90-288 RESOLUTION NO. 90R-288
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN
NO. 90-2 FOR DOWNTOWN ANAHEIM - EAST
CENTER STREET
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 18.93 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive
a request for approval of a specific plan for the proposed
Downtown Anaheim - East Center Street project (hereinafter
Downtown Anaheim - East Center Street Specific Plan) on property
consisting of approximately 23.68 acres bounded by Cypress
Street to the north, Center Street and Broadway to the south,
Olive Street and Philadelphia Street to the west and the
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe railroad right-of-way to the east,
and described as:
PARCEL A:
PARCEL 1: LOT ONE (1) OF THE NEMETZ ADDITION TO THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 4 PAGE 54 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL B:
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SANTA FE STREET
ADJOINING SAID PARCEL 1 ON THE EAST THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
LOT 2 OF THE NEMETZ ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 4 PAGE 54 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY.
PARCEL C:
LOT 4 OF THE NEMETZ ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 4 PAGE 54 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF OLIVE STREET ADJOINING
PARCEL 1 ON THE WEST THAT WOULD PASS WITH A CONVEYANCE OF SAID
PARCEL 1.
PARCEL D:
LOTS $ AND 6 OF NEMETZ ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY
OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 4 PAGE 54 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL E:
LOT 7 OF NEMETZ ADDITION, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF
ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK
4 PAGE 54 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL F:
LOT 8 OF NEMETZ ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 4 PAGE 54 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL G:
PARCEL 1: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9 OF THE
NEMETZ ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 4 PAGE 54 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY, AND RUNNING THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT, 178 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES EASTERLY AND PARALLEL
WITH CENTER STREET 60 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHERLY AND
PARALLEL WITH OLIVE STREET, 178 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES
WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF CENTER STREET 60 FEET TO
POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LINCOLN AVENUE [CENTER
STREET) ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE SOUTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL H:
LOT 9 OF THE NEMETZ ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 4 PAGE 54 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY.
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 178 FEET THEREOF.
PARCEL I:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 9 OF THE NEMETZ ADDITION TO THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 4 PAGE 54 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAiD LOT 9, 178 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE RIGHT ANGLES WESTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH CENTER
STREET, 50 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL
WITH SANTA FE STREET, 178 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF CENTER
STREET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF CENTER
-2-
STREET, 50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL Z: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SANTA FE STREET
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE EAST THAT WOULD PASS WITH A CONVEYANCE
OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL J:
THE EAST 50.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH ?4.00 FEET OF LOT 9 OF NEMETZ
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY
OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN
BOOK 4 PAGE 54 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL K:
PARCEL 1: LOTS 7 AND 8 IN THE BLOCK 5 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, SATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE UNNAMED ALLEY
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE SOUTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL L:
LOTS 9 AND 10 IN BLOCK 5 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A
MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPT THE NORTHWESTERLY 66.00 FEET FROM SAID LOTS.
PARCEL M:
LOTS 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 AND 24
IN IN BLOCK 5 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, INCLUDING A STRIP OF LAND 13 FEET
WIDE AND 250 FEET LONG RUNNING EASTERLY AND WESTERLY ABUTTING
LOTS 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 AND 22 ON THE NORTH, AND
SAID LOTS 12 AND 23 ON THE SOUTH, BEING AN ALLEY ABANDONED BY
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
PARCEL N:
PARCEL 1: LOTS 11, 12, 23 AND 24 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE SANTA FE
TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49 OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
-5-
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY ADJOINING
PARCEL 1 ON THE NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL 0:
LOTS 13 AND 14 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT OF ANAHEIM, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTION OF TOPEKA STREET, LINCOLN AVENUE,
(FORMERLY CENTER STREETJ AND THE 13.00 FOOT WIDE ALLEY ADJOINING
SAID LOTS ON THE NORTH, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP, BOUNDED NORTHERLY
BY THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ALLEY, WESTERLY BY THE CENTERLINE OF
TOPEKA STREET 00.00 FEET WIDE AND SOUTHERLY BY THE CENTERLINE OF
LINCOLN AVENUE BEING A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY 42.50
FEET FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID LOTS.
PARCEL P:
LOTS 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 IN IN BLOCK 3 OF SANTA FE TRACT, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49 OF MISCELLANEOUS
RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LINCOLN AVENUE
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE SOUTH AND THAT PORTION OF UNNAMED
ALLEY ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE NORTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL Q:
PARCEL 1: LOTS 20, 21 AND 22 IN IN BLOCK 3 OF THE SANTA FE
TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49 OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LINCOLN AVENUE
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE SOUTH AND THOSE PORTIONS OF THE
UNNAMED ALLEYS ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE NORTH AND EAST, THAT
WOULD PASS WITH A CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL R:
LOTS 25 THROUGH 37, INCLUSIVE, OF BLOCK 3 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT
OF ANAHEIM, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49 OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL S:
THE WESTERLY 113,00 FEET OF IN BLOCK 1 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
-4-
PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49 OF MISCELLANEOUS
RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE
LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL ONE IN THE DEED TO PACIFIC SOAP COMPANY
RECORDED DECEMBER 4, 1969 IN BOOK 9154 PAGE 385, OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
AND:
THAT PORTION OF ANAHEIM VINEYARD LOT E~2, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 4 PAGES 629 AND 630 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF EAST BROADWAY
[80.00 FEET WIDE) WITH THE EAST LINE OF SOUTH ATCHISON STREET
(60.00 FEET WIDE); THENCE NORTHERLY 383.?5 FEET ALONG SAID EAST
LINE; THENCE EASTERLY 94.42 FEET PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTH LINE;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 143.40 FEET ALONG A LINE MAKING A
DEFLECTION OF ?7° 3?' 29" WITH SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A LINE
PARALLEL WITH AND 125.25 FBBT EASTERLY (MEASURED ALONG SAID
NORTH LINE) FROM SAID EAST LINE; THENCE SOUTHERLY 243.?5 FEET
ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO SAID NORTH LINE; THENCE WESTERLY
125.25 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AND:
THAT PORTION OF THE RAILWAY DEPOT RESERVATION AS SHOWN ON THE
PLAT OF HOTEL DEL CAMPO TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF
ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK 24 PAGES 69 AND 70
OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
BEING A POTION OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY
COMPANY'S STATION GROUNDS AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED
DATED JULY 7, 1887, RECORDED IN BOOK 332 PAGE 24? OF DEEDS,
RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, SAID PARCEL BEING
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID STATION
GROUNDS, BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN 1.0541 ACRE
PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO E. A. SlZLB CORPORATION
DATED JUNE 6, 1955 AND RECORDED NOVEMBER 23, 1955 IN BOOK 3292
PAGE 156, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE NORTHERLY
ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE [BEING ALSO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SOUTH
ATCHISON STREET (60 FEET WIDE) TO A POINT IN A LINE PARALLEL
WITH AND DISTANT NORTHERLY 30.00 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES
FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID 1.0541 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 87181 FEET TO ITS
INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID 1.0541 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION ?7o 3?' 29"
-5-
FROM SAID PARALLEL LINE, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 1.0541
ACRE PARCEL OF LAND; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE
OF 1.0541 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND 94.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
AND:
THAT PORTION OF VINEYARD LOT E-2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY
OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 4, PAGES 629 AND 630 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING EASTERLY OF ATCHISON STREET, SHOWN AS
ORANGE STREET, 50.00 FEET WIDE, ON A MAP OF THE HOTEL DEL CAMPO
TRACT RECORDED IN BOOK 24, PAGE 69 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF
SAID LOS ANGELES COUNTY.
