Loading...
1976-070RESOLUTION NO. 76R-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1587. WHEREAS? the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive an application for a conditional use permit from Pacific World Corporation, owner, to permit a planned in- dustrial complex with commercial uses and a restaurant on "M& zoned property described as follows: All that certain land situated in the State of Cali- fornia, County of Orange, City of Anaheim, described as follows: That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 26, Township 4 South, Range 10 West in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as shown on a map recorded in book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the East half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 26; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of said East half to a point on a line parallel with and distant Southerly 567.00 feet measured at right angles from the Northerly line of said Section 26; thence East- erly along said parallel line to a point in a line par- allel with and distant Easterly 300.00 feet, measured at right angles, from said Westerly line of the East half, said last mentioned point being the true point of beginning for this description; thence Northerly along said parallel line to the Northerly line of said Section 26; thence Easterly along said Northerly line to the Northeast corner of the West half of the Northeast quar- ter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 26; thence Southerly along said Easterly line to said parallel line distant Southerly 567.00 feet measured at right angles from the Northerly line of said Section 26; thence West- erly along said last mentioned parallel line to said true point of beginning. All that certain land situated in the State of Cali- fornia, County of Orange, City of Anaheim, described as follows: That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 26, Township 4 South, Range 10 West in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of orange County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the East half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 26; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of said East half to a point on a line parallel with and distant Southerly 567.00 feet measured at right angles from the Northerly line of said Section 26; thence East- erly along said parallel line to a point in a line par- allel with and distant Easterly 300.00 feet, measured at right angles, from said Westerly line of the East half; thence -1- Noraher.along said -parallel line to the Northerly line of said Section '�6; thence Easterl'y along said. Northerly line to the Northeast corner of the West half of the Northeast cruart-er of the Northeast auar- ter of said Section 26; thence Southerly along the i Easterly line of said West half to the Norther' y C it line of the land of 211bert Spound and others" as shown on a Map filed", in Book A-3, Paqe 37 of Record of Surveys, in the office of the County Recorder of said County; said point being the true point of be- ginning. Thence Easterly along said Northerly line of the land of "Albert S�,Dound and others" and the Easterly prolongation of said Nlortherly line to the center line of State College Boulevard (formerly Placentia Avenue) ; thence Southerly along said cen- terline of State College Boulevard to a point in said centerline distant -Nor-'Cherlv measured along sa4 d cen'L'terlline 627. 1--3 feet from the centerline of .L _� J. OranqevTood Avenue; thence South 691 591 33" West to the boundary line of "Spound"; thence -North. 01 081 49" West aloncr said boundary of "Spou-nd" to an angle point therein; thence North 890 571 41" West along said boundary 634.55 feet to an angle point therein; thence -North 10 201 40" West along said boundan7 653.44 feet to the Northerly line of the South half of said Northeast quarter of Section 226; thence East- erly along said Northerly line to the true point of beainninq. Excepting therefrom any portion included within the land quitclaimed to Falstaff Brewing Corporation, by Quitclaim Deed recorded June 20, 1961 in Book 5759, Page 921, Official Records. AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Carni scion did, hold. a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said application on the 19th day of January, 197--%6, notices of which said public hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 1.8.76 of the Anaheim 11,11unicipal Code; and WHEREAS, said Cormission, after due inspection, investi- gation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and .-eoor-;C-s offered at said hearing, did adopt its Resolution No. PC76-7 approving Conditional Use Per- mit No. 15807 subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, thereafter within twenty-1--wo (22) days from the date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal was filed with the City Council Protesting the action of the City Planning, CommAssion in approving said conditional use permit and said a --Peal was set for public hearing on the 17th day of February, 1976, at the City Hall, in the City of Anaheim, and notices of such public hearing were duly given as required by laA,7 and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim ImIunicipal Code; and WTHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public hear- ing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct- such hearing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard and did receive evidence and reports; and TVMEREAS, the City Council finds, after careful considera- tion of the recommendations of the City Planning Commission and all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, that: Mc 1. The Proposed use is properly one for x#hich a conditional use permit is authorized by the Anaheim Municipal Code. 2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the a adversely area in which J_ ;rowth and development of 4 t is proposed to be located. 3. The size and shwoe of the site Proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of -',--be proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and gene-ra! welfare. 4. The traffic aenerated by the Proposed use will not im- pose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the Peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.. NOW, THEIRE]FORE, BE IT RESOIN by the City"an Co cil of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Corn -Mis- sion in approving said conditional use permit be, and the same is hereby, sustained and that Conditional Use Permit No. 1587 be, and the same is hereby, granted permitting an industrial complex with cominercial uses and a restaurant on the aforedescribed prop- erty and that said conditional use per-Ti,,it is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in width from the center- line of the street along Pacifico, Avenue for street widening pur- poses. 