1975-019RESOLUTION NO. 75R -19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION
TO VACATE CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND
FIXING A DATE FOR HEARING THEREON.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim has
elected to proceed under the provisions of the Public Service
Easement Vacation Law, Title 5, Division 1, Article 5 of the
Government Code, in connection with a request for vacation and
abandonment of a former Anaheim Union Water Company easement
located north of La Palma Avenue, west of Euclid Street, in
the City of Anaheim, and more fully hereinafter described.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Anaheim that it hereby declares its intention
to vacate, abandon and close to public use a portion of a
former Anaheim Union Water Company easement located north
of La Palma Avenue, west of Euclid Street, in the City of
Anaheim, for utility purposes, as it may relate to the
following described property:
That portion of a former Anaheim Union Water Company
right of way, 12 feet wide, as described in deed
recorded in Book 86, page 293 of Deeds, records of
said Orange County, lying within the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, to be abandoned,
the centerline of said 12 -foot strip is described
as follows:
Commencing at the centerline intersection of Euclid
Street and La Palma Avenue, said intersection being
the southeast corner of the Southeast quarter of
Section 5, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, S.B.B.
M.; thence S 89 46' 20" W, 1,650.06 feet along the
centerline of said La Palma Avenue to an intersection
with the southerly prolongation of the west line of
Tract No. 483, as per map recorded in Book 17, page 20,
Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County;
thence N 0 15' 29" W, 186.42 feet to the true point of
beginning of the above mentioned centerline; thence
S 66 42' 20" W, 340.54 feet, more or less, to an
intersection with a line parallel with and 53.00 feet
northerly of the centerline of said La Palma Avenue,
said point of intersection being distant S 89 46'
20" W, 313.28 feet from the westerly line of said
Tract No. 483, said point of intersection also being
the point of terminus of the centerline herein described.
and it elects to proceed under the provisions of the Public
Service Easement Vacation Law, Title 5, Division 1, Article
5, of the Government Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a time and place for
hearing all persons interested in or objecting to the pro-
posed vacation and abandonment has been fixed on the 4th day
of February 1975, at 2 :30 o'clock P.M. in the Council
Chamber in the City Hall in the City of Anaheim.
-1-
74 -8A
ATTEST:
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk
shall certify to the passage of this resolution and shall
cause the same to be published in a manner prescribed by
law in the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper of general circula-
tion, printed, published and circulated in said City of
Anaheim.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed
by me this 14th day of January, 1975.
CITY CLERK OF THE C� TY OF
C ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, ALONA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 75R -19 was intro-
duced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City
Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 14th day of January, 1975,
by the folloiwng vote of the members thereof:
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor Pro Tem of the City
of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 75R -19 on the 14th
day of January, 1975.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the seal of the City of Anaheim this 14th day of January, 1975.
(SEAL)
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Seymour
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
CITY CLERK OF THE CI'T`Y OF ANAHEIM
I, ALONA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No.
75R -19 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on
January 14, 1975.
City Clerk v
cxA