LOTS 7 THROUGH 16 OF THE RE-SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK "E" OF THE
VINEYARD LOT D-3, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 28, PAGE 63 OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, AND LOTS 1 THROUGH
8 OF TRACT NO. ?6 AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 10, PAGE 19 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF LINCOLN
AVENUE, PHILADELPHIA STREET, OLIVE STREET, CHARTRES STREET AND
THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY.
AND:
LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF TRACT NO. 303, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY
OF ORANGE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN
BOOK 15 PAGE 20 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF "OLD" LINCOLN AVENUE
ADJOINING SAID LAND ON THE NORTH AND THAT PORTION OF THE UNNAMED
ALLEY ADJOINING SAID LAND ON THE SOUTH, THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID LAND.
AND:
LOT 4 OF TRACT NO. 303, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF
ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK
15 PAGE 20 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY.
AND:
LOT 5 OF TRACT NO. 303, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF
ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK
15 PAGE 20 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 OF TRACT NO. 303, IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 15 PAGE 20 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LYING EASTERLY
OF A LINE ADJOINING A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT,
DISTANT 0.6? FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT AND A
POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT DISTANT 0.49 FEET FROM THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT.
AND:
PARCEL 1: LOTS 57 AND 58 AND THE WESTERLY HALF OF LOT 56, ALL
IN BLOCK "B" OF THE "HOTEL DEL CAMPO TRACT", IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 24, PAGES 69 AND 70 OF MISCELLANEOUS
RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF STREETS ADJOINING
PARCEL 1 ON THE WEST ~MELROSE STREETJ AND ON THE NORTH ~LINCOLN
AVENUE) AND THE UNNAMED ALLEY ON THE SOUTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH
A CONVEYANCE OF PARCEL 1.
AND:
LOTS 54 AND $5 AND THE EASTERLY 12.5 FEET OF LOT 56 IN BLOCK "B"
OF THE HOTEL DEL CAMPO, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF
ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2 PAGES
75 AND 76 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
AND·
LOTS 52 AND 53 IN BLOCK "B" OF THE HOTEL DEL CAMPO TRACT, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER
MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 24, PAGES 69 AND 70 OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
LOTS 48, 49, 50 AND 51 IN BLOCK "B" OF THE HOTEL DEL CAMPO
TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 24, PAGES 69 AND 70 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY·
AND:
LOTS 53, 54, S5 AND 56 IN BLOCK "C" OF HOTEL DEL CAMPO TRACT, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 24, PAGES 69 AND 70 OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
LOTS 51 AND 52 IN BLOCK "C" OF THE HOTEL DEL CAMPO TRACT, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER
MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 24, PAGES 69 AND 70 OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
PARCEL 1: LOTS 49 AND 50 IN BLOCK "C" OF THE HOTEL DEL CAMPO
TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 24, PAGES 69 AND
70 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LINCOLN AVENUE
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE NORTH AND THAT PORTION OF THE UNNAMED
ALLEY ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE SOUTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
AND:
LOTS 47 AND 48 IN BLOCK "C" OF THE HOTEL DEL CAMPO TRACT, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN
ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 24, PAGES 69 AND 70 OF MISCELLANEOUS
RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 4? CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
EOR PUBLIC SIDEWALK PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 8, 1908 IN
BOOK 1S0, PAGE 26?, OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY.
AND:
PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 1 OE THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER
MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OE MISCELLANEOUS
RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS EOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF NORTH ATCHISON
STREET, NORTHERLY 385.70 FEET FROM THE CENTER LINE OF EAST
CENTER STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY 220.00 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY
LINE; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES, EASTERLY 113.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHERLY 220.00 FEET PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY LINE; THENCE
AT RIGHT ANGELS, WESTERLY 113.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF NORTH
ATCHISON STREET, NORTHERLY 605.?0 PEET EROM THE CENTER LINE OF
EAST CENTER STREET, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF
THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO FRANK BELMONT RECORDED JUNE
17, 1942 IN BOOK 1149 PAGE 29?, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE AT
RIGHT ANGLES, EASTERLY 19.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
SAID LAND OF BELMONT TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
NORTHERLY 180.00 FEET PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY PROLONGATION
OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF EAST CYPRESS STREET; THENCE EASTERLY
94.00 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND
EASTERLY 113.00 FEET FROM SAID EASTERLY LINE OF NORTH ATCHISON
STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 180.00 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LAND OF BELMONT; THENCE WESTERLY
94.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LAND TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 3: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF NORTH
ATCHISON STREET, NORTHERLY 605.70 FEET FROM THE CENTER LINE OF
EAST CENTER STREET, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF
THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO FRANK BELMONT RECORDED JUNE
-8-
17, 1942 IN BOOK 1149 PAGE 297, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE
NORTHERLY 190.00 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY
PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF EAST CYPRESS STREET;
THENCE EASTERLY 113.00 FEET ALONG SAID PROLONGATION TO A LINE
PARALLEL WITH AND EASTERLY 113.00 FEET FROM THE SAID EASTERLY
LINE OF NORTH ATCHISON STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 10.00 FEET ALONG
SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND SOUTHERLY 10.00
FEET FROM SAID EASTERLY PROLONGATION; THENCE WESTERLY 94.00 FEET
ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND EASTERLY
19.00 FEET FROM SAID EASTERLY LINE OF NORTH ATCHISON STREET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY 180.00 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LAND OF BELMONT; THENCE WESTERLY 19.00
FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AND:
THE WESTERLY 113.00 FEET OF BLOCK 1 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER
MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS
RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY OF THE LAND
DESCRIBED AS PARCEL ONE IN THE DEED TO PACIFIC SOAP COMPANY
RECORDED DECEMBER 4, 1989 IN BOOK 9154 PAGE 385, OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
AND:
LOTS 1, 2, 3, 26, 27 AND Z8 IN BLOCK 6 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS,
IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 11 FEET OF LOTS 3 AND 26.
AND:
THE SOUTHERLY 11 FEET OF LOTS 3 AND 26 AND ALL OF LOTS 4 AND 25
IN BLOCK 6 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY
OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21
PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
AND:
LOTS 23 AND 24 IN BLOCK 6 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
LOTS 21 AND 22 IN BLOCK 6 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
'9-
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
PARCEL A: LOTS 15 AND 16 IN BLOCK 6 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA
EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 85.85 FEET FROM SAID LOTS.
