if any they have, why such territory should not be so annexed; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to cause a copy of this Resolution to be published at least twice, but not oftener than once a week, -2- in a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City, to wit: The Anaheim Bulletin of Anaheim, Orange County, California, and also in a newspaper of general circulation, published outside of the City, but in the County of Orange, in which is located the territory hereinabove proposed, to be annexed to the City of Ana heim, to wit: The Placentia Courier That such publication shall be completed at least twenty (20) days prior to the date of hearing hereinabove specified. AND RE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of Anaheim be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to cause written notice of such proposed annexation to be mailed to each person to whom land within the territory proposed to be annexed is assessed, in the last equalized county assessment roll available, on the date the proceedings were initiated, at the address shown on said assessment roll or as known to said City Clerk, and to any person who has filed his name and address and the designation of lands in which he has any interest, either legal or equitable, with said Clerk: That in the event that land within the territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Anaheim is owned by a County, the City Clerk of the City of Anaheim shall also cause written notice of such proposed annexation to be mailed to the Board of Supervisors of such County. The foregoing notices shall be given not less than twenty (20) days before the first public hearing on the proposed annexation. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 9th day of February 19.5 ATTEST: CITY CLERK Or THE OF ANAHEIM MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ss CITY OF ANAHEIM I, CHARLES E. GRIFFITH, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 9th day of February, 195 by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Wisser and Van Wagoner. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte. AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on the 9th day of February, 1954. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 9th day of February, 1954. (SEAL ;''ANAHEIM