2. a. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along State College Boulevard including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewa!"ks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work, shali be co-ir�plied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard Plans and specifications on file in -the office of the City Engi- neer; and that a bond in an amolant and form sat-isfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above-ruentioned requirements, b. That the underground utilities along Pacifico Ave- nue between State College Boulevard and Lewis Street s1hall be ex- tended and installed by the owner(s) of subject property and that the above -ground street improvements along Pacifico Avenue shall be installed by the City of Anaheim at a' cost -not to exceed $80,000; if the cost should exceed $80,000, the owner(s) of sub- ject- property shall Day to the City of Anaheim the difference be- tween the X80,000 arra. the total cost of such ira�provements, as stipulated to by the petitioner; and that a bond in an a - mount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the instaliation of said underground utilities. 3. That the owner (s.) of su3biect property? shall -pay to the C i tv of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along :patella Ave- nue and State College Boulevard for street lighting purposes. ME 4. That sidewalks shall be installed along Katella Avenue as required by the City Engineer and in accordance wit -h. standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 6. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as re- quired and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the F -ire Department prior to commencement of structural framing. 7. That subject property shall be served by-undergro=,d utilities. 8. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 9. In the event that subject p opertv is to be divided for the purpose of sale, lease or financing, a parcel map to record the approved division of subject property shall be subM4tted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. 10. That appropriate water assessment fees as deterrniined by the Director of Public Utilities shall be Daid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. That a 10 -fool: wide public utility easement ext -ending southerly from Pacifico Avenue to the sout--hernnost- boundary of subject property shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim, on an alignment subject to the approval of the Director of the Utilities Department. 12. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay a pro- portionate share to the City of Anaheim for -the cost of the traf- fic signal to be located at the intersection of Pacifico Avenue and State College Boulevard or a bond in an amount- and form sat- isfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee Payment of the proportionate cost of said traffic signal, prior to the issuance of building permits. J. - 13. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 5; provided, however, that the location and number of all drive accesses to Katella Ave- nue, Pacifico Avenue, and State College Boulevard shall be subject to the review and approval of the Traffic Engineer; and that the Private street provided on the northerly parcel shall be 40 feet wide from curb to curb and t1nat right—turn only ingress and egress shall be DroV4 ded from patella Avenue and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Traffic Engineer. 14. That Condition Nos. 1, 2-a, 2-b, 3, 9 and 11, above- mentioned, shall be comp -lied with prior to the com=mencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the time that the building permit is issued, or within a period of one near from the date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further ti -se as the City Co=1nc_J1 may grant. 15. That Condition Nos. 4. 5, 71, 8 anti 13, move -mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning -inspec- tions. 16. That each use pro -posed to be established or, subject. property, which is intended to qualify under Code Section 18.61.050.400, shall be submitted in written form to the Plan- ning Departrltent for review and approval in order that a deter- mination may be made as to whether the proposed use would be appropriate for -the site and whether stiff '4cient'parkina is Pro- vided on the nroDertv to acro riodat'e art additional Parking demand created by such a use. In order to provide guidelines 4 for staff deterM-Mation, he following type of uses, as submit- ted -by the peti4oner, - m. ay I be-pebrAii,tted subject to -Erie written request- and reviei-� procedure outlined above: a. Mortgage, an, -.1 -Finance coy-nipanies b. 'Investment security companies C.Insurance cornipanies -- bra'nFh, or hoiiie offices ci. insurance agencies and brokerage fir -ms e. Real estate firms - investntent,, cormercial and industry only f. Title and escrow companies 9. Attornevs h. CPAs. -1. A d ve r�--t i s i n g j. Engineering fi rI -! s consulting k. Architects 1. :7,4arketing,research. M interior decoration` .12 31. consultants 0. m.ravel agencies P. Training schools related to sales promotion, management sklills, advancement, etc. The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke such Conditional T -Ise Permit for good cause or failure of said owner, its successors or assigns to comply with the zhnah8_L-a Municipal Code and regulations and the conditi,ons herein. THE FOREG07LNG P.E.-SOLUTIO11,11 is a-oDroved . and siqned by me this 17th day of February, ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF UME CPT_Y OF ANAHEUI FIN -L JR: fm I= STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, ALONA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 76R-70 was intro- duced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 17th day of February, 19762 by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 76R-70 on the 17th day of February, 1976. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 17th day of February, 1976. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY/OF ANAHEIM (SEAL) I, ALONA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the for"egoing is the original of Resolution No. 76R-70 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on February 17, 1976. City C1er