PARCEL B: THE WESTERLY 26.75 FEET OF LOTS 13 AND 14 IN BLOCK 6
OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
LOTS 19 AND 20 IN BLOCK 60E THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OE ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
THE WEST 39.00 FEET OF THE EAST 71 FEET 6 INCHES OE LOTS 11, 12,
13, AND 14 IN BLOCK 6 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OE ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
THE EAST 32.50 FEET OF LOTS 11, 12, 13 AND 14 IN BLOCK 6 OF THE
SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
LOTS 9 AND 10 IN BLOCK 6 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
LOTS 7 AND 8 IN BLOCK 6 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
LOTS S AND 6 IN BLOCK 6 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OE CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 2 PAGE 51, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
AND:
LOTS 2S THROUGH 37, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 5 OF THE SANTA EE TRACT
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS
OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIEORNIA.
AND:
LOTS 9 AND 10 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OE
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OE CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
LOTS ? AND 8 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FB TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
AND:
LOTS S AND 6 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
AND:
PARCEL 1: LOT 24 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE UNNAMED ALLEY
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE NORTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL T:
PARCEL 1: LOT 23 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
-11-
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE UNNAMED ALLEY
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE SOUTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL U:
LOTS 21 AND 22 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL V:
LOTS 19 AND 20 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF
SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL W:
LOTS 17 AND 18 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL X:
LOTS 15 AND 16 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL Y:
LOTS 13 AND 14 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF
SAID ORANGE COUNTY.
AND:
PARCEL 1: LOT 12 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE UNNAMED ALLEY
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE SOUTH AND THAT PORTION OF SANTA FE
STREET ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE WEST THAT WOULD PASS WITH
CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL AA:
-12-
LOT 11 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL BB:
LOTS ?, 8, 9 AND 10 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A
MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL CC:
LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK 2 IN THE SANTA FE TRACT, CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL DD:
LOTS 3 AND 4 OF BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL EE:
LOTS 1 AND 2 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL FF:
LOTS 23 AND 24, BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF
· ~ ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE UNNAMED
ALLEYS ADJOINING SAID LOTS ON THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH THAT
WOULD PASS WITH A CONVEYANCE OF SAID LOTS.
PARCEL GG:
PARCEL 1: LOTS 18 AND 19 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE UNNAMED ALLEY
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE NORTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
-13-
PARCEL HH:
LOTS 16 AND 17 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL II:
LOT 15 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE UNNAMED ALLEY
ADJOINING SAID LOT 15 ON THE NORTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID LOT 15.
PARCEL JJ:
LOTS 13 AND 14 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL KK:
LOT 12 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FB TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL LL:
LOT 11 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL MM:
THOSE PORTION OF LOTS 25 TO INCLUSIVE IN BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE
TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 25; THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 25 TO 38
INCLUSIVE, 350.65 FEET MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID LOT 38; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
LOT 38, 80.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 125.50 FEET TO A POINT IN
THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 34 IN SAID BLOCK 2; DISTANT THEREON
EASTERLY 80.93 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 34;
THENCE SOUTHERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 33, 32
AND 31 IN SAID BLOCK 2, 66.45 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLE
-14-
WESTERLY 1.45 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND
HAVING A RADIUS OF 451.38 FEET, SAID RADIAL LINE BEING A
PROLONGATION OF SAID LAST DESCRIBED COURSE; THENCE SOUTHERLY
ALONG SAID CURVE 64.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A TANGENT TO
SAID CURVE 25.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A TANGENT CURVE
CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 471.38 FEET; 67.22 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A TANGENT TO SAID LAS MENTIONED CURVE
2.26 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT 25, DISTANT THEREON EASTERLY 66.48 FEET FROM THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 25; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY LINE 66.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL NN:
THAT PORTION OF LOTS 25 THROUGH 38 INCLUSIVE OF BLOCK 2 OF THE
SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 25; THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINES OF SAID LOTS 25 THROUGH 38
INCLUSIVE TO THE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 38; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 38 TO A POINT
THEREON DISTANT EASTERLY 80.93 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID LOT 38, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND
DESCRIBED IN DEED TO DORIS C. HENRY AND OTHERS, RECORDED
FEBRUARY 23, 1950 IN BOOK 1972 PAGE 3?5, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF
SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF
SAID LAND, A DISTANCE OF 125.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT 34, DISTANT EASTERLY THEREON 80.93 FEET FROM
THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 34, SAID POINT ALSO BEING
THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO DORIC
C. HENRY AND OTHERS, RECORDED JUNE 14, 1950 IN BOOK 2027 PAGE
61, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID
LAST MENTIONED LAND, SOUTHERLY 66.45 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE
WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS, WESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES 1.45 FEET
TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF
451.38 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEING A PROLONGATION OF
SAID LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, SOUTHERLY 64.37 FEET ALONG SAID
CURVE, SOUTHERLY 25.52 FEET ALONG A TANGENT TO SAID CURVE,
SOUTHERLY 67.22 FEET ALONG A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY AND
HAVING A RADIUS OF 471.38 FEET, AND SOUTHERLY 2.26 FEET ALONG A
TANGENT TO SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT 25, DISTANT EASTERLY THEREON 66.48 FEET FROM
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 25; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 00:
LOT 22 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE UNNAMED ALLEY
ADJOINING SAID LOT 22 ON THE NORTH AND ON TttE EAST THAT WOULD
PASS WITH A CONVEYANCE OF SAID LOT 22.
PARCEL PP:
LOTS 20 AND 21 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE
UNNAMED ALLEY ADJOINING SAID LOTS 20 AND 21 ON THE NORTH THAT
WOULD PASS WITH A CONVEYANCE OF SAID LOTS 20 AND 21.
PARCEL QQ:
LOTS 1, 2 AND THE EAST HALF OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 5 OF THE SANTA FE
TRACT, iN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL RR:
THE WEST HALF OF LOT 3, ALL OF LOT 4 AND THE EAST HALF OF LOT 5
IN BLOCK 5 OF TIlE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY
OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21
PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF CHARTRES STREET
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE SOUTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE.
