1975-201WHEREAS, after a request for variance by John °Molinaro,
owner, was received, a public hearing; before the Planning Commis-
sion of the City of Anaheim was held upon due and proper notice as
a result of which Variance No. 2671 was denied covering the follow
ing described property:
That portion of the north half of Section 1, Township 4
South, Range 11 est, SBP•I, in Rancho Los Coyotes, acquired
by the State of California by deed 1277 recorded in book
3571, page 393, Official Records, described as follows:
Commencing at the Southerly terminus of that certain
course having a bearing and distance of South 0° 36' 50"
East 86.05 feet as shown in the Easterly line of Parcel
1 of State Highway Relinquishment No. 759, recorded in
book 9393, page 732, Official Records; thence North 89°
0 3' 10" East 37.85 feet; thence Borth 64° 36' 21" East,
198.89 feet to the Southwesterly line of said land so
acquired by said Deed 1277, described therein as having
a length of 1964 feet, said point being the TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing
North 6 36' 21" East 294.10 feet to the %Iortheaste rl
line of said land so acquired; thence along said o
easterly line North 57° 10' 35" Vest, 531.7, feet to the
Easterly boundary of the City of 'Buena Part thence alon
said. boundary South 0° 36' 50" ?east 299.59 feet to said
Southwesterly line; thence along said Southwesterly line
South 57° 10' 35" Fast 261.75 feet to said TRTJ`: PC177
MEGIN HING
7 rr
1ERNAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested ?arty or the City Council, on its own mp#i_on, caused
the review of said Planning Commission action at a public hearing
noticed and held as prescribed by law and, as a result thereof,
the City Council does hereby make the following findings:
1. There is no substantial property right possessed
by other property in the same vicinity and zone
and denied the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property can be ade-
quately developed and used under the present zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that said Variance be, and the same is hereby,
denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 22nd day of April, 1975.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANA I
FAL, JR:fm
RESOLUTION NO. 75R -201
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANNICE NO. 2671.
AN IIEI
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANADEIM
(SEAL).
6
I, ALONA M, HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No, 75R-201 was intro-
duced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City
Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 22nd day of April, 1975,
by the following vote of the members thereOf:
AYES; COUNCIL MEMBERS; Kaywood, Seymour and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS; Pebley and Sneegas
ABSENT; COUNCIL MEMBERS; None
AND 1 FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim
approved and signed-said Resolution No, 75R-201 on the 22nd day of
April, 1975,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the seal of the City of Anaheim this 22nd day of April, 1975.
CITY' CLERK OF THE C OF ANiWEIM
I, ALONA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,do
hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No
75R2G1 dui messed end adopted her the Aneheim Cit7 Council on
April 22, 1975.
)27. 2
City Clerk