1974-256ATTEST:
/fm
RESOLUTION NO. 74R -256
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 2595.
WHEREAS, after a request for variance by Collins
Limited Partnership, owners, was received, a public hearing be-
fore the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim was held
upon due and proper notice as a result of which Variance No. 2595
was denied covering the follawing described property:
SUBJECT PROPERTY: Beginning at a point on the South
line of West Broadway which said point is 40 feet South
of a point which is 132.88 feet East of a monu-
ment marking the Northwest corner of Lot 47 of "Anaheim
Extension," as shown on a nap of Survey made by Wm.
Hamel and filed for record with the County Recorder of
Los Angeles County, California, said point being the
intersection of the South line of West Broadway with
the West line of Adams Street, running thence South 0
10' West along the West line of said Adams Street and
the continuation thereof 455.75 feet to the South line
of the tract of land conveyed to the Anaheim Manufactur-
ing Company by deed recorded November 12th, 1920 in Book
378, Page 396 of Deeds; thence South 88° 57' West along
said South line 100.40 feet to a point on the East line
of the right of way of the Los Alamitos Branch of the
Southern Pacific Railway; thence North 0 09' West along
said East line 248.44 feet to a point and continuing
along said right of way line on a curve Northeasterly
with a radius of 352.25 feet to an intersection on the
South line of, said Broadway Street; thence North 88° 55'
East along said South line 34.44 feet to the point of
beginning.
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law
an interested party or the City Council on its own motion caused
the review of said Planning Commission action at a public hearing
noticed and held as prescribed by law and as a result thereof the
City Council does hereby make the following findings:
1. There is no substantial property right possessed
by other property in the same vicinity and zone
and denied the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property can be ade-
quately developed and used under the present zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that said Variance be and the same is hereby
denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 4th day of June, 1974.
CITY CLERK OF THE SL`ITY OF ANAHEIM
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, ALONA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 74R -256 was intro-
duced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City
Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 4th day of June, 1974, by
the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: 'Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour, Thom
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim
approved and signed said Resolution No. 74R -256 on the 4th day of
June, 1974.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the seal of the City of Anaheim this 4th day of June, 1974.
CLERK OF THE CI OF
ANAHEIM
LER IM
I, ALONA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No.
74R -256 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on
June 4, 1974.
City Clerk;