PARCEL ES:
PARCEL 1: LOT 6 AND THE WEST HALF OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 5 OF THE
SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF CHARTRES STREET ADJOINING LOTS 6 AND
5 ON THE NORTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A CONVEYANCE OF SAID LOTS.
PARCEL TT:
THE NORTHWESTERLY 66 FEET OF LOTS 9 AND 10 IN BLOCK 5 OF THE
SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF CHARTRES STREET ADJOINING PARCEL 1
ON THE NORTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL UU:
LOTS 7 AND 8 IN BLOCK 5 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE
-16-
UNNAMED ALLEY ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE SOUTH THAT WOULD PASS
WITH A CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL VV:
THE WEST 85.85 FEET OF LOTS 1S AND 16 IN BLOCK 6 OF THE SANTA FE
TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL WW:
LOTS 17, 18 AND THE WESTERLY 26 FEET AND 9 INCHES OF LOTS 11 AND
12 OF BLOCK 6 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL XX:
LOT 4 AND THE EASTERLY 10 FEET OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE SANTA
FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE UNNAMED ALLEY ADJOINING PARCEL
1 ON THE SOUTH.
PARCEL YY:
LOT ? AND THE EAST 5 FEET OF LOT 8 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE SANTA FE
TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL ZZ:
PARCEL 1: LOT 6 AND THE WESTERLY 15 FEET OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 3 OF
THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF CHARTRES STREET
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE NORTH AND THAT PORTION OF THE UNNAMED
ALLEY ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE SOUTH THAT WOULD PASS WITH A
CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
PARCEL AAA:
LOTS 8, 9, AND 10 OF BLOCK 3 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
-17-
EXCEPT THE EAST 5 FEET OF LOT 8.
PARCEL BBB:
LOT 3 OF BLOCK 5 OF THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL CCC:
PARCEL 1: LOTS 1 AND 2 IN BLOCK 5, IN THE SANTA FE TRACT, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE 49, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF CHARTRES STREET
ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON TIlE NORTH AND THOSE PORTIONS OF THE
UNNAMED ALLEYS ADJOINING PARCEL 1 ON THE EAST AND SOUTH THAT
WOULD PASS WITH A CONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCEL 1.
~HEREAS, the Redevelopment Commission deemed it
appropriate, pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act, to prepare an addendum, including a
Mitigation Monitoring Program, to Final Subsequent Environmental
Impact Report No. 189 in connection with Specific Plan No. 90-2
for the proposed development of the property referred to as the
Downtown Anaheim - East Center Street Development; and
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold
a public hearing upon said application, notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt its Resolution No. PC90-160
recommending the adoption of Specific Plan No. 90-2; and
~HEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
the City Council caused the review of said Planning Commission
action at a duly noticed public hearing; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such hearing
and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be
heard and did receive evidence and reports, and did consider the
same; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does find, after careful
consideration of the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission and all evidence and reports offered at said hearing
that:
-18-
1. That the property proposed for the Specific Plan
has unique site characteristics such as topography, location or
surroundings which are enhanced by special land use and
development standards.
2. That the Specific Plan is consistent with the
goals and policies of the General Plan and with the purposes,
standards and land use guidelines contained therein and as
follows:
[a) That the Specific Plan document provides
information to establish consistency between the
Specific Plan proposal and the General Plan
policies concerning Land Use, Community Services
and Infrastructure, Redevelopment, Circulation,
Housing, Open Space/Conservation, Safety,
Seismicity and Noise.
lb} That the proposed residential densities for Parcel
14S [18.0 du/ac for the single-family attached
condominium product) are in conformance with the
Low-Medium Density Residential land use
designation which permits up to 18 dwelling units
per acre and the proposed residential densities
for Parcels 14N [35.11 du/ac for the apartment
product), 4d (44.7 du/ac for the apartment product
integrated with a commercial/retail component),
and 22 [4.74 du/ac for the single-family detached
product and 8.39 du/ac for the single-family
attached product) are in conformance with the
Medium Density Residential land use designation
which, given the location of the Specific Plan
project area within the "Downtown" area of Anaheim
[as defined in the Redevelopment Element), permits
densities exceeding the maximum 36 dwelling units
per acre.
[c) That the commercial/retail component on Parcel 4d
would serve as a limited extension of the General
Commercial designation of properties immediately
to the west of the site and also as a transition
to the Medium Density Residential land use
designated for Parcel 4d.
[d} That the open space designation along Center
Street is implemented by a pedestrian oriented
esplanade and the open space designations for the
easterly portion of the Specific Plan area are
implemented by a private park on the north side of
Lincoln Avenue and by a public park on the south
side of Lincoln Avenue.
3. That the Specific Plan results in development of
desirable character which will be compatible with existing and
-19-
proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; the
Specific Plan creates an approval mechanism for the City which
addresses downtown planning issues and provides the necessary
standards and guidelines to achieve a development plan with
product types compatible with surrounding neighborhoods; the
specific plan establishes development standards to govern the
types of residential and commercial uses within the Specific
Plan area and develop the downtown area so it will serve as a
commercial, cultural and social focus for City residents.
4. That the Specific Plan contributes to a balance of
land uses within the City by:
[a) Providing a balanced mix of housing types with a
mix of uses which ensure active use of the
downtown area during and after work hours and on
weekends.
(b) Providing a variety of community support
facilities including public open space and a train
station/day care center.
(c) Providing employment opportunities, including
retailing, financial, business services, offices
and food service facilities.
5. That the Specific Plan respects environmental and
aesthetic resources consistent with economic realities.
WHEREAS, the City Council does further find, after
careful consideration of the action of the City Planning
Commission and all evidence and reports offered at said public
hearing before the City Council regarding said specific plan,
that all of the conditions set forth in Section 18.95.040 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code are present.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after considering
Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 189, together
with the accompanying addendum, including a Mitigation
Monitoring Program (collectively "FSEIR No. 189") for the
proposed Downtown Annahelm-East Center Street project and
reviewing evidence, both written and oral, presented for FSEIR
No. 189, the City Council finds that FSEIR No. 189 is adequate
to serve as the required environmental documentation for this
project on the basis that it is in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and the State and City CEQA
Guidelines, and further finds that:
a) Certified FSEIR No. 189 represents the analysis
and evaluation of the Downtown Project Alpha area
land use patterns, traffic circulation, utilities
and infrastructure and municipal services. While
the Specific Plan No. 90-2 project is not
-20-
specifically referenced, it meets the intent and
purpose of the certified FSEIR No. 189.
b) FSEIR No. 189 evaluated environmental impacts for
the Second Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project ^lpha. The boundary of
FSEIR No. 189 is Cypress Street to the north,
Broadway to the south, Harbor Boulevard to the
west and East Street to the east. The current
project, Specific Plan No. 90-2, is located within
said boundaries.
c) None of the conditions described in Section 15162
of the CEQA Guidelines calling for preparation of
a Subsequent EIR has occurred.
d) The currently proposed project does not create any
new significant environmental impacts which will
occur as a result of the project and no new
information of substantial importance to the
project has become available that was not
discussed in the previously certified documents.
AND THEREFORE, the City Council hereby certifies FSEIR
No. 189 and adopts the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring
Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City
of Anaheim that Specific Plan 90-02 be, and the same is hereby
adopted, subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the approval of, and
exercise of any rights under the specific plan as herein adopted
shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. That prior to issuance of the first building permit, a
phasing plan for construction of the street, sewer and
storm drain improvements shall be submitted to the City
Engineer for review and approval. The plan shall include a
proposed development schedule.
