56R-3092
"-._"..~
-
RESOLUTION NO. JO~2
r'"
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COPNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING V~IANCE NO.
4)6 TO JULY 1, 1956.
WHEREAS, the City Planning fommiSSion did receive
a petition from Jo An Burdiok, applic nt, and J. W. Thorne,
agent, requesting a zoning varianoe f r the following de-
scribed real property situated in the'City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, to wit:
A portion of Vineyard Lot A~_l. located at
the Southwest corner of Nor~h East Street
and East Sycamore Street.
(419 North East Street, An~eim, California)
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
pUblic he~ring at the City Hall in th~ City of Anaheim on Octo-
ber J, 1955, notices of which said pu~lic hearing were duly
given as required by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17
of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due in-
speotion, investigation and studies m~de by itself and in its
behalf and after due consideration of all the evidence and re-
ports offered at said hearing, did adqpt Resolution No. 55 __
Series 1955-56, granting Variance No. 4)6 until January 20,
1956; and
",.......,
WHEREAS, upon request made qy said applicant that
said variance be reopened and extended indefinitely, the City
Planning Commission did duly hold and conduct a pUblic hearing
at the City Hall in the City of Anahetm on December 5, 1955,
noti~s of whioh said public hearing ~ere duly given as re-
quired by law and the provisions of Selction 9200.17 of the
Anaheim Munioipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said Planning Commi,ssion, after due inspeo-
tion, investigation and studies made b~ itself and in its be-
half, and after due consideration of all evidenoe and reports
offered at said hearing held on Deoember 5, 1955, did adopt
Resolution No. 82 -- Series 1955-56, denying an extension of
time on Variance No. 436 beyond the 20th day of January, 1956.and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution No. 82 -- Series
1955-56, a written appeal was filed with the City Counoil of
the City of Anaheim requesting a review of the action taken
by said Planning Commission, and said appeal was set for pub-
lic hearing on January 10, 1956 at 7;00 o'clook P.M. at the
City Hall, in the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public
hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions
of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said pUblic
hearing, the City Council did duly hol~ and conduot such pub-
lio hearing and did give all persons i~terested therein an
opportunity to be heard and did receive evidence and reports
and did thereupon close said hearing amd declare that action
would be taken at a later date; and
-1-
-
_.
/
WHEREAS, after due invest~ation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due oonsideration of all
the evidence and reports offered at said hearing held on Jan-
uary lOJ 1956, the City Council does find that:
1. There are exoeptional or e(lttraordinary oircum-
stanoes or conditions appl~cable to the property
involved or to the intende~ use of the property
that do not apply generall~ to the property or
class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
2. That suoh a variance is nebessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right possessed by other p~operty in the same
vicinity and zone and deni~d to the property in
question.
3. That the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the pUblio welfare or
injurious to the property pr improvements in
such vicinity and zone in which the property is
loca ted.
4. That the granting of such variance will not ad-
versely affect the oomprehensive general zoning
plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT REsOtVED by the City Counoil
of the City of Anaheim, that a conditional zoning variance be,
and the same is hereby, granted to J~ An Burdiok to conduot
ballet, tap, acrobatic, Hawaiian, modern and ball room danc-
ing, as well as baton and trampoline~ on the above described
property looated at 419 North East street, Anaheim, California,
until JUly 1, 1956.
The City Council hereby re$erves the right to revoke
such variance permit for good cause or failure of said Jo An
BUrdiok, or her heirs, suocessors or assignBJ to oomply with
the Anaheim Municipal Code and regulations, and the oonditions
herein.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by
me this 24th day of January, 1956.
~~
~~,
ATTEST:
/I
~LE7roF/.r~~f ~NAHEIM
r
-2...
~
-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COum- OF ORJ\NGE ) ss .
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of .Ilna.heim, do "'
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted .upon a final
reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim,
held on the 24th day of January, 1956, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES:
COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte, Wisser and
Van Wagoner.
COUNCILMEN: None.
NOES :
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None.
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the Ci ty of Anaheim
approved and signed said resolution on the 24th day of Jar:uary, 1956.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of the City of Anaheim this 24th day of January, 1956.
jJc_~'~. ?J~
CIIT CLERK F THE CITY OF .ANAHEIM
. (SEAL)
~