1976-069NO. 76R-69
A PESOLU-10ION. OF T CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM GPANTING VARIA NO. 2771.
WHEREAS, after a request for variance by 1',lark D. Leff,
owner, was received, a Public hearing before the Planning Co-immiis-
sion of the City of Anaheim was held upon cue and proper notice,
a result of which Variance No. 2771 was granted covering the fol-
lowing described property:
That portion of Tract No. 613, in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
as shown on a map thereof recorded in Book 19,
Page 19, Miscellaneous flaps, records of said
Orange County, which lies east and south of a
line described as follow�s:
Beginning at a point in the north line of said
Tract No. 613, (said north line being tl--.e center-
line of Placentia-Yorba Boulevard as shown on
said map) distant thereon North 870 191 West
685.30 feet from the northeast corner of said
71
Tract No. 613, and running lCfence South 70 151
East parallel with the easterly line of said
Tract No. 613, 278.34 feet; t2hence South 750 201
West to a point in -the westerly line of said
Tract No. 613 which is distant 570.00 -feet South
18* 11..1 West from the niost northwest corner of
said, Tract No. 6113.
Excepting that -portion which lies west of a line
whici.a. con-nences at a point in the south line of
said Tract No. 613, distant thereon 827.04 feet
North 730 121 East f-ro7.,.n the southwest corner of
said Tract No. 613, and anis thence North 70 151
West 1208.11 feet to the 14 ne first above des-
cribed.
Also except-ing the southerly 20 feet as conveyed
to the County of Orange for road purposes by deed
recorded February 24, 1926 in Book 626 Page 387,
Deeds.
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party or the City Council on its own Y.-totion caused
the review of said Planninq Cort.,amission action at a pifblic hearing
noticed and held as prescribed by law and, as a result thereof,
the Citv Council does herebv make the following findings:
1. That t1 ere are special circumstances applicable to the
Property including size, shape, topography, 'Location or surround-
ings, ings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning
classification in the vicinity.
2. That, because of special circumstances shown in (1)
above, strict application of the zoning code deprives the property
of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning
classificat4 on in tLe v-cinitv.
J_
-1-
NOW,TRIER FORE, BE IT IFW SOLVED by the 'C*ity Council of
the City of 71naheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and
-the same is hereby, granted permi-t-ting a 117 -Lot "11,S-5000" sub-
division with a waiver of the following section of -the Anaheim,
MuniciDal Code:
SECTION 18.27.065.010 - Requiremenit that single -family
structures rear on arterial high-
ways. (one lot to side on Orange-
thorpe Avenue)
That said Variance be granted subject to the -following conditions:
1. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion
of Peclassification No. 75-76-16, now pending.
2. That subject property shall be developed substan-tialiv
in accordance'wjitlh plans and specifications on I file with the City
o-1-2 Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1;. provided, however, that Lot 'ATo.
39, as shown on E,:�hibit No. 1, shall have a miniriyum building set-
back of forty (40) feet adjacent, to Orangethorpe Avenue, per City
Council Policy 11:416. 538, 'unless the City Counrcil'grants relief
from said Policy and permits a 26 -foot setback f'Or said lot; and
that a structural wall, as defined in the Uniform Building Code,
shall be constructed on top of the proposed berm along the north-
er -1v property line adjacent to Crowther Avenue and the railroad
tracks, as a sound attenuation -measure complying with Council
Policy No. 542, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City 'Count' il hereby re-
serves the right to revoke such variance permit for good cause or
J_ailure of said owner, his heirs, successors or assigns to cornply
with the Anaheim Municipal Code and regulations and the conditions
herein. Said Variance iance is aranted for the term prescribed by the
Anaheim Municipal Code un -less otherwise specified herein.
TSE FOREGOINIG RE SOLUTION
this 17th day of February, -1976.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERIC OF THE CT1Y OF ANAHEI:1.11
FAL JR: fm
-2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, ALONA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 76R-69 was intro-
duced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the -City
Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 17th day of February,
1976, by the following vote -of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas
and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim
approved and signed said Resolution No. 76R-69 on the 17th day of
February, 1976.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the seal of the City of Anaheim this 17th day of February, 1976.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY; F ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
i, ALONA M. HOUGARD, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No.
76R-69 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on
February 17, 1976.
City Clr rk