2. That prior to issuance of the first building permit,
street, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be
submitted to the Subdivision Section for review and
approval. The improvement plans shall be in conformance
with the circulation plan and the utilities and services
plan contained in the Specific Plan.
$. That prior to final building and zoning inspection for each
development area, the street, storm drain and sewer
improvements shall be completed in accordance with the
phasing plan approved by the City Engineer.
-21-
4. That grading and drainage of subject property shall conform
to Chapter 17.04 "Grading, Excavations, Fills and Water
Courses" of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
5. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the
appropriate traffic signal assessment fee shall be paid to
the City of Anaheim in an amount as established by City
Council resolution.
6. That gates shall not be installed across any (driveway in a
manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic in the
adjacent public streets. Installation of any gates shall
conform to Engineering Standard Plan No. 402 and shall be
subject to the review and approval of the City Traffic
Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. That plans shall be submitted to the City Traffic Engineer
for his review and approval showing conformance with the
latest revision of Engineering Standard Plan Nos. 402, 436
and 601 pertaining to parking standards. Subject property
shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance
with said plans.
8. That all driveways in the Specific Plan No. 90-2
Development Area shall be constructed with ten (10) foot
radius curb returns as required by the City Engineer in
conformance with Engineering Standards.
9. That both parking spaces in each pair of tandem spaces
shall be assigned to the same dwelling unit.
10. That guest parking shall be clearly marked "guest parking
only" and shall be readily accessible to motorist from
contiguous streets and/or accessways.
11. That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire
hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
approved by the Fire Department.
12. That all lockable pedestrian and/or vehicular access gate
shall be equipped with "knox box" devices as required and
approved by the Fire Department.
13. That fire sprinklers shall be installed as required by the
Fire Department.
14. That an adequate, unobstructed £ire truck turn-around
areas, as required and approved by the Fire Department,
shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building
permits. Said turn-around area shall be permanently marked
and maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire Department.
15. That street lighting facilities along Olive Street and
Cypress Street shall be installed as required by the
-22-
Utilities General Manager in accordance with specifications
on file in the Office of the Utilities General Manager; or
that security in the form of a bond, certificate of
deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted with
the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of the
above-mentioned improvements. Said security shall be
posted with the City of Anaheim prior to issuance of a
building permit. The above-required improvements shall be
installed prior to occupancy.
16. That all lots within subject project area authorized by
this resolution shall be served by underground utilities.
17. That the legal property owner/developer shall install
underground conduits and substructures and shall pay a fee
to the City of Anaheim Public Utility for removing existing
overhead 69KV, 12KV and 4KV street lighting, secondary
conductors and related facilities, and converting said
facilities to the underground system.
18. That the legal owner/developer of subject property[s) shall
provide and install underground conduits, substructures,
and related facilities, as shown on a City of Anaheim
Electrical Engineering Drawing, to accommodate the
conversion of overhead electrical lines and related
facilities to underground electrical system.
19. That the legal owner/developer of subject property[s) shall
pay a fee in accordance with the City of Anaheim Rules,
Rates, and Regulations for the removal of existing overhead
power lines, related facilities, and the installation of
underground cables, switches, pad mounted switches,
transformers, capacitors, and related facilities to
complete the underground electrical systems in the
developersprovided conduit/substructure systems.
20. That the legal owner/developer of subject propertyts) shall
pay fees in accordance with the City of Anaheim Rules,
Rates, Regulations, and Electrical Engineering Construction
Standards for the installation of an in-tract electrical
system to provide service to each unit.
21. That the legal owner shall provide a fifty [50~ X seventy
[70) foot parcel for a future City groundwater well site.
22. That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained
in a location acceptable to the Street Maintenance and
Sanitation Division and in accordance with approved plans
on file with said division. Such information shall be
specifically shown on the plans submitted for building
permits.
-25-
23. That plans for the collection of solid waste shall be
submitted to the Maintenance Department for review and
approval.
24. That all plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures
located on the exterior of the building shall be fully
screened by architectural devices and/or appropriate
building materials; and, further, such information shall be
specifically shown on the plans submitted for building
permits.
That an unsubordinated covenant shall be recorded with the
office of the Orange County Recorder agreeing to provide
the renter and/or buyer of each dwelling unit with written
information obtained from the School District~s} pertaining
to possible overcrowded conditions and busing status of the
school~s} serving the dwelling unit. A copy of the
covenant shall be submitted to and approved by the City
Attorney prior to recordation. A copy of the recorded
covenant shall be submitted to the Zoning Division.
That prior to the introduction ordinances rezoning subject
properties, a preliminary title report shall be furnished
to the Zoning Division showing the legal vesting of title,
a legal description and containing a map of the specific
property to be rezoned.
27. That subject property shall be developed substantially in
accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the
City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on
file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1
through 69; provided, however, that minimum eighteen
foot long driveways shall be provided fn front of all
"front-on" garages.
28. That a lease agreement between the legal owner/developer
and the Redevelopment Agency shall be entered into to
provide seventy-four [74) additional parking spaces within
the Center Street public parking structure, owned by the
Redevelopment Agency, in order to ensure the required
number of parking spaces in conformance with current City
of Anaheim codes. A copy of the executed and recorded
Lease Agreement shall be provided to the Zoning Division
prior to the issuance of building permits.
29. That prior to issuance of a building permit Condition Nos.
1, 2, S, 6, 7, 14, 15, 17, 19, Z0, 21, 22, 25, 24, 25 and
28, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions
for further time to complete said conditions may be granted
in accordance with Section 18.05.090 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code.
-24-
30. That prior to final building and zoning inspections,
Condition Nos. 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, IS, 18, 2Z and 27,
above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
31. That approval of this application constitutes approval of
the proposed request only to the extent that it complies
with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other
applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval
does not include any action or findings as to compliance or
approval of the request regarding any other applicable
ordinance, regulation or requirement.
32. That the legal owner/developer shall be responsible for any
direct costs associated with the monitoring and/or
reporting required as set forth by Section 21081.6 of the
Public Resources Code to ensure implementation of those
mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring
Program which have been incorporated as conditions of
approval for subject property. A copy of the Mitigation
Monitoring Program is attached to this resolution and
labeled Attachment "A".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Anaheim does hereby find and determine that the adoption
of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's
compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set
forth. Should any condition or any part thereof, be declared
invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals
herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 24thday of July
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
SJM:kh
3809L
072390
-26-
STATE OF CALIFO~IA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONO~ N. SOHL, City Clerk of Me City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 90R-288 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 24~ d~ of July, 1990, by the following vote of the members Sereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Daly, Ehrle, Ka~ood, Pickler and Hunter
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I ~RTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 90R-288 on the 25~ day of July, 1990.
IN WITNESS MEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of An~etm Sis 25th day of July, 1990.
CI~ CLE~ OF THE CI~ OF ANAHEIM
(SEA~)
I, LEONORA N. $OHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 90R-288, duly passed and
adopted by the Anaheim City Council on July 24, 1990.
