Loading...
1977-785RESOLUTION NO. 77R -785 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 2966. WHEREAS, after a request for variance by BERTHA Q., PHYLLIS ELLEN, FRANK and LARRY M. HERNANDEZ, owners, was received, a public hearing before the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim was held upon due and proper notice, a result of which Variance No. 2966 was denied covering the following described property: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 3 OF ANAHEIM EXTENSION, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SURVEYED BY WILLIAM HAMEL IN 1868, SAID POINT BEING IN THE CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN STREET COMMONLY KNOWN AS SYCAMORE STREET; SAID POINT BEING DISTANT NORTH 74 30' 30" EAST 303.53 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED UNDER CERTIFICATE NO. 10434; THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, NORTH 17° 30' 30" WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND, 320.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE BOUNDARY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED UNDER CERTIFI- CATE NO. 7905; THENCE NORTH 74° 30' 30" EAST, ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE, 240.00 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN; THENCE SOUTH 17° 30' 30" EAST, CONTINUING ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE, 320.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE, 240.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN- NING; and WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law, an interested party or the City Council, on its own motion, caused the review of said Planning Commission action at a public hearing, noticed and held as prescribed by law and, as a result thereof, the City Council does hereby make the following findings: 1. That there are no special circumstances applicable to the property which do not apply to other property in the same vicinity and zone. 2. That strict application of the zoning code does not de- prive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the same vicinity and zone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that said Variance be, and the same is hereby, denied. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this 6th day op 1977. ATTEST: r l'TMV T.PPV nr TM TmY nP ANAHEIM TY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM I, LINDA D. ROBERTS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 77R -785 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 6th day of December, 1977, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom' NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution No. 77R -785 on the 6th day of December, 1977. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and b.ffixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 6th day of December, 1977. SEAL) 9 CI CLERK OF THE CI OF ANAHEIM I, LINDA D. ROBERTS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 77R -785 duly passed and'adopted by the Anaheim City Council on December 6, 1977.