CITY CLERK OF~HE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTACHHENT A
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
This mitigation monitoring program for the Lincoln Village Project has been
prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 (California Public Resources
Code Section 21081.6) which became State Law on January 1, 1989. The
program includes mitigation measures for the project that the City of Anaheim
will adopt or make conditions of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid
significant and adverse effects on the environment. The program has been
designed to ensure compliance during project implementation.
1. MONITORING CHECKLIST
Project mitigation measures, identified to mitigate or avoid significant and
adverse effects on the environment, have been incorporated into a checklist.
Each mitigation measure is listed separately on the checklist with appropriate
spaces for monitoring the progress of implementation of each mitigation measure.
This checklist is the basis for the monitoring program. Any information provided
to the City by the applicants for individual development projects must be kept
with the checklist in the project file for that project for the purpose of
verification. The checklist is included at the end of this section.
2. MONITORING PROGRAM
Mitigation monitoring for the Lincoln ¥fllage project will be managed through
the City's development review process. Many mitigation measures can be
monitored through the City's plancheck process. As City staff reviews the project
plan~ the plans will be checked for compliance with each mitigation measure.
The project specific measures are divided into project design and on-going
measures. Each category and sub-category requires different monitoring
techniques, but will be monitored using the checklist.
2.1 Project Design Mitigation Measures
A project design mitigation measure is a measure that will be incorporated into
the project design (for example: provision of a retention basin or construction of
an acoustical barrier). Such measures will normally be shown on the building
and/or grading plans. These plans will be reviewed for each mitigation measure,
and each mitigation measure shown on the plans will be noted on the checklist
and signed off. If a mitigation measure is not shown, the plans will be sent for
corrections. pJann will not be approved until each mitigation measure has been
incorporated into the project design. After the plans are approved, and before
the final inspection of the project, the project proponent will submit proof that
each mitigation measure shown on the plans has been installed or incorporated
into the constructed project. Installation or incorporation of mitigation measures
1
will be verified with a letter of verification from the Director of Conununity
Development. Verification of compliance will then be noted on the monitoring
checklist and signed off, thereby completing the process for that particular
monitoring measure.
2.2 Ongoing Mitigation Measures
An ongoing mitigation measure is a measure that is associated with the project
over a period of time, such as dust control or landscape maintenance.
Monitoring of this type of measure will be similar to that described in Section
2.1, except that the status of each mitigation measure will be noted at various
times on the checklist, until monitoring is no longer needed. The project
proponent may be required to submit periodic reports to the City on the status of
this type of mitigation measure.
3. OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS
For cases in which compliance with a mitigation measure cznnot be verified
through the plancheck process or the City-established inspection process, or
which require specialized expertise, an outside consultant may be hired. The
project proponent may hire outside consultants subject to the City's approval, or
the City will do so. Should the City hire consultants, the City will collect a
deposit from the project proponent for the consultant services, as described in
Section 6 of this program.
4. OTHER AGENCIE~
Monitoring mitigation measures requested by other agearies will be the
responsibility of the requesting agency. The City will notify these agendes which
mitigation measures requested by these agencies have been included in project
approval. The agencies will then submit a. proP. Osed monitorin.g program to the
City. These agencies will inform the City m writing when tootutoring is
complete.
5. MONITORING PROGRAM RECORDS
The overall program monitoring checklist will be maintained by the
Redevelopment Agency and City Planning Department. The completed
mitigation monitoring checklist for each development project will be kept in the
project file in the Plannin$ Department. These records will be available for
public inspection upon request. Any information provided to the City by the
applicant or other agencies for the purpose of verification must be kept with the
checklist in the project file.
2
6. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FEES
6.1 Processing Fee ·
The City may charge a project applicant for the actual cost to the City of
monitoring all mitigation measures for a specific development project as
described in this program.
A deposit may be required by the City to be applied toward this fee. Any
unused portion of the deposit will be refunded to the project applicant.
6.2 Consultant Fee
The cost associated with services of outside consultants will be paid by the
project applicant. A deposit may be required by the City to be applied toward
the consultant services. Any unused portion of the deposit will be refunded to
the project applicant.
7. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM AGREEMENT
The City may require an agreement from the project applicant specifying the
applicant's responsibility for the monitoring program, including manner of
payment, penalties for noncompliance and financial security arrangements. The
project applicant's responsibilities for monitoring and reporting on the status of
implementation of specific mitigation n,.easures will also be included in this
agreement, as will any other relevant issues identified by the City.
8. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
In the event of a disagreement between the City and a project applicant
regarding the monitoring program, including manner of payment, penalties for
noncompliance and £manciai security arrangements, the following procedure will
be followed:
8.1 The Environmental Coordinator for the City shall attempt to
resolve the disagreement. If the disagreement cannot be resolved,
the Environmental Coordinator shall prepare a report documenting
the source of the dispute and the City's position.
8.2 The Environmental Coordinator will take the report before the
Planning Commission, which will determine the resolution of the
disagreemont.
3
!
8.3 The Project Applicant shall be allowed to appeal the decision of
the Planning Commission to the City Council. The decision of the
City Council shall be final.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
SPECIFIC PLAN
CEQA Action: Notice of Determination of Adequacy of Previously Certified
Environmental Impact Report # 189 for Project Alpha Redevelopment Planl
Project Description: The proposed development for the Specific Plan Area
encompasses the eastern end of the new Center Street 'Esplanade~, terminating
at Atchison Street. Future development plans by the Redevelopment Agency will
extend the Center Street improvements to the west to connect to the Civic
Center facilities and a proposed commercial center west off Anaheim Boulevard.
The land uses envisioned in the Plan provide for retail services to be developed
at the ground level of Center Street west of Olive. The principal land use,
however, will be residential, providing a wide range of new housing types
including: detached and attached (paired) single family units, townhouses, and
multiple-family apartments. To buffer the residential neighborhoods from the
ATSF RaiLroad right-of-way, a new public park is proposed that will help meet
the recreational needs of the new residents of Downtown. Proposed land uses by
parcel are shown on the table below, and their location is indicated on Figure 1.
Owner/Applicant: Anaheim Redevelopment Agency
300 S. Harbor Blvd., Suite 900
Anaheim, CA 92805
Agent: Lincoln Property Development Company N.C., Inc.
17011 Beach Boulevard, Suite 1400
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Project Location: Generally bounded by Cypress Street, the ATSF right-of-way,
Atchison Street, Center Street, and Olive Street (refer to
attached map of project area).
City Action: Approval of Disposition and Development Agreement;
Resolution Number:
O) The mitigation measures for this program are from the following reports and
memos: "Subsequent Environmental Impact Report", November 1976;
"Downtown Anaheim East Center Street Development Draft Specific Plan", April
1990; ~areliminary Noise Assessment and Noise Control Recommendations,
Parcels 22, 14N and 4D, City of Anaheim", April 19, 1990; Memos from Wilbur
Smith Associates dated April 6, 1990, February 6, 1990 and August 4, 1990
regarding traffic in the project area; and "Sewer System Analysis for Lincoln
Properties Development in the City of Anaheim", April 1990. Where additional
measures have been included over and above those provided in the preceding
reports, these measures are indicated by an *.
$
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
SPECIFIC PLAN
PROPOSED LAND USE BY PARCEL
LINCOLN VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN
Number of Dwelling
Land Use Units/Square Feet Parcel #
Condominium 28 du 14S
Multiple-Family 184 du 14N
101 du 4D
Paired Units 46 du 22
Single-Family 31 du 22
Retail 6,600 sq. ft. 4D
Total Dwelling Units: 390
Source: Downtown Anaheim East Center Street Development Draft Specific
Plan, April 1990.
m~'~ P~ject 5ou~ar/
SOURCE: Sect, ray Co~e Associates 4/90
North lincoln Village
.Figure 1
Project Area
7
] I .~..~-{~ r~m SOY.
' '' ~' I ~=~ Reserved
~- I '-', k-~ =,.:.--~. --=----.---- I I ~:1 ~or UsaOle
I~ '{ I ~: ~enSpace
~ente~ Sffeet
' :~?~:;~ ~ ATS~ ROW
Designation (D.U. I Net Acre) Type
Figure 2
Proposed Land Use
8
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Land Use Prior to issuance of All rolocation activity shall Redevelopment Agency
building permits be conducted in compliance
with California Relocation
Assistance Law (Government
Code Section 7260 et seq.),
the State Guidelines thereto,
and the Relocation Rules and
Regulations adopted by the
Agency.
Air Quality Prior to issuance of Increase the number and Planning
building permits and ty~:es of full grown plant
certificate of occupancy specie~ to be introduced in
to ensure installation the area.
During construction Compliance with SCAQMD Planning, SCAQMD
Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust
Emissions)*
During construction Incorporate energy Planning
conservation measures which
meet or exceed the
requirements of Title 24.*
9
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Ar~a Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Noise Prior to issuance o[ The exterior noise level on Planning
building permits and the project site shall not
certificate of occupancy exceed a community noise
to ensure installation equivalent Icvel (CNEL) of
65 dB. This will be
accomplished with the
following measures:
For Parcel 22, a barrier 13
ft. in height will be
constructed along the
northern, eastern. and
southern property lines in
the ,~icinity of Ihe railroad as
indicated in Figure 3.
Barriers, 5 ft. to 7 ft. high
shall also be built which
enclose the rear and side
yards of lots with line of
sight to Lincoln Avenue, as
shown in Figure 3.
10
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Noi~e -The barriers shall bc
(continued) continuous structures
without gaps or gates, and
will be constructed of a
material that is impervious to
noise (e.g.concrete block.
concrete panels, stucco-on-
wood, earthen berm, 1/4-
inch tempered plate glass, or
any eombinatlon of these
materials).
11
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Noise -Balconies in Parcels 14N
(continued) and 4D which have line-of-
sight to either Lincoln
Avenue or the railroad will
need perimeter walls 5 ft. to
5.5 ft. high. Refcr to
Figures 4 and 5 for the
location and heights of the
balcony walls. These walls
will also be continuous
structures. without gaps or
gates and shall be
constructed of a material that
is in. pervious to noise (e.g.
stucco-on-wood, 1/4-inch
plate glass, or any
combination of these
materials). Refer to Figure 6
for a typical construction
detail of the balcony walls.
12
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKlAST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Nois~ -The precise height of the
(continued) precise height of the sound
barriers will be determined
as part of the linal
engineering design.
Prior to issuance of The following measures will Planning
building permit and be implemented to ensure
certificate of occupancy that the 45 dB CNEL
to ensure installation interior standard is met:
-All windows and sliding
glass in the project will be
,~.11 fitted, well
weatherstripped and sound
rated assemblies. Sound
transmission class (STC)
ratings as high as 32 may be
needed at buildings adjacent
to the proposed sound
barriers. The actual ratings
needed will be determined as
part of the final engineering
design of the project.
13
MITIGATION MONITORING CIIECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Noise -Sound transmission class
(continued) (STC) is per American
Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM)
Designations E-90 or E-366
and E-413.
-Bathrooms are not
considered to be habitable
spaces ind, therefore. do not
require sound rated windows.
This applies only to
bathrooms which have a
tig£t fitting door between
adjacent living spaces.
-Windows are required to be
kept closed in order to meet
the interior standard;
therefore, mechanical
ventilation and cooling will
be provided to maintain a
habitable environment. The
system will supply two air
changes per hour to each
habitable room including
20% (one-fifth) fresh
14
MITIGATION MONITORING CIIECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Noise make-up air obtained
(continued) directly from the outdoors.
The fresh air inlet duct
should be of sound
attenuating construction, and
will consist of a minimum of
ten feet of straight or curved
duct, or six feet plus one
sharp 90 degree band.
NOTE: Wall mounted air
conditioners will not be
placed on an elevation facing
Lincoln Avenue or the
ra~!:oad for those units in
the vicinity of the noise
sources.
-All exterior walls will
include one layer of R-11
insulation between the studs
and one thickness of 1/2-
inch or $/8-inch gypsum
wallboard on tbe interlot
side of the wall. The
exterior surface will be
constructed with 7/8-inch
stucco or siding-on-
sheathing.
15
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Noise -There will be no direct
(continued) openings (such as mail slots
or vents) in exterior walls or
doors with direct line-of=
sight to the railroad or
Lincoln Avenue,
-Entry doors will be well
weatherstripped, solid core,
l-3/4-inch thick assemblies.
=The roof system of the
proposed buildings will
consist of at least one layer
1/2=inch plywood to form a
well sealed assembly.
Insulation as required by the
State Energy Insulation
Standards will be placed in
the attic, if such a space is
provided.
Large (12-inch by 14=inch)
attic vents will not be placed
on elevations facing either
the railroad or Lincoln
Avenue. If this is not pos-
sible, then an attic
16
MITIGATION MONITORING CIIECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measur~ to Monitor Date Completed
Noise muffler will be used, as
(continued} indicated in Figure 7.
Light and Glare Prior to issuance of Light sources from telall Planning
certificate of occupancy uses will be shielded from
residential uses.
Coltoral Resoorces Prior to issuance of The existing historic train Planning
building permits depot will be relocated by
the applicant to a location
within the public open space
adjacent the ATSF right-of-
way.
Prior to issuance of In order to blend with Planning
building permits adjacent historic
neighborhoods, the
architecture of Ihe project
will draw on the "craftsman"
style as described in the
"Downtown Anaheim East
Center Street Development
Draft Specific Plan".
17
MITIGATION MONITORING CIIECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Cnmpleted
Socloecouumlc Prior tO issuance of The agency will make all Redevelopment Agency
buildinS permits reasonable elf otis to see that
all persons or businesses
displaced as a result of
development are relocated to
suitable locations either
within or outside the project
area, and that businesses
compatible with the
provisions of the
Redevelopment Plan are
relocated within the
revitalized and redeveloped
Prior to issuance of !n order to minimize the Planning
building permits possible adverse impacts
from acquisition. demolition
shall be timed so as to
minimize the time a
structure will remain
unoccupied. In order to
effectively accomplish
appropriate scheduling, the
shortening of time as much
as possible between
relocation of the occupant
and the demolition of the
18
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Dote Completed
gocloeeonomle building will be encouraged.
(continued) An alternative mitigation
measure would provide
adequate boarding up and
installation of security
fencing around unoccupied
buildings.
Prior to issuance of The relocation of existing Redevelopment Agency
building permits busineske~ to locations within
the redevelopcd area or
within reasonable distance of
the downtown area to
m~imize loss of employment
will be encouraged.
Prior to issuance of Of the approximately 700 Planning/
building permits units proposed to be built or Redevelopment Agency
acquired within the
downtown area,
approximately 300 senior
citizens and 300 family units
are to be provided within the
Residential area designated
south of the realigned
Lincoln Avenue and west of
the railroad tracks. The
remaining 100 units will
19
MITIGATION MONITORING CIIECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Dote Completed
Socloecouomic occur predominately in the
(continued) area designated Residential
south of Lincoln Avenue and
west of East Street. !n the
event in-kind housing cannot
be provided within the
downtown area. the Agency
will construct housing
elsewhere in the City.
Police Protection Prior to i~suance of Commercial facilities will Police Department
building permits and provide their own security
prior to issuance of gts~,rd surveillance systems
certificate of occupancy and residential areas will be
to ensure installation easily accessible.
Five Protection Prior to issuance of Construction materials and Fire Department
building permits and fire protection devices will
prior to issuance of be selected to minimize the
certificate of occupancy possibility of any type of
to ensure installation fire or fire hazard.
Additional fire protection
services will be
accommodated at the main
fire station on Broadway, if
necessary.
2O
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area TimlaB Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Schools Before 'tssuance of The Anaheim City School Redevelopment
Certificate of District will receive a pass- Agency/School District
Occupancy through from the Project
Alpha Redevelopment Area
to be used for expansion of
an existing school or for
purchase of a new school
site.
Water Prior to issuance of Landscaped areas will be Planning
buildin~ permits and watered during early morn-
prior to issuance of ing hours or during the
certificate of occupancy evening. If included as part
of the project, water
amenities will recycle water
within the ,~ater supply
system for these amenities.
To reduce. the impact on the
fresh water supply, the use
of reclaimed water for
irrigation is encouraged.
Prior to issuance of Construction of additional Public Works
certificate of occupancy storm drain facilities serv-
ing the project area will be
completed as described in
the City*s Master Plan for
Drainage.
21
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Water Prior to issuance of The following water conset- Planning
(continued) building permits and vation measures will be
prior to issuance of implemented as required by
certificate of occupancy State law: installation of
to ensure installation low-flush toilets, showers
and faucets; insulation of hot
water lines in water recircu-
lating systems; and the pro-
ject will comply with the
water conservation provision
of the appropriate Plumbing
Code.
Sewage Prior to issuance of Im~.lementation of water Public Works
building permits and conservation measures, and
prior to issnance of flow reduction techniques
certificate of occupancy will be incorporated into
to ensure installation project dt~sign.*
Snlld Waste Prior to issuance of Adequate storage bins and Planning Not applicable. Project
building permits and trash compactors for solid will conform with City
prior to issuance of waste shall be installed on- ordinance regarding
certificate of occupancy site. solid waste reduction.
to ensure inslallalion
22
MITIGATION MONITORING C!IECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Solid Waste Prior to issuance of Individual tenants o! the Planning Not applicable - the
(continued) building permits and office buildings will bc project will not include
ongoing during encouraged to introduce office buildings.
operation techniques to reduce and to
recycle waste materials (i.e.
paper); and businesses will
use Irash compactors to
reduce volume and thereby
trips to a disposal site.
Natoral Gas Prior to issuance of Incorporate energy Public Works
building permits conservation techniques into
project design to reduce
natural gas consumption.
23
MITIGATION MONITORING CIIECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Dote Completed
Aesthetics Prior to issuance of Specific developmen( plans Redevelopment Agency
building permits for the proposed project
shall be submitted to the
Redevelopment Agency for
determination of consistency
with Redevelopment Project
Alpha. Open space will be
provided in amounts
consistent with the Open
Space Element of the
General Plan. and will be
landscaped. Architectural
and landscaping plans will be
rcvi.'wed and approved by
the Agency prior to
construction.
Prior to issuance of If the Church of the Holy Planning Photographic Survey
building permits Presence is to be demolished, completed in 1985.
photographic records of the
exterior and interior of the
building will be developed,
preserved, and included in a
public record.
24
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Traffic Prior to issuance of Maintain the right-angle Public Works
occupancy permits turn at Atchison Street and
Center Street to minimize
vehicular conflict and
impedance of traffic flow.
Prior to issuance of Provide two entrance/exit Planning/Public Works
certificate of occupancy points on Olive Street for the
proposed apartment building
on Parcel 4D.
Prior to issuance of The plan shall show that Planning
building permit parking spaces will be
pr.~,,ided as follows:
Parcel 14N - 2.125 spaces
per dwelling unit
Parcel 14S - 2.42 spaces per
dwelling unit
Parcel 4D = 2.125 spaces per
dwelling unit/5.5 spaces per
1,000 square feet retail space
Parcel 22 - 5.71 spaces per
dwelling unit (single-
family)/5.37 spaces per
25
, (' ,
6'.~?,
6'-?,
SOURCE: J.J. Van Houlen & ^ssoclates, Inc. 4/19/90 · ~
~ North L~co~n Village
Figure 3
Location and Heights of Proposed
Sound Barrier Walls for Parcel 22
r~.~ Fir;t Floor - 5.5'. Second FIo<x - 5'
~-1 FIr~ Floo~ - 5'. Second FIo~ - 5'
SOtJRCE: J.J. Van Flouton & Associates, I~. 4119190 · -
North Lblcoln Village
Figure 4
Location and Heights of Proposed First and
Second Floor Balcony Walls for Parcel 1
SOLI~F.: J.J. Van I~ & Associa#-~, Inc. 4/19/90
North. Lincoln Village
Figure 5
Location of Proposed F'~'st and Second
Floor 5' Balcony Wa, for Parcel 4D
-.<----- 1/4" STATIONARY GLASS
2" X 4" STUD
STUCCO WALL
~ ~:~ BALCONY FLOOR
SOURC~ ~ v= ~ & ^.o=~. ~.
I. Jncoln ViSage
Figure 6
Cross Section of the Proposed Balcony
Sound Barrier Walls for Parcels 14N and 4 D
2g
SOURCE4 J.J. V~n I-~__~e_~ & Associates, In~. 4/19/90
Lincoln VEage
Figure 7
Attic Vent Installation with
Acoustic Baffle for Noise Control